evolution in payment platforms removing the straightjacket of legacy thinking october 22, 2014
TRANSCRIPT
Evolution in Payment Platforms
Removing the Straightjacket of Legacy Thinking October 22, 2014
Background
Pat Naples, Manager of Operations Joined PSE&G in 1969 and held various union positions
(Meter Reader, Bookkeeper, Service Rep, Field Collection Rep, Collection Rep, and Exception Processor)
Accepted a Customer Relations Management position in 1979 and held various positions (Methods Analyst, Sr. Methods Analyst, Collection Process Lead, Collection Process Owner, Call Center Office Supervisor, and Customer Operations Facility Process Owner)
Accepted current position in 2007 Involved with payment processing for PSE&G since 1977
About PSE&G
Headquarters in New Jersey One of the 10 largest electric companies in the US >12,000 employees $32.5 billion in assets in 2013 $10 billion in revenue in 2013 Ranked 284 on the Fortune 500 List for 2014
Presentation Objectives
Discuss the evolution of remittance platforms in our utility environment
Identify why legacy systems do not effectively adapt to today’s new demands
Share benefits and lessons learned
Agenda
What is legacy thinking? PSE&G’s legacy timeline PSE&G’s system selection process Conversion away from legacy Lessons learned Outcomes / results Questions and answers
Defining Legacy
Do you process exceptions?
If YES …
… You have a legacy system!
Physical Exceptions
Transaction types Check only Multiples Money orders Full-page checks Correspondence
Methods of handling Outsort Separate job Write amount Separate check Physical routing
Electronic Process Exceptions
Transaction types Unreadable Image Skewed Image Unknown Account Illegal Transaction Cash Pay Required
Methods of handling Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject
Legacy Systems
Let’s define legacy systems: Methodology
Preconceived assumptions aboutcurrent process
Inflexible design Resistance to new ideas
Technology Implementation options limited Built-in processing methods are locked in Exceptions are patches or separate workflows Limited innovation in new software releases Upgrades and changes are required, time
consuming, unreliable, and costly
Previous Platforms
Timeline of platform evolution Previous, previous system (J&B) 2002 – 2008
First generation image remittance Based on stub / check design Limited automation of clean work Two pass processing / paper deposits
Previous system conversion (Wausau) 2008 – 2014 Integrated remote branch transaction capture Common archive for all payments Second generation e-deposit (ARC and ICL) Automated many manual exception payments Many components, but also multiple vendors
Accumulated Business Pain
Despite evolving …Why was the previous system not optimized? Some exceptions handled, but many remained Capture workflow not completely efficient and needed
expansion for new capture items Upgrade process was expensive, significant in time
commitment, and error prone Infrastructure not optimized Security audit issues Complexity in changing workflow Difficulty in issue resolution due to
complex setup limiting true root cause analysis
Addressing Change
Justification for a project Address audit requirements
Encryption and redaction of data Eliminate data access risk
Reducing complexity within the system to lower total cost of ownership (TCO) Lower cost of upgrade Lower cost of on-going system change Lower cost of infrastructure and reduce hardware footprint Improve supportability by removing fragile components
Expand for more features Optimize capture devices for one-touch scanning New workflows for non-payment capture
Project Scope
What was required at PSE&G? Capture operations for central and remote branches Centralized operations conversion and optimization Archive replacement
When did it have to be live? 90 days from order!!!
System Replacement Process
Timeline – Key Milestones
Go-Forward for Conversion Approved
On-Time and
SuccessfulGo Live!!!
Discovery,Installation, Testing, and
Training
RFP Completed and New Vendor Selected
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Provider Selected
ProviderFully Implemented
RFP Sent toThree Vendors
Project Management Approach
Initiation ClosingExecutionPlanning
Project Phases
Focus on optimization
without preconceived
notions or limitations
Key Factors for Success
Establish great communications
and transparency to foster trust and teamwork
Design application-
specific testing scenarios and
don’t skimp on training
Provide continuous and honest feedback
to vendor for additional
improvements
Benefit #10
Hardware optimization Two production servers
Core processing Archive
Eliminated import PCs, CAR/LAR PCs, Queue PCs
Benefit #9
Security improvements End-to-end encryption
Seamless (single vendor) from capture to archive All data and images encrypted
True client-server architecture Limited data access
Redaction of customer data Selective zones / data files – MICR line, signature, etc. Configurable at user level
Benefit #8
Advanced virtual batching True one-touch scanning with no stopping
or rejects Automated classification of pages and
transactions Transaction validation and repair All transaction types handled
Benefit #7
Advanced image processing Bitonal enhancement
Advantage of grayscale Money orders and gel pens New image to ICL and archive
Deskewing Clean-up reduces bank
rejects
Benefit #6
Intelligent check separation Example of
innovative approach Reduced scanning
labor Capture of account
information
Benefit #5
Enhanced data capture Interactive OCR for complicated check and list Point and click on data fields Advanced address reading and USPS validation Check only lookups
Benefit #4
Integrated archive Encryption and
redaction Advanced
searching Remote capture
Benefit #3
Workflow monitoring Real-time status Operator and machine performance Disk full Email alerts
Benefit #2
Smart Track™ physical tracking Life cycle tracking: scanning to destruction Essential for compliance Check pulling accuracy
Benefit #1
Advanced and optimized workflow Single workflow Sequential, logical, configurable Eliminates legacy constraints Platform for future expansion
No exceptions!!!Free upgrades (software and
professional services)!!!
Metrics
Increased kill ratio Improved CAR/LAR read rate Significant reduction in bank rejects and
exceptions Faster handling of rejected items Cash review process automated One click end-of-day process
The Right Partner is Key to Success
Trust Responsiveness Transparency Accuracy
Teamwork Knowledge Collaboration
Track record Client references
Technology Demonstrated Continuous innovation
Summary
Dynamic platform optimized for payment and forms processing - Customized without custom code using modular approach - One-touch scanning with advanced virtual batching - Optimized remittance and Check 21 experience - Superior imaging technology Improved audit compliance - Eliminated risk from third party component sunset/incompatibility - Encrypted data and flexible redaction at field level Significant ROI and lowest TCO - Free annual upgrades on-going - Reduced dependence on and cost of hardware infrastructure - Continuous innovation and collaboration for on-going improvements
Questions & Answers
THANK YOU
For More Information
Pat Naples contact info [email protected]
Mavro Imaging booth #204 [email protected] www.MavroImaging.com Connect with Mavro