evidence of evolution by natural selection (ch. 22)staff.katyisd.org/sites/1300770/documents/ap...
TRANSCRIPT
Evidence supporting evolution• Fossil record
• Anatomical record
• Molecular record
• Artificial selection
Fossil record• Layers of sedimentary rock contain fossils
– new layers cover older ones, creating a record over time
– Show that a succession of organisms have populated Earth throughout a long period of time
Formation of sedimentary strata containing fossils
1 Rivers carry sediment to the ocean. Sedimentary rock layers containing fossils form on the ocean floor.
2 Over time, new strata are deposited, containing fossils from each time period.
3 As sea levels change and the seafloor is pushed upward, sedimentary rocks are exposed. Erosion reveals strata and fossils.
Younger stratum with more recent fossils
Older stratum with older fossils
A gallery of fossil types
(a) Dinosaur bones being excavated from sandstone
(g) Tusks of a 23,000-year-old mammoth, frozen whole in Siberian ice
(e) Boy standing in a 150-million-year-old dinosaur track in Colorado
(d) Casts of ammonites, about 375 million years old
(f) Insects preserved whole in amber
(b) Petrified tree in Arizona, about 190 million years old
(c) Leaf fossil, about 40 million years old
Evolutionary change in horses
Millions of years ago
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Equus
HyracotheriumMesohippus
Merychippus
Nannippus
Bo
dy
size
(kg
)
Evolution of birds
Smithsonian Museum, Washington, DC
• Archaeopteryx– lived about 150 mya
– links reptiles & birds
Anatomical record
• Homologous structures
– similarities in characteristics resulting from common ancestry
Homologous structures
• Similar structure
• Similar development
• Different functions
• Evidence of close evolutionary relationship
– recent common ancestor
Analogous structures
Separate evolution of structures
similar functions
similar external form
different internal structure & development
different origin
no evolutionary relationship
Solving a similar problem with a similar solution
Don’t be fooledby their looks!
Convergent evolution
• Flight evolved in 3 separate animal groups– analogous structures
Does this mean they have a recent common ancestor?
Convergent evolution
Fish: aquatic vertebrates
Dolphins: aquatic mammals
similar adaptations to life in the sea
not closely related
Those fins & tails & sleek bodies areanalogous structures!
Parallel Evolution
• Convergent evolution in common niches– Similar ecological roles in similar environments, Similar
adaptations were selected
– but are not closely related
marsupial mammals
placental mammals
Parallel types across continentsNiche Placental Mammals Australian Marsupials
BurrowerMole
Anteater
Mouse
Lemur
Flyingsquirrel
Ocelot
Wolf Tasmanian “wolf”
Tasmanian cat
Sugar glider
Spotted cuscus
Numbat
Marsupial mole
Marsupial mouse
Anteater
Nocturnalinsectivore
Climber
Glider
Stalkingpredator
Chasingpredator
Vestigial organs• Structures that serve little or no function
– remnants of structures that were functional in ancestral species
– deleterious mutations accumulate in genes for non-critical structures without reducing fitness
• snakes & whales — remains of pelvis & leg bones of walking ancestors
• eyes on blind cave fish
• human tail bone
This is notLaMarck’s loss from “disuse”!
Vestigial organs
• Hind leg bones on whale fossils
Why would whaleshave pelvis & leg bonesif they were alwayssea creatures?
Comparative embryology
• Similar embryological development in closely related species
– all vertebrate embryos have similar structures at different stages of development
• gill pouch in fish, frog, snake, birds, human, etc.
Anatomical similarities in vertebrate embryos
Pharyngealpouches
Post-analtail
Chick embryo Human embryo
Molecular record
0 25 50 75 100 1250
25
50
75
100
Millions of years ago
Horse/donkey
Sheep/goat
Goat/cow
Llama/cow
Pig/cow
Rabbit/rodent
Horse/cow
Human/rodent
Dog/cow
Human/cow
Human/kangaroo
Nu
cle
oti
de
su
bst
itu
tio
ns
• Comparing DNA & protein structure– universal genetic code!
• DNA & RNA
– compare common genes• cytochrome C (respiration)
• hemoglobin (gas exchange)
Closely related species have sequences that are more similar than distantly related species
A molecular record of evolutionary relationships
Why comparethese genes?
Comparison of a protein found in diverse vertebrates
Species
Human
Rhesus monkey
Mouse
Chicken
Frog
Lamprey14%
54%
69%
87%
95%
100%
Percent of Amino Acids That AreIdentical to the Amino Acids in aHuman Hemoglobin Polypeptide
Comparative hemoglobin structure
Number of amino acid differences betweenhemoglobin (146 aa) of vertebrate species and that of humans
100 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
LampreyFrogBirdDogMacaqueHuman
328 45 67 125
Why does comparingamino acid sequencemeasure evolutionaryrelationships?
Building “family” treesClosely related species (branches) share same line of descent until their divergence from a common ancestor
Artificial selection
• Artificial breeding can use variations in populations to create vastly different “breeds” & “varieties”
“descendants” of the wolf
“descendants” of wild mustard
Natural selection in action
• Insecticide & drug resistance
– insecticide doesn’t kill all individuals
– resistant survivors reproduce
– resistance is inherited
– insecticide becomes less & less effective
Evolution is not goal-orientedAn evolutionary trend does not mean that evolution is goal-oriented.
Surviving species do not represent the peak of perfection. There is compromise & random chance involved as well
Remember that for humans as well!
Evolution is not the survival of the fittest. Rather it is the survival of the just good enough.