evidence for adjuvant radiation therapy benefiting breast cancer patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph...
TRANSCRIPT
Evidence for adjuvant radiation therapy benefiting breast cancer patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes treated with a modified
radical mastectomy and systemic therapyShaheenah Dawood, Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo, Wendy
Woodward, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Kelly Hunt, Aman U. Buzdar,Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Thomas A. Buchholz
The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer CenterDepartments of Breast Medical Oncology, Surgical Oncology and Radiation Oncology
Dubai Hospital, U.A.E, Department of Medical OncologyDepartments of Breast Medical Oncology, and Quantitative Sciences
(Abstract number :507
Disclosure
• I have no relevant relationships to disclose.
Postmastectomy RadiationOxford: Mastectomy +/- XRT
Trials
LN - Disease
LN + Disease
Breast Recurrence Breast Ca Deaths
8% vs. 3%
29% vs. 8%
28% vs. 31%
60%vs. 55%
Local Recurrence
• 2/3 reduction
Breast Ca Survival
• none in LN-
• 5% for LN+
• There is current consensus that postmastectomy radiation therapy is indicated for patients whose tumors are either > 5cm and/or >= 4 positive lymph nodes.
• Whether adjuvant radiation therapy should be used for patients with early stage breast cancer with tumors < 5cm and up to 3 positive axillary lymph nodes treated with mastectomy and systemic therapy is controversial.
Aim
• Thus the purpose of this retrospective study was to determine if adjuvant radiation therapy had an impact on survival for patients with early stage breast cancer with up to 3 positive axillary lymph nodes treated with surgery and systemic therapy
Methodology
Stage I and IIBreast Cancer Stage I and II
Breast Cancer
Mastectomy + no Radiation
Mastectomy + no Radiation
Segmental Resection + Radiation
Segmental Resection + Radiation
Methodology• Database : M.D Anderson Breast Cancer Management Systems Database• Inclusion criteria :
• Female patients• Diagnosed between 1980 and 2007• Surgery• T1/T2 N0 or T1/T2/N1• Tumors <5 cm• Nodes <4
• Exclusion criteria :• Male patients• More than one primary• Hormone receptor positive who did not receive hormone treatment• Mastectomy and radiation therapy• Segmental resection and no radiation
Outcome Measures• Follow-up cut-off was 30th December 2008.• Outcome measures:
– Local-Regional Disease Free Survival (LRDFS): Calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of first locoregional metastases or last follow-up.
– Distant Disease Free Survival (DDFS): Calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of first distant metastases or last follow-up.
Statistical Analysis
• Kaplan-Meier method used to calculate outcome and segmental resection with radiation patients were compared to those with mastectomy without radiation using two-sided log rank tests.
• Cox proportional hazards was used adjusting for differences in patient and tumor characteristics between the two groups.
Patient and Tumor Characteristics
Mastectomy
(No Radiation)
Segmental
(Radiation)
P value
N
1585 (42.37%)
2155 (57.63%)
Range of year
Of diagnosis
2001 2003
Median Age 48 50
SubgroupsT1N0T2N0T1N2T1N2
434 (27.38%)
469 (29.59%)
383 (24.16%)
299 (18.86%)
757 (35.13%)
528 (24.50%)
493 (22.88%)
377 (17.49%) <.0001Median nodes
removed 13(1-58) 10(1-57)
Mastectomy
(No Radiation)
Segmental
(Radiation)
P value
Neoadjvuant chemotherapy
No
Yes1239 (78.17%)
346 (21.83%)1627 (75.5%)
528 (24.5%) 0.0564Anthracycline
No
Yes141 (9.02%)
1423 (90.98%)155 (7.29%)
1972 (92.71%) 0.0561Taxane No
Yes716 (45.78%)
848 (54.22%)919 (43.21%)
1208 (56.79%) 0.1198
ResultsNumber
Total no. analyzed 3740
Deaths 767 (18.1%)
Median follow-up 54 months (1- 312 months)
Median OS 161 months
(95% CI 144-180 months)
5-year DDFS 78%
(95% CI 76%-79%)
5-year LRDFS 88%
(95% CI 87%-90%)
Multivariate Analysis of LRDFS
LRDFS
Whole Cohort HRLower 95% CI
Upper 95% CI P-Value
Mastectomy vs. Segmental 1.26 0.95 1.68 0.11
Models adjusted for age, grade, hormone receptor status, HER2 status, menopausal status, race, neoadjuvant chemo, anthracycline use, taxane use, and lymphovascular invasion
LRDFS Among LN Negative Groups
T1N0 (N=1191) T2N0 (N=997)
5- Year EstimatesSegmental : 92%Mastectomy: 91%P=0.93
5- Year EstimatesSegmental : 91%Mastectomy: 89%P=0.99
LRDFS Among LN Positive Groups
T1N1 (N=876) T1N2 (N=676)
5- Year EstimatesSegmental : 91%Mastectomy: 90%P=0.65
5- Year EstimatesSegmental : 91%Mastectomy: 87%P=0.009
Adjusted Hazard Ratios for LRDFS among various subgroups
T1N0
T2N0
T1N1
T2N1
Whole Cohort
T1N0
T2N0
T1N1
T2N1
Forrest Plot For Sub-Groups
Hazard Ratios LDFS
No Neoadjuvant group (HR = 2.62 , 95% CI 1.26-5.46, P =0.00099
Favors SegmentalFavors Mastectomy
Multivariate Analysis for DDFS
DDFS
Whole Cohort HRLower 95% CI
Upper 95% CI P-Value
Mastectomy vs. Segmental 1.38 1.13 1.70 0.0018
Models adjusted for age, grade, hormone receptor status, HER2 status, menopausal status, race, neoadjuvant chemo, anthracycline use, taxane use, and lymphovascular invasion
DDFS Among LN Negative Groups
T1N0 (N=1191) T2N0 (N=997)
5- Year EstimatesSegmental : 87%Mastectomy: 86%P=0.11
5- Year EstimatesSegmental : 85%Mastectomy: 80%P=0.38
DDFS Among LN Positive Groups
T1N1(N=876) T2N1(N=676)
5- Year EstimatesSegmental : 90%Mastectomy: 85%P=0.004
5- Year EstimatesSegmental : 77%Mastectomy: 68%P=0.0177
Adjusted Hazard Ratios for DDFS among various subgroups
T1N0
T2N0
T1N1
T2N1 HR = 1.71 , 95% CI 1.15-2.52, P =0.007
No Neoadjuvant group (HR = 1.54, 95% CI 0.98-2.23, P =0.061)
Favors SegmentalFavors Mastectomy
Conclusions
• Patients with tumors <5 cm and 1 to 3 positive lymph have an increase risk of loco-regional and distant disease recurrence when radiation is not used as a component of their local-regional treatment.
• The benefit of radiation appears to be most pronounced for patients with T2N1 disease with the benefit still unclear for those with T1N1 disease.
Limitations
• We acknowledge the following limitations:– Retrospective nature of the study– Comparing women who underwent segmental resection with
radiation to a comparable cohort who underwent mastectomy to assess the benefit of post mastectomy radiation may not be ideal.
• However the results of our study are hypothesis generating and will need to be confirmed in prospective randomized clinical trials.
Acknowledgement
Mentors
Dr. Thomas A. BuchholzDr. Ana M. Gonzalez-AnguloDr. Mona Al RhukhaimiDr. Farid Khalifa
Thank You