event organization and public authorities: transport and ... · tourism organizations ... creating...
TRANSCRIPT
Event organization and publicauthorities: transport and
security
Philippe H. BOVYHonorary Professor
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology atLausanne/SwitzerlandIOC Transport Expert
www.mobility-bovy.chJune 2005
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
2
Agenda
1. Event basic organization2. Key organizational issues linked to
transport and security3. Short case study “ Montreux Jazz
Festival”
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
3
1.Event basic organization
Any temporary public event (large-medium-small) must have an organizationresponsible for its planning /preparation /delivery / dismantling
A schematic diagram illustrates the basicminimal organizational “6 task” structure
Event owner and organizer can be the same Event organizer can be a “permanent”
structure (1 or more event per year) or a“temporary” structure (for each new event)
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
4
Event basic organization
The 6 task “basic” organization shall cover(indicative): the event program (sport/artistic/commercial)
and facilities finance + human resources + accreditation marketing + promotion + ticketing transport + security + safety + logistics +
medical accommodation communication, media
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
6
Event public functions
Public events of all types need officialauthorization for key event functions:Security (with Police)Traffic, parking, transport, use of public space
(also with Police + transport agencies)Public health + medical (with Police and
health authorities)Labour - working permits ( with related
agencies)
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
7
Event basic organization
MOU- Memorandum of Understanding or agreementssigned with Public Authorities to defineresponsibilities and their boundaries: “who does what, where and when?” “who pays what?” “at event time who is responsible to take security and
transport decisions?”
The event “structure + content” must be clearlyidentified and all hardware and software needs welldefined and budgeted before “launching” the event
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
8
…event producers…
Sport event “producers” are multi fold:Event organizers / ownersSponsors / suppliersLocal/regional public authoritiesLocal/regional interest groupsTourism organizationsMedias
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
9
…event consumers…
Sport event “consumers” are multi fold:Ticketed spectatorsSponsor guestsGeneral visitorsCitizensLocal/regional public authoritiesTV+audience and internetOther medias
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
10
2. Event transport and security
The major interfaces with Public Authoritiesare:general and public security (public + private)
inside and outside of event site (including fire) traffic and transport (all circulations on public
domain (pedestrian / car / parking / publictransport / goods and freight transport)
health and medical (also drug control +surveillance)
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
11
... planning…
Whatever the size and configuration of the event(one site / multi site / linear) a “Traffic+Transportand Security Plan” must be prepared in fullpartnership between Organizer and PublicAuthorities
In most cases official “Guidelines” exist Of importance is the experience drawn from past
event in the same area
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
12
…operations…
The “Traffic+Transport and Security Plan”provides the framework for all preparation of theevent hardware and services procurement
Monitoring of costs, quality of products+servicesdelivered and timelines is essential
The operational and command shift from eventpreparation to event readiness and delivery mustbe carefully planned and tested (simulations + testevents such a rehearsal)
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
13
…readiness and delivery…
A “4C” or “CCCC” or Command-Control-Communication-Centre must beimplemented (even in a simplified way forsmall events)
Real time operation of this “coordination +decision + crisis centre” must be pre testedto train event time staff and integrateoperational functions
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
14
3. Short case study = MJF
Sport and artistic temporary events havethe same basic organizational problems:concentration of large (or very large) crowds of
spectators/visitorson specific enclosed or open urban or rural sites
(venues)with a well defined program (event schedule)event traffic must be superimposed on “normal”
City and regional traffic + activities with allsecurity measures associated with large crowds
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
15
…Montreux Jazz Festival…
Montreux = one of the most famous worldJazz Festival
25 years of regular attendance growth andlogistical developments
250’000 visitors in 20 days, 1/3 festival “IN”(with reserved tickets) and 2/3 festival“OFF” (for free)
Festival located in Montreux -- a Lake ofGeneva famous “small” resort town (about25’000 population a 1/10 of MJF visitors)
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
16
…Montreux Jazz Festival…
Its urban lakeside attractive location is achallenge to guarantee good accessibility/conviviality while avoiding traffic jam andparking congestion (like at most large crowdevents)
Challenge is amplified by the late nightattendance of most events- -- endinganywhere from 1AM to 5AM
Challenge also due to unpredictable “off”festival crowds (weather + others)
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
17
…transport challenges…
Large events “in small towns” or rural sitesattract mostly spectators by car -- withhuge parking demands
Late night and early morning 1 to 5 AM “endof event” incentive for use of car due tonon availability of public transport
For most sports/artistic temporary eventsthe No 1 transport/accessibility constraint is“parking” (mostly lack of nearby parking)
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
18
…what new transport scheme?…
Around 2000, growing success of the MJF wascreating huge traffic (+security) problems inMontreux threatening MJF development andMontreux tourist image
Studying, finding, financing and implementinga new transport+ traffic+ parking concept wasmandatory
Partnership study by MJF top organizers andPublic Authorities
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
19
…an innovative transport concept…
The new transport accessibility concept:No MJF parking in the City of MontreuxProvision for free “alongside state highway”
double side parking East (3-5km) and West ofMontreux (5-7km)
Free public public transport (for everybody)from 6PM to 4AM every day of the MJF along theentire coastal highway
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
20
…an innovative transport concept…
Montreux Police is organizer of transport concept(signage+ operations) with local public transportcompany (articulated low floor pollution freetrolleybuses)
Festival fans from Swiss German Cities (Bern-Basel,Zurich) coming by train can use special “longdistance return night buses” with same rail ticket--Night buses on the hour 1-2-3-4AM!!
Whole transport scheme operation costs (>350’000Frs) covered by MJF+City (45-55%). Organizer’stransport cost per visitor O,5€/1,5% of MJFoperating budget
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
22
…concept assessment…
The new transport concept allowed full“final” convivial accessibility on foot (fromrail station), on bus public transport (allevening and night free service) and by boat
Favorable impact in terms of Festival andCity of Montreux image
Festival attendance can still grow inMontreux while avoiding the usual “toomuch traffic, not enough parking” verytough constraint
June 2005 AISTS-SEMOS-CIES© [email protected]
23
5 runners and 25’000 cars = the worst possible transport mess!