EVALUATION PROPOSAL

Construction of a Border Crossing Check Point

Molvania

Turkistan

Stari Grad

Yenikale

Group 5

T H E O R Y C H A N G E OF

Inhabitants of CBC Regions :: Technical Assistance

Funding :: Contracts and Budgets

Preparation of design documentationLand Acquisition Construction of the Check PointSupervision of construction worksPurchasing Ferryboat

Border Crossing Check Point Opened

Increased Cross Border Mobility (Traffic)

Economic Development

Social Cohesion in the CBC Regions

Quality of Transport Improved

C

O

N

T

E

X

T

A

S

S

U

M

P

T

I

O

N

and

Context

Bilateral agreement was reached

Cultural differences

3 other Crossing Points exist

External financial support needed

Existing preliminary design

Land acquisition process has been started

Assumptions

New investors and companies attracted to the two regions

Labor migration doesn’t negatively influence the social cohesion

Whole investment returned

Travelling time decreased

Willingness of people to use BCCP

Information campaign provided

Stable climate conditions – no extreme floods

Design Matrix for Evaluation

Question Sub-Question Type

1. To what extent has the

construction of the Border

Crossing Check Point impacted

on the economical

development?

a) Has the project increased the GDP per capita in the two regions?

Cause & Effect

b) Has the project increased the real income in the two regions?

Cause & Effect

c) Has the project increased the trade volume in the two regions?

Cause & Effect

1. To what extent has the construction of the Border Crossing Check Point impacted on the economy development?

Measures/Indicators Regional GDP per capita

Design Interrupted time series comparison design

Data Sources National Statistics Offices (Mol. – Turk.)

Sample or Census Reports for each of the past 10 yearsData Collection Instrument Record Retrieval Document

Data Analysis Line Charts Trend Analysis

Comments “You make me happy!...”

a) Has the project increased the GDP per capita in the two regions?

Design Matrix for Evaluation

Question Sub-Question Type

2. Was the Border Crossing

Check Point project

effective?

a) Has the investment returned, in two years, as expected?

Normative

b) Has mobility increased as expected? Normative

c) Has the average travelling time shorten? Normative

2. Was the project effective?

Measures/Indicators Return on investment

Design One Shot

Data Sources Border Control Authority Financial

Sample or Census Reports of the past 2 yearsData Collection Instrument Record retrieval document

Data Analysis Comparison of real data to the estimated

Comments “Who invented love?”

a) Has the investment returned, in two years, as expected?

Design Matrix for Evaluation

Question Sub-Question Type

3. What were the main problems which affected

the Border Crossing Check Point project?

a) Was there any information campaign about opening and benefits of the new BCCP?

Descriptive

b) Were people satisfied with the new BCCP? Descriptive

3. What were the main problems which affected the BCCP project?

Measures/Indicators N/A

Design One Shot

Data Sources Project Manager, Project Reports, Check Point Users

Sample or Census Stratified Random SampleData Collection Instrument Interview, Record retrieval document, Survey

Data Analysis Content analysis, Content analysis & Frequency count

Comments Clever girls! FUN IS OVER...

a) Was there any information campaign about opening & benefits of the new Border Crossing Check Point?

Come to Molvania

Thank you for your attention!