evaluation plan format - casey county schools kets_district_tec… · web viewgen.fund. 5121 one...

Technology Plan Casey County Schools

Liberty, Kentucky

http://www.education.ky.org/

http://www.casey.k12.ky.us/content_page.aspx?cid=2

Prepared Date: 11/13/2009Update to Plan Date:

Plan Start Date: July 1, 2010Plan Expiration Date: September 30, 2011

Approved Date: Pending Commonwealth Approval

http://www.casey.k12.ky.us/content_page.aspx?cid=2

http://www.education.ky.org/

Acknowledgments There are many who contributed data, gave directional input, agreed to monitor and evaluate, procured funding, and participated in the creation of this technology plan. The persons listed here represent special contributors in our efforts to enhance quality of service and affect student learning. This plan does not list or otherwise cover all aspects or acknowledge every effort of our technology program. It does highlight major support structures to address functional needs of the district and schools.

District Technology Staff Jerome Cummins, CIO/DTCRoy Huff, LAN TechnicianAlejandra Woodrum, System Support Technician

School Principals/AssistantsShawn Pierce, JPEBoyd Harris, LESTim Goodlett, WHEKathy Fogle, CMSBarry Lee, CHS

School Library Media Specialists Delania Luttrell, Jones Park Elem. LMSKathy Pennington, Walnut Hill Elem. LMS

Additional District Contributors Terri Price, Assessment Coordinator

i

Table of ContentsAcknowledgments.......................................................................................................................iTable of Contents........................................................................................................................iiExecutive Summary...................................................................................................................1Planning Process / Methodology................................................................................................2Technology Vision and Goals.....................................................................................................3Student Technology Literacy Skills............................................................................................6Integration of Technology into Curricula and Instruction.........................................................7Current Technology and Resources...........................................................................................9Evaluation.................................................................................................................................10Budget Summary......................................................................................................................11Attachments/Appendices (Optional)........................................................................................12

ii

Executive Summary We have used the KETS Master Plan as a guide for successful planning and implementation strategies since 1993. The 2007 - 2012 Education Technology Master Plan is the third major plan and we still use it to guide, plan and budget overall operations. The initiatives and programs identified within this plan support the Kentucky Board of Education goals of (1) High student performance, (2) A strong and supportive environment in each school for every child, and (3) High-quality teaching and administration in addition to the Casey County Board of Education Commitment to Student Achievement.

The focus of this plan is to identify and ensure the infrastructure necessary to support those identified goals and commitment, provide the necessary tools to identify student needs via formative and summative assessments, and to have properly trained teachers and staff to intervene on the students’ behalf to help them achieve their highest potential.

1

Planning Process / Methodology This technology plan was devised by (1) identifying student educational need(s); (2) setting a plan of action where technology can server to address those needs; (3) setting success goals with oversight; and (4) procure funds to support the action plan.The tools and guides associated with infrastructure, learning devices, software and services are the 2007 – 2012 KETS Master Plan and the budget for the plan years.

2

Technology Vision and Goals We envision technology defining our school district. Every aspect of the educational process from

administrative to student evaluation requires expert command of its use. The ability to focus efforts on specific learning needs and the latitude for self-directed learning are achievable through the use of technology; therefore, we will adapt our methods and tools to advance education and cultivate devotion to learning.

Goal 1Provide network infrastructure capable of delivering reliable, high-speed access to teaching/learning resources.

Action Plan: Strategies/ActivitiesStrategy/Activity Instructional

OutcomeEvaluation Timeline Person(s)

ResponsibleFunding Source

High-speed network connectivity

Students will access learning resources, research and communication tools

Network uptime 7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC Formula Title IID$16,536 annual

Maintain routers and switches

Students will access learning resources, research and communication tools

Network uptime 7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC KETS$16,100 annual

3

Goal 2Provide communication infrastructure and service to promote partnership between community and schools.




Maintain telephone systems at all schools

Improve student perception of parent and school expectation

Teachers are able to use telephones to communicate with parents

7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC General Fund $5121

Maintain an automated voice notification system

Parents will receive important school related announcements

One Call call logs will show communication with parents

7/1/10 – 9/30/11 DPP General Fund $5000

Host district and all school web sites.

Increased communication between schools and public promotes a learning cooperative culture

Site analytics will show traffic from public addresses

7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC KETS $3740

Provide telephone service to all sites

Improve student perception of parent and school expectation

Teachers are able to use telephones to communicate

7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC General Fund $37164 with USF 80% discount $7432.80

Provide Student Management System

Student progress can be monitored and intervention as needed by all stake holders using IC and Parent Portal.

Portal log 7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC, teachers, counselors, administrators, parents

KETS $15,144

4

Goal 3Up-to-date technology tools will be used to support Students using computers and other kinds of technology to collect, organize, and communicate information and ideas.




Support On-line Library Catalogs for all schools - Destiny

Students will find books specific to their need.

Library reports will show activity level

7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC, LMS KETS $3750

Provide KET Encyclomedia

Students will view information in visual formats.

Teacher lesson plans, survey

7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC KETS $3000 annual server/storage cost

Replace workstations as per Master Plan life cycle

Increased time on task from speed, function and reliability

Hardware Inventory.

7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC, IT Dept. KETS $95,836

5

Student Technology Literacy Skills[The plan must have clear goals and a specific implementation plan detailing how students will acquire technology and information literacy skills as adopted by the Kentucky Board of Education in the Program of Studies for Kentucky Schools Grades Primary-12. The plan must also have a specific implementation plan detailing how students will become technology literate by the end of the 8th grade. Use format shown below. Insert additional goals as necessary.]

Link to the Program of Studies: http://www.education.ky.gov/kde/instructional+resources/curriculum+documents+and+resources/program+of+studies/default.htm

Goal 1Students will use technology to learn, to communicate, increase productivity and become competent users of technology. Students will manage and create effective oral, written and multimedia communication in a variety of forms and contexts.




Portfolio entries will be completed

StudenStudents write using appropriate forms, conventions, and styles to communicate ideas and information to different audiences for different purposes

Critique rough drafts

7/1/10 – 9/30/11 Classroom teachers, LMS, Lab teachers

Existing expenditures

Research a topic and present data using spreadsheets and graphs

StudenStudents use computers and other kinds of technology to collect, organize, and communicate information and ideas

Evaluate criteria and give student feedback

7/1/10 – 9/30/11 Classroom teachers, LMS, Lab teachers

Existing expenditures

6

http://www.education.ky.gov/kde/instructional+resources/curriculum+documents+and+resources/program+of+studies/default.htm

http://www.education.ky.gov/kde/instructional+resources/curriculum+documents+and+resources/program+of+studies/default.htm

Goal 2[Insert goal here.]




7

Integration of Technology into Curricula and Instruction

Goal 1Integrate technology into the curriculum to improve student academic achievement.

Action Plan: Projects/ActivitiesProject/Activity Instructional



Support Renaissance Place

Reading and math formative and summative evals, intervention to improve reading and math skills

AR, AM, STAR data 7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC, classroom teachers

Title I and Local $15,000 software KETS $1000/yr server

Purchase, maintain Study Island for elementary, middle

Improve area content knowledge, consistent tools and data collection across schools for formative assessments, intervention strategies and summative assessments

Study Island school, subject, class, and individual reports

7/1/10 – 9/30/11 CIO/DTC, 21 Cent, Title I

KETS, Title I, Local, 21st Century $10,000 annual

Purchase, maintain Compass Learning, Success Maker

Students will use technology to support directed and independent learning

Individualized program reports

7/1/10 – 9/30/11 Elem. Principals, Terry Price, Cynthia Durham

ARRA, Local, Title I$102,000

8

Staff Training/ Professional Development Goals

Goal 1Teachers will use various electronic tools for student formative and summative assessments.




Teachers and administrators will receive training on Classroom Assessment for Student Learning

Students will achieve Mastery in content areas

Administrators will monitor teacher implementation of learning targets and assessments

7/1/10 – 9/30/11 Administrators, teachers, curriculum specialists

Formula Title IID $3000, other

9

Current Technology and ResourcesDespite current economic trends that may continue into the next two years, we are positioned to not only maintain current levels of technology but plan to meet the growing needs of our district through server virtualization and the new Microsoft LIVE site with extended collaboration tools. IT staffing is set at a most crucial point where we can sufficiently support the technology for the coming year. While we have added one more full time technical position at the district level, mobile communication devices and mobile computing have most certainly required additional support.The number of teacher and administrator workstations lacking technology hardware items such as DVD readers and writers is a great need at this time. While 95% and 91% of the teacher and administrator workstations respectively met minimum standards, other hardware needs were not part of the standard. The most recent Technology Tools Readiness Survey shows that the percentage of student workstations that meet the minimum standards was 93% overall. The majority of workstations falling below standard generally fell into one of three categories: 1) were slated for replacement within 6 months; 2) insufficient RAM; 3) inadequate HDD. All new workstations are ordered with upgraded RAM and HDDs which should extend the fullest potential of the workstations for the entire life cycle. Several file servers are nearing replacement. One in particular hosts our KET Encyclomedia as a “local host”. We are planning to further consolidate our services using virtualization.The installation of “smart-classroom technology” products and services such as projectors, document cameras, personal response systems, and locally hosted Encyclomedia adds to the tools requiring maintenance and replacement at various intervals. A ten-year minimum operations report has been presented to the CEO and CFO with projections for annual maintenance and replacement that will enable the district to predict operation/ownership costs.

10

Evaluation

Performance Goal 1Evaluate Impact and Implementation of strategies/activities

Action Plan: Strategies/ActivitiesIndicator Target Tools/Methods

UsedTimeline Person(s)


Network infrastructure

High uptime Network monitoring

7/1/2010 CIO/DTC

Voice communications

Availability Customer reports 7/1/2010 CIO/DTC

Web, IC presence Availability Access 7/1/2010 CIO/DTCLibrary Resources and streaming video/stills

Student and teacher use

Destiny logs, teacher lesson plans

7/1/2010 CIO/DTC

Up-to-date workstations

6-year replacement cycle

KETS Master Plan 8/1/2010 CIO/DTC

Subject area assessment and skill building software

Students will make academic gains

Software reports and logs

12/1/2010 Elem. Principals, classroom teachers, curriculum specialists

Classroom Assessment for Student Learning

Administrators and teachers will adapt teaching and assessments for student success

Principal evaluations, walkthroughs

12/1/2010 Principals, Instructional Supervisors

11

Budget SummarySchool Year: 2010-2011Annual Budget Summary

Acquired Technologies and Professional

Development

Ed Tech Competitive

Title IID

Ed Tech Formula Title

IID

ARRAFormula Title IID

ARRACompetitiv

eTitle IID

E-Rate NCLB/other than Title IID KETS Other (Specify)

Gigabit fiber - schools 16536

Router, switch maint. 16100

Phone sys. Maint. Gen.fund. 5121

One Call Gen. Fund 5000

Web hosting 3740

Telephone service 7432.80 Gen.fund 29731

IC 15144

Destiny (library service) 3750

KET Encyclomedia 3000

Workstation Replace 95836

AR, AM, STAR Title I, Local 15000

Study Island670 Title I, Local,

21st Century 9330

Compass,SuccessMaker ARRA, Local, Title I 102000

Teachers PD 3000

12

TOTAL 16536 3000 7432.80 138240 166182

13

Attachments/Appendices

Ten-Year Technology Cost Projection (assumes current technology level and student to computer 4:1) r11/13/09

Items Under KETS Master Plan Replacement Cycle Year

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Telephone System *15 5121 5121 5121 5121 5121 5121 114745 8048 8048 8048

School Leased Dark Fiber 16536 16536 16536 19080 -25200

School Leased Network Service 0 0 0 0 68640 8640 8640 8640 8640 8640

Data & Voice Wiring *20 (1993)

Network Components *10 18722 18722 18722 18722 54422 19300 126163 19300 46972 19300

File Servers - Instructional *5 13000 18000 5000 5000 13000 18000 5000 5000

Web Hosting 3040 3040 3040 3040 3040 3040 3040 3040 3040 3040

Server Operating System 250 375 125 125 250 375 125 125

Microsoft ISA Server 230 230

CALs (device license 20xx) 5460 5460

CALs (email license 20xx) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

McAfee Endpoint (antivirus) 1150 1150 1150 1150 1150 1150 1150 1150 1150 1150

Infinite Campus (SMS) 15144 15144 15144 15144 15144 15144 15144 15144 15144 15144

Follett (library automation) 3750 3750 3750 3750 3750 3750 3750 3750 3750 3750

Study Island (gr. 2-9 estimate) 636 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000

eInstruction Response Systems 22420

eInstruction Question $1000/site 0 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000

Document Cameras *6 450 31050 26100 14850 450 31050 26100

LCD Projectors *6 767 56758 44486 25311 767 56758 44486

Printers, Instructional + Admin *6 6400 5320 40000 17800 1100 6400 5320 40000

Workstations, Student (current) 108680 95836 119548 102752 145236 153140 142272 95836 119548 99788

and Staff ($988 MasterPlan) *6

Total 221526 197994 285819 299700 309228 284256 455896 175228 314455 289571

14

File Server - MUNIS 14000 *not included in the cost table above -jc

Computer Replacement qty./yr 110 97 121 104 147 155 144 97 121 101

2009 Technology Tools Readiness Survey Results

DIST NAME CaseyADA 2,152

NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS 170NUMBER OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS 165

Section 1: Student Instructional Devices/Desktop Virtualization/Home Access

Instructional Devices - Elementary Schools Total Percentage

Number of student Instructional Devices located in standard classrooms 234 64.3% Number of student Instructional Devices located in fixed or mobile labs 130 35.7% Number of student Instructional Devices that are carried and stay with student 0 0.0%

TOTAL of Elementary Student Instructional Devices 364 100% Instructional Devices - Secondary Schools (Middle, HS, Alt) Total Percenta

ge Number of student Instructional Devices in locations that have 3 or less student workstations 43 13.9% Number of student Instructional Devices in locations that have 4 or more student workstations 266 86.1% Number of student Instructional Devices that are carried and stay with student 0 0.0%

TOTAL of Secondary Student Instructional Devices 309 100% GRAND TOTAL 673

Desktop Virtualization - Elementary Schools How many hardware based desktop virtualization cards (i.e. N-Computing, Fiddlehead, MiniFrame) have you deployed in your district? 0 How many additional student instructional access terminals did this create in your district? 0 Desktop Virtualization - Secondary Schools (Middle, HS, Alt) How many hardware based desktop virtualization cards (i.e. N-Computing, Fiddlehead, MiniFrame) have you deployed in your district? 0 How many additional student instructional access terminals did this create in your district? 0

15

Home Access for Students Percentage

1. Percentage of students that have a computer at home? 71.0% a) Percentage of these computers that are less than 5 years old? 70.0% 2. Percentage of students that have Internet access at home? 84.0% 3. Percentage of students for each type of Internet connectivity? 100.0% a) Dial Up 13.0% b) Cable Modem 4.0% c) DSL (usually provided by telephone company) 72.0% d) Satellite Dish 2.0% e) Other 9.0% Home Access for Teachers Percenta

ge 1. Percentage of teachers that have a computer at home? 97.0% a) Percentage of these computers that are less than 5 years old? 74.0% 2. Percentage of teachers that have Internet access at home? 93.0% 3. Percentage of teachers for each type of Internet connectivity? 100.0% a) Dial Up 14.0% b) Cable Modem 5.0% c) DSL (usually provided by telephone company) 75.0% d) Satellite Dish 2.0% e) Other 4.0% Section 2: Age, Mobility and Availability of School District Instructional Devices

** Minimum Standard Specification for PC and Macintosh platform Elementary Schools Total Percenta

ge Total number of student Instructional Devices 364 Number of student Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 319 Number of student Instructional Devices that are laptop 0 Number of student Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 Total number of classroom teacher Instructional Devices 92 Number of classroom teacher Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 84

16

Number of classroom teacher Instructional Devices that are laptop 0 Number of teacher Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 Total number of administrator/other Instructional Devices 42 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 39 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that are laptop 5 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 Secondary Schools (Middle, HS, Alternative) Total Percenta

ge Total number of student Instructional Devices 309 Number of student Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 309 Number of student Instructional Devices that are laptop 33 Number of student Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 Total number of classroom teacher Instructional Devices 73 Number of classroom teacher Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 72 Number of classroom teacher Instructional Devices that are laptop 1 Number of teacher Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 Total number of administrator/other Instructional Devices 48 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 47 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that are laptop 4 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 District Office Total Percenta

ge Total number of administrator/other Instructional Devices 37 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that meet or exceed minimum standards 30 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that are laptop 12 Number of administrator/other Instructional Devices that are tablet 0 How many total Instructional Devices (desktop/laptop/tablet) within the district were purchased/acquired new, from all funding sources, for FY09? 24

17

How many total Instructional Devices (desktop/laptop/tablet) within the district were surplused during FY09? 0 How many total Instructional Devices (mini computing devices) within the district were purchased/acquired new, from all funding sources for FY09? 0

Section 3: Workstation Software Workstation operating system information Instructional Administrativ

e1. How many total Instructional Devices use the following OS? Student

IDUTeacher

IDUAdminstrator/

Other IDUPre-Windows 2000 (DOS, WIN 3.1, 95, 98) 0 0 0

Windows 2000 6 0 0Windows XP 667 165 117

Vista 0 0 10Mac OS 9 (and earlier) 0 0 0

Mac OS 10 0 0 0Other:(workstation/Instructional Devices that have an OS that is neither Windows or Mac

(e.g. Linux) 0 0 0TOTAL (Equals totals from Section 2) 673 165 127

What percentage of all Instructional Devices does the district plan on upgrading to Windows 7 in the next 12 months? 15 2. How many total Instructional Devices use the following Productivity Software? Student

IDUTeacher

IDUAdminstrator/

Other IDUOffice 2003 or Earlier 673 0 0

Office 2007 0 165 127Office 98 for Mac or Earlier 0 0 0

Office 2004 for Mac 0 0 0Open Office or Other 0 0 0

TOTAL 673 165 1273. Has the district began utilizing web-based productivity tools (i.e Office on-line, Google Docs, etc) No

3.a If you answered "Yes", what level of adoption have you achieved? None adopted (0%) Section 4: Other Computing Devices Handheld computer systems (district owned devices only) Instructional Administrativ

e

18

1. Number of standalone PDAs - Device that combines a range of basic computing functions, such as scheduling and contact management. 8 32. Number of Smartphones (Windows Mobile, iPhone, Palm Centro, Palm Pre, Blackberry, etc) - Devices which provide wireless email, texting, internet access and other on-line services. 0 0

TOTAL 8 3 Personally Owned Computing Devices (Laptops/Tablets/Mobile Devices) 1. Has the district permitted personally owned Devices to be brought to school by students? No 2. Has the district permitted personally owned Devices to be brought to school by teachers? No 3. Has the district permitted personally owned Devices to be brought to school by administrators? No Section 5: Technology Leadership Service, Support and Training Resources Total number of days CIO/DTC position is employed during the FY08 school year 240 1. Estimate the percentage of time the CIO/DTC spends performing the following tasks:

1.a) Justifying, obtaining, managing funding for existing technology services or new projects (e.g., e-rate discounts, NCLB technology funds, KETS EDTECH funds, other local, state or federal funds)

5.0% 1.b) Planning, research, preparation, engineering, procurement and installation of new

technology enabled projects or major enhancements to existing instructional or administrative systems

10.0%

1.c) Integration and training of technology tools into instructional and administrative business processes 3.0%

1.d) Operations and maintenance of existing instructional and technology services to schools and district office 60.0%

1.e) Technology related written communications, meetings, customer satisfaction/complaint investigations, public relations, providing data requests, personnel issues, security, and vendor management

10.0%

1.f) Other CIO/DTC Responsibilities 2.0% 1.g) Other Responsibilities outside of CIO responsibilities (e.g., Facilities Director, Teacher,

Supt) 10.0% TOTAL (Section 5 : 1.a - 1.g) 100.0%

2. Number of schools with a STC? 5 3. Are they paid a stipend? If yes, what is the annual average stipend? $0 4. Number of FTE in-house district/school technicians that focus on daily operations and maintenance? 2.0 5. Number of FTE outsourced district/school technicians that focus on daily operations and 0.0

19

maintenance?6. Number of FTE district/school Technology Integration Specialists (Technology/Curriculum Resource Teachers)? 0.0 7. Number of FTE students that assist with technology leadership, services, support and training? 0.0 8. Number of schools with active STLP? 0 9. Are STLP Leaders paid a stipend? If yes, what is the annual average stipend? $0 Student, Instructional and Leadership Technology Skills Students 1.a) Has the district implemented the technology skills for students as defined in the Program of Studies? Yes 1.b) Are these student technology skills evaluated? No 1.c) At what grade level do your students start formally learning and acquiring keyboarding skills? 9th Instructional and Leadership Staff

1.d) Has the district defined and implemented technology skills and knowledge assessments as part of the district evaluation plan for teachers? Yes 1.e) Has the district defined and implemented technology skills and knowledge assessments as part of the district evaluation plan for school leaders (central office and school level leadership)?

Yes

Digital Citizenship Please indicate which of the following nine elements of Digital Citizenship have been adopted as part of the district’s technology culture through either curriculum or an Acceptable Use Policy for students and staff?

Digital Access Yes Digital Commerce Yes Digital Communication Yes Digital Literacy/Education Yes Digital Etiquette Yes Digital Law Yes Digital Rights and Responsibilities Yes Digital Health and Wellness/Safety Yes Digital Security/Self Protection Yes

Section 6: Network Connectivity School Wide Area Network (WAN) Connection to District Hub Site # Schools Percenta

20

ge1. Number of schools connected to WAN via leased line connection (T1 or more)? 0 0% 2. Number of schools connected to WAN via leased line connection (Less than T1)? 0 0%3. Number of schools connected to WAN via Fiber? (district owned or leased) 6 100% 4. Number of schools connected to WAN via Wireless? 0 0%

TOTAL 6 100% Local Area Network Capacity within the Schools 1. What percentage of LAN ports are switched 100MB or above? 100% 2. What percentage of your classrooms are connected to the local area network? 100% 3. What percentage of your Instructional Devices are connected to the local area network? 100% 4. What percentage of your Instructional Devices use wireless to connect to the school LAN? 100% Section 7: Ease of Access to Telephonic Services 1. Ratio of classroom phones to out-going telephone trunk lines? (example, if ratio is 9:1 enter 9) 41 2. Ratio of classroom phones to in-coming telephone trunk lines? (example, if ratio is 9:1 enter 9) 20 3. Number of schools that have implemented Traditional Phone System? 6 4. Number of schools that have implemented a Voice over IP (VoIP) system? 0 5. Number of schools that anticipate to replace/upgrade phone system in the next two years? 0 a) Upgrade/replace to traditional phone system 0 b) Upgrade/replace to Voice over IP (VoIP) system 0 Section 8: Intelligent Classrooms 1. Number of electronic image Projection Devices available to classrooms? (mounted or mobile) 170 a) Number of mounted? 170 b) Number of mobile? 0 2. Number of Plasma/LCD wall-mounted units in classrooms? 0 3. Number of interactive white-boards (mounted or mobile) in classrooms? 1 a) Number of mounted? 1 b) Number of mobile? 0 4. Number of individual responder systems (using clicker type Devices)? 27 5. Number of wireless interactive slates/pads? 25

21

6. Number of Document Cameras? 170 Section 9: Video Conferencing /Web 2.0 Collaboration /On-line Assessment Video Conferencing 1. How many Classroom-type systems (Tandberg, Polycom, etc) does your district own? 0 2. On average, how often are these systems used? Not Applicable3. What other video-based communications does your district use?

a. Desktop-based (WebEx, Adobe Connect, Elluminate, Tandberg MOVI) No b. Web-based (iChat, SKYPE, etc.) No c. One-way video broadcast (webcast, podcast, etc)? No

Web 2.0 Tools Which best describes your district’s use of Web 2.0 Tools (i.e. collaboration tools, social networking tools, etc.) for instructional/educational purposes by teachers and district staff Strictly prohibited

Which best describes your district’s use of Web 2.0 Tools (i.e. collaboration tools, social networking tools, etc.) for instructional/educational purposes by students Strictly prohibitedDoes your district have a Board Policy on the use of Web 2.0 Tools? No Online Assessment Do your students use instructional devices (desktops, laptops, netbooks, etc.) for formative testing purposes? Yes

Please indicate which of the following online formative assessment packages you use in your district (you may choose more than one)

G-MADE (Group Mathematics Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation) No GRADE (Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation Yes MAP (Measures of Academic Progress) Yes PAS (Predictive Assessment Series from ThinkLink/Discovery Education) No Other Yes

Section 10: Federal Reporting Technology Literacy Number of 8th graders (school year 2008-09) that are technology literate as referrenced in the Program of Studies? 141

Number of 8th graders (school year 2008-09) that are not technology literate as referrenced in the Program of Studies? 35

22

Number of 12th graders (school year 2008-09) that are technology literate as referrenced in the Program of Studies? 124

Number of 12th graders (school year 2008-09) that are not technology literate as referrenced in the Program of Studies? 14 Number of teachers that are proficient in Standard 6? 165 Number of teachers that are not proficient in Standard 6? 0 Number of Library/Media Specialists that are proficient in Standard 6? 3 Number of Library/Media Specialists that are not proficient in Standard 6? 0 Number of administrators that are proficient as per the Technology Standards for School Administrators (TSSA) 24

Number of administrators that are not proficient as per the Technology Standards for School Administrators (TSSA) 0

23

evaluation plan format - casey county schools kets_district_tec… · web viewgen.fund. 5121 one...

Documents