evaluation of the benefits of fm systems in cochlear implants and hearing aid users

25
Universidad de La Laguna EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS USERS Barajas , J.J. (3) , Mora, R. (2) , Fernández, R. (1) , De Lucas, G. (1) Zenker, F. (1) (1) Clínica Barajas (2) Fundación Canaria Dr. Barajas para la Prevención e Investigación de la Sordera (3) Universidad de la Laguna SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE - CANARY ISLANDS - SPAIN SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE - CANARY ISLANDS - SPAIN Gobierno de Canarias Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deportes 1 st Conference EHDI August 13-14 Johannesburg - South Africa

Upload: micheal

Post on 22-Feb-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Universidad de La Laguna. Gobierno de Canarias Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deportes. Barajas , J.J. (3) , Mora, R. (2) , Fernández, R. (1) , De Lucas, G. (1) Zenker, F. (1). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

Universidad de La Laguna

EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID

USERSUSERSBarajas , J.J. (3), Mora, R. (2), Fernández, R. (1), De Lucas, G. (1)

Zenker, F. (1)

(1) Clínica Barajas (2) Fundación Canaria Dr. Barajas para la Prevención e Investigación de la Sordera (3) Universidad de la Laguna

SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE - CANARY ISLANDS - SPAINSANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE - CANARY ISLANDS - SPAIN

Gobierno de CanariasConsejería de Educación,

Cultura y Deportes

1 st Conference EHDI August 13-14 Johannesburg - South Africa

Page 2: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS
Page 3: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

CLASSROOM ACOUSTICSCLASSROOM ACOUSTICS– Background Noise (BN).– Reverberation Time (RT).– Speech Audibility Index (SAI).

FREQUENCY MODULATED SYSTEMSFREQUENCY MODULATED SYSTEMS – Selection of Candidates– FM Fitting and Verification

CANARIAS FM PROJECTCANARIAS FM PROJECTGobierno de CanariasConsejería de Educación,

Cultura y Deportes

Page 4: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

AVERAGE CLASSROOM AVERAGE CLASSROOM (N=24)(N=24)

WIDTH: 6,31 mLENGTH: 9,78 mHEIGHT: 3,03 m

Page 5: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

MEAN REVERBERATION TIME MEAN REVERBERATION TIME (N=24)(N=24)

UNE en ISO 3382 (2001) “Acoustic measurements of the reverberation time of rooms with referent to other. Acoustical parameters” (1997)

Page 6: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

MEAN BACKGROUND NOISEMEAN BACKGROUND NOISE (N=24) (N=24)

Noise Rating Curves (NRC) - ISO

NOISE RATING CURVES (NRC)

Page 7: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS
Page 8: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS
Page 9: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS
Page 10: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

CLASSROOMS ACOUSTIC CLASSROOMS ACOUSTIC N=24N=24SPEECH AUDIBILITY INDEX (SAI): SPEECH AUDIBILITY INDEX (SAI):

52%52%PSR = 90 %

% P

redi

cted

Spe

ech

Rec

ogni

tion

(PS

R)

% Speech Audibility Index (SAI)

Norm

al H

earin

g

Hearing I

mpaired

PSR = 48 %

Page 11: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

FM SYSTEMFM SYSTEM TRANSMITTER RECEIVER

Page 12: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

SUBJECTS(n = 23)

RANGE OF AGE: 5 – 14 YEARS

UNILATERAL COCHLEAR IMPLANT

(n = 7)

HEARING AID

(n = 9)

BILATERAL

(n = 7)

UNILATERAL

(n = 2)

n=16

Page 13: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

Speech Discrimination TestSpeech Discrimination Test

LEXICAL FREQUENCY LEXICAL FREQUENCY

(% of correct phonemes recognition)

High Frequency WordsExamples:

Vaca- casapeluche- cepillo

Low Frequency WordsExamples:

Bufón- bizón, flácida- tímpano

Page 14: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

PROCEDUREPROCEDURESpeech Discrimination TestSpeech Discrimination Test

☺☺NOISENOISE

☺☺QUIETQUIET

WITH FMWITH FMWITHOUT WITHOUT FMFM

Page 15: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

TEST CONDITIONTEST CONDITION

Page 16: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

FREQUENTLY WORDSFREQUENTLY WORDSWITH FM AND BACKGROUND NOISE WITH FM AND BACKGROUND NOISE

CLASSROOM CLASSROOM ACOUSTICACOUSTIC

BNICRA = 65 dBA

RT60 = 1,28 mseg

SNR = 7 dB

SAI = 52%

HEARING HEARING CORRECTIONCORRECTION

FM = Phonak Campus + Micro Link

HA= Phonak Supero 412

Page 17: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

INFREQUENTLY WORDSINFREQUENTLY WORDSWITHOUT FM AND BACKGROUND NOISEWITHOUT FM AND BACKGROUND NOISE

CLASSROOM CLASSROOM ACOUSTICACOUSTIC

BNICRA = 65 dBA

RT60 = 1,28 mseg

SNR = 7 dB

SAI = 52%

HEARING HEARING CORRECTIONCORRECTION

FM = Phonak Campus + Micro Link

HA= Phonak Supero 412

Page 18: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

RESULTSRESULTS

Page 19: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

BOX PLOT OF % PHONEMES RECOGNITIONBOX PLOT OF % PHONEMES RECOGNITION

Page 20: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

MAIN EFFECTSMAIN EFFECTS

HEARING CORRECTION FM

Page 21: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

LEXICAL FREQUENCY BACKGROUND NOISE

MAIN EFFECTSMAIN EFFECTS

Page 22: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

INTERACTIONSINTERACTIONSFM X LEXICAL FREQUENCYFM X BACKGROUND NOISE

Page 23: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

FM BENEFITFM BENEFIT Dot Diagram

WITH FM

WITHOUT FM

% S

CO

RE

PHO

NEM

ES R

ECO

GN

ITIO

N> 85 % > 85 %

Sens: 62,5Sens: 62,5

Spec: 60,3Spec: 60,3

Page 24: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

FM BENEFIT: WORDSFM BENEFIT: WORDSReceiving Operation Curves (ROC)

Page 25: EVALUATION OF THE BENEFITS OF FM SYSTEMS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND HEARING AID USERS

CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS

The lexical infrequent words in noise conditions subtest may be use as a selection criteria for establish FM candidates