evaluation of shrinkage compensating cement in bridge...

26
EXPERIMENTAL PROJECTS EVALUATION OF SHRINKAG IE r CO I MPENSATING CEMENT IN A BRID' GE SLAB Report Number: 626-1 DE PARTM EN TAL IN -< R rvlATION EXCHANGE STATE DEPARTM E NT OF HIGH WAYS ANI) PUBLIC T RANSPORT A TI ON

Upload: others

Post on 19-Nov-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

EXPERIMENTAL PROJECTS EVALUATION OF SHRINKAGIE rCOIMPENSATING

CEMENT IN A BRID'GE SLAB

Report Number: 626-1

DE PARTM ENTAL IN -< R rvlATION EXCHANGE

STATE DEPARTM E NT OF HIGH WAYS

ANI) PUBLIC T RANSPORTATI ON

Page 2: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

..

1. Reporl No. 2. Government Ace ••• ion No.

FHWATx78-626-1 4. Ti.le and Sub.i.le

Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in a Bridge Slab

TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE

3. Recipien" I Calalao No.

S. Repar' Do'"

September, 1978 6. Pe,larmini Organization Code

~7~~~(7)--------------------------------------------~-----.~------~-~~----~ . Author. 8. Perlo"",ng Organi zotion Report No.

H. D. Butler Exp. Proj. Report 626-1' r.::--::--:---:-----------------------------t--;;::--:::--:--------------1

9. Performin\! Orllanilation Nome ond Addre.. 10. Work Unit No.

Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation-Bridge Division Austin, Texas

12. Sponlorong Allency Nam~ ond Addr ...

1). Con'rac' or Grant No.

13. Type of R~part and Period Cov.red ----;

Final i

I'Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation-Bridge Division Austin, Texas

Aug. 1975 - Aug. 1978

f--------------.--- -------------------------_-'-__________________ --1 15. Supplementary Nole.

Work done in cooperation with Federal Highway Administration FHWA Experimental Project No. 064875009

16. Abllroct

The performance of a bridge deck slab made with shrinkage compensating cement (Texas Industries 4-C Type K ChemComp) was evaluated by comparison with a deck slab made with conventional Type II cement. No significant problems were encountered in mixing, placing, or finishing the concrete made with shrinkage compensating cement. Compressive strengths were less than the conventional concrete but were well above the design strength. A few short cracks were found in the control slab but they are not believed to be shrinkage ~elated because they formed between two and three years after construction. Results of this evaluation did not show any engineering advantage gained from the use of shrinkage compensating cement.

17. Key Wardl 18. Dil'ributio" S,., .... _,

Shrinkage Compensating Cement Bridge Deck Performance Evaluation

[

19. Security Claui/. (0/ ,his ,epa,t)

Unclassified

Form DOT F 1700.7 (1·691

20. S.curi,y Ciauif. (0/ 'hi I page)

Unclassified 21. No. 0/ Pag.. 22. P,ice

25

Page 3: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

EVALUATION OF SHRINKAGE COMPENSATING

CEMENT IN A BRIDGE SLAB

By

H. D. Butler

Senior Designing Engineer

State Department of Highways & Public Transportation

Bridge Division

Austin, Texas

Experimental Projects Report No. 626-1

Work done in Cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Highway Administration

FHWA Experimental Project No. 064875009

"Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in a Bridge Slab"

Page 4: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

~he contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data pre­sented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation.

The material contained in this report is experimental in nature and is published for informational ~rposes only. Any discrepancies with official views or policies of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation should be discussed with the appropriate Austin Division prior to implementation of the procedures or results.

iii

Page 5: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

REPORT •..••..•..•..••..•...•.•......•.•......•. 1

TABLE 1.

TABLE 2.

TABLE 3.

APPENDIX A.

APPENDIX B.

Ambient Air-Fresh Concrete ..... . Temperatures for Each Batch of Concrete

Concrete Strengths for Concrete .. Made with Type II Cement

Concrete Strengths for Concrete .. Made with Shrinkage Compensating Cement

6

7

8

Bridge Slab Details.............. 9

Concrete Batch Designs .•...••••.• 19

iv

Page 6: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

EVALUATION OF SHRINKAGE COMPENSATING CEMENT IN A BRIDGE SLAB

Early in 1974 the Texas State Department of Highways and

Public Transportation awarded a contract which included the

construction of twin bridges on State Highway 360 over

Johnson Creek in Arlington, Texas. At the request of the

contractor1s cement supplier, a shrinkage compensating

cement (Texas Industries 4-C Type K ChemComp) was used in

the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance was

evaluated by comparison with the other bridge slab made

with conventional Type II cement.

Description of Bridges

The Johnson Creek bridges are 175.00 feet long with three

prestressed concrete beam simple spans (42.50 1-80.00 1-52.50 1).

The prestressed concrete beams are 54 inches deep and the

slab thickness is 8.25 inches. The test bridge has an overall

width of 60.896 feet and the control bridge has an overall

width of 66.896 feet. Slab details for these bridges are

shown in Appendix A. The test bridge carries the northbound

traffic of State Highway 360 and the control bridge carries

the southbound traffic.

Page 7: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

Specifications

The slab concrete of the control bridge contained Type II

portland cement and was designed and placed in accordance with

standard specifications of the Texas State Department of Highways

and Public Transportation. Slab concrete in the test bridge

contained the ChemComp shrinkage compensating cement and was

of the same batch design as the control concrete. All items

of the specifications were unchanged except maximum allowable

slump for the ChemComp concrete was increased from four to

six inches. Placement procedures, equipment, construction

joints, placing, finishing, testing, and curing of the two

concretes were as nearly identical as possible.

Construction

The Johnson Creek bridge slabs were placed between August 18,

1975, and September 26, 1975. Temperatures were generally warm,

ranging from the middle seventies to the high eighties and

low nineties. An exception occurred during the placement of

slabs Band C of the experimental bridge when temperatures

remained generally in the fifties and sixties. During those

days of high temperatures, ice was added to the concrete mix

to keep the temperature of the concrete at time of placement

2

Page 8: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

aSo or less. Ambient air and fresh concrete temperatures for

each batch of concrete are shown in Table 1.

Observations

Concrete made with shrinkage compensating cement has a

tendency to set up faster than conventional concrete and

therefore must be placed as soon after mixing as possible.

Travel time between the concrete batch plant and the construc­

tion site was approximately thirty minutes and it was determined

that the ChemComp concrete would lose approximately one and

one-half inches of slump in this time. The slump at the plant

was adjusted to give a slump of approximately six inches at

the job site.

The final mix design for the ChemComp concrete gave a

good plastic mix with no tendency towards segregation and no

excessive bleeding with slumps up to six inches. Twenty-eight

day strengths were somewhat lower than for the conventional

concrete but well above that required. Strengths of the

conventional concrete are shown in Table 2 and strengths

for the ChemComp concrete are shown in Table 3. The fresh

ChemComp concrete had a sticky consistency and would adhere

to a wooden float, however this problem was overcome by the

3

Page 9: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

use of metal tools. The ChemComp concrete also appeared to

set up quicker than conventional concrete and therefore

created a problem in obtaining a uniform textured surface.

The experimental and control bridges were visually inspected

at seven months, one year and seven months, and two years and

eleven months after construction. There was no discernible

difference in the appearance of the two decks and no visible

cracks were found until the last inspection was made, nearly

three years after construction. During this inspection four

short cracks, 12-18 inches long, were found in the control

bridge. These bridges have a skew angle of 31°00' and these

cracks are located in the acute angle corner of the slabs,

an area generally susceptible to the formation of cracks.

Conclusions

Based on the results of this evaluation the following

statements are made:

1. The few cracks that formed in the control slab are

not believed to be caused by shrinkage since they

formed between two and three years after the concrete

was placed and in a location generally susceptible

to the formation of cracks.

2. There were no significant problems encountered in

4

Page 10: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

mixing, placing, or finishing the ChemComp concrete.

3. Twenty-eight day strength of the ChemComp concrete

was less than the conventional concrete but was well

above the design strength of 3600 psi.

4. There was no apparent engineering advantage gained

from the use of shrinkage compensating cement .

5

Page 11: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

TABLE 1. AMBIENT AIR - FRESH CONCRETE TEMPERATURES FOR EACH BATCH OF CONCRETE

Slab A B C D E F Date 9-4-75 9-22-75 9-26-75 8-18-75 9-3-75 9-11-75 Placed

80-78 58-78 50-70 78-80 94-79 80-81 78-78 58-77 50-75 77-78 94-80 80-81 78-78 60-78 50-76 77-78 78-77 80-82 80-78 51-72 51-76 80-82 78-78 77-78 82-80 51-72 51-75 80-81 90-84 78-79 86-84 51-75 50-75 78-80 76-78 78-80 86-84 51-75 58-78 78-79 76-78 78-80 86-82 53-76 56-78 76-? 76-79 76-76 84-82 54-75 54-78 76-78 76-76

56-76 51-76 80-80 76-76 58-77 84-80 76-77 60-78 84-80 64-79 84-81 66-78 84-81 70-78 86-83 58-78 88-85

90-85 76-?

Note: Concrete for spans A,B, and C made with shrinkage compensating cement. Concrete for spans D,E, and F made with Type II cement.

6

Page 12: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

TABLE 2. CONCRETE STRENGTHS FOR CONCRETE MADE WITH TYPE II CEMENT

Date Span Beam No. 7-Day

Flexural 7-Day Compressive

28-Day . Compress1ve

8-18-75 D C-70 775 D C-7l 822 D C-72 846 D C-73 874

9-3-75 E C-74 823 4015 5837 • E C-75 843 4864 6279

E C-76 643 3997 5536

9-11-75 F C-77 690 2812 5023 F C-78 663 2848 5447 F C-79 634 3449 4828 F C-80 686 4156 5200

7

Page 13: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

TABLE 3. CONCRETE STRENGTHS FOR CONCRETE MADE WITH SHRINKAGE COMPENSATING CEMENT

7-Day 7-Day 28-Day Date Span Beam No. Flexural Compressive Compressive

9-4-75 A 4C-1 650 3537 4988 A 4C-2 671 3661 5306 A 4C-3 655 3573 5147

9-22-75 B 4C-4A 510 2441 4139 B 4C-4B 480 2441 3926 B 4C-5A 580 3537 5359 B 4C-5B 565 3325 5465

9-26-75 C 4C-6A 594 3608 5394 C 4C-6B 531 3166 5265 C 4C-7A 610 2989 5164 C 4C-7B 622 3467 5394

8

Page 14: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

APPENDIX A

BRIDGE SLAB DETAILS

9

Page 15: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

i ,.n

i r-: :~"t:==-__ .

,1It1$'SS, ()f~'6" .d

;: <.I"9·~

. i_6'~

"" "" ~

I"

(0

l :~ ... on

-... ' ~ t

/' ~

" ,,' IA

'0 -, %

.~

·M~ \

/

.. I I

l~ r I

r' I

, I

,<,

'I

'" "

'. ..l

~r;'r~'1 \~~

I '1 • .... ,

,,~.:: '>

:' ~[ \11

-1"

.y

I ! 1 I 1

--.oos'i

-I

... .. , ., vlj \1)

?oi \J

(l( C

l .... ?-~j Iv l'J ~ :{ l)

::.. V

)

L_----------=~-------

-~------

10

,~ -

I·IT

' ....

--..'-... .... ~: ~~I

, I

' ,1

,.1

I 1

I

OJ;!'

I I "

t _

_

' __

:

~.~ ...

~: ~ li

: o

:i\,) ~

LU~l~ ,_

._ L

_

, • •

Page 16: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

I,: :.:

Ii!

I I

1 , 1'1", -I

-"1

I I "I : I

; 1

I" I

I

'\1 II

I I:

:t

III ~

' I" I '" iii ..

I.,

• ,

-..' ,

"

~~ '" .. ,

l . , ",'<, .......

: , I

,If II . , ~\

," (~ ~

.:-

"

," .... 1_, ;'"

.~

'!

,,"

1;

U ~' . ,

W.

'II

... ... ., I"

"",,

.;. .. II~ ~: .:: ~"1

,..'.,

I';' '.,

~ ., "

I .

I

~ II ('.~

:'. " 0, ~

,'I'

i ( It~!'

-,

I u ~ .\~

I ,4.1", . ", '. ~

0

" .~::' ~ , " {

----:-2

,)).

-~,o">~·'

~ .. '0 .. , .~ :~.

) II

':~ i

.1): i

::.~i:~ I )I"q

,·! I I II : i

I I

I'

II i 1 1 I

: I i I

i I I

Page 17: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

-;-

~

-1 .111 I

. I..J.

;-.:-' 4j1"! lu.,u

1: ~

~'trr 7 f1PJoO

~~ ;

t" .... (

~ :J ~ ..

... ----,

~

~~.

",

12

Page 18: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

~ W

c

_ _ _ . _ _____ . _ _____ . _ ~fI.,'

~!'

4

~ _.:r.,,,"_ I

Cl-:.me.~ I1.>Ho ", • • /J. &/17 .'.6 ~!

~ .~: p.l'SO~ -r-~ ~,.. •. If. O.!!I.: I IIJ!' ___ . •

_#.,111>,' I"z..~.~ J~O' __

~;.' 6.~. (;.

' b .'!..!..

.r

()~ K:!Nr:~;;C,'NS

. S:e=~ 'Sp~-';: " C'

.... ; " . -l---r-L \_ _

t -·_ -·V - - -_1:St L -- ,1:;:.:..::. .. -_. - - . .~,&.~ 6 t.

(C,6c. t:>~ Ab.I~","'; I'" :,. .. ,..; e .. ff-s"" - ....: - - ~ - -~::. - -:::-

--l--'_-z Ii ~

'-'~,- ., \ .

. .... ...'i ~~._z.~,.C~.'iJ~

:~~~. --~ :~ ·- !'·:/~~ · I!~· :~i!' - -~ -. -- ~t~ . f#".t#"-: '~~~

~ .. "" In,

-~ i ~, .... - ~ ,

~ 0; Cb ~ ~ £ '

co .. ~ , ~

.1..1

-~ .~

~ '; I"

------"0---- __ ... __ _ Z'!._~ ___ --- .. - _ -.. _r_!l: ~?t._ ' /

~'~W ~(] .. ·e .. ~",,,; ........~.:.;.l.w~ ·.' 'J~,.,.,.o ··.d

... I -,' : , '$ ;

··1~~~ --:~ - -/-~~~~~ ·- Ir"'-"'-'~1i.""-J~· ~

\

_ !;:;clt..,.fI , ~rm(),.,J I . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l \-'~ 'f (R./$) I' \\

- - - . - - .:. - -; - .: - - - - • '$#' • __ 'fiE." - ~ :{ -=-=--= it __ =-- -='=-=- '. ----

_ ___ $ &~8' - - -- "\ ryp _ -r'y~ __ \ _'''.'!!l1 -/1', (J.!l18'. !II. 15"

.- . -E'~ ~ : ~:" ~ · I !_=~~;<~.-,~, :7t1~ . .• . 7L_ .'_ ._ . . .. It 'f' '''of]1 ~.~·~'.z~1·· ~~/::;~1': t~tt

~ 6.r .~'~ ~ !~~".e~d • _.~ ": (C. ·S)

r.,p -

..... _ ~ ~-=- --:. -:.. __ _ ._ _ --:. --=--_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ ~ ".,/ 'I ~ 'Z.S~.OO ' p r-~ - iL . _ _ '. iA"""t>".tJ

, I' c~tll. 6 ...... 3 , 5r.1171' ;..

~ :;' E";-;;;::'~ = ,,'d-__ ~,~_-=/:""- 'rr"J~ \ '\. :04 !¥,,:s (;S ---:"'"

-~-;d ''I ~ .;~':,;-." .• Z#'

Y'~":':-- ~:.;:s~ ~ :i:!~1 ~:~;~, .

.• cr . I';' 'I . St.I7' : ·it" :.J .... - - -OJ ' -'$ -: '.10" - '.1'

~~}-1j~jf:?~ -. Nj-" --! -+7r IO~W j ~i; ~~!<! . :J~~ "~~I • - -, - ,.' .- • . -. . - 1 .

--, ' '1 .--+------.-=-fiW..~v..,.,i:I~ .: . . ru,,~ ~

yP ) " _ , f::" ""."m.)\', . _ 'I . ' /(PJS )

,<-_C,', S-.d. • ..~ OK, O. 1'" -'\ . _"II \ :. _ ,I I \

\~ . -, . , --- \ • 0. ~'--~~?; ,:';;;~:;:fo~ -_\'~~::: • .''' O·'-<:6~''. 3r"6 ' GJ,~ b.r6 -:"<; .'''''''':1 b.r 6c-"i<:_ (:u P./.iIJ :.' ... t;', &:.-~.3 o .• ~,.~,... sl,.l

- I

~ J

J

'-

""- . .. '.~ .. --\

_~r.;:;I();c:; '&=C;;·:C~I;-~ ;:~3 ~;(;r;;: c:;:' \

1 ,; ,'C;

Z'6 . '; - -, ~ ... ,..

Et;.: : ; .

. -~~ .. ~_:;- .=~::;-;:. ~r.

\.

. : .I.;o - C · I, r~ t# .J#'<I~.~ :'9' '''' &1"0'

A .-=- - ,,-c' to r o'G= ~ ~d ~ Z ' Op,, '" .'c ·r ~

~. soo

S .I..'c:..'.' ..... '5 ~E : ..... ' t:Ot;C:" ' S .S;EE!.. .,~: .'-'1 _~~Si':;~~_ .

PL A '''-J __ :._?~_~Q _ !:.\'2. _§E.A N _:C" ( "f REa:'./IfiE~

:!....:.- ~_~8 .; _;4 -:., ' fI ~ ·.·~ . I,;, · ..

~:, ~.C • ... C!,($~ ~~. C"~

' !6~

\,

-- - . -~.......:-.:..-- -~.;:-, •. ,c" ;-~

--- . .. -........ -- -_ .. • 4'$/-_ ~: " .. '· ,: ,n' ___ .: . !~'.

.Z.~

~L· C;,...·' .... ,S .. <=_'~·_~O;~ .. .... ,S S!..!E!..

·E , 'If.':'~ &..' ,' $11: .. '114 v C.P~~"':"~'Nr

:-5 . ~'; ' .O:<~$~;'~_SS::J _ .. = ~ '-' :: < ~.~ =- 5 =~.:. "1_ :r.f.' ''' .~~

.::: 5,: -!.:.OC: 6'l1:)' SC .... ·S J

_·:;:""':SC·" __ ~_Zee~ ;':<::JS§

S-,A. ~Z:!·;6.(;() ~ S-~ 6.0 4 $&.&& /ff" ~.!. •• l -'" ~ .,; f ~I."~~

: .. w ......... .! .:~;-;.;".I'--...-_-... . .. - \ _ ... 'f:: .. .. . : :;._=:;,'E..~;:6 ·r.C' :~.; 14=~ Ii 1.' 1e C~ ; ~L (j.. . • '-~ ••. • ; ." ~ .~ . ~~ - . r .J,#!!:!:- . ~_ :z_ ;!j-" .':

Page 19: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

..

,. I l···

~~.

r:J " ~

\

\.! I

I !

I I •

I

~)! ~

.

I(,J

I ....

T~

'

f

L~

.4'..j 1

'\

,: · .... g·2-:-+ I"

'"

~

I

_J

14

Page 20: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

,I ,§I a' I ! ~-~

"It,C

d Ie c~ Pol ,,'" JI"-.. ~Q) ,)\I ~

'lI~ l'\)

.Pc \til

" r,o«J"J1 , r

-,0

0<

;.1 r +

,~ ~

III -4

I,

" I"

0,

c I"

. <

I'

u c '

! I

I

~ I

I 1:1

I'

-j

~ ~

: ". ,,; I

~J-,

~'~ 1

:1 .." iii I '-'I ~

;

I" <l

t .~

I

i~ :

, I I ~ I

'I

I I

Q.

~. ,'­<:)

' ,\I

I II, "I ~

9-.,. v

':./

,1

,oDS

U' -,Q

9i'll •

:.ds ""-'i':

---

-,,*,II''P

''

i t"'i

"

". ~'(I"j

II ~I~,

••

'I

jt~

't":t: t)lljI

)

~--------------------------------------------'----.

15

,.!

I~.: --------It ,

. I ~

/ ~:'l //"

.

I'

, '" I,

I,

II

, I

! ,

, I

f.,

, I

--,~fI,g'z

'

; '" (, i

) .~

.~ :. ~

:.

,,<)

'<)

}<

\l."

: ~ (

I <!

Page 21: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

J. _

_

.. - ~

i .. .. "J ~ , ~ I

. I

~:

I I 1--'" .----

I-

, , ~'

.... ~

' I ,

-r~

.1 Q

: Ii;

~:. ,.., ,~

:~ C

),,

'" ...

:' ::~ '«~

.. , II oQ

~ ~ .. l .. ~

I,

~ , .~

.. \)

-I I

.~

\)

~'J ,",

0.. ... 1')011

~~

101)-'II . .. .. .. ~

.. "l I

-.

I

~ ...

~

()

'"l ... .. ' ~ 11

,0 1

6

. I ~ '

I r­I I I ,j, I

,. 1 ,. '-1 'I. 'I, r r T

,. ~~ 5

~ '~~

~

:. i ~~ i

~: . !~,~' ~~: '"

i

41 .

,

" 0

" ,,',

...

~ I , ,

I

* ..)

"-.

... : ~ .. . "'1

1;!i'~ ~l

: ... '~I "

~~ ~ .. "

I"'I-~

... ~~! (j:

~!, OJ

L1I,:;

~:~~ "1

' ~ \I

. ",

, Q

, f\,

' ,t ~I .~.

~ ,/I

",'

'Il '. If) V)

('i "i 'f)

.1 T,I

y ~

..

" '" ... j

J ~ , , .. ~ ,I ~ -.~ ~

'"

'I

'~,I ,

I I

, .~ ~

~ iii

'" <-i.

: ~ a~ " ...

~

"llll

"l

~ ~.~

~, ;;, ~ , "

~ ~ ~ 'l

' ""

"C,

,~:~ ):

~I ~

.0 "l" "l

'-l

~: ~ i .,-1 ~..,

I ~ r

I I I ---_

._---

-'

• • •

Page 22: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

! ~ :

I I

-t

I ~

I

I i

il ' ~ .L

j .;;

't'. ' ~ . Ii

i~ f .. ..

f-! C)

~ ,.,.

t-. J.

"": tt:I t,i .

l

,.

floH!9'

CAord l'M b."_." b.".,,'; /" .nd britt ••• nd • e· Dp." JI.

~ I

(&'-,- ! l \!

..

,-.o.r50~~Sp. ~.P:I*'.!. .• '-~~

_!' ..• IJtJ~' ___ c-- _. -; !JILL. O~ r;~/NF02~'N5 STEEL

. --. . - - SPA ,;::J",:-'-

"\ ,_ ... " .... " J _ •. , ~ !.~clc"".,I.

'. _ ~6e .... E IT.,. ~ a.lf.,")

------I...-----. - .-. i

/~~==-~ ~ =·-~.;~;,o~~ ~ - ~b----eJ'-./~~:' ~ ..... ::~;.::,f:'1,.7:!.tI I ' . 1 - Cr_" Ch.ng. /..;,.. \' _" . 'e (~JSJ I.IS' ! I

~~!:~~~~~i~~~J;;~ ~1.1~~I' _ll_·_ ~-/! .• ~~

~1iS~!t~~: 1~~!f~_~W \ L I '.' ~,L ____ -- -~ . l:L---~.=__.,._<L-=---:..-=-_=__:.~ \to =i -F I,j ,

~\ . rz $'·OC' (Typ.) I ': 5'1°00' (Typ.) ~ '\z, "\ II "

-~~:..:-==-=- -f--=-~J'= =-r.:.:=-=-=~-===::!::~-- .. . -~~- -1--'- ~ .. \\ t.~/. &r'" li"' '' ~'\ _ __ ._ J~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ __ - .\ ~.---- -- ---~- ---=qr------

- - - - ,I I I I '~'\ .,-/tI' II __ 6.t~ Z'.:~IO \-,

\' ( r;.j;) - - - I I tryP.) tryp) \'

, -. - :-_...-_ .. :: =-:1-_-_ } -=_- -- _. ~rc. = =--_ .. _=-~\ -r pc SJ .~ ..... s';'re~ •• c · · _~,..,J..,."~" ~:.,e,.." , . . ~

• )"'",;,. ••• 6C6"'S --z.- ~:;r:l Dk:. DN. ~ 05Z . t i &r:; .~ J -A,~ 7SC.l~7'J I; _. ~ /.~.,·",-.d '~'\ .. . I... . -;-. ' . ~ _'~ or ' o_os; ~ -~-_.-._ _ .. ___ . :" .. _ . ~~ __ ..

\ ~.c' ~ ;;~r-.r.-. :s ;:~ ~!-~~;;""'':';#55.. '. ......-:. ~~rl =kl ~"'. ~ ~.s/ __ 6 _ ...

\. ' _i

-~~ - --

\. Z$ .• tO 28. ~~(;

& .. ,.. "~ •• -:U~_~.~-.:J~-~ ___ - _ _ a,!! \~";.".d -,I 'r,1'JS, - - - - 5". ~ D"~7'0 ~7 .• '.' t '

I ,

!,.", ...: ••• i e,n- 17 . :Sp. -. C.7ert; "Z . ,~.T -._.-

, a""~!r . ! ~. "$ $1 CliIl"l 217, ._ ~41"-, )e~. : -'S ... fr,.M'A .. : · -~I'f·

! .... , .," : .~ . ~ 1 $!. ~7', . t./~

::~~ -~ -,-'! : ~1-·~ .~:~=~~~ -·~C-·~· t.S 1·~~r:--it~

::~ . : · ~r r!!t~~i ='~i~ •

IZO .liMnI Cs .,..... ::! , ~~

f..Jel' __ ~

,~-\. f!~_

\

\ r;.,el

!_ .. ~ &c-"~~C&$­c."":,,,Z'· ·Z.,'tf':' ,

\ \

:.g~: . - -,I~-~~ ~ J:~; : .. . : ~~ : _~~L~.: .:.~~~ ~ ~1 '~' _~ ~ tK

-i -l ··· ·~ t",l.f t+.;""~:s ___ .-':' .d;I'

-lnJic.f.s ... :_ • . o~4 1:",._ .I'"~ /,, rlc~ :~- :f;~'C' ' s,.o.l.,.,)

\. O.·,..d/~.I •• = .~t2,. .. ~. S~ •• J

:-;r~ ":5w_~~!~" .!~.,';-.6!f- c: :~; !iC=~C - ~-.: ... .: '

' .

.. ~ --

~ , - - ---.: - ~ -.c- _ c~._:;~ :~.~ bo~~~ <": ,:~ J .y-

l ($, -1- '

l

.\ ~ ~.,~~ .. ~ .c e , f.;.·r~,.... !: :~ .

. - --Y if til ,

__ c.rso · ~ .:: !; .. r~ ~- .... -:~ ... :..-~I.~.',,' ~.68!'

Sf.Jowr"'t!# __ ~E,4M !..A~OUT' i DIMEfo.J5.'O"-JS

f;)t....A ,,"' -S_z" .5..() I : , .... ::J SPA ,'-J or:'

- " -_. ----------.

5' "t - -' ~~( SWOW'·.:S ~=~ 'i:o..~~.'::::i.~ S;":!c..

-S~'t(~5 .... ·S~·,;....~V' ~60"'~~ ·"'E."'·~

'-5.~~ =2ES~2ESSE~ ~ ~ ". ~ ~ ~ -;E8E;": ,-:- ' ~L,,~

'::. ~~ "'e~CO ·-fZ.50· ~:"~"':s\

_ ·:;.l....'-;.s.Q ," .~q.2£e<:. 5; ·'050= .:: -~ ~Z61> -;~c:; ,. 0 ~.~ ~~~-~ccc 111

:_1etl~ ".5 c,..t.:,; ~L. •• .l$

.= .. -_: - ... C$~;::';;-~---=-;;~' _ . .. ,.; .7'-.-.. -;::-;,- -" ."'!.-

__ ~~t~rc;:~_::~ ~r.~··~.~~~~~~:2:~3~ ==_ .;JL

Page 23: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

~ 00

I

i

~~--- -- -_ . . _- - _. "",.n.' -- - --J 0. .... ,

~rii 3*> .• ,,' .~.IJ()(I' ,

.o.ooo,!- t:.~ •• 11 g.," 4 C CN-d ".". - -----~ t.~ •• f"j bI.,r; I.~' l.-"'.-I .. •• .I.,.,,~. s •• '.r ___ ...:-__ ~ ____ ___ ~ _____ _

~ , ~_ J'~'-.--J' ., _".I b,.",. ~ -(,g!HZ!.;,.;w~ . c.nc,..I.

.,;.---z. 1'1._,.", ,.,.,.,.r "..-"""- ,~ .... , .e c._. <Ao &w-Tr Z-"'7~: : . /,/ II . I ~ a..-=-_,-) '. ' ." ~ ,-r. 1 I / "'"~.,. ."J. ,._ " •. . ;~ ' . . "-T~ I · • . • , ~ ... lr ... , ...... ' :> ;I, .~: II' \ J . ,,', .. =. , '. i "U ...... 'i- • - .• _ ,

v."'y " ..... ,-,.,1..61",.,,1- ,.,,'Ilt /d.~ 10.01 d.I!'.c~io,., . D.",'

" __ cl. .1 '''.r;~

&.oz~ s .• c. ~

! ~-- .-. .3.i.::~~7~~~t ... ;."~_ ~ .. _=,- ~ _ . IL

i ~

"f()# ' :!.~r .

[)r .;~ ~-.ti

"'M ~-=~.­$:"'~

~.~~

Cfo.,..,E.,. ~"JQ';"" &~ lop ./l .. I.b '0

t;" 'lid •• 1 &1.....,., cr cr",.," pl.~ • .

~;""o;.."t-.~S .: .... :;; ~(AEQA MS

Z'<#.ooo' .c~. CCO·:- :5~. ot? ~ •• / '- ~

:",-, t $ D· E - '~'G:~~ :s..fI~·.~-;:-- · __

1 ... :- .. ~

~l ,.~------

r, 11 .. ", 5p. G 9.~/·55.500'

S~_c;;nON A-A SPANS A : a~C

, " .~. ~Z: !F~' _'.'

rlfII.eH'-_ : _ _ __ .. __ __ .

._- -+--:--- --

Sf.l~_~'~~ ,':'''!.t:E~:gJ?' :;;IA~QA"""S ...

-F.5~ .c.ii!J:i"

.. ___ . _ _ __ . ,r.JDD'

"NOTE: O,'m ..... :$;<>'" Erc.- lop 01' 6.~b 'D bDH.,,... ct: b.c.." d." .. ".,~ ,r:t;! .. d. "''''-clr.".s .. ;"e £I.,.foo"" .... ,'c .~.~,.:"9 I':d.

'::''':-c' _ - ::I. _ __ .~ .'!..l2f _' __ ":f=-ti. e.. .II>--~~- ~: --=-" i~·t:;' :- :-~.

..f..0Z ::' J!D,r:.

:: ::~ ~:....=:Co • . ~~

~w! .. : C.:fl7 .

"'~.;fe . c. d · .. ""'pe • ,:;,. ' ~-Z ~ .. Q.,-'

~4. ... j cc- =-'_,,'$) . ~:.:c:' ".:::: ;;;::~:'I,;;; . ~~ ;;; 'I. - -r-c .. -s-s~ ~. .. ...... ,..sl- ... ~ { &.~,. ; .... !1 5: ~ . .L

;;~.~ ::~, ;~r" '..' ;::-:.~::~ ;';:~L:,;~~·· :; .. ~:::~;;~~:~~ ~·1. ~;~:;')F :' ... : . ~ gt;'~:~~ ~;~ -:.!;:

..

; . . f' - . : . .1 : ~ c·~.,.,~.,. ,, ': .'0·""" .----;'\",rso - "' ... _j ' I 1 . 6_", 'c/= ~E6·'.b f.. ~ .1 '(' - i ~, I ·';,,~,,'d • .,E t ...... .,,. ~-- z.o,· c. --•• ·· f~ • u. ... ~ . , • - - ","_..e; a ... . · • I ~ . ' , .... . £ . 1 . : ",-,""D'" p , • . -. ''!6' ::' ... -f?,- s~· ·p .

r- . ,/ ~ " .., ~ 1.;.' / . . --:L li!:J~': 1!'!.j.Uf_--11

.~

_~~~ '..l- 7~"'" :5~ ~ (J.7IJf1'. ~,.5CO' --- ---- .-,5L·OW.',yS ~.""'D O.'~~QA~S s/Jcw..!"'.5~"!fL~r;,'012. ._DIA r I1A ~.

sE,ngN . :r¢ SPANS D,~,; ~

• ~ ~ ..

_ _ z.~9."-:_

·E;<AS J.I:6/o/;..iAY OEC~I2:·~~/'>IT

. ~-5~OO C2=S~<=S~ ~t;N~<€""£ ~.":,, :....,':..,.. . ~25:, /~8~:52. 5(T5&.tN;-r ....

_'t;I-IA/SON C.!2EEI<:.!3:2pe: ~.r", :rtJ " / -:.00 TO ST" ~:1C~:C.cc 171:

':'h_; II y .,e., ~~ •• ~.

__ . _ ____ _ . ___ f: ?~}/~~~~~~!~-;;~:~~~~~;5 ~~:~ . -- -- .- . -- -- - -. -

- ..

Page 24: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

APPENDIX B CONCRETE BATCH DESIGNS

19

Page 25: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

CONCRETE BATCH DESIGN SHRINKAGE COMPENSATING CEMENT

Aggregate Characteristics

-Fine Aggregate (FA) Coarse Aggregate (CA)

Design Factors

Sp. Gr.

2.63 2.64

SSD Unit Wt. 3 Lbs./Ft.

102.80 96.70

Cement Factor (CF) 6.0 Sacks per C.Y. of Concrete Coarse Aggregate Factor (CAF) 0.73 Water Factor (WF) 5.50 Gal./Sack Air Factor (AF) 4.00%

Batch Design (One Sack)

Concrete Yield = 4.500 Volume CA = 1. 925 Volume Mortor = 2.575 Volume Water = 0.733 Volume One Sk. Cement = 0.485 Volume Entrained Air = 0.180 Volume Paste = 1. 398 Volume FA = 1.177 Yield = 4.500 Fine Agg. Factor = 0.73

20

1 Sk. Wts.

317.63

45.83 94.00

193.41

% Solids

62.50 58.60

1 C.Y. Batch

1905.76

275.00 564.00

1160.48

"

f

..

t

,

Page 26: Evaluation of Shrinkage Compensating Cement in Bridge Slablibrary.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/thdresearch/ep_626-1.pdf · the slab of one of the bridges. Its performance

CONCRETE BATCH DESIGN TYPE I I CEMENT

Aggregate Characteristics

Fine Aggregate (FA) Coarse Aggregate (CA)

Design Factors

Sp. Gr.

2.66 2.62

SSD unit wt. 3 Lbs./Ft.

103.00 94.70

Cement Factor (CF) 6.0 Sacks per. C.Y. of Concrete Coarse Aggregate Factor (CAF) 0.77 Water Factor (WF) 4.90 Gal/Sack Air Factor (AF) 4.0~/o

Batch Design (One Sack)

Concrete Yield = 4.500 Volume CA 2.003 Volume Mortar = 2.497 Volume Water = 0.653 Volume One Sk. Cement = 0.485 Volume Entrained Air = 0.180 Volume Paste = 1. 318 Volume FA = 1.179 Yield = 4.500 Fine Agg. Factor 0.76

21

1 Sk. Wts.

327.95

40.83 94.00

195.99

% Solids

62.00 57.80

1 C.Y. Batch

1967.72

245.00 564.00

1175.95