evaluation of nrhm
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Evaluation Study of NationalRural Health Mission(NRHM) In 7 States
Programme Evaluation Organisation Planning Commission Government of India New Delhi-110001 February 2011
-Presented By Dr. Swati SharmaBDS (Pt.B.D Sharma Uni., Rohtak)
PGDPHM(student)(NIHFW)
![Page 2: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
NRHM
(NATIONAL RURAL HEALTH MISSION)
INTRODUCTION
12th April 2005. The National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) was launched by the Hon’ble Prime Minister
DECENTRALISATION
COMMUNICATIONORGANISATIONAL
BEHAVOIUR
INTER-SECTORIALCONVERGENCE
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
![Page 3: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Launched on 12th April 2005 by the Prime Minister
Identified 18 States with weak PH Indicators/Health Care Infrastructure
The initial Outlay for NRHM for 2005-06 was over Rs.67000 Million and outlay for 2012-13 is Rs.208220 Million
![Page 4: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Mainstreaming of AYUSH
![Page 5: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Why NRHM ?
STATE OF PUBLIC HEALTH IN INDIA BEFORE NRHMHealth gap at rural level
Multiple health crisis ( malnutrition, maternal and infant deaths, inadequate water supply etc..
Systemic Deficiencies in health Sector
![Page 6: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
OBJECTIVES
Reduction in child and maternal mortality
Universal access to PH services for food and nutrition, sanitation and hygiene with focus on women and children health
Prevention and control of communicable and non communicable diseases including locally and endemic diseases
Population stabilization, attaining gender and demographic balance
Revitalize local health traditions and mainstream AYUSH
Promotion of healthy life styles
![Page 7: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
EVALUATION(Concurrent evaluation)
Evaluation Design:(Intervention – Post only)
![Page 8: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
PROCESS IN ACTION PLAN
Supervision &Monitoring
(Output &Efficiency)
Situation Analysis
Objective Setting
Implementation
- Inputs
- Activities- Outputs
-Outcomes
Goals- Impact
EFFECTIVENESS
EVALUATION
![Page 9: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
131.66
44.33
20.95
31.28
23.22
7.62
34.92
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
UP MP Jharkhand Orissa Assam J & K Tamil Nadu
Rural population(2001) in million .
![Page 10: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
neo-natal mortality
component of IMR for India in 2008
was 37
![Page 12: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
the total fertility rate (TFR) is around 2.7
![Page 14: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Health Infrastructure
![Page 15: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Approaches:
Routine:Reporting and feedback system with help of structured scheduled reports
SRS AHS
DLHS
TOOLS
![Page 22: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Community interviews(internal/external)
Tracking program implementation:
Supervisory field visitsusing checklists
Community monitoring with special tools
Fixed monthly meetings with subordinate staff
![Page 23: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Implementation plan
1. Hiring or recruitment 2. Hiring of office space 3. Fund for activity and Monitoring &
evaluation support4. Basic survey of all the Government
facilities, private facilities, private practitioners,
1. Categorization of population on high risk, low risk and migration
2. Identify the causes.3. Ensure availability of interventions.4. Ensure the availability of service
provider.
Inputs
Process
![Page 24: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
1.Capacity building of all stakeholders.2.Capacity building of health workers.3.Local NGOs and private practitioner can be involved.4.Capacity building of private practitioner.5.Ensure outgoing patient to be registered.6.IEC activities in community.
Activity
1. Training of stake holders.2. Training of ASHA planed and held3. No. of health centers have increased.4. No. of health providers have increased.5. Pt. registration & diagnosis, treatment.
Output
![Page 25: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Outcome
EXPECTED
Reduce IMR to 30/1000 by 2012
Reduce MMR to 100/100000 by 2012
TFR to 2.1 by 2012.
OUTCOME
39/1000,
167/100000 by 2013
2.3,by 2013
![Page 26: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Malaria mortality reduce by 50% by 2010,Additional by 2012.
Kala Azar 100% by 2010, sustain elimination until 2012.
Filaria/microfileria reduction – 70% by 2012, 80% by 2012 & elimination by 2015.
Dengue mort. Reduction by 50% by 2010, & sustain until 2012
Cataract operation increasing by 46 lkhs by 2012.
Leprosy prevalence rate below 1/10000 Below 1
45% by 2012
45% by 2012
0.29% by 2012
9 death reported in 2014
6304177 operated, 2012
![Page 27: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
TB DOTS maintain 85% cure rate., sustain case detection.
Upgrading health establishment acc. To IPHS.
Increase utilization of FRU bed occupancy from 20% to over 75%
67.3
Not upto IPHS standars
2514
![Page 28: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
*Prevalence and incidence not improved upto the expectations.
*Awareness in the district will increase in the district
Impact
![Page 29: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Where it is lacking. !!
Not adequate number of ASHA .
Failing family planning services.
No Job security and high attrition rate.
Low motivation level among staff.
![Page 30: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
OVERALL RECOMMENDATIONS TO UPGRADE PUBLIC HEALTH FACILITIE
filling of vacant positions
provisioning of cold chains would facilitate improvements in outreach of the health services in rural areas.
emergency care for sick children, and treatment of emergency cases for the chronic diseases at FRUs.
Provisioning of ambulances at FRUs and referral transport at PHCs and SCs would be more cost effective.
ASHA’s mentoring and retraining for updating skills
Utilization of untied funds
![Page 31: Evaluation of NRHM](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021923/5a66d59d7f8b9a21208b4ad1/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)