evaluating the rwjf-af4q super-utilizer project
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluating the RWJF AF4Q Health
Care Super-Utilizers Program
RWJF Super-Utilizer Summit
Chicago, IL
July 30, 2013
Joel Cantor
Rutgers Center for State Health Policy
This project is supported by a grant from
the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Center for State Health PolicyInstitute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research
Evaluation Objectives
1. Document the experiences of program sites in adapting
super-utilizer strategies– Describe your model, accomplishments, challenges, lessons learned
– Semi-structured interviews (some by phone), review program documents
2. Assess how patient needs are addressed through new care
management strategies– Illustrate how your program model works
– Two case conferences with your team about a hypothetical patient
3. Document changes in hospital resource use by enrolled
patients– Examine how hospital resource use change
– Benchmark resource use using non-intervention patient comparison data
Center for State Health PolicyInstitute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research
Hospital Resource Use Benchmarking
• How has hospital resource use changed for enrolled patients
relative to comparable non-intervention patients?
• Adjust for the expected “natural” decline in hospital resource
use, a.k.a., “regression to the mean”
• Compare total hospital resource use, readmissions, ED visits
following discharge and other outcomes
Center for State Health PolicyInstitute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research
Hospital Resource Use Benchmarking (continued)
• De-identified hospital records for enrolled patients
– Hospital billing records, before, during and after enrollment in
care management (e.g., demographics, admitting diagnoses, resources
used such as ICU days, length-of-stay, payer category, charges, month/year of
visit, patient origin zip code, hospital information)
– Data use agreement between your institution and Rutgers CSHP
• Benchmark data from publicly available uniform hospital
billing data
• Statistically match enrolled to comparison patients with similar
utilization history, diagnoses and
comorbidities, payer, demographic and other factors
• Analyze actual versus benchmark trends
Center for State Health PolicyInstitute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research
Thank you
Q&A