evaluating practical work using de bono’s ‘thinking hats’ · 16 ssr june 2010, 91(337)...
TRANSCRIPT
16 SSRJune2010,91(337)
Science notes
What are the hats?
TherearesixThinkingHats(deBono,1999),eachofwhichdefinesatypeofthinking.Theywereoriginallydevelopedforuseinindustrytoimprovethequalityofthinkinginbusinessmeetings.Youcanputonortakeoffoneofthesemetaphorical‘hats’toindicatethetypeofthinkingthatyouareusingand,accordingtodeBono,thisputtingonandtakingoffisessentialasitallowsyoutoswitchfromonetypeofthinkingtoanother.Theintention,inthecontextdescribedhere,istoencouragepupilstodevelopcreativity,tothinkaboutaproblemfromarangeofanglesandtoimprovetheircritical-evaluationskillsthroughextendingthewaysinwhichtheyevaluatethepracticalworktheyhaveundertaken.
EachThinkingHatrepresentsadifferentwayofthinking(deBono,1995):
l WhiteHatcallsforinformationandfacts;l YellowHatfocusesonthepositiveelements;l BlackHatasksfornegativeaspectsandcriticalthinking;l RedHatrepresentsfeelingsandemotions;l GreenHatcallsforimprovements;l BlueHatgivesanoverview.
Using the hats
Agroupof12-to13-year-olds(year8)madepinholecamerasinalessonbuttheyhadnotbeenverysuccessful.Thepupilsfounditdifficulttoseewhatmightbeexpected,andinfactonecaughtfireasthepupilhadheldittooclosetoatea-light.Whenitcametoevaluatingthepracticalwork,deBono’sThinkingHatswereused.Inordertomaketheactivitymorekinaesthetic,ratherthanusingmetaphoricalhatsreallaminatedhatsweremadeforthepupilstohold(Figure1).Theclasswasdividedintosixgroupsoffivepupilswitheachgrouphavingahatofadifferentcolour.TominimiseTOOT(talkingoutofturn)andgeneralchatter,therulewasthatduringgroupdiscussionsonlythepersonholdingthehatcouldspeak.Itwasthenpassedtoanothermemberofthegroupsothattheycouldcontribute.Thewholeideawastofindsomethingpositivethathadcomefromthepracticalwork.
Eachgroupfocusedontheelementofevaluationthatmatchedthecolouroftheirhat.Thepupilsenjoyedthesessionandlovedthelaminatedhats,oftenholdingthemabovetheirheadsasiftheywerewearingthem.Theymadesomegoodattemptsatthinkinginthedifferentwaysbutitwasclearthatmorestructuredsupportwasneededinordertogetthemtofocusonthespecificaspectlinkedtothehatcolour.
Developing the idea
Itwasfeltthatthisapproachtoteachingandlearninghadwiderpotentialandsoitwasusedwithayear11(ages15–16)appliedsciencegroup,whohadcompletedtheirexamsbeforeChristmasandhadcourseworkuntilJuly.Appliedsciencecoursestendtobeofferedtoyear11pupilswhoarelessacademicallyinclinedandwhomighthavemoreofaninterestinvocationalsciencecourses.Thegrouphadundertakenaqualitativeanalysiswheretheprotocolinvolvedtestingknownsubstancesinordertoidentifyunknownsubstances,usingaprecipitatetest,aflametest,achloridetestandsulfatetest.Whentheinvestigationshadbeencompletedpupilswereaskedindividuallytoevaluatethem.Theclassdiscussedwhattheythoughtneededtobeincludedinanevaluationanda‘mindmap’wasdrawnuponthewhiteboard.Thisconsistedmainlyof
Evaluating practical work using de Bono’s ‘Thinking Hats’
Abby Garner and Roger Lock
Figure 1 Laminatedhatsgiventothestudentgroups(photos,RogerLock)
SSR June2010,91(337) 17
Science notes
statementsthatcouldbesummedupas‘Whatwentwrong?’and‘Howcanweimprove?’LinkswerethenmadebetweentheirstatementsandthoseassociatedwithdeBono’sThinkingHats.Forexample,whatwentwrongwaslinkedwiththeblackhatandimprovementswiththegreenhat.Inthisway,pupilscouldseethattherewasawiderrangeofwaysinwhichtheycouldthinkabouttheevaluationofpracticalwork.
Supporting resources
Eachgroupwasgivenalaminatedcardthatprovidedmoreguidanceonthespecificelementsoftheevaluationassociatedwiththedifferent-colouredhats(Figures2and3).Theywerealsogivenanindividualworksheetonwhichtorecordtheirownandothergroups’ideas.
Thefinaltouchwastoreplacethelaminated2Dhatswithsomerealhatsforthepupilstowearduringtheevaluationsessions(Figure4).ThesewereboughtfromsitesontheInternet(seeWebsites)forpricesrangingfrom£1.50to£7.00,costingabout£20intotal,butcheaperresourcescouldbeobtainedfromyourlocalcharityshop,jumbleorcarbootsale.Pupilsworethehatstofeedbacktotheclassandsomeevenprovidedanaccenttomatchthehat,suchasapiratevoice,animitationofatelevisionchefortheposh,receivedpronunciationassociatedwithajudge.
Evaluation quality
ToseehoweffectivetheThinkingHatsapproachwas,acomparisonwasmadeoftheevaluationsprovidedby15pupilspriortousingthehatsandthosetheymadewhenusingthehats.
Forthefirstevaluation,sevenofthe15pupilsdidnotwriteanevaluation,sixlefttheirpagesblankandonewrote‘I don’t know what goes in an evaluation’.Oftheremainingpupils,onewroteonlyaboutwhattheydid(information),whileanotherincludedonlywhatwentwellforthem(strengths).Fourpupilswroteabouttheirweaknessesandhowtoimprove,whiletheremainingtwopupilsincludedstrengthsandweaknesses.Afterusingthehatstrategy,11pupilsincludedaspectsofallsixassessmentcriteriaintheirevaluations,whilethreepupilsusedfivecriteria,missingouttheoverview.Onepupildidnotmentionfeelings.
ComparingthetwodatasetssuggeststhatuseofdeBono’sThinkingHatsasascaffolding
Figure 2 Supportforthegroupwiththechef’shat
Figure 3 Supportforthepirate’shatgroup
Figure 4 Thesixpartyhats
18 SSRJune2010,91(337)
techniqueimprovesthequalityoftheevaluationsandincreasestheproportionofpupilswhoincludeallthecriteria.Italsoprovidesaclosermatchtotheexpectationsembeddedin‘Howscienceworks’.
Pupils’ and teachers’ views
Asaplenarytothesession,pupilswereaskediftheyhadusedthehatsbefore.Nonehadandtheyallagreedthatusingthemhelpedinevaluatingpracticalwork.Whenaskedforthereasonsfortheirresponses,ninepupilsstatedthatusingthehatshelpedtobreakdownanevaluationintomanageablechunks,whilethreepupilssaidthatusingthehatshelpedtogivethemideasaboutwhattoincludeinanevaluation.Onepupilrepliedthatusingthehatshelpedhimtowritemoreinhisevaluation,whiletwopupilsthoughtthatusingthehatshelpedthemtowriteabetter evaluation.WhenaskediftheywouldliketousedeBono’sThinkingHatsagain,14replied‘yes’,andone‘maybe’.
Fromateacher’sperspectivethehatsareeasytouseandclearlydevelopthedepthandbreadthofpupils’evaluations,aswellasgeneratinglivelylessonsinwhichthepupilsareengagedwithscienceprocesses.
Conclusions
UsingdeBono’sThinkingHatsasamodelforwritinganevaluationofsciencepracticalworkappearstobesuccessfulintermsofthequalityandnumberofaspectsmentionedinevaluations.Fromapupil’spointofview,itisfun,enjoyableandmuchbetterthanchalk-and-talk.ThisdevelopmentoftheuseofdeBono’sideaswascarriedoutbyAbbyGarner,thefirstauthor,inthetwoschoolplacementsduringherinitialteachertrainingyearwhileengagedonaPostgraduateCertificateofEducationcourseattheUniversity
ofBirmingham.RogerLockisthetutoroftheScience:Biologycoursewherethedevelopmentofanovelapproachtoteachingandlearning,andassociatedschool-basedresearchlinkedtotheeffectivenessoftheapproach,isasmallpartofthecourseassessment.
Inordertodisseminategoodideassuchasthismorewidely,thestudentteachersarerequiredtodemonstratetheirideastoalltheircolleaguesandthementorsworkingwiththematatwilightsessionintheuniversity.Mentorsquestionthestudentsfollowingtheirpresentationsandmakeanassessmentbasedonthequalityoftheidea,thepresentationandthestudent’sresponsetoquestions.Thiscancreatepressureforthestudentsbutisgenerallyenjoyedbyall.Onthisoccasionsomestudents,includingallthosewhocontributedtothesciencenotesinthisissue,chosetokeepthehatsonfortheremainderofthesession(Figure5),possiblyinthehopethattheyhadthefirstelementinplaceforanovelapproachtotheirownevaluations.
Figure 5 PGCEstudentswiththehats;AbbyGarneriswearingthechef’shat,LouiseHammondtheberetandAndyRaistrickthebluehat
References
deBono,E.(1995)Exploringpatternsofthought...seriouscreativity.The Journal for Quality and Participation,18(5),12–18.
deBono,E.(1999)Six Thinking Hats.London:Penguin.
Website
www.partydelights.co.uk/hats
Abby Garner isascienceteacheratEllowesHallSportsCollege,Dudley.ThisteachingaidwasusedwhileAbbywasastudentonthePGCEScience:BiologycourseattheUniversityofBirmingham.Roger LockisaseniorlecturerinscienceeducationandtheScience:BiologytutorattheSchoolofEducation,UniversityofBirmingham.Thereisaccesstosimilarideasviawww.rogerlock.com
Science notes