evaluating automated sentiment analysis of library survey respondent feedback - peter corrigan

26
Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of LibQUAL+ Peter Corrigan

Upload: conul-conference

Post on 11-Aug-2015

300 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of LibQUAL+

Peter Corrigan

Page 2: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<Sentiment Analysis - Goals>

• Maximize the value from LibQUAL+ Comments e.g. track the efficacy of initiatives to address issues at granularity

• Develop a simple to execute, repeatable process, with visualizations of results

• Get this project done quickly.

Page 3: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<Caveats>

• Not a clinical trial of Sentiment Analysis

• There’s no substitute for someone reading the comments

• Purists may question Methodology

• Proceed with caution

Page 4: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<Sentiment Analysis = Opinion Mining>

Page 5: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<The API>

• AlchemyAPI

• Hybrid: Linguistics/(Grammar) + Statistics/(idiom, slang, misspelling)

• Large-scale deep-learning technology trained on massive data from a variety of domains.

Page 6: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<LibQUAL+ * 5>

• Year No. of Comments

• 2010 1383

• 2012 705

• 2013 927

• 2014 1133

• 2015 791

Page 7: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<LibQUAL+ Comment>

textbox11: 714 of 1323id: 6015515SubmitDate: 4/13/2015 8:52:39 AMUserGroup: Postgraduate: Doctoral Research degreeDiscipline: Arts, Humanities and Celtic Studies Age: 31 - 45Sex: FemaleIsComplete: TruetextResponse: I've always found library staff really pleasant and helpful. Remote access to library resources is excellent, though I could benefit from some guidance on how to search more effectively.

Page 8: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<Document Level Results>

I've always found library staff really pleasant and helpful. Remote access to library resources is excellent, though I could benefit from some guidance on how to search more effectively.<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><results> <status>OK</status><totalTransactions>1</totalTransactions> <language>english</language> <docSentiment> <score>0.901543</score> <type>positive</type> </docSentiment></results>

Page 9: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<Keyword Level Results>

I've always found library staff really pleasant and helpful. Remote access to library resources is excellent, though I could benefit from some guidance on how to search more effectively.

Page 10: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<Keyword>

I've always found library staff really pleasant and helpful. Remote access to library resources is excellent, though I could benefit from some guidance on how to search more effectively.

Page 11: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<Comment Table>

Page 12: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<Comment Table>

Page 13: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<Keyword Table>

Page 14: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

Best comments ever!

The most important thing that makes the library a brilliant place to study is the kind and courteous staff who go out of their way to help you.0.989229

Page 15: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

Best comments ever!

Overall I find the library services to be excellent and I would like to say that the staff are superb, very friendly and always willing to above and beyond their duties to help students. 0.988592

Page 16: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

Best comments ever!

The Hardiman library is an invaluable resource for my research - an excellent range of services, modern, user-friendly facilities and very friendly and helpful staff.0.995445

Page 17: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

Correlated strongly with Adequacy Gap

r = 0.9827The p-value is 0.002724. The result is significant at p < 0.05

Page 18: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

WiFi

Page 19: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

Noise

Page 20: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

Staff

Page 21: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

Plugs and Sockets

Page 22: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

<Keyword Term Frequency>

Page 23: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

Hapex terms - significant

Page 24: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

Page 25: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

Project Costs

• €0.00

• API free for academic use < 30,000 calls per day

Page 26: Evaluating Automated Sentiment Analysis of Library Survey Respondent feedback - Peter Corrigan

Source Code:

• https://github.com/pcorrigan