european policy and the practice of worker representation on health and safety laurent vogel etuc
DESCRIPTION
Historical background A double input from the ’70s –New workers ’ strategies for health and safety –Workers’ control on strategic aspects of management: the debate on the introduction of new technologies At EU level: a post-68/73 agenda –The « Vredeling directive » proposal –A new negative context from 79/first 80sTRANSCRIPT
European Policy and the Practice of Worker Representation on Health and
Safety
Laurent VogelETUC
Safety Reps in the European Union
Laurent VogelHESA department
ETUI-REHS
Historical background
• A double input from the ’70s– New workers ’ strategies for health and safety– Workers’ control on strategic aspects of
management: the debate on the introduction of new technologies
• At EU level: a post-68/73 agenda– The « Vredeling directive » proposal– A new negative context from 79/first 80s
The Framework Directive as a compromise (1)
• OSH a central priority for social policy in the EU (from the Single Act in 1986)– Less divergences– Already a consolidated tradition– The illusion of a non conflictive area
dominated by technical approach– Linked with the market unification (machine
directive, chemicals)
The Framework Directive as a compromise (2)
• « Balanced participation »– Something more than information and
consultation– No clear definition– National practice …
• Coexistence of two conceptions– Management just informs…– Workers and their organisation as an central
agent
An era of topdown reforms• In most of the countries
– Systematic management is strongly consolidated: risk assessment, prevention plans, preventive services, etc…
– Industrial relations system is neglected (go on with the existing system in a context changing dramatically !)
• Some exceptions where no specific OSH representation existed– Italy and Spain (Greece and Portugal to a minor
extent)
In Eastern Europe
• From a Trade Union Control with a context of Party-State dominated TU…
• …to a liberal pro-management approach• with some space for safety reps
• The debate on TU inspection• The debate on general representation from the
workers• The difficulty to define an autonomous TU strategy
for OSH
Present situation
• Coverage ???– No systematic monitoring– Excluding factors:
• Size• Trade union density• Contingent workers
Structures for safety representation
• Elected/nominated by TU• Joint structures/delegates• A OSH specific structure/a general
representation structure• Specific common structures from SME’s
and worksites: still an exception
An effective intervention ?
• Many factors are preconditions– Rights and competences– Links between safety representation and the
general OSH management: participatory risk assessment
– Trade union strategy