european network on new sensing technologies …...esf provides the cost office through a european...
TRANSCRIPT
ESF provides the COST Office
through a European Commission contractCOST is supported
by the EU Framework Programme
European Network on New Sensing Technologies for Air Pollution
Control and Environmental Sustainability - EuNetAir
COST Action TD1105
1ST TRAINING SCHOOL
Universitat de Barcelona, Spain, 13 - 15 June 2013
organized by UB, MIND-IN2UB - Dept. of Electronics and CSIC-IDAEA
Action Start date: 01/07/2012 - Action End date: 30/06/2016
Year 1: 2012 - 2013 (Ongoing Action)
Thu-Hoa TRAN-THI
WG2 Member / [email protected]
CEA-Saclay, Francis Perrin Lab, URA CEA-CNRS 2453
91191 Gif-sur-Yvette/FRANCE
SENSORS which properties?
• Sensitivity ppb level : Pre-concentration
• Selectivity micro-chromatography
doping, T°
molecular recognition
• Rapidity
• Low-cost
2
Chemical sensors based on nanoporous materials
3
Porous Materials Sol-gel
Chemical Reactivity Confined Media
Metrology Gas Mixtures
Sensor Prototypes
Sensors for Environment
& Health
Chemical Sensors
4
Naporous Sponge • Filter • Concentrate
Sol-Gel Simple Cheap
Selectivity
Probe-molecule/Target-analyte
Optical detection: rapidity
Visual detection
Ms Analyte
Mr. Probe
Mr Interfere
5
Sol
S i
O R
O R O R OR
2
3
1
Gel
monolith
EtOH/H2O
1 2
Probe-Mol
4 5
Thin Film
Sol-Gel Process
Hydrolysis & polycondensation
(RO)3-Si-OR + H2O (RO)3-Si-OH + ROH
(RO)3-Si-OH + OH-Si- (RO)3 (RO)3-Si-O-Si-(OR)3 + H2OH2O
6
Doped monolith
Easy-to-do synthesis
6
thermostated bath
Magnetic stirring
3 – water (pH)
1 –organic solvent
2 – Si Alkoxyde + Probe mol.
4 – Molding 5 – drying 6 - Storage
Commercialized alkoxydes
7
Si
OMe
MeO
OMe
CF3
SiEtO
OEt
OEtC
6F
13Si
OMe
MeO
OMe
C8F
19
and others…..
Nanostructured materials (film)
8
Mobil Oil: CMC41
-Br ,+(H3C)3NCH2
H2C
CH2
H3C7
-Br ,+(H3C)3NCH2
H2C
CH2
H3C7
after washing, MET
Surfactants & organic polymers as templates: wash or calcination
Thin film deposition
9
mask
Doping methods
10
Doping
« One Pot » one pot
grafting
Diffusion in
liquid phase
Diffusion in
gas phase
phase
Post-grafting
11
Characterisations Monoliths & films
Porosity
Films thickness
Organisation-nanostructuration
Hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity of materials
Porosimetry micro (<20Å), meso (20-500Å), macro (>500Å)
12
0
100
200
300
400
500
0,00E+00 5,00E-01 1,00E+00Vo
lum
e e
n c
c/g
P/P°
N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms @ -77°K
Série1Série2
0,00E+00
5,00E+00
1,00E+01
1,50E+01
2,00E+01
2,50E+01
3,00E+01
3,50E+01
Pore diameter distribution
Ad
s.
su
rface a
rea
Pore diameter (Å)
Pore volume (cm3.g-1) Specific adsorption surface area (m2.g-1) Pore diameter distribution
Density Functional Theory
Thin film porosity
In-situ Ellipsometry-Porosimetry
13
Polarisability change Film thickness Refraction index Vmolec adsorptive Adsorptive polarisability
Isotherms of adsorption and desorption of toluene V = f(P/P0) → Vp, Rp
Hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity Near-IR Spectroscopy & ATG
TMOS-MeTMOS precursors mixture (film: 580 µm)
14
wavelength / nm
1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500
Abso
rban
ce
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
dehydrated
hydrated
Fre
e S
i-O
H (
ham
on
ic 2n)
Free Si-OH
(stretching +bending)
Films thickness: Profilometry & Absorbance
15
Durée de polymérisation (min)
160 180 200 220 240 260
Absorb
ance à
298 n
m
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Epaisseur du film (nm)
0 50 100 150 200 250
Ab
so
rba
nce
à 2
98 n
m
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Thin film
Substrate
Longueur d'onde (nm)
240 260 280 300 320 340
Abs
orba
nce
à 29
8 nm
0
1
2
3
tem
ps
Sol (TMOS) + Fluoral-P
Ab
sorb
ance
@ 3
00 n
m
Wavelength (nm)
Ab
sorb
ance
@ 3
00 n
m
Condensation duration (min)
Film thickness (nm)
Ab
sorb
ance
@ 3
00 n
m
Hydrophobic Films : Contact Angle
16
Sol-Gel Films :
References:
Quartz: SiO2 Teflon: CF3
20-30° 95-110°
TMOS MeTMOS 8:2 FluoProTMOS 8:2
80° 20-30° 35-40°
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
17
Mass loss measurement with T°
0 1500 3000 Time (sec)
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
Mas
s lo
ss
(mg
) H2O
Silicate+ Fluoral-P
Fluoral-P
METROLOGY
18
Generation of calibrated gas mixtures
Solid compounds (paraformaldehyde,
naphthalene….)
Liquid compounds
Compounds formed in situ (chloramines)
Generation of calibrated gas mixtures
N 2
F M
F M
F M
F M
FM Liq
90°C 4 bars
N2
To flow cell
H2O injection
Permeation oven
Dilution stages
Paraformaldehyde permeation tube
[CH2O] = 400 ppt to 2 ppm, Flux: 50 – 2000 mL.min-1
Sensors for Environment
20
Indoor Air Quality
(Formaldehyde, BTXs, nitrogen trichloride)
Are we safe indoors?
21
BTX,NO2,CO NCl3, CHCl3,
CH2O,B
B, CH2O
CO,Acrolein,CH2O
NO2, cooking
CH2O
CH2O,B,T,
hexanal
Trichloro-
ethylene,
naphthalene
…. Incense burning,
mosquito repellent,
detergent, deodorizer
Insulating foam cigarette
22 22
benzene toluene xylenes mesitylene naphthalene
formaldehyde acetaldehyde hexanal acrolein
alkanes alcohols acids estersesters
CnHn+2
Most common indoor air pollutants
styrene
Outdoor and indoor VOC French national campaign in 2005 (600 dwelling-houses)
0
5
10
15
20
25
Intérieur Extérieur
2-butoxy-éthylacétate
1-méthoxy-2propylacétate
styrène
trichloroéthylène
Acroléine
tétrachloroéthylène
2-butoxyéthanol
1 méthoxy2propanol
Benzène
Éthylbenzène
o-xylène
1,2,4-triméthylbenzène
1,4-dichlorobenzène
n-décane
m/p xylène
n-undécane
Acétaldéhyde
toluène
Hexaldéhyde
Formadéhyde
Co
nce
ntr
ation
µg
/m3
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
hexaldehyde
acrolein
benzene
toluene
m/p xylene
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene
23
80 - 85 % of time indoor
Indoor Outdoor
24
2006 : List of 50 indoor air pollutants (INDEX list & ANSES)
2007-2009 : Guide Values for Indoor Air (ANSES)
Formaldehyde, Benzene, NO, Naphtalene
Nov. 2009 : Values for Risk Management (HCSP)
Formaldehyde : 10 µg/m3, 30 µg/m3, 50 µg/m3
Jan. 2012 : Labelling of materials (Law)
Juil. 2012 : IAQ monitoring in public buildings (Law)
24
Decisions resulting from the campaigns
ANSES = Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement
et du travail
HCSP = Haut Conseil de la Santé Publique
Classification of compounds to be monitored European working group INDEX & ANSES
25
Indoor Air quality
Detection of the ubiquiteous formaldehyde
26
Sensors for Environment
Formaldehyde detection
27
Concentration
Measu
rem
en
t ti
me
10 µg/m3 100 µg/m3
Sec
Min
H
ou
r D
ay
50 µg/m3
Draëger
PPM Technology
Draëger, Gastec…
RKI Instruments
Radiello
3M
Delayed analyses in laboratory
Aerolaser GmbH
Greywolf
Indoor air quality in homes
ETHERA
Chemical Sensor
Principle of detection of CH2O
28
NH2O
+
O
N
H
O
2 HCHO-H
2O
- NH3
Fluoral P 3,5-diacetyl-1,4-dihydrolutidine (DDL) 2D Graph 1
Wavelength (nm)
200 300 400 500
Abso
rban
ce
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Wavelength (nm)200 300 400 500 600
Abso
rban
ce
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Flu
oresc
enc
e int
ens
ity
(cps
)
0.0
5.0e+6
1.0e+7
1.5e+7
H. Paolacci et al, Sensors & Transducers,
82, 1423-1431, 2007
Sol-Gel thin film doped with Fluoral-P TMOS/CH3OH+Fluoral-P 0,5M/H2O: 1/4/4
29
Durée de polymérisation (min)
160 180 200 220 240 260
Absorb
ance à
298 n
m
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Epaisseur du film (nm)
0 50 100 150 200 250
Ab
so
rba
nce
à 2
98 n
m
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Thin film
Substrate
Longueur d'onde (nm)
240 260 280 300 320 340
Abs
orba
nce
à 29
8 nm
0
1
2
3
tem
ps
Sol (TMOS) + Fluoral-P
Ab
sorb
ance
@ 3
00 n
m
Wavelength (nm)
Ab
sorb
ance
@ 3
00 n
m
Condensation duration (min)
Film thickness (nm)
Ab
sorb
ance
@ 3
00 n
m
Thin film of sol-gel doped with Fluoral-P
30
Sol formulation: TMOS/MeOH+FP 0,5M/H2O: 1/4/4 Dip-coating: 50 mm.min-1, film thickness : 200 nm
He
igh
t (0
-15
mm
)
Length (0-8 mm) Length (0-8 mm)
He
igh
t (0
-15
mm
)
31
Detection of DDL abs & fluo
Flow-cell holder Micro-pump
Ocean Optics
Spectrophotometer
UV-visible Lamp
LED 420 nm
Detection units
32
Gas in
Gas out
Light from lamp
Light to spectrometer
Light from LED
Gas in
Gas out
Dual detection of CH2O via abs and fluo
33
Films doped with Fluoral-P and exposed to a gas mixture
containing 10 ppb CH2O
Longueur d'onde (nm)
200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Ab
sorb
an
ce
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.00 min
1
11
21
31
41
55
65
75
95
105
DDL
Incident
light Fluorescence
En
erg
y
Ground state
Excited state
Wavelength (nm) Longueur d'onde (nm)
450 500 550 600
Inte
nsité d
e F
luo
(cp
s)
0
500
1000
1500109 min907560 453015810
Wavelength (nm)
Fluo
resce
nce
inte
nsity (cp
s)
110
100
80
70
60
46
36
26
16
6
Kinetics of formation of DDL
34
FP + CH2O I
FP + I DDL
k1
k2
[DDL]t= 𝐹𝑃 0 (1 − 𝑒−𝑘1[𝐶𝐻2𝑂]𝑡)
Durée d'exposition (min)
0 100 200 300 400
Inte
nsité
de
flu
o
0
500
1000
1500
2000
I(Fluo) = f(t)
I = a (1 - e-bt
)
Exposure duration (min)
Flu
ore
sce
nce
are
a
Slope = k1 * [FP]0 * [CH2O]
Intermittent exposure to CH2O 1 film ~ 20 measurements
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 50 100 150 200 250
Measurement Concentration
(ppb) C
on
cen
trati
on
of
CH
2O
(p
pb
)
Time (min)
PA
US
E
L. Chiappini et al. Air. Qual. Atmos. Health, (2011), 4, 211-220
T.-H. Tran-Thi et al., Chem. Soc. Rev., (2011), 40, 621-639
Increasing the exposure duration with monolith doped with Fluoral-P
36
Ocean Optics
S. Mariano et al, Procedia Engineering, 5 (2010) 1184-1187
PROFIL’AIR of ETHERA
37
DD
L f
orm
ati
on
ra
te (
min
-1)
CH2O concentration (ppb)
Sampling time: 15 min at 200 mL.min-1
1 ppb -1 ppm, RH = 50 % 5 ppb: 20 min 1 ppb: 90 min
T.-H. Tran-Thi et al., l’actualité chimique, Valorisation de la recherche, N°366, Sept. 2012.
Detection of CH2O: comparison
38
AEROLASER GmbH : 42 k€, 20kg (45*15*56cm) Reactant solution at 4°C: 5 days max Fluorimetry: 0.1 ppb to 3 ppm 90 s (10%-90%) every 5 min
Hantzsch reaction
NTT technology, GrayWolfSensing FM801 (1.515 £) Vycor glass doped with acetylacetone 5 cartridges: 530 £ Absorbance @ 420 nm, 20 ppb-1 ppm, 30 min
LFP technology, ETHERA Profil’Air (1.260 €) Sol-Gel material doped with Fluoral-P 5 cartridges: 225 € Absorbance @ 420 nm, 5 ppb-2 ppm, 20 min
Sensors for Environment
39
Indoor Air Quality
Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
BTX: Benzene, Toluene, Xylenes (o-, m-, -p)
JAPAN USA(EPA) EU(WHO) max. Cont.
indoor air (WHO)
Benzene 3 µg/m-3
1 ppb
1.3-4.5 µg/m-3
1.7 µg/m-3
10 µg/m-3
Toluene 260 µg/m-3
70 ppb
400 µg/m-3
260 µg/m-3
200 µg/m-3
Xylenes 870 µg/m-3
200 ppb
400 µg/m-3
_ 100 µg/m-3
Styrene 2200 µg/m-3
50 ppb
1000 µg/m-3
260 µg/m-3
20 µg/m-3
Ethylbenzene 2800µg/m-3
880 ppb
1000 µg/m-3
_ 100 µg/m-3
40
Regulations for monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
41
Tsutomu Horiuchi et al., NTT Technical Review, Vol. 4 No. 1, 30-37, Jan. 2006
BTX detection: what are the needs?
Europe
Mesoporous powder for BTX trapping
42 Tsutomu Horiuchi et al., NTT Technical Review, Vol. 4 No. 1, 30-37, Jan. 2006
TEOS/Pluronic/HCl/H2O Triblock copolymer Pluronic F127; Mw = 12,600) as template agents Dongyuan Zhao et al.,
JACS,120,6024, (1998)
Pre-concentration unit T = 50 min Flow rate: 4 – 6 mL.min-1
Optical detection unit
43
Tsutomu Horiuchi et al., NTT Technical Review, Vol. 4 No. 1, 30-37, Jan. 2006
33 cm
17
cm
Absorption & spectral deconvolution
44
Measurement in a garage Tprecon = 50 min Desorption via heating TM = 10 s
Differential absorption spectrum (…….)
After deconvolution:
B = 23 ppb and T = 250 ppb
Limit of detection: 10 ppb of B
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0.01
Ab
so
rban
ce
220 240 250 260 270 280 290 300
Wavelength (nm)
Sensors for Environment
45
Air quality in swimming pools
Detection of nitrogen trichloride (NCl3)
46
Water
Cl2 (g) + H2O ClO- + 2H+ + Cl-
Air
NH2Cl NHCl2 NCl3
CHCl3
+ N
What air do we breathe in swimming pools?
Toxicity of NCl3
47
– Classified as « irritant »
– Troubles reported for kids and pool attendants
–Acute exposure: eyes irritation & breathing trouble
– Long time exposure : asthma
– French regulation for exposed workers (INRS, 2001)
– 0,3 to 0,5 mg/m3 in air = 60 to 100 ppb
– Typical levels measured in swimming-pools
– 10 to hundreds of ppb (number of swimmers & ventilation system)
Generation of NCl3 Reproducing swimming pool atmosphere
Chloramines: NH2Cl, NHCl2 & NCl3
48
(NH4)2SO4 + 2 HClO →2 NH2Cl + H2SO4 + 2 H2O
NH2Cl + HClO → NHCl2 + H2O
NHCl2 + HClO → NCl3 + H2O
T.-H. Nguyen et al, Sensors & Actuators, submitted
NCl3 detection methods
49
Acidic silica
NH2Cl,
NHCl2
HClO
Quartz Filters containing
diarsenic trioxide & sodium
carbonate
Air flow
NCl3
2 hours of pumping + HPLC or 45 min of pumping + liquid phase colorimetry (TRIKLORAM)
Needs : Easy-to-use method
Direct & fast measurements
Principle of NCl3 detection
50
6 I- + NCl3 + 3 H+ → 3 I2 + NH3 + 3 Cl- (1)
I2 + I- → I3- (2)
I3- + Amylose → complex Amylose/I3
- (3)
-0,001
0,009
0,019
0,029
0,039
270 470 670
Ab
sorb
ance
Wave length / nm
TMOS/H2O/Amylose/I- Sads = 700±100 m2.g-1
Dpore = 30 Å
T.-H. Nguyen et al, Sensors & Actuators, submitted
Kinetics of formation of I3-/amylose
51
y = 0,0008x R² = 0,9951
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0 20 40 60
Ab
sorb
ance
at
54
0 n
m
Time / min
200 mL.min-1
NCl3 : 50 ppb
Slope proportional to NCl3 concentration
Calibration curve for NCl3 detection
52
Flux = 200 ml.L-1, %RH 60%
* : Batch of January 24, 2011
Δ : Batch of March 25, 2011 : Batch of Sept. 19, 2011
T.-H. Nguyen et al, Sensors & Actuators, submitted
Technology transfer to ETHERA
53
Commercialized by CIFEC since December 2012
Sensors for Health
54
CO2 detection
Specific VOC markers detection
CO2: Environment & Health CO2 = end product in organisms in cellular respiration (breaking down sugars, fats and amino acids with O2)
Plants → Photosynthesis
Animals → blood to lung &
in exhaled breath
Fungi
Some Bacteria
55
CO2 in fresh air: 0. 036 to 0.039% 360 to 390 ppm
Detection of CO2 : principle
56
1.5%
3.0%
6%
12%
25%
50%
Abs(Sudan III) Fluo(Ru complex)
Abs(Sudan III(H+))
C. von Bültzingslöwen et al. / Analytica Chimica
Acta 480 (2003) 275–283
Food Packaging
Hybrid Ormosil-cellulose film for the detection of CO2
57
CO2 + H2O HCO3- + H+
Detection: Fluorescence lifetime of Ru complex via phase fluorimetry
Si alkoxyde Cellulose Ru(II)complex Sudan III Ammonium
C. von Bültzingslöwen et al.
Analytica Chimica Acta 480 (2003) 275–283
CO2 detection via fluorescence phase modulation
58
𝝉𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝝉𝟎−𝟏 − 𝝉𝒎𝒂𝒙
𝝉−𝟏 𝝉𝒎𝒂𝒙
𝝉−𝟏 = R = kpCO2 =
cot 𝜃0−cot 𝜃
cot 𝜃−cot 𝜃𝑚𝑎𝑥
tan 𝜽 = 𝝎𝝉
angular modulation frequency
Ph
ase
an
gle
/deg
ree
R
CO2 (%)
Response time: 30s Limit of detection: 0.06% RH: 90%
VOC markers detection
59
Fluorescence Absorbance
probe product
Escherichia coli
Microbiology analysis for the detection of pathogens
Breath analysis for non-invasive diagnosis
VOC emitted by bacteria
60
M. Lechner et al., Current Microbiology, 2005, 51, 267.
Escherichia
Coli
Klebsiella
pneumoniae
Citrobacter Helicobacter
pylori Staphylococcus
areus Pseudomonas
aeruginosa
Co
ncen
trati
on
(p
pb
V)
209 masses: 21-229 amu VOC= alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, organic acids indole….
GC-MS
Discriminating indole(+) and indole(-) bacteria
61
NH
NH2
H
O
NH
Tryptophanase
TryptophaneIndole
Indole emitted by pathogens (Salmonella, E. coli, …)
Objective Detect indole in the gas phase above a bacteria culture
Detection of Indole with DMACA
(p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde)
62 Wavelength (nm)
abso
rban
ce
lmax = 624 nm
e(624nm) = 97000 M-1.cm-1
N
H
CH
NCH3H3C
N
H
HC
N+CH3
CH3
+
H+
CH
O
+
Cl-
Indole
DMACAAzafulvenium chloride
S. Crunaire et al., Procedia Chemistry, (2012), 6, 125-131
Nanoporous sensor doped with DMACA
63
Sol-gel synthesis with TMOS and APTS
TMOS (0.97)/APTS (0.03)/MeOH (5) /HCl (0.06)/H20 (4) /DMACA (0.004)
SBET = 610 m2.g-1
Smicropore = 130 m2.g-1 Vpore = 0.525 cm3.g-1
Pore diameter: 30 Å
Transparent pastille D = 3 mm, thickness = 1,5 mm
S. Crunaire et al., Procedia Chemistry, (2012), 6, 125-131
Detection of indole in the gas phase
above a bacteria culture
64
2
1
3
1 Petri dish
2 agar nutrient medium + Tryptophan
3 desiccant powder
nanoporous sensor doped with DMACA
Tests with E. Coli, H. Alvei and non-inoculated culture (37 °C, 24H)
S. Crunaire et al., Procedia Chemistry, (2012), 6, 125-131
Discrimination of Indole (+) Bacteria
65
E. Coli non-inoculated H. alvei
Color change visible with naked eye after 7 hours of incubation Bacteria: 105 cfu (colony forming unit)
24 H
S. Crunaire et al., Procedia Chemistry, (2012), 6, 125-131
Discriminating bacteria
66
colorimetric nose
alcohols aldehydes alkanes alkenes organic acids amines
CO2
H2S, CH3SH, (CH3)2SH CS2, OCS NH3
67
Petri dish with tryptic soy broth inocculated with 7 107 to 4 108 cfu
36 colorimetric sensors
Colorimetric nose
Colors change with time collected
J. R. Carey et al., JACS, 133, 7571-7576, (2011)
with a scanner
68
Bacteria discrimination
E.coli 25922 Specific kinetics pattern with color stabilisation
after 8H
7 107 to 4 108 cfu
J. R. Carey et al., JACS, 133, 7571-7576, (2011)
2nd strategy: exogen VOC detection
69
Substrate VOC free
VOC
Enzyme
Advantages: Specific enzyme of the targeted pathogen bacteria choice of VOC not emitted by bacteria detection of the gas phase
A. P. Snyder et al., J. Microbiol. Methods 1991, 14, 21-32 (Ion mobility spectroscopy).
Proof of concept: E. Coli detection
70
Enzyme β-D-glucuronidase
p-nitrophenol
Nanoporous sensor (12*5*2 mm)
Plastic cuvette for spectroscopy
Eppendorf tip filled with E. Coli culture (1.5mL, 1.5 105 cfu)
Absorbance measurement as function of time
L.-H. Guillemot et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, submitted
Detection of released p-nitrophenol
71
Enzyme β-D-glucuronidase
p-nitrophenol
L.-H. Guillemot et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, submitted
72
CONCLUSIONS
• Sol-Gel nanoporous materials well-suited for:
– Selective and sensitive sensors (nanoreactors with specific probes)
– Analyte preconcentration (sponge, high Sad)
– Analyte filter (tailored pores)
• Many domains of application
– Environment : chemical sensors for air quality
specific filters for depollution
– Health : Microbiology, food industry (discrimination of bacteria)
Non-invasive diagnosis of diseases
• Other potential uses
– Filtering membranes for other sensors (pore size monitoring)
– Up-stream specific filters trapping of undesired pollutants)