eucap 2011 n buchanan full version template
DESCRIPTION
eucapTRANSCRIPT
-
A Circular Polarized Self Tracking L Band Array
with High Bandwidth and Scan Beamwidth for
Inmarsat BGAN Applications. N.B. Buchanan
*, V.F. Fusco
*, M. Van Der Vorst
+
*The Institute of Electronics, Communications and Information Technology (ECIT), Queen's University Belfast, Northern
Ireland Science Park, Queens Road, Queens Island, Belfast, BT3 9DT, Tel +44 2890 971721, Fax +44 28 9097 1702,
[email protected] +European Space Agency, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The Netherlands
Abstract This paper presents a 4x5 element antenna array for
Inmarsat BGAN applications. This array addresses an important
phenomenon which appears to have been little reported in the
literature. This is the degradation of circular polarization
characteristics when a CP array is steered electronically. The
design of this array presents significant challenges, as not only
deos it have to maintain a high quality of CP when scanning up
to 40, but also has to do this over an 8.5% frequency coverage
of 1.525 to 1.66 GHz. The resulting array was able to fulfill these
requirements, with element sequential rotation being employed
to further enhance the CP characteristics.
I. INTRODUCTION
Despite there having been numerous studies on antenna
arrays for electronic beam steering regarding linear
polarization, e.g. [1], what seems to have been much less
studied, is the performance of circular polarized (CP) arrays
with regard to electronic beam steering, especially for self-
tracking array applications. Obtaining a high quality of CP,
over a wide range of electronic beam steering angles, is
challenging, as axial ratio can rapidly degrade as beam
steering angles move away from boresight [2,3]. If the array is
also required to operate over a reasonably large bandwidth the
polarization problem is further compounded, as a significant
number of well known planar CP element designs only offer
high quality CP over a reasonably small bandwidth [4, 5].
In this paper we are showing results from a 4x5 element
planar electronically steered circularly polarised array,
intended for an advanced self-steering application for
applications such as the L band (1525 to 1660MHz) Inmarsat
BGAN system. When combined with novel retrodirective
circuits, developed at QUB, it will offer a simple and energy
efficient self steering alternative to fixed beam planar antenna
arrays used for portable ground terminals. Using the new
retrodirective technology ground terminals can be setup in
seconds.
II. DESIGN METHOD
The antenna array was designed to the specification shown
in Table 1. Existing planar arrays operating in this frequency
range were of fixed beam type, so as long as the individual
elements offered good CP characteristics at boresight, they
fulfilled the requirements. The challenges occurred with the
requirement to obtain high quality CP at angles of up to 40
away from boresight. In addition the L band Inmarsat BGAN
system operates over a frequency range of 1525 to 1660MHz,
equating to an 8.5% bandwidth, whereas most planar patch
type antennas only offer a few percent coverage.
TABLE I
BGAN ANTENNA ARRAY SPECIFICATION
Frequency coverage: 1525 1660 MHz
Polarization: RHCP
Beam steering Capability: 40 Azimuth/Elevation
Gain: > 17.5 dBi
Polarization isolation: < -10dB
Antenna geometry planar
A. CP Element Contending Options
A number of different planar antenna elements were
studied to attempt to find one suitable for use in the L band
retrodirective array. The crucial factors for the selection of the
antenna element were: (1) It required a reasonably flat
amplitude beamwidth over a 40 azimuth/elevation range,
(2) High quality CP was required over the 40
azimuth/elevation range and (3) Points 1 and 2 needed to be
fulfilled over the 8.5% (1525 to 1660MHz) frequency
coverage. To begin the antenna selection only those with the
potential for the 8.5% frequency coverage could be considered.
If a patch element is considered, its bandwidth can be
enhanced by placing an air layer between the patch element
and groundplane [6]. Regarding the feed structure, probe
feeding [7] or aperture feeding [6] can be employed to
enhance bandwidth. In this paper we will mention the most
significant findings of the positive and negative characteristics
of the different antenna options.
First we looked at the possibility of a simple patch design
which required a single feed structure to produce CP. A patch
element with perturbation segments [4,5], which is often used
for GPS applications, only offered acceptable axial ratios at
the centre of the frequency coverage, degrading fairly rapidly
outside this. This type of antenna has also been shown as an L
band array in [8] but was only of fixed beam configuration.
This polarisation bandwidth problem can be alleviated by
-
using a dual 90 fed patch element. Three methods were
studied to facilitate the feed structure (1) Direct pin fed,
(2) Probe Fed, (3) Aperture coupled. The aperture coupled
option (Fig 1(a)), appeared, at first, to be the most attractive
one, since a CP array for similar L band applications had
already been shown in [6] where the return loss bandwidth of
the elements was well within what was required. The
interesting discovery was made of this structure when applied
to simulations using Agilent Momentum and CST Microwave
Studio. What was found was an asymmetry in the axial ratio
Vs scan angle (Fig 1(b)) where at -40 coverage the axial ratio
has increased beyond 3 dB, which would be considered
unacceptable for the application. This characteristic may have
seemed previously unimportant if the antenna was only being
considered for a fixed beam application at boresight.
Axial Ratio
m1THETA=dB(ARcp)=4.744
-40.000m5THETA=dB(ARcp)=1.315
40.000
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-200 200
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0
50
THETA
Mag.
[dB
]
m1
m5
m1THETA=dB(ARcp)=4.744
-40.000m5THETA=dB(ARcp)=1.315
40.000
Asymmetry (>3dB)
(a) Aperture Coupled CP
Patch
(b) Asymmetry of Axial Ratio
Fig. 1 Aperture coupled patch showing Asymmetry on Axial ratio Vs
Azimuth Angle
B. Selected Element for Circular Polarised Array
The Antenna element chosen for the array was a probe fed
circular patch element (Fig. 2(a)). This was simulated using
Agilent Momentum which showed that an axial ratio of
-
degraded. This shows that, when combining elements to form
a circularly polarised array, despite the fact that acceptable
performance is achieved from a single element, does not
always guarantee a high level of performance when combined
as an array. One contributing factor to this is the mutual
coupling between elements and the next section will show
methods to reduce this.
Fig. 4 4x5 array of probe fed CP patches
E_left E_right
-80
-60
-40
-20
0 20
40
60
80
-10
0
10
0
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
-60
0
THETA
Ma
g. [d
B]
Ma
g. [d
B]
Axial Ratiom1THETA=dB(ARcp)=4.769
0.000
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80-100 100
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0
50
THETA
Ma
g. [d
B]
m1
m1THETA=dB(ARcp)=4.769
0.000
(a) CP radiation patterns at 1.6 GHz (b) Axial Ratio at 1.6 GHz Vs Azimuth Angle
Fig. 5 Radiation characteristics of 4x5 element array including mutual
coupling, all elements at the same rotation orientation
D. Circular Polarised Array With Sequential Element rotation
To improve the overall performance of the probe fed CP
patch array, a well known technique to mitigate the effects of
mutual coupling is to sequentially rotate the elements of the
array. Some studies were carried out on this in [9] which
showed that the highest level of CP performance for a CP
patch array could be achieved using the sequential rotation
scheme shown in Fig. 6. This was applied to the 4x5 array of
probe fed patches, and the feed phases adjusted accordingly to
account for the phase difference induced by the element
rotations. An EM simulation of the entire array, carried out
using Agilent Momentum, produced the radiation patterns of
Fig. 7 (a)&(b). These show a polarisation isolation of 28dB at
boresight, and an axial ratio of 0.661 dB. Boresight gain was
predicted to be 17.99dB. The results show that the sequential
rotation has offered a significant improvement on the 4x5
array, considering that the same array with no sequential
rotation had already degraded, in terms of axial ratio, to 5 dB,
and offered only 12dB polarisation isolation.
90 0 0 180
270 180 90 270
180 270 270 90
0 90 180 0
90 0 0 180
180 270
0 90
90 0 0 180
270 180 90 270
180 270 270 90
0 90 180 0
90 0 0 180
180180 270270
00 9090
Fig. 6 4x5 Element array sequential element rotation
Circular Polarization
E_left E_right
m3THETA=dB(Erhp)=-0.007
0.000
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80-100 100
-55
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
-60
0
THETA
Ma
g. [d
B]
m3
m3THETA=dB(Erhp)=-0.007
0.000
Axial Ratio
m1THETA=dB(ARcp)=0.661
0.000
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80-100 100
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0
50
THETA
Ma
g. [d
B]
m1
m1THETA=dB(ARcp)=0.661
0.000
(a) CP radiation patterns at 1.6 GHz (b) Axial Ratio at 1.6 GHz Vs Azimuth Angle
Fig. 7 Radiation characteristics of 4x5 element array with element sequential
rotation
E. Beam Steering Simulated Performance
After verifying that the 4x5 array gave a high level of
performance at boresight, the main purpose of this study was
to ensure that adequate circular polarization characteristics
could be maintained over the entire 40 beam scanning
coverage. The results of Fig. 8 show that a polarization
isolation of -15dB is maintained when scanning out to
azimuth angles of 40 at the 1.6 GHz centre frequency. This
easily fulfils the
-
To verify that the array also produced acceptable CP
performance over the 1525-1660 MHz frequency coverage,
the plots of axial ratio for azimuth and elevation beam steering
angles were produced (Fig. 9 (a&b)). These include the 1.6
GHz centre frequency and also include the results for the
upper and lower frequencies (1525 and 1660 MHz). The
results show that axial ratio increases as the scan angle is
moved away from boresight, although the array is still able to
maintain an axial ratio of approximately < 3dB over all the
required scan angles and frequency coverage.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
Azimuth Beam Steering Angle (degrees)
Ax
ial R
ati
o (
dB
)
1.525 GHz 1.6 GHz 1.66 GHz
(a) Azimuth
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
Elevation Beam Steering Angle (degrees)
Ax
ial R
ati
o (
dB
)
1.525 GHz 1.6 GHz 1.66 GHz
(b) Elevation
Fig. 9 Axial Ratio Vs Beam steering Angle over the BGAN frequency range
1.525GHz to 1.66GHz
F. Measured CP Array Results
To provide confidence that the simulated results were
accurate, verification was provided by measuring a 1x2 array
(Fig. 10) inside an anechoic chamber. The array employed a
90 element rotation to enhance the CP characteristics. The
same antenna array size was then applied to the ADS
momentum simulation for comparison. The measured CP
radiation patterns of Fig. 11(a) show that the 20dB of
polarization isolation at boresight is in close agreement with
the simulation (-22dB), the overall trend of the results
providing excellent agreement. The same level of agreement
is also evident for the axial ratio measured and simulated
results of Fig. 11 (b).
Fig. 10 Fabricated CP Array
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
-90 -45 0 45 90
Angle (deg)
Re
lati
ve
Po
we
r(d
B)
Measured LHCP Measured RHCP
Simulated LHCP Simulated RHCP
(a) CP Radiation Patterns
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-90 -45 0 45 90
Angle (deg)
Re
lati
ve
Po
we
r(d
B)
Measured Axial Ratio Simulated Axial Ratio
(b) Axial Ratio Vs Azimuth
Fig. 11 Measured Results of 1x2 CP Array
III. CONCLUSIONS
A 4x5 element antenna array has been presented for
Inmarsat BGAN applications. This array has addressed an
important phenomenon which appears to have been little
reported in the literature. This is the degradation of circular
polarization characteristics when a CP array is steered
electronically. The design of this array presented significant
challenges, as not only did it have to maintain a high quality
-
of CP when scanning up to 40, but also had to do this over
an 8.5% frequency coverage of 1.525 to 1.66 GHz. The
resulting array was able to fulfill these requirements, with
element sequential rotation being employed to further enhance
the CP characteristics.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This project is supported by the European Space Agency
project AO/1-6168/09/NL/JD, Self-Focussing Retro-
Reflective Tx/Rx Antennas for Mobile Terminal
Applications.
REFERENCES
[1] Albani, M.; Cadili, T.; Di Maggio, F.; Gardelli, R.; Incorvaia, A.; Mollura, C.; Pomona, I.; Russo, M.; Sbarra, E.; Sorrentino, R.; Gatti,
R.V, A 2-D electronic beam steering phased array for point-multipoint
communication applications, European Microwave Conference, 2007,
Page(s): 1629 - 1632
[2] M. Amin, S. Ahmed, V. Fusco, H. Cantu, T. Ratnarajah; The Effect of Spatial Axial Ratio Variation on QPSK Modulation Encoded Using
Orthogonal Circularly Polarized Signals, 2007 European Conference
on Wireless Technologies, 8-10 Oct. 2007 Page(s):62 65
[3] S. O'Kane, V. Fusco, Circularly Polarized Curl Antenna Lens With Tilt Properties, Accepted for future publication in IEEE Transactions
on Antennas and Propagation
[4] Richards, W.; Lo, Y. Design and theory of circularly polarized microstrip antennas International Symposium on Antennas and
Propagation Society, Volume: 17 1979, Page(s): 117 120
[5] K.L. Chung and A.S. Mohan, A systematic design method to obtain broadband characteristics for singly-fed electromagnetically coupled
patch antennas for circular polarization, IEEE Transactions on
Antennas and Propagation 51 (2003), pp. 32393248
[6] N. C. Karmakar, M. E. Bialkowski. Circularly Polarized Aperture-Coupled Circular Microstrip Patch Antennas for L-Band Applications
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 47, No. 5, May
1999
[7] D.M. Pozar, D. Haufman, Increasing the Bandwidth of a Microstrip Antenna by Proximity Coupling Electronics Letters, Vol 23 No 8,
April 1987, pp 368-369
[8] Shi-Qiang Fu, Shao-Jun Fang, Zhong-Bao Wang, and Xiao-Ming Li A wideband circular polarization antenna for portable inmarsat
BGAN terminal applications MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL
TECHNOLOGY LETTERS Vol. 51, No. 10, October 2009.
[9] Thiel, M.; Dreher, A.; , "Sequential rotation in a smart antenna terminal for broadband communication," Antennas and Propagation Society
International Symposium, 2004. IEEE , vol.1, no., pp. 145- 148 Vol.1,
20-25 June 2004