etcs implementation on hsl zuid: challenges and technical solutions · · 2008-03-27etcs...
TRANSCRIPT
1March 17 – 19, 2008
Fast track to Sustainable Mobility
ETCS Implementation on HSL Zuid:Challenges and Technical Solutions
Jörn Schlichting, Infraspeed, Siemens AG
2March 17 – 19, 2008
• Ca. 100 km high-speed line, ETCS level 2 and fallback level 1
• Siemens:2 Simis W interlockings, Siwes point controllers, balises, MSTT/LEU
• Thales:2 RBC, cables, axle counters, point machines,“Stopmerkborden”
• Works:Engineering, installation, commissioning, documentation, maintenance training, approval, test
Signalling Overview
Amsterdam
Belgium, France
HSL-Zuid
RotterdamBreda ca
. 100
km
Key Technical Data- Two double-track sections- Train speed (max. 300 km/h)- Min. signalled headway: 180 sContract terms- Signature 05/2001- Financial close 10/2001- Certificate of Availability South 04/2006 (07/2006)- Certificate of Availability North 06/2006 (10/2006)
3March 17 – 19, 2008
Contractual StructureDutch Government
Ministry of Transport and EnvironmentINFRASPEED Holding
Industrial shareholdersSiemens Fluor Daniel NBM / BAM
Institutional shareholdersCharterhouse Innisfree
EPC turnkey contract Maintenance contractfor 25 years
INFRASPEED HOLDING
Concession contractThe "IA"
EPC Consortium
Trackwork/Civil worksNBM
SystemsSiemens
Systemdesign TS TK
TractionpowerTS EL
E/MsystemTS TK
Project managementFluor Daniel
COM
TS RA RC
NS RIBMobirailSie./KPN GSM-R &
Tunnel radio
OthersTHALES
Maintenance BV
SIG
TS RA MLI
Concession companyINFRASPEED BV
4March 17 – 19, 2008
Contractual Conditions and Challenges
The HSL Zuid Contract (PPP) covers the infrastructure. The State is the Contracting & Developing Party, ProRail has been involved at a later time.
In parallel there is a contract between the State and the High Speed Alliance (HSA), today NS-Highspeed, for the rolling stock.
The TSI definition of trackside assembly defines a larger scope than what has been contracted to Infraspeed.
Additional need to clarify the Real Configuration Tests (RCT) and theSafety Qualification Tests (SQT) etc.
The HSL Zuid contract is mainly a functional contract. Technical specifications and details have been clarified after the contracthad been signed.
Originally the contract only required ETCS Level 2. Due to the very strict performance regime Infraspeed decided to additionally implement ETCS Level 1 as fallback level.
5March 17 – 19, 2008
Baseline, Rules and Regulations
ETCS and high-speed lines require dedicated operating rules. At the beginning of the project, operational procedures and rule books for ETCS and operation above 160 km/h were not available.
Operational scenarios had to be created.
Originally Unisig TSI 2.0.0 was ordered. During the project, it had to be changed to 2.2.2 and finally after CoA to “2.3.0” (2.2.2 plus selected CRs, Subset 108).
“2.3.0” OBU definition received as a baseline to determine the impact on the infrastructure.
Compliance with the rolling stock according to the definitions set up by thecorridor countries.
6March 17 – 19, 2008
Planning Challenges
The HSL Zuid is the first border crossing ETCS project (first application of the TSI for border crossing, also for the Notified Bodies).
Need to efficiently synchronise processes and all involved parties.
The stations (Schipol airport, Rotterdam, Breda) are not included in the project. The connections were located at in total five heavily traffic-loaded areas (RAS). Possessions had to be required and managed.
The main challenge has been timing rather than the technical changes.
“2.3.0” update had to be squeezed into the customer’s time frame with the target of producing no or little impact on the overall program executed by the State/HSA.
Dependencies between rolling stock and infrastructure activities (access to site, compliance, test programme) had to be considered.
7March 17 – 19, 2008
Border Crossing Challenges
Unisig TSI 2.0.0 as well as 2.2.2 did not define the RBC-RBC hand-over at a technical border between two countries in enough detail. However, the ETCS L2-L2 border crossing at 300 km/h was a contractual requirement in both contracts.
Several proposals had been made (e. g. wait until 2.3.0, Gateway, L1-L1 300 km/h connection as an interim solution). The States decided for the Gateway.
During the past period of having no real RBC-RBC link across the border,the seamless L2-L1 solution was an auxiliary measure, which can beregarded as a best-practice example for preventing trains being stoppeduntil the real RBC-RBC connection can be provided. Consequently, ETCSL1 is a useful measure to keep the performance and availability level high incase of a non-available ETCS L2.
8March 17 – 19, 2008
Approval, Conformity, EC Declaration
Whenever decisions are made in favour of a new technology, it is recommended also to consider the changes for operating staff. This applies to rules as well as to the approval process, especially in the case of the ERTMS process of reaching the position to release the EC Declaration of Conformity.
The European process of achieving conformity and authorisation is not always and everywhere commonly seen and partly depends on interpretation.
Contractual needs, standard definitions and reality may conflict with each other.Example: EC declarations are not defined for interim versions but might beneeded for operational purposes.
Way out: pragmatic and commonly target-oriented approach of all partiesinvolved (customer, supplier, notified body, safety assessor, etc.).
11March 17 – 19, 2008
Line Overview
Key Technical Data- Two double-track sections- Train speed (max. 300 km/h)- Min. signalled headway: 180 s- Max. capacity: 20 train sets per h/d
(800 passengers each)16,000 passengers per hour/direction
- Grades max. 2.5%- Curves (300 kph) min. 4,000 m radiusKey Requirements- Performance (RAMS)- Validation & verification and safety case
according to Cenelec (EN 50126 to EN 50129) - Interoperability according to the TSIContract terms- Signature 05/2001- Financial close 10/2001- Certificate of Availability South 04/2006 (07/2006)- Certificate of Availability North 06/2006 (10/2006)
Bleiswijk Viaduct
Hollandsch Diep Bridge
Groene Hart Tunnel
Rotterdam Noordrand Tunnel
Oude Maas Tunnel
Dordtsche Kil Tunnel
RARANDSTAD
SECTION
43 km
BRBRABANTSECTION
45 km
Ringvaart Aqueduct
Bergschenhoek Cutting
Galder Cutting
Mook Hoek Cutting
AmsterdamSchiphol Airport
Rotterdam
Brussels
ParisLondon
Breda
Dutch/Belgian border
12March 17 – 19, 2008
Structural Breakdown, Hardware Overview
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Project LevelLevel 0
Infraspeed
EPC consortium Maintenance(IMC)
E&MSiemens
Track & civilsBAM- NBM
Traction powerSiemens
Communication systemSiemens
Ancillary equipmentSiemens/TBN
Signal modules ( MSTT/ LEU)
Interlocking and interface
Route protectionThales
Route protectionSiemens
Point machines
Axle counters
Outdoor cables
Train protectionSiemens
Train protectionThales
Balises
TBE
RBC
SIG SystemSiemens/Alc.
Alcatel's part
Siemens' part
Block markers
Route protection Train protection Power supply
Vicos MMI
Key switches
Only for test purposes
Siwes
SIG subsystemSiemens
MMI RBC
13March 17 – 19, 2008
Signalling System Project
Man-machine interface
RBC
Central interlocking
Lineside interlocking container
Uninterruptible power supply
Cross-over
Branch
Maintenance yard(sidings)
Passenger station
Key: Maintenance point
Rotterdam
S
SchipholAmsterdam Breda
RAS
Hoofdorp
(SIMIS C)
Netherlands Belgium
Approx. 47 km
Approx. 10 km
Approx. 46 km
Approx. 22 km
NMBSIL
OCC
RAS
Rotterdam
(SIMIS C)
RAS
Breda
(SIMIS C)
Belgium
Quantities100 Stopmerkborden with overrun light 72 Stopmerkborden without overrun light
134 transparent balises135 fixed balises140 axle counter devices28 points with up to 9 point machines
14March 17 – 19, 2008
Signalling System Computer Configuration
IL busACC
Rotterdam Central
IL busACC
MMI S+D
IL busACC
MMI S+DMMI S+DMMI S+D
GSM R
IL busACC
Electronic housing
IL busACC
IL busACC
IL busACC
IL busACC
IL busACC
IL busACC
IL busACC
VPT +
KEV CE
PIA
Electronic housing Electronic housing Electronic housing Electronic housing Electronic housing Electronic housing Electronic housing Electronic housing
GSM R RBC RBCIIC / OMCIIC / OMC
15March 17 – 19, 2008
System Configuration SIG Subsystem
Operation &Display
Route Protection
CentralManagement
12
TCP/ IPundUDP
PIA 1 PIA 2
Operation(OCC)
LANSTW
TCP/IP
Network-Analyser
MMIVICOS OC111
MMIRBC
S & DAxlecounter
Recorder(BMR)
LANSTW
RAS-HSL
VPT+KEV CEKEV CE
Train Protection
ETCS LEVEL 1
EBP
RBC
BlockInterface
NMBSArea
FixedBalise
Switchable Balise
(Transparent)
TRAIN
ETCS LEVEL 2
Radio
RBC
Cabling
Grounding
EMC
IBS-PCTestsystemS & D
VICOS
Service & Diagnose
LAN
DiagnoseCentral
PowerSupply
Inter-locking
Container
BlockInterface
Signal LEU
Signalling SIMIS W and Tools
I/O Elements
Application HSL ZuidConfiguration-
data
AxlecounterStaff Protection
TTI (Simatic) MA MarkerPower Supply Status
Points
SIWESMSTT
Flood DoorsWater Barriers
Drainage Control
S & DRBC
LAN
LAN
Network-Analyser
Network-Analyser
LANVPT+
LANVPT+
IL- Bus
16March 17 – 19, 2008
European Process to Achieve Conformity and Authorisation
Man
ufac
ture
rO
pera
ting
com
pany
Not
ified
bo
dyN
atio
nal
auth
ority
Applicationfor
assessmentof
conformity
EC declaration ofverification
Assessment of
conformity
Certificate of conformity of
the constituent
OBU
RBC
Balise Onboard assemblyTrackside assembly
Systems integration
Implementation ofconstituents at the
assembly
Applicationfor EC
verification procedure
Declaration ofconformity
EC verification procedure Certificate of
conformity of the
subsystem
Applicationfor verification of the national
parts(non-ETCS)
Level of products launching Level of customer projects
Process of declarationof conformity of constituents
Process of EC verification of subsystems andnational authorisation to put them into service
Authorisation for putting
subsystems into service
Technicalrecord
Goal
Verification of the
National Parts
17March 17 – 19, 2008
Signalling System Input for Signalling DesignOperational Scenarios, Example of Entrance from Hoofdorp RAS Area
1133A-11133A-2
1131B
1132
1:34,7.1:15
8
1:34,7.
1106
HoofddorpHSL
HR472 HR447
1105A
1111-11111-2
18125 18216 18410 19122 19573 19692
Shl-Ldn: 19972HSL: 47164
46553 46147 35845199604717617855
270 91 194 712 451 119 268 623 1431406
Vmax: 160km/h
Vmax:300km/h
Vmax:130km/h
Route to LeidenVC463HS
L
HSL HR358
9815
Transition to L1
Transition to L2
GSM-RPositionReport
ATB Operation L1 Operation L2 Operation
L2 MA
L2 TransitionAnnouncement
GSM-RPositionReport
L1 MA
GSM-RL2 MA
44716
L1T AL2 L2T
HR472 HR447 HR258
RBC Announcement Balise group
ETCS Level 2 Transition Balise Group
L1 Movement Authority
ATB Supervision Drawing not at scale
km marks (in meters)
Distances in meters
ETCS Balise group
AL2 ETCS L2 Announcement Balise group
L1T ETCS L1 Transition Balise Group
Normal Travelling Direction VC: Voltage ChangeoverL2T
L2 Movement AuthorityKm Kilometer Mark Balise group
RBC AnnouncementBalise group
GSM-RRBC AnnouncementPosition Report
18March 17 – 19, 2008
Signalling System Input for Signalling Design
InterlockingRadio
block centre
Control of field elements
Element statusTrain positionand status
Movement authorityand trackdescription
ATC•
Radioblock centre
ATC•
Train positionand status
Movement authorityand trackdescription
Routerequest
Linestatus
Interlocking
Control of field elements
Element status
Routes locked
Route request
Traffic control centreVPT +
Traffic control centreNMBS
Block interface
Traffic control interface
HSL Zuid SIG scope Belgium
VPT + interface server
Operational Scenarios, Example of Interface to NMBS
Gateway