estimates of vapor pressure for the lj system below the triple point
DESCRIPTION
Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point. Barbara N. Hale Physics Department Missouri University of Science & Technology Rolla, MO 65401. Motivation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56813655550346895d9ddd64/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below
the triple point
Barbara N. HalePhysics Department
Missouri University of Science & TechnologyRolla, MO 65401
![Page 2: Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56813655550346895d9ddd64/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Motivation One of the challenges in predicting nucleation rates from potential models is obtaining a reliable equilibrium vapor density at low temperatures, where the experimental rate data exist. Equally troublesome for experimentalists is extrapolating measured vapor pressure data far below the freezing point.
In this work we present “small cluster Monte Carlo simulation based” estimates of the LJ system vapor pressure at reduced temperatures, T/k = 0.33, 0.42, 0.50 and 0.70. The results are presented in a “Dunikov” corresponding states analysis together with an extrapolated vapor pressure formula, vapor pressure data (at high temperatures) and results from other MC simulations.*
* B. Hale and Mark Thomason, Scaled Nucleation in a LJ System, submitted.
![Page 3: Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56813655550346895d9ddd64/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Model Lennard-Jones System
dilute LJ vapor system with volume, V
non-interacting mixture of ideal gases
each n-cluster size is ideal gas of Nn clusters
full LJ interaction potential
separable classical Hamiltonian
![Page 4: Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56813655550346895d9ddd64/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Cluster Free Energy Differences
n = number of atoms in cluster
- fn = ln Qn – ln(Qn-1Qn)
n - fn ln [ ρliquid /ρ1,vapor]
![Page 5: Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56813655550346895d9ddd64/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Canonical Configuration Integral
Qn = … exp[-i >j VLJ(|ri-rj|)/kT]dnri
Monte Carlo Bennett method
is used to calculate ratios:
Qn/ [Qn-1 Q1]
![Page 6: Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56813655550346895d9ddd64/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Schematic of Monte Carlo Simulations
Ensemble A:
(n -1) cluster with monomer probe interactions turned off
Ensemble B:
n cluster with normalprobe interactions
-fn = lnQn - ln(Qn-1Q1)
![Page 7: Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56813655550346895d9ddd64/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
LJ n-cluster Free Energy Differences
0
4
8
12
16
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
n-1/3
- f
nT* = 0.335 (40K)
T* = 0.415 (50K)
T* = 0.503 (60K)
T* = 0.700 (83.6K)
![Page 8: Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56813655550346895d9ddd64/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
LJ n-cluster Free Energy Differences
y = -15.715x + 12.93
R2 = 0.999
y = -6.4432x + 6.1
R2 = 0.9955
y = -22.062x + 17.6
R2 = 0.9974
y = -11.447x + 9.9
R2 = 0.9988
0
4
8
12
16
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
n-1/3
-f n
![Page 9: Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56813655550346895d9ddd64/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Dunikov Corresponding States Approach
D. O. Dunikov, S. P. Malyshenko and V. V. Zhakhovskii, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6623 (2001) demonstrated that LJ potential model systems (full potential and cutoff models) and experimental argon data display corresponding states properties. That is, for the LJ liquid number density
[ρliq ([T/Tc])/ρc]LJ [ρliq(T/Tc)/ρc]Argon
Using this approximation, an estimate of the full LJ potential vapor density can be obtained from the small cluster free energy difference intercepts, lnIo:
ln ρvapor,LJ ln ρliq,LJ – lnIo
![Page 10: Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56813655550346895d9ddd64/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
LJ System Vapor Pressure: T*c =1.313
0
4
8
12
16
20
0 1 2 3Tc / T - 1
-ln
( P
o /
Pc
)ln(Po/Pc) vapor pressureformula
experimental data
B. Chen et al.
Present work
![Page 11: Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56813655550346895d9ddd64/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
References
• Argon vapor pressure formula: A. Fladerer and R. Strey, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 164710 (2006); K. Iland, J. Wolk
and R. Strey, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 54506 (2007).
• Monte Carlo simulations for LJ vapor number density at T* = 0.7:
B. Chen, J. I. Siepmann, K. J. Oh, and M. L. Klein, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 10903 (2001)
• Argon experimental vapor pressure data: R. Gilgen, R. Kleinram and W. Wagner, J. Chem. Therm. 22, 399 (1994)
• Monte Carlo simulations of small LJ clusters: B. N. Hale and M. Thomason, “Scaled Nucleation in a Lennard-Jones System”,
submitted for publication.
![Page 12: Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56813655550346895d9ddd64/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Summary & Comments
• Estimates of vapor pressures for the full LJ potential system at reduced temperatures, T/k = 0.33, 0.42, 0.50 and 0.70, are obtained from small cluster free energy differences.
• Using a corresponding states approach, the results are compared with extrapolations of an argon vapor pressure formula, experimental data at high temperature, and MC simulation results at T/k = 0.7.