estimates of burned biomass based on burned areas from spot-vegetation in 2000

12
Estimates of burned biomass based on burned areas from SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000 Akinori Ito Joyce E. Penner University of Michigan

Upload: mariko

Post on 13-Jan-2016

47 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Estimates of burned biomass based on burned areas from SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000. Akinori Ito Joyce E. Penner University of Michigan. Summary of data set used in the estimation of burned biomass. Estimate of biomass burned. Amount of biomass burned ( M ) M = A x B x ce - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Estimates of burned biomass  based on burned areas from  SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

Estimates of burned biomass based on burned areas from SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

Akinori Ito Joyce E. Penner

University of Michigan

Page 2: Estimates of burned biomass  based on burned areas from  SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

Summary of data set used in the estimation of burned biomass

Data set Spatial Resolution MethodArea burned (Grégoire et al., 2002.) 1-km globe SPOT-VEGETATION

Fractional forest cover (Zhu and Waller, 2001) 1-km globe AVHRRFractional vegetation cover (Zeng et al., 2000) 1-km globe AVHRRVegetation map (Hansen et al., 2000) 1-km globe AVHRR

Carbon pool of forests (Myneni et al., 2001) 8-km NH(>30˚N) AVHRRAbove-ground biomass density of forests (Gaston et al., 1998) 5-km Africa GIS modelBiomass density (Barrette and Xu, 2002) 5-km Australia GIS modelLitter biomass density of forests(Matthews, 1997) 0.1˚ globe Measurement dataBiomass density of grassland Global average Measurement data(Shea et al., 1999, Hoffa et al., 1999, Gill et al., 2001) (42 sites)

Combustion factor (see Table 1) Global average Measurement data

Emission factor (Andreae and Merlet, 2001) Global average Measurement data

Amount of biomass burned (M)

M = A x B x ce

A: monthly area burnedB: annual average aboveground biomass densityce: average combustion factor , the fraction of above

ground biomass that is burned

Estimate of biomass burned

Page 3: Estimates of burned biomass  based on burned areas from  SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

Table 1 Combustion factor

Reference grass forests stem & CWD leaf & fine litterCarvalho et al. (2001) 0.33 0.26 0.92Shea et al. (1996) 0.99 0.91Araujo et al. (1999) 0.20 0.13 0.83Carvalho et al. (1998) 0.20 0.14 0.88Fearnside et al. (2001) 0.30 0.26Guid et al. (1998) 0.51 0.47 0.95Graca et al. (1999) 0.36 0.29 0.96Fearnside et al. (1993) 0.29 0.26 1.00Fearnside et al. (1999) 0.43 0.32 0.97Average 0.99 0.33 0.27 0.93

*: CWD means coarse woody debris.

*

Page 4: Estimates of burned biomass  based on burned areas from  SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

1.1.1. Classification method in North America

Area burned in grassland

Living biomass density of forests

Biomass density (tons / ha)

Burned area (x 102 ha)Litter biomass density of forests

Area burned in forests

Global average of biomass density of grassland

2.791 (tons / ha)

Biomass density (tons / ha)

Burned area (x 102 ha)

(Forest area: evergreen needleleaf, evergreen broadleaf, deciduous needleleaf, deciduous broadleaf, mixed, woody savanna)

(Grassland area) = (Fractional vegetation cover) - (Fractional forest cover)

(Living biomass: stem, bark, branches, and twigs, and leaves)

(Litter: fine litter and coarse woody debris)

Combustion factor of forests:

0.33

Combustion factor of grassland:0.99

Page 5: Estimates of burned biomass  based on burned areas from  SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

1.1.2. Classification method in Eurasia

Area burned in grassland

Living biomass density of forests

Biomass density (tons / ha)

Burned area (x 102 ha)Litter biomass density of forests

Area burned in forests

Global average of biomass density of grassland

2.791 (tons / ha)

Biomass density (tons / ha)

Burned area (x 102 ha)

(Forest area burned) = (Area burned) x (Forest map: evergreen needleleaf, evergreen broadleaf, deciduous needleleaf, deciduous broadleaf, mixed, woody savanna)

(Grassland area burned) = (Area burned) x{(Fractional vegetation cover) - (Fractional forest cover)}

(Living biomass: stem, bark, branches, and twigs, and leaves)

(Litter: fine litter and coarse woody debris)

Combustion factor of forests:

0.33

Combustion factor of grassland:0.99

Page 6: Estimates of burned biomass  based on burned areas from  SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

(Grassland area burned) = (Area burned) x{(Fractional vegetation cover) - (Fractional forest cover)}

Combustion factor of forests:

0.33

Area burned in grassland

Living biomass density of forests

Biomass density (tons / ha)

Litter biomass density of forests

Area burned in forests

Global average of biomass density of grassland

2.791 (tons / ha)

Biomass density (tons / ha)

Burned area (x 102 ha)

1.2.1. Continuous field method in Africa

Only grassland burned for

the second fire.

(Forest area burned) = (Area burned) x(Fractional forest cover)

Combustion factor of

grassland:0.99

Burned area (x 102 ha)

Page 7: Estimates of burned biomass  based on burned areas from  SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

1.2.2. Continuous field method in Australia

Area burned

Biomass C density (tons C / ha)

Leaf + fine litterbiomass density

Stem + woody debrisbiomass density

Fractional vegetation cover (%)

Actual area burned

Burned area (x 102 ha)

Combustion factor of leaf & fine litter:

0.93

Combustion factor of stem & CWD:

0.27

Page 8: Estimates of burned biomass  based on burned areas from  SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

2.1. Results of biomass burned (Tg / yr)

Africa Australia Extratropical regionThis work 2572 374 649Barbosa et al. (1999) 704-2168Hao and Liu (1994) 2290 290Hao et al. (1990) 2818 425Lobert et al. (1999) 640Lavoué et al., (2000) 66-700

2.2. Results of emissions (Tg species / yr)

Africa Australia Extratropical regionCO 254.46 34.50 63.94NO2 4.88 0.86 2.06

BC 1.64 0.23 0.35Smoke (TPM - BC) 15.68 2.41 9.85

Page 9: Estimates of burned biomass  based on burned areas from  SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

2.3. Results of emissions from biomass burned

January biomass burned (kg) February biomass burned (kg)

April biomass burned (kg) Jun biomass burned (kg)May biomass burned (kg)

March biomass burned (kg)

Page 10: Estimates of burned biomass  based on burned areas from  SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

2.4. Results of emissions from biomass burned

July biomass burned (kg) August biomass burned (kg)

October biomass burned (kg) December biomass burned (kg)November biomass burned (kg)

September biomass burned (kg)

Page 11: Estimates of burned biomass  based on burned areas from  SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

4. Future work

Update biomass burned in tropical America and Asia

Complete photochemistry model using meteorology from GEOS-DAS in 2000

Compare predicted fields (CO, BC, etc) with observations

3. Conclusions

1. These methods appear to give reasonable results for total biomass burned.

2. In Northern Hemisphere, the estimated litter burned seems too high, while

the living biomass looks low.

3. Need to test the emissions in a model and develop uncertainty estimates.

Page 12: Estimates of burned biomass  based on burned areas from  SPOT-VEGETATION in 2000

References

Andreae, M.O. and P. Merlet, Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 15, 995-966, 2001.Araújo, T.M., J.A. Carvalho Jr., N. Higuchi, A.C.P. Brasil Jr., and A.L.A. Mesquita, A tropical rainforest clearing experiment by biomass burning in the state of Pará, Brazil. Atmos. Environ., 33,

1991-1998, 1999.Barbosa, P.M., D. Stroppiana, J-M. Grégoire, and J.M.C. Pereira, An assessment of vegetation fire in Africa (1981-1991): burned areas, burned biomass and atmospheric emissions. Global

Biogeochem. Cycles, 13, 933-950, 1999. Barrett, D.J. and H.Y. Xu, Parameterisation of a large-scale terrestrial carbon cycle model by a constrained genetic algorithm using multiple data sets of ecological observations from minimally

disturbed sites. Global Biogeochem. Cycles (submitted).Carvalho Jr., J.A., F.D. Costa, C.A.G. Veras, D.V. Sandberg, E.C. Alvarado, R. Gielow, A.M. Serra Jr., and J.C. Santos, Biomass fire consumption and carbon release rates of rainforest-clearing

experiments conducted in northern Mato Grosso, Brazil. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 17877-17887, 2001.Carvalho Jr., N. Higuchi, T.M. Araújo, and J.C. Santos, Combustion completeness in a rainforest clearing experiment in Manaus, Brazil. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 13195-13199, 1998.Fearnside, P.M., P.M.L.A. Graça, N.L. Filho, F.J.A. Rodrigues, and J.M. Robinson, Tropical forest burning in Brazilian Amazonia: measurement of biomass loading, burning efficiency and

charcoal formation at Altamira, Pará. For. Ecol. Manage., 123, 65-79, 1999.Fearnside, P.M., P.M.L.A. Graça, and F.J.A. Rodrigues, Burning of Amazonian rainforests: burning efficiency and charcoal formation in forest cleared for cattle pasture near Manaus, Brazil. For.

Ecol. Manage., 146, 115-128, 2001.Fearnside, P.M., N. Leal Jr., and F.M. Fearnside, Rainforest burning and the global carbon budget: biomass, combustion efficiency, and charcoal formation in the Brazilian Amazon. J. Geophys.

Res., 98, 16733-16743, 1993.Gaston, G., S. Brown, M. Lorenzini, and K.D. Singh, State and change in carbon pools in the forests of tropical Africa, Glob. Change Biol., 4, 97-114, 1998.Gill, R.A., R.H. Kelly, W.J. Parton, K.A. Day, R.B. Jackson, J.A. Morgan, J.M.O. Scurlock, L.L. Tieszen, J.V. Castle, D.S. Ojima, and X.S. Zhang, NPP Grassland: Consistent Worldwide Site

Estimates, 1954-1990. Available on-line [http://www.daac.ornl.gov/] from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A., 2001.Graça, P.M.L.A., P.M. Fearnside, and C.C. Cerri, Burning of Amazonian forest in Ariquemes, Rondônia, Brazil: biomass, charcoal formation and burning efficiency. For. Ecol. Manage., 120,

179-191, 1999.Grégoire, J-M., K. Tansey, and J.M.N. Silva, The GBA2000 initiative: Developing a global burned area database from SPOT-VEGETATION imagery. Int. J. Remote Sensing, in press, 2002.Guild, L.S., J.B. Kauffman, L.J. Ellingson, D.L. Cummings, E.A. Castro, R.E. Babbitt, and D.E. Ward, Dynamics associated with total aboveground biomass C, nutrient pools, and biomass

burning of primary forest and pasture in Rondônia, Brazil during SCAR-B. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 32091-32100, 1998.Hao, W.M. and M.-H., Liu, Spatial and temporal distribution of tropical biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 8(4), 495-503, 1994.Hao, W.M., M.-H., Liu, and P.J. Crutzen, Estimates of annual and regional releases of CO2 and other trace gases to the atmosphere from fires in the tropics, based on the FAO statistics for the

period 1975-1980. In Fire in the Tropical Biota: Ecosystem Processes and Global Challenges, edited by J.G. Goldammer, pp. 440-462, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.Hansen, M.C., R.S. DeFries, J.R.G. Townshend, and R. Sohlberg, Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 21, 1331-

1364, 2000.Hoffa, E.A., D.E. Ward, W.M. Hao, R.A. Susott, and R.H. Wakimoto, Seasonality of carbon emissions from biomass burning in a Zambian savanna. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 13841-13853, 1999.Lavoué, D. C. Liousse, H. Cachier, B.J. Stocks, and J.G. Goldammer, Modeling of carbonaceous particles emitted by boreal and temperate wildfires at northern latitudes. J. Geophys. Res., 105,

26871-26890, 2000.Lobert, J.M., W.C. Keene, L.A. Logan, and R. Yevich, Global chlorine emissions from biomass burning: Reactive Chlorine Emissions Inventory. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 8373-8389, 1999.Matthews, E. Global litter production, pools, and turnover times: Estimates from measurement data and regression models. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 18771-18800, 1997.Myneni, R.B., J. Dong, C.J. Tucker, R.K. Kaufmann, P.E. Kauppi, J. Liski, L. Zhou, V. Alexeyev, and M.K. Hughes, A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of Northern forests. Proc. Natl.

Acad. Sci. USA., 98(26), 14784-14789, 2001.Shea, R.W., B.W. Shea, J.B. Kauffman, D.E. Ward, C.I. Haskins, and M.C. Scholes, Fuel biomass and combustion factors associated with fires in savanna ecosystem of South Africa and

Zambia. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 23551-23568, 1996.Zeng, X., R.E. Dickinson, A. Walker, M. Shaikh, R.S. DeFries, and J. Qi, Derivation and evaluation of global 1-km fractional vegetation cover data for land modeling. J. Appl. Meteor., 39, 826-

839, 2000.Zhu Z. and Waller E., FRA 2000 Global forest cover mapping final report. In Forest Resource Assessment Programme Working Paper 50, edited by P. Pugliese, Forest and Agriculture

Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2001.