estado da arte no tratamento do · pdf file2cm clinical target volume margin gajjar a, ......
TRANSCRIPT
Estado da Arte no Tratamento do Meduloblastoma State of the Art Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of
Medulloblastoma
Thomas E. Merchant, DO, PhD Baddia J. Rashid Endowed Chair in Radiation Oncology
Chair, Radiation Oncology Discipline Children’s Oncology Group
XVII Brazilian Radiation Therapy Congress
Objectives
• Review recent US trials for medulloblastoma
• Disease control
• Functional outcomes
• Identify opportunities to advance radiation oncology and review radiation dose-volume effects
• Cognitive
• Neurologic
• Endocrine
2
Medulloblastoma Therapy for Medulloblastoma 20 Years Ago
Standard of Care
• Surgery
• Craniospinal irradiation
• 36Gy
• Posterior Fossa Boost
• 54Gy
Classic Portal:
Posterior Fossa Boost
3
Medulloblastoma Results from Medulloblastoma Therapy 20 Years Ago
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
IQ
Years after Craniospinal Irradiation
Walter et al. J Clin Oncol 1999
Loss of IQ: 3.7 points per year
4
Craniospinal → Combined Modality Chemotherapy is Required to Reduce CSI Dose
5
36Gy→23.4Gy Reducing CSI Dose Had No Effect on IQ Loss
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
IQ
Years after Craniospinal Irradiation
Walter et al. J Clin Oncol 1999
Ris et al. J Clin Oncol 2001
Loss of IQ: 4.2 points per year
6
54
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Dose (cGy)
% V
olu
me
Craniospinal Dose Reductions Reducing CSI Dose Has Little Effect on Brain Dose
Total Brain DVH
54
54
23.4
36.0
7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Dose (cGy)
% V
olu
me
Primary Site Volume Reductions Primary Site Instead of Posterior Fossa Irradiation
Total Brain DVH
23.4
23.4
54
54
8
SJMB96 Protocol St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital 1996-2003
9
2cm clinical target volume margin Gajjar A, et al. Lancet Oncol 2006 Merchant TE et al. Int Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007
Medulloblastoma Improving Outcomes by Omitting Posterior Fossa Irradiation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
IQ
Years after Craniospinal Irradiation
Walter et al. J Clin Oncol 1999
Ris et al. J Clin Oncol 2001
Mulhern et al. J Clin Oncol 2005
Loss of IQ: 2.4 points per year
10
Medulloblastoma (Ages 3-8 Years) Children’s Oncology Group 2004-2014
11
Amendment 2: Patients with anaplastic medulloblastoma were excluded after 2008!
Medulloblastoma (Ages 8-21 Years) Children’s Oncology Group 2004-2014
12
Amendment 2: Patients with anaplastic medulloblastoma were excluded after 2008!
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Dose (cGy)
% V
olu
me
Brain DVH
COG Average-Risk MB Trial
18.0Gy CSI + 5.4 Gy PF +CRT
18.0Gy CSI + Conventional
23.4Gy CSI + CRT
23.4Gy CSI + Conventional
COG ACNS 0331
Medulloblastoma (Ages 3-8 Years) Children’s Oncology Group 2004-2014
13
SJMB03 Protocol St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital 2003-2013
14
Results unpublished
Importance of Targeting Target Volume Comparison
GTV CTV SJMB03
CTV SJMB96
GTV
CTV - SJMB03
CTV - SJMB96
CTV – Posterior Fossa
CTV P Fossa
15
SJMB03 - Results
16
SJMB03 - Results
17
Future MB Protocol Design
Ellison DE et al. Acta Neuropathol 2010
18
What about MB Age < 3 years?
• POG 8633 (Neuro-oncology 1999) • CDDP/VCR/CPM/VP16 5 year - PFS 32 + 8%
• POG 9233 (Abstract) • CDDP/VCR/CPM/VP16 4 year – PFS 25 + 6%
• PBTC-001 (J Neurooncol 2012) • CDDP/VCR/CPM/VP16 + IT + RT 5 year – PFS 57 + 15%
• IT = mafosfamide; RT = 45-54Gy
• A9934 (J Clin Oncol 2012) • CDDP/VCR/CPM/VP16 + RT 4 year – PFS 50 + 6%
• RT = 50.4-54Gy
19
Medulloblastoma Age < 3 Years COG A9934 Protocol 2000-2006
5430.6/023.4CR/0> 24 mo
5430.6/023.4CR/0>24 mo
5432.4/3.618PR/SD/+<24 mo
50.432.4/018CR/0< 24 mo
Total
Dose
Primary
Site
Volume
Posterior
Fossa
Volume
Response/
ResidualAge
5430.6/023.4CR/0> 24 mo
5430.6/023.4CR/0>24 mo
5432.4/3.618PR/SD/+<24 mo
50.432.4/018CR/0< 24 mo
Total
Dose
Primary
Site
Volume
Posterior
Fossa
Volume
Response/
ResidualAge
Initial Surgery
Induction Chemotherapy
4 months
Second Surgery
Age, Risk, Response-Adapted
Conformal Radiation Therapy
Posterior Fossa + Primary Site
Maintenance Chemotherapy
8 Months
Initial Surgery
Induction Chemotherapy
4 months
Second Surgery
Age, Risk, Response-Adapted
Conformal Radiation Therapy
Posterior Fossa + Primary Site
Maintenance Chemotherapy
8 Months Period of Enrollment: 10/2000-06/2006
CTV Margin = 1.0cm
20
Medulloblastoma Age < 3 Years COG A9934 Pattern of Failure
<5.4Gy
<10.8Gy
<5.1Gy
<5.6Gy
<5.4Gy
<10Gy
<11.7Gy
Lost Data
<5.4Gy
<5.4Gy
Brain Sites of recurrence
Post RT
Frontal n= 10
<5.4Gy
<10.8Gy
<5.1Gy
<5.6Gy
<5.4Gy
<10Gy
<11.7Gy
Lost Data
<5.4Gy
<5.4Gy
Brain Sites of recurrence
Post RT
Frontal n= 10
0Gy
0G
y
0Gy
0G
y
0Gy
0Gy
0G
y
0g
y
Brain Sites of recurrence Pre
RT
Primary site n = 7
=8n=887
0Gy
0G
y
0Gy
0G
y
0Gy
0Gy
0G
y
0g
y
Brain Sites of recurrence Pre
RT
Primary site n = 7
=8n=887
Progression during
Induction Chemotherapy
Progression after
Focal Irradiation
Ashley DM, Merchant TE, et al. Induction chemotherapy and conformal radiation therapy for very young children
with nonmetastatic medulloblastoma: Children's Oncology Group study P9934. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 10;30(26):3181-6.
21
Medulloblastoma Age < 3 Years COG A9934 Pattern of Failure
22
Ashley DM, Merchant TE, et al. Induction chemotherapy and conformal radiation therapy for very young children
with nonmetastatic medulloblastoma: Children's Oncology Group study P9934. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 10;30(26):3181-6.
St. Jude SJYC07 Protocol
CTV margin – 5mm
Total dose – 54Gy 23
SJYC07 – Pattern of Failure after Focal RT
24
Medulloblastoma 2015 Where do we go from here?
• Reduce craniospinal dose • ACNS0331 (18Gy) • A9934 (12-15Gy)
• Reduce cumulative dose to primary site
• A9934 (50.4Gy) • PBTC-001 (45Gy)
• Smaller clinical target volume margin
• + Proton therapy • Reduce volume receiving
lowest doses • Reduce extra-CNS dose
reductions: heart, lungs, thyroid, vertebral growth plates
Primary Site CTV
• Past – Posterior Fossa
• 1996 – 20mm
• 2003 – 10mm
• 2007 – 5mm
• Future – < Tumor Bed?
25
P Fossa PTV CTV GTVP Fossa PTV CTV GTV
Future MB Protocol Design
Ellison DE et al. Acta Neuropathol 2010
26
SJMB12 Study Design
27
SJMB12 Study RT Summary
28
Low-Risk Intermediate-
Risk High-Risk
15Gy CSI 23.4Gy CSI 36Gy CSI
CTV=5mm CTV=5mm CTV=5mm
51Gy 1° Site 54Gy 1° Site 54Gy 1° Site
+ Proton Therapy + Proton Therapy + Proton Therapy
IRB Approved 5/28/2013
Medulloblastoma Cognitive Effects (IQ) in Standard Risk Patients
29
Medulloblastoma 50% Risk Subnormal (<85) IQ by Age
30
0
20
40
60
80
100
V25Gy V30Gy V35Gy V40Gy V45Gy V50Gy
% V
olu
me
Bra
in
15yrs
12yrs
10yrs
8yrs
5yrs
3yrs
Merchant TE et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 5 8 10 12 15
Mea
n D
ose
Gy
Age at Irradiation
Math
Infratent
Hippo L
Hippo R
Temporal L
Temporal R
Brain
Supratent
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 5 8 10 12 15
Mea
n D
ose
Gy
Age at Irradiation
Reading
Infratent
Hippo L
Hippo R
Temporal L
Temporal R
Brain
Supratent0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 5 8 10 12 15
Mea
n D
ose
Gy
Age at Irradiation
Spelling
Infratent
Hippo L
Hippo R
Temporal L
Temporal R
Brain
Supratent
Medulloblastoma TD50/5 IQ, Math, Reading, Spelling
31
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 5 8 10 12 15
Mea
n D
ose
Age at Irradiation
IQ
Hippo L
Infratent
Hippo R
Temporal L
Temporal R
Brain
Supratent
Merchant TE et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014
Medulloblastoma TD50/5 (IQ)
32
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 5 8
Me
an D
ose
Age (years)
Hippo L
Infratent
Hippo R
Temporal L
Temporal R
Brain
Supratent
Merchant TE et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014
Medulloblastoma Comparing Dose Distributions (Photon vs. Proton)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
V25Gy+ V30Gy+ V35Gy+ V40Gy+ V45Gy+ V50Gy+ V55Gy+
Pe
rce
nt
Vo
lum
e T
ota
l B
rain
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
V25Gy+ V30Gy+ V35Gy+ V40Gy+ V45Gy+ V50Gy+ V55Gy+
Pe
rce
nt
Vo
lum
e T
ota
l B
rain
Proton Dose and Volume
Photon Dose and Volume
Merchant TE et al. Cancer J 2009
33
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6
IQ
Years after Radiation Therapy
Abnormal IQ
IMRT (photon)
IMPT (proton)
Medulloblastoma Estimating IQ after Radiation Therapy (IMRT vs. IMPT)
34
∗𝐼𝑄 = 93.00 + 0.024 𝑥 𝐴𝑔𝑒 − 0.0091 𝑥 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑥 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒
*Merchant TE et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006
Double-Scattered Proton Beam
Double-Scattered Proton Beam
Double-Scattered Proton Beam
Double-Scattered Proton Beam
Proton Therapy - Pencil Beam Scanning
39
Proton Therapy - Pencil Beam Scanning
40
Proton Therapy - Pencil Beam Scanning
41
Proton Therapy - Pencil Beam Scanning
42
Double-Scattered Proton Beam Primary Site Boost
Double-Scattered Proton Beam CSI Composite + Primary Site Boost
Summary
• Radiation therapy for medulloblastoma continues to evolve.
• Late effects have been reduced and our knowledge about the effects of radiation dose and volume have increased.
• Current and future protocols are designed to answer questions about the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of these unique tumors.
45
Thank You!