essay disagree

5
The Future: The “solve-it-all” misconception of Innovations and Traditions The best way to predict the future is to design it.” This is a statement from the modernist architect, Buckminster Fuller. He is a successful planner in the context of adding definition and at the same time, redefining the essence of architecture, both in shaping man and the society through form-linked solutions that innovate his approach in designing spaces. Form-linked solutions are basically innovative and form-based ideas that aims to solve problems and issues that arises in the modern context. The concept of such solutions employs change on the structure of the solution itself in order to provide a new perspective in addressing new problems. Several theories and propositions have been developed in order to define and scrutinize the concept of innovation and its implications towards fostering communal and societal stability. However several arguments are critical enough to produce ontological statements that sharply influences the perception of innovation in the built environment. On the other hand, the role of tradition is inarguably a critical determinant in indicating the approach of the solution in the context of the sensitivity and preserving the culture and genus loci of the place. It is a consideration especially on innovation regarding industrialization, where tradition will always be affected. The relationship between tradition and innovation are vital components that will determine the structure of the future. Thomas Kuhn and George Kubler, among other philosophers and theorist, have made an impact in this prospect. They have set the pioneering definition of what it takes for an innovation to happen. But regardless of their credibility, does tradition and innovation really gives birth of a sustainable future or it’s just a fallacious misconception in order to make an excusable account to create something new and prove the designer’s proficiency in his field of expertise? Does innovation induce sensitivity to the tradition? Is the future really defined by these two components? Thomas Kuhn, a philosopher during the modern period, has made a controversy in his book, The Structure of Scientific Revolution. He claims that innovations are produced through the anomalies that lies on the present paradigm. If we’ll follow the postulate of

Upload: luigee-castillo

Post on 19-Aug-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

essay

TRANSCRIPT

The Future: The solve-it-all misconception of Innovations and Traditions The best way to predict the future is to design it. This is a statement from the modernist architect, Buckminster Fuller. He is a successful planner in the context of addin de!nition and at the same time, rede!nin the essence of architecture, "oth in shapin man and the societ# throuh form-linked solutions thatinnovate his approach in desinin spaces. Form-linked solutions are "asicall# innovative and form-"ased ideas that aims to solve pro"lems and issues that arises in the modern context. The concept of such solutions emplo#s chane on the structure of the solution itself in order to provide a ne$ perspective in addressin ne$ pro"lems. %everal theories and propositions have "een developed in order to de!ne and scrutini&e the concept of innovation and its implications to$ards fosterin communal and societal sta"ilit#. Ho$ever several aruments are critical enouh to produce ontoloical statements that sharpl# in'uences the perception of innovation in the "uilt environment. (n the other hand, the role of tradition is inarua"l# a critical determinant in indicatin the approach of the solution in the context of the sensitivit# and preservin the culture and genus loci of the place. It isa consideration especiall# on innovation reardin industriali&ation, $here tradition $ill al$a#s "e a)ected. The relationship "et$een tradition and innovation are vital components that $ill determine the structure of the future. Thomas *uhn and +eore *u"ler, amon other philosophers and theorist, have made an impact in thisprospect. The# have set the pioneerin de!nition of $hat it takes for an innovation to happen. But reardless of their credi"ilit#, does tradition and innovation reall# ives "irth of a sustaina"le future or it,s -ust a fallacious misconception in order to make an excusa"le account to create somethin ne$ and prove the desiner,s pro!cienc# in his !eld of expertise. /oes innovation induce sensitivit# to the tradition. Is the future reall# de!ned "# these t$o components. Thomas *uhn, a philosopher durin the modern period, has made a controvers# in his "ook, The Structure of Scientifc Revolution. He claims that innovations are produced throuh the anomalies that lies on the present paradim. If $e,ll follo$ the postulate of imperfections of ever# solution and its ina"ilit# to provide all the ans$ers, $e can sa# that innovations $ill al$a#s "e perpetual and inde!nite in its phase, thus helpin to solve existin pro"lems and at the same time,produce ne$ pro"lems. In *uhn,s point of vie$, the main misconception that planners and scientist comes into, is the total reliance on theories and not cruciall# lookin on its oriins and failure to develop concrete analoies. This intellectual dependence leads to vaue innovations and produces more con'icts. Form-linked solutions out of dependence on theories $ill never "e sensi"le enouh to e0cientl# solve the present issues. If $e need to o "ack to our oriins, then $e can have an assumption on the concept of tradition as our prime source of innovation. Tradition is the concept of oriinalit# and peculiarit# of a certain communit# that sets it apart from other communities. It is often characteri&ed "# a distinct culture and it is shaped "# the situations that the communit# ets involved over time. If these traditions $ill "ethe "asis of our model, there is a reater pro"a"ilit# that innovations and form-linked solutions $ould have its more tani"le source of credi"ilit#. 1oreover, iven the di)erent ph#sical site and conditional di)erences, these traditions $ould also have certain circumstances 2durin those times3 that speci!call# shaped the frame$ork of the tradition itself. If $e $ould never "e certain of those circumstances, then $e $ill never have a perfect analo# to develop thus, $e $ill never have the most concrete solutions to ever# pro"lems. If this concept holds trueto ever#thin, then innovations and con'icts $ill "e perpetual and the future will never become the future that we might expect.(ne example is the present situation of Intramuros.4entur#-old $alls ma# not have dilapidated due to preservation "# the administration "ut it doesn,t help to the prevalence of ur"an spra$l inside the historic district. The innovation that has "een done toda# is the renovation and retro!ttin of the neo-hispanic "uildins inside intramuros. (n the other hand, this priorit# has left the administration to inore the ur"an residential context and the historic interit# of intramuros. Bein sensi"le to tradition does not totall# incorporate a sensi"le solution. The district,s situation onl# concerns the tani"le and concrete exemplars "# $hich the vie$ers and users "ene!ts, usin the plasters and other architectural skins to develop a fraud frontae to make historic district, historic. Furthermore, another concept have in'uenced on our perception on innovation. The concept of *u"leron innovation lies on its d#namic model of chane and modi!cation of form. He interprets that innovation is due to chane in pattern, thus producin a ne$ one. This is developed throuh drift, noise, and5or interference. In *u"ler,s point of vie$ , modif#in somethin $ill eventuall# chane it,s structural con!uration thouh it doesn,t remove the fact that the oriin,s core is still there. This proposition $as opposed "# 6o#ce Brodsk#, $ho states that innovation is the radual revealin as sta#in close in revealin the real pattern , and not necessaril# creatin a ne$ pattern , $hich displaces the old. (ver time, she developed a concept $hich opposed *u"ler,s point of vie$. %he translated *u"ler,s opinion into the idea of continuit# and discontinuit#. For Brodsk#, continuit# and discontinuit# are natural phenomena that occur in the "uilt and natural environment. 7ver# pro"lem triers the need for a ne$ solution that in the lon run , $ill produce future con'icts. In this loical sense, the concept of chained reaction produces societal insta"ilit#. (ne example on this concept is "est illustrated on the consecutive patterns on 1arcosian Brutalism architectural st#le and the 8ernacular Filipino concept "# other architects such as 1anosa. /urin the 9:;