esp and speaking

Upload: akbar-filial-hafid

Post on 07-Jul-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 ESP and Speaking

    1/4

    Changing perspectives within ESP speaking

     The successful communication have to be rise by both of speaker

    between native or non-native speakers. Because native speakers also need

    language training to understand the dierences of language. In aviationaspect, communication is limited between air trac controller !T"# and pilot

    also. $o it has own protocol, pronunciation and grammar. $uch as between

    pilot and air trac controller have some codes when they are take a

    conversation and It has a speci%c meaning.

     The further of the e&planation, every '( speakers have dierent way to

    e&press like greetings and closings. )ore *+ between pilot and !T" get

    misunderstanding because they cannot follow the reuired scripts. for

    e&ample, in aviation nglish word /hold means stop0 and /collouially means

    continue or maintain0.But actually, being native speakers of nglish is not

    necessarily. Because non-native speaker could act well than native speaker.

    The conference forum

    It means that the ways when take presentation in a conferences. The

    aspect of it is include posters and papers. Those aspect could be e&plored in

    a research by individual or group. 1e used both of them because a part of 

    student prefer to like by using paper when taking presentation. 2n the other

    hand, students prefer to by using poster in same condition. 3ind of poster

    presentations need speakers to remain at their assigned location for a

    speci%ed period of time, during they have opportunities to interact with and

    get feedback from attendees.'acking the control gave by a conference

    presentation paper, poster presenters have to be good at reading the

    audience on many stages including interest in the research and the uantity

    and level of detail to provide.

    )ove )odel for paper "4 introductions based on 5owley 6 7olivetand "arter -

     Thomas 899:a #

  • 8/18/2019 ESP and Speaking

    2/4

    (. )eeting interpersonal aims; stablishing rapport and proreeting

    = 7oking

    = 2ering personal anecdotes

    = )aking light - hearted remarks

    = Thanking the audience for being present at a less than ideal time or

    e&pressing thanks to collaborators or those providing %nancial support.

    8. )eeting discoursal aims; 4reparing the audience

    &amples;

    = 4resenting the topic in a light dierent from what was previously stated or

    written

    = nhancing the contribution of the research by using evaluative language to

    indicate novelty possibly absent from the title or abstract#

    =Indicating one ? s stance toward the topic possibly absent from the title or

    abstract#

    = 2utlining the talk.

    )ove B. "onte&tuali@ing the framework

    $ituating the talk within the larger conference e&perience or research area

    &amples;

    = 5eferring to other presentationsAconference events or other acts of 

    interte&tuality

  • 8/18/2019 ESP and Speaking

    3/4

    = !lluding to previous work likely to be familiar to attendees 'iterature

    reviews, typical of research article introductions, are absent due to time

    constraints and the cognitive burden this would place on the listeners. The

    talk is situated by assuming shared knowledge.#

    )ove ". Indicating the research rationale

    (. $tating motivation

    &amples;

    = ighlighting problems, gaps or counter 6 claims

    = !sserting relevance, centrality or need

    = stablishing the continuation of previous work.

    8. 5esponding to the motivators

    &amples;

    = 5aising uestions

    = $tating hypothesis

    = 4reviewing results or solutions

    = 2utlining research goals.

    "onference presentation is the most important for all $4 research.

    specially, for compare between speaking and writing in dierences and

    similarities. The "onference 4resentation %ndings are relevant for all

    presenters without to know of their '(. The pro%ciency in nglish may

    contribute to successful "4 or other speaking events. In global economy,

    native nglish will learn ways to provide agents in a dierent cultural and

    linguistic background for make understanding between them.

    Conclusions and Future Directions

  • 8/18/2019 ESP and Speaking

    4/4

    In conclusion, the $4 speaking is an approach to teaching language.

    $4 have aims to make researcher, instructor, material designer and

    curriculum are clear. $o that, when spoken in nglish between native or non-

    native have accuracy for eective in communication conte&t.