esmo 2010 powerpoint slides
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Esmo 2010 Powerpoint Slides](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082603/54661965b4af9fdf3f8b4e46/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes of five subtypes of adenocarcinoma
that has been associated with histological characteristics of EML4-ALK NSCLC
Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, MD PhDAssociate Clinical Professor
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology
University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA 92868
![Page 2: Esmo 2010 Powerpoint Slides](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082603/54661965b4af9fdf3f8b4e46/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Background• ALK translocation in NSCLC has recently been
discovered• At least 9 EML4-ALK fusion transcripts in NSCLC
described• Usually ALK +ve NSCLC are found in young, never-
smokers, with adenocarcinoma but only constitutes about 3-5% of all NSCLC
• Several adenocarcinoma histological subtypes have been associated with ALK +ve NSCLC including signet ring carcinoma (SRC), acinar carcinoma, papillary carcinoma, mixed adenocarcinoma, and even BAC
• An ALK inhibitor (Crizotinib-PF02341066) has significant clinical activity in ALK +ve NSCLC
![Page 3: Esmo 2010 Powerpoint Slides](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082603/54661965b4af9fdf3f8b4e46/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Objective
• We investigated clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcome of several rare adenocarcinoma subtypes to see if any one or more of the adenocarcinoma subtypes closely matches those described for ALK + ve NSCLC
![Page 4: Esmo 2010 Powerpoint Slides](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082603/54661965b4af9fdf3f8b4e46/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Methods• Adenocarcinoma of the lung diagnosed from
1989 to 2006 were abstracted from the California Cancer Registry (CCR)
• Smoking status were abstracted from subgroup of patients within 3 regional CCR using a text mining algorithm
• Univariate analysis were performed by log-rank using Kaplan-Meier method
• Multivariate analysis were performed by Cox proportional hazards model
![Page 5: Esmo 2010 Powerpoint Slides](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082603/54661965b4af9fdf3f8b4e46/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Results
• A total of 59501 cases were analyzed including– 50089 cases of adenocarcinoma– 7171 cases of BAC– 1241 cases of papillary carcinoma– 379 cases of acinar carcinoma– 359 cases of mixed adenocarcinoma– 262 cases of signet ring carcinoma
![Page 6: Esmo 2010 Powerpoint Slides](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082603/54661965b4af9fdf3f8b4e46/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
AdenoCA BAC Acinarcarcinoma
Papillary carcinoma
SRC Mixed adenoCA
p
N 50089 7171 379 1241 262 359
Median age (95% CI) 67 (46-83) 69 (49-83) 66 (47-83) 67 (46-82) 64 (40-80) 68 (48-85) < 0.0001
Median f/u time (95%CI) 9 (1-109) 28 (1-151) 31 (3-98) 17 (1-115) 5.5 (1-58) 21 (1-62) < 0.0001
Age category 0-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
666 (1.3)3516 (7.0)
9852 (19.7)16198 (32.3)14822 (29.6)5035 (10.1)
66 (0.9)327 (4.6)
1095 (15.3)2197 (30.6)2569 (35.8)917 (12.8)
3 (0.8)24 (6.3)
61 (16.1)142 (37.5)111 (29.3)38 (10.0)
20 (1.6)86 (6.9)
253 (20.4)386 (31.1)386 (31.1)110 (8.9)
13 (5.0)24 (9.2)
64 (24.4)80 (30.5)65 (24.8)16 (6.1)
1 (0.3)21 (5.9)
65 (18.1)115 (32.0)101 (28.1)56 (15.6) < 0.0001
Gender Male Female
26062 (52.0)24027 (48.0)
2958 (41.3)4213 (58.8)
166 (43.8)213 (56.2)
592 (47.7)649 (52.3)
146 (55.7)116 (44.3)
149 (41.5)210 (58.5) < 0.0001
Ethnicity Caucasian African-American Hispanic Asian Other
37677 (75.2)3695 (7.4)4310 (8.6)4215 (8.4)192 (0.4)
5226 (72.9)481 (6.7)646 (9.0)
800 (11.2)18 (0.3)
290 (76.5)23 (6.1)30 (7.9)34 (9.0)2 (0.5)
875 (70.5)86 (6.9)
108 (8.7)169 (13.6)
3 (0.2)
190 (72.5)19 (7.3)
31 (11.8)21 (8.0)1 (0.4)
255 (71.0)20 (5.6)
37 (10.3)47 (13.1)
0 (0.0) 0.0001
Tumor differentiation Well Moderate Poor Undifferentiated Unknown
2635 (5.3)11484 (22.9)21743 (43.4)
794 (1.6)13433 (26.8)
2119 (29.6)1840 (25.7)
614 (8.6)55 (0.8)
2543 (35.5)
61 (16.1)208 (54.9)89 (23.5)
4 (1.1)17 (4.5)
204 (16.4)411 (33.1)189 (15.2)
16 (1.3)421 (33.9)
2 (0.8)24 99.2)
131 (50.0)3 (1.2)
102 (38.9)
86 (24.0)126 (35.1)86 (24.0)
6 (1.7)55 (15.3) < 0.0001
AJCC stage I II III IV Unknown
9174 (18.3)2610 (5.2)
8315 (16.6)18409 (36.8)11581 (23.1)
3139 (43.8)403 (5.6)658 (9.2)
1171 (16.3)1800 (25.1)
184 (48.6)47 (12.4)43 (11.4)26 (6.9)
79 (20.8)
319 (25.7)95 (7.7)
170 (13.7)375 (30.2)282 (22.7)
16 (6.1)13 (5.0)
54 (20.6)129 (49.2)50 (19.1)
152 (42.3)35 (9.8)
51 (14.2)39 (10.9)82 (22.8) < 0.0001
![Page 7: Esmo 2010 Powerpoint Slides](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082603/54661965b4af9fdf3f8b4e46/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Smoking status according to adenoCA subtype
![Page 8: Esmo 2010 Powerpoint Slides](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082603/54661965b4af9fdf3f8b4e46/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Kaplan-Meier survival curves by adenoCA subtypes
![Page 9: Esmo 2010 Powerpoint Slides](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082603/54661965b4af9fdf3f8b4e46/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Cox analysisHazard Ratio 95% Confidence Interval p
Histology Adenocarcinoma Acinar carcinoma Mixed adenocarcinoma BAC Papillary carcinoma Signet-ring cell carcinoma
1.0000.7620.8150.8380.9031.215
(0.653-0.889)(0.688-0.966)(0.812-0.866)(0.848-0.963)(1.069-1.382)
0.00060.0182
< 0.00010.00190.0029
Age 1.012 (1.011-1.013) < 0.0001
Gender Male Female
1.0000.828 (0.813-0.843) < 0.0001
Ethnicity Caucasian African American Asian Hispanic
1.0001.0130.8100.988
(0.978-1.048)(0.784-0.838)(0.957-1.021)
0.4782< 0.00010.4714
Tumor differentiation* Well Moderate Poor Undifferentiated
1.0001.1731.3701.327
(1.126-1.221)(1.318-1.426)(1.226-1.437)
< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001
AJCC stage* I II III IV
1.0001.8772.3053.588
(1.792-1.966)(2.220-2.392)(3.460-3.720)
< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001
![Page 10: Esmo 2010 Powerpoint Slides](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082603/54661965b4af9fdf3f8b4e46/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Conclusions• Acinar carcinoma subtype has the best OS• Signet ring carcinoma (SRC) subtype had the worst OS• Adenocarcinoma subtypes are heterogeneous• SRC had the highest proportion of never-smokers• All adenocarcinoma subtypes is a favorable prognostic
factor in OS when compared to adenocarcinoma• SRC is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor
after factoring in age, gender, ethnicity, stage, tumor differentiation, period of diagnosis and treatment (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy)