escheatment
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
1/58
Escheatment Update for APEscheatment U
pdate for AP
By Dan MayerAssociate Director of Advisory Services
Abandoned Property Services, LLC
Accounts Payable Operations 2009
March 11-13, 2009
San Antonio, TX
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
2/58
Refresh the escheatment compliance basics
Suggest practices for minimizing liability
Consider hot issues in audits, legislation and
pending lawsuits
Presentation ObjectivesPresentation O
bjectives
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
3/58
BasicBasic
Unclaimed PropertyUnclaimed PropertyTerminologyTerminology
3
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
4/58
Basic TerminologyBasic Terminology
4
Holder The business or any other entity which holds inactive property that
belongs to another and is deemed to be presumptively abandoned under state law.
(In some case law, the debtor.) In A/P, this is the entity that is the payer of
the check.
Owner The person or entity to whom the property belongs. (Sometimes this is
the creditor.) In the A/P realm, this is the check payee.
Escheat In the UP industry, this means delivering or remitting property to the
applicable state.
Last Activity Date The date of last owner-generated activity. In A/P, the last
activity date is the check date. This date is used to determine dormancy and
correspondingly, when property is due for reporting and remitting to states.
Dormancy Period The period of time property remains inactive before it is
presumed abandoned by state law. Dormancy periods differ by property type and
state. In A/P, most uncashed checks have a 3 or 5 year dormancy period.
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
5/58
5
WhatWhat is Unclaimed Property?is Unclaimed Property?
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
6/58
Unclaimed Property Basics:Unclaimed Pro
perty Basics:
What is Unclaimed Property?What is Unclaimed Pro
perty?
Definition: Any intangible personal property that is held, issued or owing inthe ordinary course of business and has remained unclaimed by the apparentowner for a specified period of time after it became payable ordistributable is presumed abandoned. Accounting errors are NOTunclaimed property.
The most common unclaimed property:1. A/P uncashed vendor checks2. Payroll uncashed wage and expense checks3. A/R unused customer/client credits, refunds4. Equity uncashed dividend checks and underlying shares, certificates returned from
the post office5. Insurance-claims payments, refunds
6. Mineral Interests uncashed checks7. Bonds uncashed interest checks and bond equity8. Bank Accounts and CDs idle account proceeds (savings and checking accounts,
official checks, timed deposits, etc.)9. Third Party Administrator records10. Suspense Accounts
6
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
7/58
7
Do unclaimed property lawsDo unclaimed property laws
apply to my business?apply to my business?
1.1. Does every business have to comply withDoes every business have to comply with
state unclaimed property laws?state unclaimed property laws?
2. Does it matter if our company doesn2. Does it matter if our company doesnt dot do
business or isnbusiness or isnt registered in the state?t registered in the state?
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
8/58
8
Business Nexus Not RequiredBusiness Nexus Not Required!! Answers: Yes, most businesses have to comply with state
unclaimed property laws. No, it doesnt matter for
unclaimed property purposes whether or not your
company is registered to do business in a state. Business
Nexus is NOTa consideration in determining whether
property is due or the state to which it is to be reported.
Texas v. New Jersey (USSC-1965): 3 rules
Last known address of the payee/creditor controls
When no address, the state of incorporation of the holder
controls
When the state does not have a law pertaining to the
property, the state of incorporation of the holder controls
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
9/58
9
What is a dormancyWhat is a dormancy
period?period?
What is anWhat is an as ofas of oror
endend date?date?
When are theWhen are the
reporting deadlines?reporting deadlines?
When Does a Business Comply?When Does a Business Comply?
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
10/58
10
StateCredit
Balances
(MS09)/A-R
VendorChecks
(CK 13)
PayrollChecks
(MS 01)
AnnualReporting
Deadline
As of /End
Date
California 3 years 3 years 1 year 11/01 06/30
Connecticut 3 years 3 years 1 year 03/31 12/31Delaware 5 years 5 years 5 years 03/01 12/31
Massachusetts 3 years 3 years 3 years 11/1 6/30
New York 3 years (1H*)
5 years (1G)
3 years (2G) 3 years
(8A)
02/15 (1H)
03/10 (2G, 8A)
12/31
Ohio 3 years 3 years** 1 year 11/01 6/30
Pennsylvania 5 years 5 years 2 years 4/15 12/31
Texas 3 years 3 years 1 year 11/01 6/30
1H is the NY Code for Consumer Credit Balance
**May be exempt under certain circumstances.
Examples of Dormancy Periods and
End Dates for non-financial corporations
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
11/58
11
Example - FactsExample - Facts Yurco Industries (a business that is not a life insurance
company) issued a check for $100 in payment to
Yursupplier on Feb. 15, 2006. It appears from Yurcos records that Yursupplier has not
cashed the check issued on Feb. 15, 2006.
Yurcustomers address in Yurcos records is inCalifornia (where CK13 vendor checks have a 3-yeardormancy period).
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
12/58
12
Is this check reportable toIs this check reportable to
California on the Fall 2009California on the Fall 2009reporting deadlinereporting deadline??
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
13/58
13
Answer to Example QuestionAnswer to Example Question
Calculation: CA Fall 09 End Date = 6/30/2009
LAD or Issue Date = 2/15/2006Dormancy Time = 3 years, 4 months, 13 daysCA Dormancy (CK13) = 3 years
Answer:
This check would be eligible for reporting to CA on theFall 2009 deadline for businesses that are not life insurancecompanies.
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
14/58
14
Compliance and Best PracticesCompliance and Best Practices
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
15/58
15
The Basic Compliance Obligations*The Basic Compliance Obligations*
1. Records Review
2. Due Diligence/Owner Contact
3. Reporting and Remitting
4. Record Retention
*All of the above must be done within thetime frames and/or in the formats/modes
required by the various applicable state
laws.
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
16/58
16
RECORDS REVIEWRECORDS REVIEW
(aka(aka Procedural Due DiligenceProcedural Due Diligence))
As a part of a businesses unclaimed property procedures,
the appropriate accounts and ledgers must be reviewedand data collected.
ITEMS TO REVIEW:ITEMS TO REVIEW:
Vendor Items uncashed vendor checks
Payroll ItemsCredit Memos / Balances
3rd Party Benefit Checks
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
17/58
17
Three Questions:
Is the owner really lost?
owner-generated activity ongoing client or vendor relationship
pertinent owner/payee address
Indication of bad address?
Is the property really unclaimed?
Procedural Due Diligence Offsetting Entries?
Is the property exempt from reporting?
RECORDS REVIEW/PROCEDURALRECORDS REVIEW/PROCEDURAL
DUE DILIGENCE: VENDOR CHECKSDUE DILIGENCE: VENDOR CHECKS
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
18/58
18
RECORDS REVIEW/PROCEDURALRECORDS REVIEW/PROCEDURAL
DUE DILIGENCE: VENDOR CHECKSDUE DILIGENCE: VENDOR CHECKSQuestion 1: Is the owner/payee really lost? Other addresses in vendor file
Finding a new address:
Forwarding Address: Payroll Checks
Internet Sources Switchboard.com
PeopleFind.com
People.yahoo.com
Anywho.com
www.free-people-search-engines.com Outsource Services
Credit Bureaus (TransUnion, Equifax, etc.)
Heir Finders
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
19/58
19
RECORDS REVIEW/PROCEDURALRECORDS REVIEW/PROCEDURAL
DUE DILIGENCE: VENDOR CHECKSDUE DILIGENCE: VENDOR CHECKSQuestion 2: Is the property really unclaimed?
Re-issues without voiding original. Duplicate items on Vendor Master Duplicate payments.
Wrong payee. Inter-company payments (payments between related
party companies). Periodic/recurring vendor payments (utilities,
landlords, etc.).
Reconciliation error (i.e., Bank rec has checks withsequential numbers outstanding/bad check run). Large dollar checks with familiar payee names. Check represents payment for an invoice for which
a credit was issued.
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
20/58
20
RECORDS REVIEW/PROCEDURALRECORDS REVIEW/PROCEDURAL
DUE DILIGENCE: VENDOR CHECKSDUE DILIGENCE: VENDOR CHECKS
Question 3: Is the property exempt from reporting?
No automatic de minimus property exemptionNo automatic de minimus property exemption Business to Business Exemption (tricky-generally, for MS09-
Credit Memos, ) AZ, IL, IN, IA, KS, MD, MA, NC, OH, TN,
VA, WI (WY-only for merchandise credits from gift
certificates)
Floridas under $10 exemption for credit balances
Gift Certificate / Card Exemption (tricky)
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
21/58
21
RECORDS REVIEW/PROCEDURALRECORDS REVIEW/PROCEDURAL
DUE DILIGENCE: PAYROLL ITEMSDUE DILIGENCE: PAYROLL ITEMS
Payroll - Follow-up on items outstanding once per year(internally)
Review Listing of Eligible Escheatment
Are Employees active or retired?
Are Employees on overseas assignment?
Are Employees retired and receiving a pension?
Direct Deposit (monthly review / clear)
Third Party Checks (Benefits, etc.) Follow-up on itemsoutstanding periodically (for items over 90 days old)
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
22/58
22
Procedural Due DiligenceProcedural Due Diligence
Best PracticesBest Practices1. Review / research outstanding checks/payments on a regularbasis (60 90 days) for accounting errors, familiar payeenames, or offsets.
a. Set a materiality limitb. Reverse identified accounting errors, make appropriate offsets
Review supplemental information that may lead to the addressof an employee or former employee.
Establish contact with the payee through correspondence andtelephone calls and resolve outstanding checks.
a. If appropriate, do electronic database searches for betteraddresses for items over the materiality limit and for those itemswith familiar payee names
4. Retain documentation of reversals resulting from research orcontact.
5. Maintain written procedures for record review and make them apart of your companys policy or manual.
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
23/58
23
Statutory Due Diligence:Statutory Due Diligence:Attempt to Contact the Payee/OwnerAttempt to Contact the Payee/Owner
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
24/58
24
Statutory Due DiligenceStatutory Due Diligence
(the 2(the 2ndnd Obligation)Obligation)
The Due Diligence Requirement: A last attempt to contact theowner/payee prior to reporting and remitting unclaimed property
Important Elements:Method
Letter Content
Timing
Form or Mode of Delivery
Limitations/ExceptionsAllowable Deductions
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
25/58
25
Statutory DiligenceStatutory Diligence
(the 2(the 2ndnd
Obligation)Obligation)1. Methods:
a. Generally A letter to the owner at the last known address in the records
of the holder
b. Banks/Insurance Companies Delaware (Life Insurance) and New York
(utilities, too) require publication in newspapers2. Letter Content:
a. Generally 1995 Uniform Act (Section 7e):
i. Must state that the holder is in possession of the property subject to the
unclaimed property law
ii. b. Must state that the claim of the owner is not barred by the statute of
limitations
iii. That the value of the property is greater than $50.
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
26/58
26
Sample Due Diligence LetterSample Due Diligence LetterDate
Name, AP or AR Manager
Company
Street Address
City, State Zip
Dear AP or AR Manager:
Our records indicate that your company may be the owner of funds or have an interest in funds represented by the items listed below. Notransaction or other activity has occurred for a significant period of time. If you have an interest in the funds and wish to prevent the fundsfrom being reported and remitted as unclaimed property to the State of ________, please indicate the disposition of the items listed below.After you complete the form, please fax it to us immediately at XXX-XXX-XXXX or mail it to us in the enclosed stamped, self-addressedenvelope. Please reply by __________.
Nature of Funds Date Issued Amont Description/ReferenceCheck #XXXX XX/XX/XX $XXXX Invoice No. XXX-4 gross widgets
Credit memo #XXX XX/XX/XX $XXXX
Disposition of Items (Check the blank next to one of the following.)
____ The above (s) / credit memo was cashed/or applied on ________.
____ Check (s) / credit memo was received but not cashed/applied. (If you still possess the check (s) / credit memo please return it/them alongwith this letter indicating if you are still entitled to these funds.
____ Check (s) / credit memo is no longer required. There are no outstanding invoices for this amount and the obligation has been satisfied.
____ This check (s) / credit memo was not received and our records indicate the amount is still due. Please issue another check.
____ Other: ____________________________________________________________________________________________
Name: ___________________________ Signature:___________________________________________________________
Address (if different from above)__________________________________________
SSN/Federal ID No. __________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________
Sincerely,
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
27/58
27
Statutory Due DiligenceStatutory Due Diligence
(the 2(the 2ndnd Obligation)Obligation)3. Timing:a. Generally Not more than 120 days nor less than 60 days prior to the reporting deadline.
(1995 Uniform Act, Section 7(e)): AL, AR, DC, FL, GA, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, ME, MT, NE,NV, NH, NJ, NM, NC, TN, UT, VT, WV, WI
b. Within 180 to 365 days prior to filing report: CA
c. Not required but recommended: DE*, TX, PA
d. Required but no timing specified: IA*, MS, SD, WA
*Please see state statute for more details. Time frames for due diligence may change as newlegislation is adopted.
4. Form of Delivery:
a. Generally No specification in the1995 Uniform Act, Section 7(e), but most states requirefirst class mail.
b. Notable exceptions:Iowa - Requires Banks and Financial Institutions only to send due diligence letters
by certified mail.New Jersey For items that are greater than $50, the letter must be sent certified
mail, return receipt requested.New York - First notice by first class mail within 90 days prior to reporting
deadline; second notice by certified mail, return receipt for $1000+Ohio - Certified mail requirement for items $1000 & greater
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
28/58
28
Statutory Due DiligenceStatutory Due Diligence
(the 2(the 2ndnd Obligation)Obligation)
5. Limitations/Exceptions:
a. DUE DILIGENCE MINIMUMS - By Item Amount/Value (ex. Securities):
$10 IL
$25 - NE
$50 AR, AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, GA, HI, ID, IN, LA, ME, MI, MO, MT, NC,
ND, NH, NJ, NM, NV, OH, OK, RI, SC, SD, TN, UT, VI, VT, WI, WV, WY
$75 WA
$100 - AK, KS, KY, MA, MD, MN, OR, VA
No minimum AL, CT, IA, MS, NE, NY, PR
b. No Statutory Letter Due Diligence RequirementDE, PA & TX
c. Self-Addressed Stamped Envelope Requirement-OH
d. Publication requirement
1. Delaware - Banks, courts, and life insurance2. New York - Banking organizations, insurance companies, and utilities must publish
in newspaper in city of residence of owner. Due Diligence mailing still required!
3. Puerto Rico has an advertising requirement.
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
29/58
29
Statutory Due DiligenceStatutory Due Diligence
(the 2(the 2ndnd Obligation)Obligation)
6. Allowable Deductions:
CA Banks and financial organizations may impose a service chargefor the notice in an amount not to exceed $2.00 on items over $50.
DE Expense incurred for advertisement is deducted fromremittance due
IL May deduct first class mailing costs (postage, stationary, andenvelopes
IA May deduct cost of mailing from amount owed
NV Charge of not more than $2.00 may be deducted from ownerswith over $50 and must be listed as line item on the report
NY May deduct cost of certified mail and return receipt as a
service charge. Also, may deduct costs of publication on a pro ratabasis (using a specified formula.)
OH Deductions are allowed up to $20.00 for certified mail
OK May deduct only the cost of postage.
PR May deduct expenses incurred in advertising
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
30/58
30
Reporting and RemittingReporting and Remitting
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
31/58
31
Reporting and RemittingReporting and Remitting
(the 3rd Obligation)(the 3rd Obligation)
Important Considerations:
Type of Report
Report FormatNegative Reporting
Report Aggregate Limits
Form of Remittance
Report & Remittance Delivery
Filing Extensions
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
32/58
32
Reporting and RemittingReporting and Remitting
(the 3rd Obligation)(the 3rd Obligation)The Report
1. Type - Paper, Diskette, CD, Magnetic cartridge, tape or Internet
a. Most states require electronic (diskette or CD) reporting if there are more than
25 items to report
b. Note that some states that require electronic reporting also require that a hard
copy of the report accompany the electronic report.c. Internet! Some states have on-line reporting. Examples:
Massachusetts:
https://abpweb.tre.state.ma.us/abp/frmLoginTaxId.aspx
First time call: 617-367-0400 x471 or 1-800-647-2300 x 471
New York:First time call: 1-800-221-9311 or email
[email protected] to get username and password.
Texas:
https://txcpa.cpa.state.tx.us/unclpropholder/welcomeAction.do?actio
n=Holder
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
33/58
33
Reporting and RemittingReporting and Remitting
(the 3rd Obligation)(the 3rd Obligation)
2. Format
NAUPA II Standard Reporting Format accepted by 44 states. See:
www.wagers.net/NaupaSpec/NaupaRevisedStandard.pdf
Standard relationship and property type codes listed as well.
NY does not use the NAUPA II Format or property type codes. CA accepts
the NAUPA II Format see: www.sco.ca.gov/col/ucp/holder/stdnaupa.pdf
3.Negative Reporting - Required by 30 states. Some states permit negative reportingon-line.
Example: Ohio - www.ohiobusinessgateway.ohio.gov
4. Aggregate limits Most states have a limit under which the property does NOT have to
be reported with name and address detail. Items are combined by property type and
reported as an aggregate lump sum. $25, $50, & $100 are usual the limits. Most states
do not permit aggregate reporting of dividends or mineral interests.
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
34/58
34
Reporting and RemittingReporting and Remitting
(the 3rd Obligation)(the 3rd Obligation) The Remittance
a.Form Cash (uncashed vendor, dividend and payroll checks, credits,refunds) are usually by check written to the appropriate state official oragency. Example: TX-Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts -Unclaimed Property Exception: Some states do not permit checks tobe used for the remittance if the total amount is greater than a
specified sum. Examples:1. CA requires that if the sum (including interest penalty amounts) is
greater than $20,000 it must be delivered by electronic funds transfer inthe specific manner designated in CCP Section 1532. Seewww.sco.co.gov for details.
2. TX law requires holders who paid $100,000 or more during the previousstate fiscal year to make subsequent payments by electronic fundtransfer. The preferred method is through TEXNET for moreinformation, see: http://www.window.state.tx.us/up/reporting.html
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
35/58
35
Reporting and RemittingReporting and Remitting
(the 3rd Obligation)(the 3rd Obligation)5.The Remittance -
b. Form Certificate or Confirmation (stock, mutual funds, book entryshares, etc.) While some states want shares to be liquidated prior toremittance, most want certificated or book entry confirmation shares
registered in the name of the appropriate state official or agency ornominee.
6. Report and Remittance Delivery -
a. Timing on or before the deadline specified.
(Fall By Nov. 1st, Spring varies by state)
b. Verifiable delivery is very important.
7. Filing Extensions -a. Notification of state administrator
b. Reason
c. Estimated, timely payment required? (i.e. NJ, TX)
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
36/58
36
Reporting Red Flags!Reporting Red Flags!
Tips - Preventing Reporting Red Flags by:
Making sure your reports/cover sheets are completed and
signed (and notarized if required)
Making sure the report reflects the same dollar amount thatis reflected by your remittance
Filing negative reports if required (one exception)
Requesting filing extensions at least 2 weeks prior to the
filing deadline
Using the state prescribed cover sheets and/or holdernumbers when filing reports
Filing all property types: securities and general ledger-
related and filing them accurately (not disproportionately)
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
37/58
37
Record RetentionRecord Retention
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
38/58
38
Record RetentionRecord Retention
(the 4th Obligation)(the 4th Obligation)
1. Retention Time Period 1995 Uniform Act (Section 21) a holder required to file a report must
maintain the records containing the information required to be included in
the report for 10 years after the report is filed. (Drafters notes indicate
records are to be kept for 10 year from the date the property was first
reportable.)
TX Statutes Title 6, Section 74.103- Holders must maintain records for 10years after the property was reportable.
2. Records to Retain
1995 Uniform Act (Section 21) Silent on this issue.
TX Statute is specific that records maintained must include:
(1) the name, the social security number, if known, and the last knownaddress of each person who, from the records of the holder of the property,
appears to be the owner of the property;
(2) a brief description of the property, including the identification number,
if any; and (3) the balance of each account, if appropriate
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
39/58
39
Record RetentionRecord Retention
(the 4th Obligation)(the 4th Obligation)Practical Considerations: Audit Protection
Verification of reversals - accounting and data errors
Evidence of reporting and timely reportingEvidence of due diligence including certified mailing if it was
required.
(Note: OH law specifically requires retention of proof ofcertified mailing, or proof of valid exemption of certifiedmailing, for at least 5 years from the report filing date orcompletion of a State compliance audit, whichever is earlier.)
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
40/58
40
AUDITSAUDITS
Preparing for An Audit
Working with the State
Considerations
Penalty Review
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
41/58
41
Preparing for An AuditPreparing for An Audit
Preliminary Questions1. Who is performing the audit?
(State or contract/third party auditors?)
2. Which states are involved?
3. What is the scope of the audit? (Number of years covered in
the audit.)4. What audit procedures will be used? (What procedures will
be used when records are incomplete or nonexistent?)
5. What are the auditors schedules and site requirements?
6. Will the state(s) or their agent sign a confidentialityagreement?
7. Have you considered obtaining legal counsel and outside
expertise to address audit issues?
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
42/58
42
Preparing for An AuditPreparing for An Audit
Internal Review Prior to AuditDocument internal controls
Review chart of accounts
Consider all company policies and procedures related to
unclaimed property compliance and reporting
Review previously filed unclaimed property reports
Compile supporting documentation, including due
diligence records
Review voided and outstanding check lists
Obtain non-ERISA benefit plan information and evaluatepotential liability
Involve legal counsel in the internal review and in
correspondence with the auditors
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
43/58
43
Preparing for An AuditPreparing for An Audit
Data to Provide to Auditors
Organization Chart
Chart of Accounts
Merger and Acquisition history
Unclaimed Property Reports
in previous years
Bank Account Related Info (Reconciliations, Statements
and Outstanding, Voided and Stopped Check Lists)
General Ledger Trial Balance Documentation (includingA/P, Payroll and Write-off Account Detail)
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
44/58
Working with the StateWorking with the State
Audit Considerations
Consider Documentation Availability
Timeframe Available
Research Depth (to determine dispositionof specific items)
System Conversions/Upgrades may
impact historical data available
Understand Write-Off History for A/P andPayroll Accounts
Review Chart of Accounts and Trial Balance
44
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
45/58
45
Working with the State:Working with the State:
Penalty and Interest AssessmentsPenalty and Interest Assessments Is the penalty accurate?Consider time frame/scope of the penalty (CA
corporate fiscal year controls)Does state law permit compounding?
Recalculate penalty to determine accuracy Was the penalty assessed in error or is it unenforceable? Is there a statute of limitations on penalty assessment?Was the property that is the subject of the penalty filed
during an amnesty period?
Are there circumstances that may permit the state to setaside the penalty ?Can the state waive penalties and interest? (If so, what
are the parameters for waiver?)
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
46/58
46
Latest DevelopmentsLatest Developments
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
47/58
Latest Developments: Audit IssuesLatest Developments: Audit Issues
Received Not Invoiced/Unmatched receivers
Assuming excess merchandise shipped over
order and not invoiced.
Extrapolations Unreasonable basis Extended Audit Periods Eroding the holders
will
Audit Costs Indiana now requires holders to
pay the costs of third party audits
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
48/58
48
Latest Developments: Legislation/Latest Developments: Legislation/
Dormancy Period ChangesDormancy Period Changes Delaware SB 334 Effective Date: 7/1/2008 - Reduced the securities-related dormancy periods
from 5 years to 3 years (except SC20 Credit Balances which remain at 5 years).
Hawaii - HB 2559 Effective date: 7/1/2009 - the HI legislature adopted the 1995 Uniform
Unclaimed Property Act to replace the current Hawaii unclaimed property law. This legislation
impacts reporting for the October 31st, 2009 deadline. As of or cut-off date for that year will
be June 30th for all entities except life insurance which will have a December 31st cut-off date
AND an October 31st reporting deadline. The report aggregate limit will be $50.
New Hampshire HB 1533 Effective date: Approx. 8/3/2008 - Various changes to the NHAbandoned Property law. Significant provisions in the bill include: 1) All reports with 20 or more
items must be reported in an electronic format prescribed by the administrator; 2) Securities
dormancy periods (including underlying shares) were reduced to 3 years from 5 years; and 3)
Requires the unclaimed property administrator to precede a sale of securities with a mailing to
the owner.
Virgin Islands: Bill 27-0169 Effective Date: 7/12/08 Repeals the unclaimed property law and
replaced it with a new one. Generally, the new law has 5, 3 and 1 year dormancy periods (i.e., giftcertificates, customer credits in retail and insurance payments = 3 years; utility deposits and
refunds, payroll and property held by a court or government = 1 year, securities, savings accounts
and checking accounts = 5 years). The new law has a due diligence minimum and aggregate
limit of $50. The reporting deadline is November 1st for all entities except life insurance which
has a May 1st reporting deadline.
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
49/58
Latest Developments:Latest Developments:
Legislation/Various ChangesLegislation/Various Changes Tennessee - HB 3793 Effective Date: 5/16/2008
- Safeguards the working papers and identity of
holders involved in unclaimed property audits.
Makes such paper confidential and not publicrecords unless certain circumstances exist.
Wisconsin: AB 617 Effective Date: 3/21/2008
The fiscal year is defined to be from July 1st toJune 30th for the purposes of the report
information cut-off and penalty assessment.
49
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
50/58
Latest Developments:Latest Developments:
Gift Cards and CertificatesGift Cards and Certificates
Over 30 states have statutes that restrict gift card andcertificates. Some prohibit dormancy fees and expirationdates.
The statutes vary dramatically from each other. Some do
not apply to prepaid phone cards, pay cards, or other opensystem cards that can be used with multiple stores
Simon Lawsuits federal preemption for certain cards notsubject to state restrictions
Newest legislation: Nebraska exempts from the NEunclaimed property law, gift cards or certificates that haveno expiration date or dormancy fees. If have such then lawapplies with a 3 year dormancy period. Does not apply toprepaid cards.
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
51/58
Latest Developments:Latest Developments:
Gift Cards and Certificates (2)Gift Cards and Certificates (2)Options:1. Incorporate a gift card issuing company in a state
where gift cards are exempt from escheatment.
May need a consultant to make it is done
correctly.
2. Remove expiration dates and dormancy fees from gift
cards.
3. Retain name and address of purchasers of gift cards
and certificates.4. Consider transactional rules.
5. Consider privacy issues.
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
52/58
Latest Developments:Latest Developments:
Third Party DisbursementsThird Party Disbursements
A Third Party Administrator (TPA) is aspecialized service provider that may manage all
or parts of specific functions within a company.Transfer Agent Securities/Dividend
Payroll & Vendor Payments
HR Benefit / 401K
Paying Agent
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
53/58
Latest Developments:Latest Developments:
Third Party DisbursementsThird Party Disbursements
Who is Liable for Escheat?
What functions were outsourced?
Issuer/Company may still be liable
Best Practices
If TPA is required under contract to do the escheatment:Make sure contract permits audit of escheat activities
Add a clause to contract that the TPA must provide proof of
compliance with state escheat laws (i.e., copies of due diligence
letters, reports and remittances)
Add a clause to the contract that requires the TPA to indemnifyyour company if the TPA fails to comply or inadequately
complies and your company is assessed penalties and/or interest
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
54/58
Latest Developments: RebatesLatest Developments: Rebates
Third party rebate processors
Whose obligation is it?
Ongoing litigation Fitzgerald v. Young AmericaCurrent status
Rebate creation/construction
Problem provisions
Current Audit Ramifications
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
55/58
Latest Developments:Latest Developments:
Pending LawsuitsPending Lawsuits
1. Massachusetts B2B Exemption - Outstanding credit
balances to a vendor or commercial customer from a
vendor resulting from a transaction occurring in the
normal and ordinary course of business shall be exempt
from the provisions of this chapter. M.G.L. ch. 200A, 5.
Massachusetts reverses its application of this statute,
resulting in lawsuits:
Biogen v. Cahill
Stride Rite v. Cahill
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
56/58
Latest Developments:Latest Developments:
Pending LawsuitsPending Lawsuits
2.California Release of Liability No Bar to SuitCA Court of Appeals
overturned the summary judgment granted by the lower court stating
that Hewlett Packard is not immune from suit when it transferred the
plaintiffs abandoned property to the state of California under the
California unclaimed property law. Vondjidis v. Hewlett Packard, 85
Cal. Rptr. 3d 806 (6th App. Dist., Nov. 25, 2008)
3. Holder challenges Delaware in assessing interest and for enforcement
of terms of a voluntary disclosure agreement. Computer Associates,
Inc. v. Cordrey, et. al. (Filed 10/22/08).
4. California Violates Due Process and Must Make More Effort to
Contact Owners - In a California US District Court, the initial rulings
caused California to change how unclaimed property reports must be
filed. Main case pending. Taylor v. Westly, 488 F.3d 1197, 1201-02
(9th Cir. 2007).
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
57/58
57
ResourcesResources
1. National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators(NAUPA) www.unclaimed.org
2. NAUPA II Standard Reporting Format:www.wagers.net/NaupaSpec/NaupaRevisedStandard.pdf
3. 1995 Uniform Unclaimed Property Act Reporting
Specifications:http://www.law.upenn.edu/library/ulc/fnact99/1990s/uupa95.txt
4. National Association of State Treasurers (NAST)www.nast.net
5. Unclaimed Property Professionals Organization (UPPO)www.uppo.org
Annual Conference March 10 13, 2009Hyatt Regency Jacksonville, FL
-
7/27/2019 escheatment
58/58
58
Your Presenter Today:Your Presenter Today:
Dan Mayer