escalate 2 nd student conference 16 april 2010 glasgow caledonian university school of health
DESCRIPTION
ESCalate 2 nd Student conference 16 April 2010 Glasgow Caledonian University School of Health. Student Engagement Through Collaboration: Enhancing the Curriculum with Learners as Partners Helen Gough Patricia McDonald Patricia Lynn - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ESCalate 2nd Student conference 16 April 2010
Glasgow Caledonian UniversitySchool of Health
Student Engagement Through Collaboration: Enhancing the Curriculum with Learners as Partners
Helen Gough
Patricia McDonald Patricia Lynn
Linda Proudfoot Lynda Yates
Aim of Presentation
To share the collaborative journey between student nurse
teachers and lecturers in the evaluation of reusable
learning objects
Background to action research project
The collaborative journey
Challenges and learning
Students as stakeholders
page 2
Glenfinnan Viaduct, West Highland Line
Planning the Journey
MSc in Healthcare Education GCU Caledonian Scholar & Associates Initiative
Learning, Teaching & Assessment Strategy
Caledonian Scholar Project Aim and Objectives AIM:
Collaboratively develop, implement and evaluate creative, reusable
learning objects which build on existing, innovative educational
approaches.
OBJECTIVES:
To collaborate with student teachers and key stakeholders in the
development and embedding of two reusable learning objects.
To design the evaluation in collaboration with student teachers.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the reusable learning objects and
their impact on student learning.
To engage and disseminate at programme, school, university &
wider education community levels.
page 5
The Ticket Office
page 6
Pre departure
Pre departure: Engaging students as stakeholders
Incentives to engageYear 2 students and newly qualified nurse teachers (NQNTs)
Learning opportunity & teaching practice hours for Year 2 students linked to stage in programme associated with M Level research and evaluating a curriculum development
CPD opportunity for NQNTs to contribute towards retaining professional recognition
Enable practical application of research process and develop research skills and knowledge
Enhancing curriculum
Build on existing relationships between students and programme team
Choosing to engageOpportunity to know more about research and evaluation
Application of theoretical research knowledge to practice was anticipated
Involvement in innovative teaching and learning
Opportunity to collaborate with peers
Enabled achievement of NMC/UKPSF outcomes
Developing teaching and research roles
page 7
Departure Point
page 8
Establishing the collaboration
Establishing the collaboration
Five members of the collaborative group ( two lecturers, two second year student nurse teachers and one newly qualified nurse teacher)
Agreeing the use of the small scale evaluation model (Hall &Hall 2004)
Determining the guiding framework for collaboration (Barrett & Keeping, 2005)
page 9
Determining the guiding framework
Collaboration in action
Cycle 1:
• Seven meetings from November 08 - May 09
• Constructed evaluation objectives:
• To determine the effectiveness of two learning objects as resources fro blended learning
• To ascertain the reusability of two learning objects
• To explore student learning from engagement with two learning objects
• To explore learning from collaboration in the design and evaluation of two learning objects
page 11
Collaboration in actionCycle 1:
Determining study populations: Emerging stakeholder positions
Students emerging as learners
Students emerging as co-investigators
Students emerging as research participants
Sampling, recruitment & data collection methods
Questionnaires
Synchronous discussion
Focus groups
Selecting analytical methods
Descriptive statistics
Thematic analysispage 12
Collaboration in action
Cycle 2:
Critical reflection on collaboration and outcomes of cycle 1 to aid
decision making for cycle 2
Students as learners and co-investigators
Determination of participant population for cycle 2
Revised recruitment strategy & ethics
Revised questionnaires
Recruited study participants
Management and analysis of quantitative data
Students as research participants
Research participants in Cycle 2 focus grouppage 13
Signalling : Student challenges and learning
ChallengesWhat have we done?
Part-time study mode
Full-time employment
Distance
IT access
Are we going to manage this?
Do we have the appropriate knowledge?
LearningMove from surface to deep approach in learning
Made jargon more meaningful
Collaboration filled gaps in learning
Development of teaching role
Promoting interprofessional working in a curriculum development
Development of preceptorship programme
Development of research role
Ethics, designing data collection tools & qualitative data analysis
Transference of research knowledge
& skills
page 14
First Station: End of cycle one early themes
page 15
Shared learning…“Its each individuals knowledge and background experience that they bring to the collaboration”
Relationships and ownership...“Oh you’re my tutors and you have much more knowledge base than me, but because of the collaboration it has not been that way at all, it has been, I think equally shared”…
Collaboration Process“I think that when we came to analysing the feedback from the students and working together with the coding…that was really beneficial and I got a lot from that collaboration…”
Signalling : Lecturer learning and challenges
Challenges
Staged ethical approval & recruitment
Integrating research activity within current workload
Facilitator Vs group member
Resisting the urge to lead;
Co-ordinating communication
Balancing stakeholder positions
Learning
Learning from collaboration requires to be recognised and made meaningful
Relationship is crucial to learning
Significant organisational role involved
Flexibility is a double edged sword
Emerging model of collaboration
age 16
page 17
Emerging model of collaboration
Approaching our Destination
page 18
Students as stakeholders
Students as learners
Students as co-investigators
Students as research participants
page 19
References
Barrett, G., Keeping, C. (2005) “The process required for effective interprofessional learning” In: Barrett, G., Sellman, D., Thomas, J. (Eds) Interprofessional working in health and social care Palgrave MacMillan: Basingstoke pp 18-31
Hall, I., Hall, D. (2004) Evaluation and social research: introducing small scale practice Palgrave MacMillan: Basingstoke
Contact details:
Helen Gough: 0141-331-8333, [email protected]
Linda Proudfoot: 0141 331 3904, [email protected]
page 20
Discussion Key questions for debate:
Please tell us about your experiences of collaboration between students and lecturers in relation to improving learning and teaching.
What frameworks or models did you use to support collaborative learning and what are your views on the model for collaborative learning introduced in the presentation today?
How viable are the three stakeholder positions (students as learners, co investigators & research participants ) in enhancing a curriculum with learners as partners
page 21