eruption sequence - wordpress.com · 2018-05-14 · distal ridge is longer (like canines) because...
TRANSCRIPT
Information about anteriors:
Mandibular contacts:
-Central: M = incisal, D = incisal
-Lateral: M = incisal, D = incisal
-Canine: M = incisal, D = mid 1/3
Maxillary contacts:
-Central: M = incisal, D = jxn of incisal + mid
-Lateral: M = jxn, D = middle
-Canine: M = jxn, D = middle
Facio-lingual contacts:
-ALWAYS IN THE MIDDLE THIRD OF CROWN
Facial embrasures:
-Facial < Lingual
-Exception: max. 1st molar and mand. centrals F = L
Mamelons:
-Every tooth is made from 4 cusps except mand/max 1st molars and mand 2nd premolar
-Mamelons are seen on permanent incisors and they represent 3 cusps
-Attrition will wear away at the mamelons
-If seen on older patients = probably malocclusion
Cingulum:
-4th cusp of the incisors. Where the distal and mesial marginal ridges join
-CENTERED CINGULUM: Max lateral/canine and Mand central
-DISTAL CINGULUM: Max central and Mand lateral/canine
All anterior teeth have height of contours in the cervical third
Eruption sequence:
-Centrals: 6~7 mand, 7~8 max
-Laterals: 7~8 mand, 8~9 max
-Canines: 9~10 mand, 11~12 max
-Premolars: 10~12
Basic background:
-Starts calcifying before age 1 until 8 = This is why fluorosis happens
-Permanent teeth roots: done 2.5 years after eruption
-Primary teeth roots: done 1.5 years after eruption
Incisal embrasures (largest to smallest):
-Max canine/lateral
-Mand canine/lateral
-Max lateral/central
-Max central/central
-Mand lateral/central
-Mand central/central
Crown (largest to smaller):
-Mandibular canine
-Maxillary central
-Maxillary canine
Deformities (most likely to less likely):
-Third molars
-Maxillary lateral
-Mandibular second premolar
-It is the widest anterior tooth-Only tooth with pulp that's wider M-D than F-L-Second tallest crown-Varying forms (square, ovoid, taper)-
Cut it at the CEJ
Only tooth that has a
triangular cross
section at the CEJ!
Cingulum has a distal shift
Mesial marginal
ridge is LONGER
Cingulum has a distal shift
Mesial edge is straight, often continuous w. root
Very straight root with a blunt end
About 90 degIncisal third = flat
Middle third = flat
Gingival third
= convex
Large
Greatest CEJ curvature(concave)
"Spade" like
appearance
Random facts:-Best developed lingually-Most likely to have dens evaginatus-Crown is MUCH smaller than max centrals-Can vary greatly (like 3rd molars)
-Distal incisal angle is ROUND
-This SLOPES the tooth cervically
-Which means distal marginal
ridge would be shorter
-Mesial is more square as usual
Distal marginal
ridge is shorter
As mentioned
above, lingual
anatomy is very
pronounced in
max laterals
Cingulum is centered-Less prominent
This groove on
the distal side
makes it hard
to do scalings
in this area
Root is thinner (M-D & F-L) than centrals but LONGER
If roots are tapered, they are usually always distally except for canines which can have mesial or distal
Tooth is much rounder than central
Curved
Curved
Curved
Root is longer and
narrower than
central incisor
Lingual pit may be seen (unlike centrals)
Crown is more "triangular"
rather than central's "spade"
because the MMR is so
prominent
Very small CEJ curve
In distal view, MMR and DMR seen because DMR < MMR
Random facts about canines in general-No mamelons-Long crowns, long roots-There are TWO lingual fossae-Wider F-L than M-D-"Cornerstone tooth" due to strength-Loss of canines = flattening/sinking of face and corners of mouth-Alveolar bone is thin -> prone to fracture
Random facts about max. canine-Longest tooth, longest root-Third longest crown-Best developed cingulum-Most stable tooth in the mouth
Pulp is really wide
Best developed
cingulum
MMR and DMR are about the same
Incisal edge is
slightly facial to the
long axis
Mesial cusp
ridge = shorter
Note: mesial cusp ridge is always shorter than distal, except for primary max. canines and max. 1st premolars
Might have a lingual pit
Prominent cusp tip
Disto-incisal angle is more cervical than mesial
Distal border of
CROWN is S
shaped and
extends past
the root's profile
Prominent labial ridge Slightly mesial
Narrower on lingual side
Lingually, there are 3 ridges-Mesial marginal-Distal marginal-Lingual
Between these 3 ridges, there are 2 fossas:-Distolingual-Mesiolingual
Overall, CEJ is flatter than incisors. On the canines, distal CEJ is flatter (as usual)
Huge cervical bulk
Cusp tip is at center of tooth
Distal side is wider and more roundedMesial side has flatter faces
Facial ridge is slightly mesial
Distal or straight apex
Much more curved than mandibular
Random facts:-Smallest tooth-Narrowest M-D-Most symmetric-First perm. teeth (succedaneous) to come in-Smallest embrasures
The only tooth that has M-D inciso-gingival contact points at the same level
Both angles basically 90deg,
but distal is SLIGHTLY
bigger and rounded
If roots are tapered, they
are usually always
distally except for
canines which can have
mesial or distal
Incisal edge is
slightly lingual
to long axis
Centered cingulum
40% chance!!!!!!!
If the tooth does have 2 root canals, then it will be facio/lingually, not M-D
Groove on this side is usually much more pronounced
Lingual anatomy is not very distinct
MESIAL VIEW:
-Incisal edge
appears to be in
middle
DISTAL VIEW:
-Due to rotation of the
tooth on the incisal
edge, incisal edge is
more lingual when
seen distally
-Longest crown
-Second longest tooth
-Second longest root
-Anterior tooth most likely to
have bifurcated root
-ONLY TOOTH W. POSSIBLE
MESIAL INCLINATION
-Similar to maxillary, but with
less defined cusps
But, a
little
duller
Cingulum is prominent
but not as much as
max. canines. Also, it
is distal shifted, which
makes MMR > DMR
Cusp tip is slightly lingual to
the axis, like mand. incisors
Unlike max. canines, there is
no lingual pit above cingulum
Only tooth with
chance of mesial
apex inclination
basically flat
Not as thick as max. caninesFacial height of
contour = more
cervical than max.
canines
Crown and
root forms a
gradual arc
Flatter profile than max. canines
As usual, CEJ is
more convex at
the mesial side,
not so much on
distalGrooves may
be on both
sides of root
-Erupts at age 10~12 after
deciduous molars
-1 buccal cusp, 1 lingual cusp
-1 root or 2 roots
-Slightly shorter than canines
-Lacks accessory grooves
2 = distal pit
1 = mesial
Buccal view: crown appears pentagonal
Mesial cuspal ridge is
longer and straighter
(unlike canines)Cusp tip =
distally shifted
Buccal cusp = sharp, more distal, tall
Lingual cusp = dull, more mesial, short
However, both cusps are still distal to the midline
Developmental groove from mesial marginal ridge may be seen in the lingual view
Mesial contact: buccal middle third
Distal contact: buccal jxn mid/occlusal thirds
Buccal HOC: gingival 1/3
Lingual HOC: middle 1/3
Flattened
CEJ on
mesial
Lingual root = straighter and shorter
Buccal root =
tortuous and longer
Bucco-lingually, pulp appears thinMesio-distally, pulp appears thick
Triangular
ridges
Central
developmental
groove
Mesial and distal triangular fossae
Mesial marginal groove
-Same size as max. first premolar
-Buccal and lingual cusps are SAME height
-Buccal cusp is less pointed and shorter
-Less distinct occlusal groove
-Less curvature of mesial surface under
contact area
-Accessory grooves are present
Rounded cusps
Distal ridge is longer (like canines)
Because distal
is longer, it
shifts the cusp
to the mesial
side. This is
opposite of first
premolars
Much shallower
Much
shallower
1st premolar =
usually 2 roots
2nd premolar =
1 root
No visible mesial
marginal ridge
groove like 1st
premoalr
No mesial marginal ridge
Also shorter
Pits and fossae are closer together
Basically a
large cingulum
Defining feature of the
mandibular first premolar.
Happens because the
triangular ridges of both lingual
and buccal cusp meet up
Buccal cusp
Ling. cusp
This groove
separates MMR
and ling. cusp
Distal = longer, so the cusp tip
shifts mesially. This is opposite to
max. 1st premolar cusp tip
Triangular ridge
Tapers toward lingual
For occlusion w. maxillary
MMR is
heavily
slanted
because it
doesnt
connect to
the lingual
cusp tip.
There is a
mesiolingual
groove in
the way
Buccal HOC = gingival thirdLingual HOC = middle third
Flat CEJ
DMR is much less angled than MMR because of no groove. However, not parallel to transverse ridge
But no concavities are
visible on crown
Not on crown
Lots of tapering on the lingual side on gingival crown
Thicker
than
mand.
1st PM
Same story as maxillary 1/2 PM's
Does not
"taper"
sharply like
the first PM
Usually 3 cusps
(largest to smallest)
-Buccal
-Mesiolingual
-Distolingual
Distolingual groove separates mesiolingual and distolingual cusps
DMR and MMR are
same, but distal
may be slightly
lower (because DL
cusp is small)
Sometimes not very prominent
Mesiofacial root
usually has 2
canals - total 4
root canals
-Largest molar-Rhomboid appearance seen occlusally-5 cusps (except cusp of Carabelli is non functional)-MAXILLARY MOLARS: wider facio-lingually-MANDIBULAR MOLARS: wider mesio-distally
Cusp size:
Mesiolingual (I) > Mesiofacial (II) >
Distofacial (III) > Distolingual (IV) >
Carabelli (V)
Buccal developmental groove
Facial
groove
Facial groove
separates the 2
facial cusps (II + III)
Can be seen even in facial
view! Due to V shaped
indent between facial cusps
Wide cuspShorter cusp`
Mesiolingual groove-Separates cusp I from V
Oblique ridge
separates mesial and
distal parts of tooth.
Highest point of tooth
Distolingual
developmental
groove
Lingual developmental groove
Distal fossa
Mesial fossa
Central fossa
Distal linear fossa
Mesial contact = jxn of occlusal and mid on buccal sideDistal contact = middle third on buccal side
Lingual root
occupies
the whole
lingual
crown
Buccal HOC = gingival thirdLingual HOC = middle third
Mesiolingual
root
Lingual root
DMR < MMR, so both are visible in distal view
AND THIRD
-Reduction in crown size
-Also rhomboidal
-Distobuccal cusp less prominent
-Roots become parallel (2nd molar)
and even possibly fused (3rd molar),
unlike first molar where the roots
were hugely spread out
-Point of root trifurcation moves
apically
-All contact areas = middle third on
buccal
-Buccal HOC gradually goes down:
jxn of gingiva/middle (2nd) and
gingical third (3rd)
-Loss of cusp of carabelli
FIRST MOLAR = RHOMBOIDSECOND MOLAR = SQUARETHIRD MOLAR = HEART
But same linguo-facially
Mesiolingual
cusp much
less prominent
Lingual root much less
prominent and smaller
-Roots fit in the crown boundary
-MMR and DMR are much less prominent
-D-B cusp and D-L cusp are less prominent,
which allows us to see most of the occlusal
surface in the distal view
Distal cusps are lower than mesial cusps
Distolingual cusp
less prominent,
usually absent in
3rd molar
Second and third have more
accessory grooves, giving it a
wrinkled appearanceOblique ridge
progresses distally as
we go distal in the mouth
-"Anchor tooth"-Greatet mesiodistal dimension of all dentition-Mandibular molars are wider M-D-Mandibular molars have no oblique ridge
Cusp size (L to S):
Mesiobuccal > Mesiolingual = Distolingual > Distobuccal > Distal cusp
Central devel. groove
Disto
buccal
groove
Mesio
buccal
groove
Lingual groove
Distobuccal groove starts
just behind the central pit
of the central
developmental groove
Central pit
Distal fossaMesial fossa
All of the developmental
grooves pass the occlusal
table and continue down the
side of the tooth
Central fossa = where
all 5 cusps meet. May
contain the central pit
Mesial and lingual PITS are within their respective FOSSAE
Bucco-cervical ridge-Gives the tooth the height of contour in cervical third
The 2 lingual cusps
are same height and
much taller than
buccal cusps (due to
relationship with
maxilla)
Facial is wider (3 cusps)Lingual has a "constricted" appearance
MMR with the MMR devl. groove going through it
Buccal HOC = cervival 1/3 due to buccocervical ridgeLingual HOC = middle third
Contact is centered, @ jxn of middle and occlusal thirds
Bulky bucco-cervical ridge makes crown appear to flex lingually
Huge mesial root with concavity
All 3 distal cusps can be seen
DMR can also have a marginal ridge devel. groove, like mesial
Smaller root and crown (because BC ridge ends here). Also has concavity like mesial root
Root bifurcation in the cervical third
-No distal cusp-Crown reduces in size-Medio-distal width reduction-Smaller cusps-2nd molar: roots are parallel and slanted-3rd molar: likely fused and distally flexed-Root bifurcates more apically as you go back-Contacts: centrally in middle thirds-Buccal HOC: gingical third-Lingual HOC: middle third-Bucco-cervical ridge flattens
No distal cusp = less convergence towards the lingual
Distal surface is just as wide as
mesial surface, so we see less
in the distal view
Mesial root sharper than 1st molar
Distal cusps are more separated than
mesial cusps
Third molar can have 4~5 cusps, could be
bigger or smaller than 1st molar, and has
heavy supplemental anatomyAND THIRD