error analysis of bahrani students
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
1/54
Page1
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
2/54
ContentsAbout the Author...................................................................................................3
Introduction........................................................................................................... 3
L1 & L2 writing.......................................................................................................5
Error Analysis.........................................................................................................7
Transfer..................................................................................................................
Literacy re!iew....................................................................................................12
"ethodology........................................................................................................ 1#
$esults and discussion.........................................................................................23
Transfer hy%othesis..............................................................................................3
'ase studies and suggestions which ha!e or are li(ely to wor(..........................37
'onclusion........................................................................................................... )*otes................................................................................................................... )
+ibliogra%hy.........................................................................................................1
A%%endi,..............................................................................................................
Page2
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
3/54
About the Author
I ha!e s%ent se!eral years teaching Arabic -rst language s%ea(ers at and around
undergraduate le!el. "y e,%erience with these students has seen e teach in the /.0.
Libya audi Arabia and at the tie of writing this dissertation +ahrain. uring the
4ourney with the I ha!e e,%erienced their struggles and tribulation of learning English
not least their atte%ts but often failures to write with 4ust the ost basic %ro-ciency in
English. It is for those students who ha!e sha%ed e as a teacher that I atte%t in this
%a%er to recognise why it was so tough for us to achie!e that which we ost desired and
wor(ed so hard for.
Introduction
6riting holds great signi-cance in the AngloAerican world and this is e!ident in its
dee% roots in +ritish and Aerican culture and history 8$eichelt et al. 2)129. The
in:uence of these two countries %olitically econoically and historically has created a
need for a world language and thus an ability to write in English. ;owe!er such a
culture of writing is not a worldwide tradition and unfortunately for Arabic s%ea(ers one
not %re!alent in their ci!ilisation. Arabic s%ea(ers are not a %ariah in the language world
because of their lac( of allegiance to writing any other nations share a ore !ocally
orientated language. i & Ahad 2)129. *e!erthelessEnglish does ha!e a fre?uently used syste one that is well de!elo%ed and co%le, and
for a learner to succeed in the ac?uisition of the language the writer belie!es that
astery of it ust be an ob4ecti!e. "oreo!er the success of an o!erall co%etence in
English is de%endent u%on a good foundation in writing %rowess because of the %rocess
in!ol!ed in ac?uiring such s(ills.
The dissiilarity for Arabic s%ea(ers is not 4ust a di@erence in attitude towards writing. As
the reader is li(ely to be aware of on the surface le!el Arabic and English are not in the
sae orthogra%hic neighbourhood 8aigh & chitt n.d.9. They do not share siilar lines
of thought or %osses the sae tense systes which are also coonly e!ident in
reading a %iece of writing co%osed by an Arabic s%ea(er. Although such di@erences are
clearly not uni?ue to Arabic and English the lac( of %ro-ciency in general by Arabic
s%ea(ers writing in English is indeed and ?uantitati!e data is a!ailable to see the
%henoenon which co%ares the writing abilities of Arabic s%ea(ers in English with
those fro other languages.
Page3
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
4/54
"y own research into the IELT test during 2)12 shed light on the e,treity of Arabic
s%ea(ers lac( of %ro-ciency in English writing s%eci-cally acadeic writing. IELT has
collocated data on all their test ta(ers and of ) -rst language bac(grounds recorded
Arabic has the 4oint lowest score for writing 8. 9 with />be( 8IELT.org 2)119. This
%ro-ciency ga% is obser!able when teaching classes consisting of both Arabic and non
Arabic students. As a co%lient to the e!idence found on the IELT website and the
bac(ground reading for this dissertation a seistructured inter!iew has been conductedwith a sall grou% of +ahraini teachers of English this focussed on the diBculties
students faced with writing and how these teachers dealt with the. Their feedbac( has
hel%ed to focus this research and -eld of literature for this %a%er and a closer loo( at the
?ualitati!e data is %resented later with the data fro an error analysis conducted for this
%a%er.
Although there is a ultitude of research that has been conducted on Arabic students
and their %robles with English there is a co%elling lac( of theory and agreeent in
the -eld. "oreo!er a large %ro%ortion of the literature a!ailable is based u%on old theory
and uch is lac(ing in acadeic rigour. Three core areas of agreeent see to be
e!ident though that of Arabic s%ea(ersC wea(nesses in writing teachersC inability tocater for these in the Arabic s%ea(ing world and the idea that %ractice of writing does not
necessarily e?uate to i%ro!eents in writing ade%tness in the case of the Arabic
s%ea(er. Therefore this %a%er atte%ts to bring together research that has been
conducted in the -eld of second language writing teaching. It loo(s at %re!ious -ndings
on the ty%ical writing errors %roduced by Arabic s%ea(ers and re:ects u%on language
transfer to see if answers for these inaccuracies lying there. The %a%er will also loo( at
strategies e%loyed by Arabic students writing in English.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
5/54
L1 & L2 writing
As entioned %re!iously there is still a lac( of co%rehensi!e theory based u%on L2
writing which is ob!ious e!en ore so with the Arabic s%ea(er learning English. oe
researchers fault a belief that -rst language 8L1 fro this %oint on9 learning is the sae
%rocess as that of second language learning 8L2 fro this %oint onwards9 8il!a 139.
The conse?uence of such reasoning is that uch L2 research which has been used is
highly de%endent u%on L1 research 8"yles 2))29. The writer feels due to the diBculty in
conducting longitudinal co%rehensi!e studies on L2 students this %attern of L1
de%endence is li(ely to continue for soe tie in soe studies but already L2 research is
gaining inde%endence and this study is a (ey e,a%le.
L1 and L2 writing ay a%%ear fairly siilar on the surface le!el li(e the co%osing
%rocess as students writing in L1 and L2 will go through %lanning writing and re!ising
stages. 8il!a 139 ;owe!er if one loo(s dee%er into this %rocess it can be seen thatthere is indeed big di@erences. ha!e to wor( uch harder when co%osing in L2
because they ha!e to deal with linguistic functions which ha!e becoe autoatic in their
L1. 6riters tend to get -,ated on the local areas of a te,t li(e s%elling graar and
word order and as a result neglect the ore global areas of the te,t li(e rhetoric
coherence and the o!erall use of cohesi!e ties 8il!a 139 8"yles 2))29. They also
tend to ta(e uch ore tie in co%osing their te,ts and %roduce writings which
des%ite the longer ties and shorter than those %roduced in their L1. Again this a%%ears
to be due to their -,ation on the local areas of their te,t but also %erha%s due to less
%lanning beforehand 8il!a 139. 6hen one considers the linguistic co%le,ities of
writing in a second language it is easy to see how a lac( of %lanning will a@ect the
studentCs writing ability. "oreo!er the reader ay agree that such additional focus when
writing in L2 creates a uch ore arduous tas( which in contrast to a creati!e and
e,%ressi!e underta(ing in L1. Therefore it is clear that L1 and L2 writing are not identical
%rocesses to go through for a learner.
It also a%%ears that the %assion for lower le!el focus by the students ay be a direct
result of in:uence fro their teachers. "uch has been written about s%eci-c graatical
and le,ical areas but little in -eld of rhetoric and other global le!el issues. "oreo!er the
writer has e,%erienced as a teacher of English that his colleagues are also highly
focused on graar and s%elling areas of studentsC writing. It ay be that dealing with
lower le!el areas of writing are easier for the teacher and student and uch oreob4ecti!ely recogni>ed. The reader ay ha!e also e,%erience that any students are
highly a%%reciati!e of graatical and le,ical feedbac( on their writing and that such
feedbac( a%%ears to be ore e@ecti!e than ore in de%th feedbac( relating to rhetoric
coherence and cohesion. "yles 2))2 also writes that she feels that students a%%reciate
feedbac( on their graar and s%elling but that other researchers li(e 8$obb et al
Page5
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
6/54
1#=9 feel that is in the studentCs interest not to focus on these areas as these i%ro!e
with writing %ractice. It is the writerCs o%inion that this is also true but caution ust be
raised as there is also the ris( or fossili>ation the ter used when an error has fossilised
in the students %roduction and sees not to be recti-able occurring if learners are not
guided away fro their ista(es. It is e!ident therefore that the teacher %lays a highly
i%ortant role in L2 writing and ay e!en hold the (ey to success or failure for their
students.
As entioned %re!iously the teacher holds soe res%onsibility in de!elo%ing a studentCs
L2 writing. The teacherCs role in a class is to foster learning and de!elo% %ro-ciency
which will both lead to better writers. In this section it was also discussed that L2 writers
%erha%s focus too uch on their lower le!el writing areas but this is ine!itable until such
things as graar and s%elling ha!e becoe ore autoatic. Autoaticity as the by
%roduct of higher %ro-ciency is argued to result in a ore :uent and con-dent writer
who can then turn their attention to the global areas of writing 8"yles 2))29.
As has been entioned in this section there e,ist soe siilarities in L1 and L2 writing
on su%er-cial le!els ?uite coonly. In contrast there can also be dee%er le!el siilarityon soe occasions.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
7/54
Error Analysis
Error analysis fro now on EA is a ethod of categori>ing and analysing errors which
ha!e been ade. It is a tool which can shed light on i%ortant learner %robles and hel%
to forulate theories about addressing the errors which learners a(e. Ellis states that
EA is concerned ore with learner language as o%%osed to nati!e or target language 8*L
& TL9. EA can be classi-ed as either in strong for where one can %redict errors which a
student will a(e based u%on %re!ious EA or it can be regarded as the wea( for where
one can e,%lain the reason of errors %ostorte. ;owe!er the latter for of EA cannot
%redict what errors will occur fro certain learners 4ust state reasons why they ha!e
occurred 8Abushihab et al. 2)119. +oth the strong and wea( !ersions can also be
classi-ed as either theoretical or %ractical with the latter being used for reedial wor(
and the forer for research %ur%oses 8Abushihab et al. 2)119.
6ith such a big area of research as error analysis it is i%ortant to clarify what is eantby an error and additionally what is generally not considered an error. An error can be
regarded as a de!iationC as Ellis %uts it fro the nors of the TL. An error is soething
which is li(ely to reoccur in the learnersC %roduction as they do not ha!e the ca%abilities
or (nowledge to be able to correct the. oeties these errors can be %roduced in an
o!ert anner where it is easy to see the fault but it ay not be as easy to notice what
Ellis 1 calls co!ertC errors an error which is only noticeable within a gi!en conte,t.
"oreo!er these errors are ore li(ely to be issed by students when re!iewing their
wor(. In such a case it would be e,treely diBcult for an error analyst to distinguish
whether the co!ert error is an error or 4ust a ista(e discussed later which has not been
noticed 8Abiara 2))39. In contrast to errors we ha!e ista(es which can also be due
to any reasons but are usually the result of carelessness or lac( of attention. These
ista(es can ty%ically be recti-ed by the %roducer and are often tered as a sli% of the
tongue. 6ith reference to writing a ista(e can be corrected if the writer has the tie
and s(ills to re!iew his or her wor( 8Abushihab et al. 2)119.
*ow that an error has been de-ned in contrast with a ista(e it is i%ortant to brea(
down the ty%es of errors which ay be found. "any error analysts recogni>e that errors
are the conse?uence of two ain categories howe!er there is not a de-nite general
consensus Intralingual or soeties tered de!elo%ental are one ty%e which can be
de-ned as an error resulting fro rule learning or to %ut it another way the incorrect
learning or o!er generalising of rules. Interlingual or soeties referred to asinterferences are another which occurs fro one language to another but does not
always e?uate an error. In such a case it would be regarded as a %ositi!e transfer 8Ellis
19 8Fohnson 2))#9 8Abiara 2))39 and this will be discussed in ore de%th in the
ne,t section. These two cases for errors are e,%anded in ulay and +urt in Abiara
2))3 where they add a third category of abiguous and a fourth of uni?ue which caters
Page
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
8/54
for those which do not -t the other categories. In an intro to foreign language learning
and teaching 0eith Fohnson gi!es us one further and interesting error category which is
the learner created error. ;e states in his creati!e construction theory that soe errors
can neither be attributed to intra or interlingual roots and ust ha!e in fact been
created wholly in the ind of the student. A -nal and %erha%s contro!ersial error to be
discussed in this section is that generated by the teacher. uch an error can be fossili>ed
within a student should their teacher or course %ro!ide the incorrect or uncleartuition. Although only brief in conte,t the errors laid out here re%resent the ost
coon categories in current ties.
;a!ing so any categories for errors a(e the a%%ear to be soe (ind of sic(ness for a
student and ay gi!e the i%ression that they are to be a!oided at all costs. This
howe!er is not the case as they can %ro!e to be one of the ost useful resources one
could use to hel% students de!elo% their language 8Ellis 19. Gne of the ain reasons
that errors can %ro!e to be useful is that they are rich in inforation about the learner
and their language %ro-ciency 8*a>i & Ahad 2)129. They can be used as tools to hel%
us deterine what needs ore %ractice what needs ore teaching and what has not
been learned. In a sense they are a window into how a language is being learned by thewriter and what is going on inside their ind 8Abiara 2))39 8Fohnson 2))#9. Gnce a
ta,onoy has been created for a grou% of learners it can then be used as a ethod of
heightening students awareness of their own errors and then be used during re!ising and
redrafting %hases to facilitate learning 8Tahaineh 2)1)9
Page!
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
9/54
"rans#er
The conce%t of errors has been discussed and what is ore it a%%ears that the -rst
language of a learner has a huge role to %lay by for of interference. $esearchers such
as 8Tahaineh 2)1)9clai that such interference fro the other tongue is the ost
fre?uent origin of errors %roduced by learners when they write. 0haldieh 2))) also
su%%orts this idea and directly relates transfer to de!elo%ental %robles in writing due
to the !ariations between oneCs L1 and L2. Therefore for the bene-t of this %a%er it is
i%ortant to e,%lore what this ter transferC actually is and how it relates to the errors
it is blaed for fostering. In this section the writer will atte%t to lay forth his
understanding of the conce%t and its i%lications.
In an atte%t to hel% clarify the de-nition of transfer the writer %oints to 8Ellis 19who
brings us to the understanding that transfer cannot be loo(ed at as si%ly the transfer
fro the other tongue to the TL. ;e states that there are other factors in!ol!ed such asany other language the learner ay ha!e encountered in their life. Gther ters are gi!en
by !arious researchers in the -eld but for the sa(e of this %a%er the ter transferC will
be used but this is in reference to any transfer bac( and forth between the TL and other
languages at %lay. "uch is focused on the negati!e as%ects of transfer which can often
result in errors as entioned %re!iously. ;owe!er there is also the %ossibility %ositi!e
transfer or soeties referred to as facilitationC where transfer fro one language
actually hel%s in %roducing accurate utterances in another 8Ellis 19. In addition to
%ositi!e and negati!e transfer is transfer which results due to o!er use of rule usually
because the student has learned soething which is siilar to a rule in another
e,%erienced language so they %ur%osely a%%ly it to ore that it can cater for in the TL
8Ellis 19. The -nal area of transfer often discussed is that of a!oidance where a
student -nds soe co%le,ity in the di@erences between words or structures in the TL
and (nown languages. As a result they tend to shun e@orts to use the co%licated
structures or words in the TD altogether 8Ellis 19.
Transfer can be caused by other factors than si%ly a di@erence between the TL and
other (nown languages. A (ey e,a%le of this is de!elo%ental factors which ha!e been
%ro!en to e,%lain why di@erent %ro-ciencies of learners fro the sae language
bac(ground ha!e show signs of di@erent transfer acti!ities occurring. Therefore a learner
who is writing in English will only transfer certain eleents into the TL when they are at a
stage of ac?uisition which allows for its use. A si%le e,a encountered such graarin the TL. Ellis continues this %oint by describing this %rocess as a restructuring of
interlangauge within the student. 0lien in Ellis 1 adds a ore negati!e loo( on this
increental transfer %rocess by stating that in such a theory the ore a studentCs
%ro-ciency increases the ore li(elihood there is for transfer to occur. In fact soe
studies ha!e e!en found e!idence that transfer can e,ist e!en in the ost ad!anced of
Page$
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
10/54
students 8Tahaineh 2)1)9. ;owe!er there are soe clais against this which suggest
that negati!e transfer will only e,ist until the TL fors ha!e becoe norali>ed within
the studentsC re%ertoire of language 8aigh & chitt n.d.9.
Gne would be incorrect to assue that only structures and le,is can be the sub4ect of
transfer as it has also been shown that ore cogniti!e entities can also be seen
transferring into the TL. An interesting transfer occurrence is that of attitudes towardswriting in oneCs other tongue being obser!ed in learnersC o%inions of writing in the TL
8Lee 2))59. This %oint is further e,%anded by r. $uwaida when he states that a %ersonCs
beha!iour is a@ected by their -rst culture. In addition to the transfer of cultural and
attitudes one can encounter it is coonly noted that writers will transfer %rocessing
routines fro a learned language into their TL 8aigh & chitt n.d.9. An e,a%le of such
a situation which I ha!e e,%erienced is when Arabic students write English letters and
soeties whole words fro right to left. In this situation they ha!e transferred the
%rocessing of right to left fro Arabic into their %roduction of English. The sae can also
be seen in the way they a%%roach a reading tas( in class. Gther researchers ha!e claied
that soe students use their L1 understanding of o!erall coherence to hel% the
organi>e their writing in the TL. 80haldieh 2)))9
It a%%ears that a transfer of cogniti!e %rocessing or transfer of ore structural and le,ical
%arts of language ay be the result of a lac( of (nowledge and in such a case this would
e?uate to ore diBculty for the student 8"yles 2))29. The ?uestion of diBculty and its
relation to transfer will now be e,%lored. In general ters the diBculty of the TL a%%ears
to de%end on the di@erences between it and any language which the user has learned
before 8Ellis 19. There are two interesting areas of e,%ansion to this theory which
focus ore on a languages graatical structures but can also be used to describe
or%hology the -rst deals with the obser!able di@erences between languages and
focuses on ar(edness and the second concerns ore %sychological factors.
"ar(edness is the ter which is based u%on 0ranschenCs /D theory. e that ost languages share a core graar which can be referred to
has unar(ed graar. 6e use the ter unar(ed because it has not had any
additional or uni?ue rules a%%lied to it. ;owe!er when a language does a(e s%ecial
e,ce%tions and use of e,clusi!e rules which are dissiilar to what we consider the core
graar then we class this as ar(ed language. Ec(an 177 relates this idea of
ar(edness and relates it to the diBculty as%ect we entioned earlier by stating that the
ore ar(ed a rule is the ore diBcult it will be for a learner to ac?uire it which is also
an idea shared and %ro!en by other researchers 8Al0hresheh 2)1)9 8Fohnson 2))#9
8Tahaineh 2)1)9. The writer feels this is an interesting idea as fro this theory one couldstart to %redict which %arts of writing are li(ely to %ose ore %robles for students and
which can be focused on ore lightly.
The %sychological factors %lay an i%ortant %art in understanding the writerCs situation in
+ahrain and the sub4ects which will be loo(ed at later in this %a%er. According to this
Page1%
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
11/54
hy%othesis the closer a language is %ercei!ed to be the easier is to learn. This
%sychological distance as 0elleran 177 %uts it a@ects the aount of transferring
which can occur and not as one would assue the actual distance of a language an
idea shared by ;u,ley 8;u,ley 1#=9. ;owe!er in the case of the Arabic s%ea(er there
a%%ears to be both an actual distance and a %sychological distance at %lay. ;owe!er this
distance is relati!e to the entality of the student and the ore cofortable he or she is
with a language and the ore %ro-cient they becoe the ore they ay associate withit and as a result the %sychological distance is li(ely to change 8Ellis 19.
6e ha!e discussed that there a%%ears to be an eleent of diBculty and ease with which
students can learn a language and this leads us into the theory of contrasti!e analysis
8'A9 to loo( at a(ing %redictions. Gne can hy%othesise as any contrasti!e analysts
do that by chec(ing the ar(edness and transfer %atterns of the two languages one can
a(e %redictions as to the ease with which students will learn an eleent of language
8r. 0han 2)119 8Fohnson 2))#9 8Ellis 19. This ty%e of thin(ing is referred to as the
strong 'A theory. ;owe!er such a theory sees not to hold water as learners still a(e
errors with ites which would be deeed easy and deal with ease ites which would
otherwise be classed as ore diBcult 8Fohnson 2))#9. Therefore an alternati!e haseerged which is the wea( !ersion of 'A and a way of loo(ing retros%ecti!ely at the
causes of errors. ;owe!er 'A has not had an easy ride in the linguistics circle with any
linguists ?uestioning the factual basis of the strong !ersions and the tie s%ent on the
wea( !ersion. It a%%ears ne!ertheless that 'A in soe for has ade a coebac( in
odern ties.
The %ros%ect of using 'A to hel% build %redictions about errors students a(e is an
i%ortant %ros%ect. It is widely acce%ted that of all the errors a@ected by transfer
%honological and le,ical are the ost %rone 8Ellis 19 8Fohnson 2))#9.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
12/54
Literacy reiew
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
13/54
Another ore global orientated area of writing research loo(s at the organi>ation of a
te,t and this is an area where ost Arabic writers of English fail to ful-l the ty%ical
re?uireents. 'oherence in English writing ters is used by linguistics to describe the
o!erall organi>ation of a te,t. It is concerned with ha!ing to%ic su%%orting and
concluding sentences to for a logical %aragra%h of the sae to%ic. "oreo!er each
%aragra%h ust be an introduction a su%%orting idea or a concluding %aragra%h of the
te,t or cha%ter it is in. Dood use of such coherence gi!es the te,t linear %rogression andas entioned in the %re!ious %aragra%h is essential to English writing. 'ohesion on the
other hand is used to describe the ties between sentences and %hrases and hel%s to hold
a %aragra%h and ine!itably the te,t as a whole together 8ith 1#9. Gne of the (ey
as%ects to Arabic cohesion on the other hand is that it is conte,t based as in it relies on
the te,t as a whole to a(e sense. "oreo!er it a(es use of re%etition to (ee% the :ow
of ideas going through the te,t and uses ore nonadditi!e cohesion than English does
8Ahed 2)1)9. Arabic also a(es use of coordinating con4uncti!e ties instead of le,ical
ties which are ore coon in ad!anced le!el English writing 8il!a 139. The result of
the di@erences can !ery easily lead to the inability to organi>e te,ts in a way which
re%resents norality for English writing and it a%%ears that this is an all too coon
occurrence with Arabic writers 8*a>i & Ahad 2)129 8Ahed 2)1)9. In English it is
!ital to consider oneCs reader and this is !ery uch the reasoning behind scul%ting te,ts
which are well organi>ed and easy to follow for an English s%ea(er. Each %aragra%h is
carefully constructed to introduce ideas se?uentially and in the linear fashion entioned
8ith 1#9 ;owe!er in the case of Arabic 'oherence and 'ohesion 8' & '9 being
a%%lied to English writing the consideration for the reader has been neglected and as
ith %uts it the writer a%%ears to be writing for thesel!es.
Gnce one !eers fro the ore global areas of English and Arabic writing and
in!estigates dee%er into the languages the di@erence between the article systes is a
clear area of interest.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
14/54
the writers. 8Abushihab et al. 2)119 8'ro%ton 2)119 /sually an Arabic student will
erroneously use the inde-nite article in %lace of the inde-nite which is a for of
interference occurring due to their L1 article syste. ;owe!er 'ro%ton also found that
the use of the de-nite article where there should be a >ero article was the ost coon
aongst his sub4ects 8'ro%ton 2)119. Although %erha%s one of the ost fre?uent ty%e
of written error for Arabic learners of English writing it is not the only (ind and one of the
other ost fre?uent will be discussed ne,t.
Gne of the ost fre?uent occurrences of errors which Arabic learners a(e when writing
in English is that of %re%ositions. The fre?uency of these errors has been well noted in
the Arabic s%ea(ing world by researchers loo(ing into the root causes in search of
solutions 8Tho%sonHanos & Thoas$uiJ 1#39 8wan & ith 2))19 8il!a 139. In
fact soe researchers ha!e gone so far as to say that %re%ositions account for the
a4ority of errors 82= of those encountered9 which students a(e in Fordan when
writing in English 8Abushihab et al. 2)119. This %oint is agreed by Tahaineh who states
that %re%ositions were the ost %robleatic for students e!en at the !ery ad!anced
stage. ;e e,%ands the inforation further a %resents the ost %robleatic %re%ositions
for Arabs as in on to with of fro for and at 8Tahaineh 2)1)9. the two facts thatArabic %re%ositions can hold eaning on their own 8wan & ith 2))19 and that soe
Arabic %re%ositions can ha!e ulti%le e?ui!alents in English 8Tahaineh 2)1)9 go soe
way to showing that astery of %re%ositional use in English is a diBcult tas( for Arabic
s%ea(ers. ;owe!er with the (nowledge of which %re%ositions %ose the ost diBculties
one can atte%t to deal with the issue in a %edagogical sense.
Two of the ost coon errors %roduced by Arabs writing in English ha!e been
discussed and the writer will atte%t to bring together ideas and results regarding other
le,ograatical errors where oission is coonly found. Arabic is a language which
a(e no use of co%ulas 8the !erb be9 au,iliary for ?uestions 8do does etc9 and uses
%articles to hel% for negati!e sentences 8wan & ith 2))19 8Tho%sonHanos &
Thoas$uiJ 1#39. The result for the learning in ?uestion is the %roduction of any
incorrect utterances due to the sheer !olue of situations which these graatical units
are re?uired in English. The oission of these is seen throughout all %ro-ciency le!els
e!en u% to the ore ad!anced le!el students 8Tho%sonHanos & Thoas$uiJ 1#39.
;owe!er at such le!els if the students are as( to re!iew their wor( they should be able
to recogni>e the oission and %ut the correct word but this is not guaranteed so one
cannot classify this as 4ust a ista(e 8note the di@erences entioned earlier9. "uch the
sae they will forgot or isuse %unctuation ?uite often.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
15/54
ca%ital letters either because they do not (now how to use the or they do not
recogni>e its need 8Abiara 2))39 8*a>i & Ahad 2)129. Gne ight also -nd an
oission of discourse ar(ers in a studentCs writing and this is highly li(ely to be the
result of the di@erence in cohesi!e de!ices which the two languages in ?uestion use.
*e!ertheless it is still an e,treely i%ortant area of English writing and a tool to guide
the reader through the te,t. 8wan & ith 2))19 A lac( of discourse ar(ers is not the
only le,ical oission which is coon in Arabs English writing there is a general lac( ofle,ical richness in ost te,ts 8Ahed 2)1)9 8*a>i & Ahad 2)129.
The area of oission is indeed an area of concern for Arab writers of English but addition
can also %ose %robles as was seen earlier when students a(e use of the de-nite
article in a %lace where there should be a >ero. $elati!e clauses are di@erent in English
and Arabic and In Arabic it is a %art of the structure to ha!e the %ronoun in the second
%art of the clause but in English this brea(s the rules of the graar 8wan & ith
2))19. It was also stated earlier that Arabic is a language which a(es use of
coordination and so the relati!e clause in Arabic a(es no use of a coa to aintain
strength through the sentence. Therefore the result of a %ronoun in the second clause in
English 8Tho%sonHanos & Thoas$uiJ 1#39 and the oission or a coa and useof coordination a%%ears to be the result of negati!e transfer fro Arabic 8Abiara
2))39.
oe of the ost coon features of Arabic s%ea(er errors when writing in English ha!e
been %resented abo!e but there are other ty%es of errors which ha!e been noted by
researchers. "abal 1#) stated that there is a %roble for Arabic s%ea(ers with sub4ect
and !erb agreeent. i
& Ahad 2)129 8wan & ith 2))19. Arabs students are also highly li(ely to a(e
errors with graar and %hrases of obligation. This is because of a di@erence in the
eaning that soe English obligation words ha!e in Arabic and so an eleent of
interference can be seen as a %otential root course of the errors. 8;u,ley 1#=9 Therearea of tense errors is one not uni?ue to Arab writers of English but it is one which %oses
soe diBculty for the students 8Abushihab et al. 2)119 8*a>i & Ahad 2)129 as there
is a di@erent %ast tense to English and there is not future tense as they a(e use of a
%resent tense to tal( about the future. 8wan & ith 2))19In fact Arabic writing
focuses on tie by for of ad!erbial clauses and usually %laces these at the beginning
Page15
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
16/54
of a sentence and hel%s to aintain their focus of tie -rst and then %lace and -nally
action 8Tho%sonHanos & Thoas$uiJ 1#39.
The area of le,is and synta, %ose great diBculty to Arabic learners of English in general
and this a%%lies es%ecially to their written %roduction. ;owe!er it can be argued that 4ust
as %robleatic as these areas is the area of %honetics and s%elling. If the reader has
e,%erienced teaching Arabic students they are li(ely to be all too aware of the ?uantityand %ersistence of s%elling errorsista(es. uch an insight is re:ected in the research
conducted on Arabic s%ea(ers around the world 8Tho%sonHanos & Thoas$uiJ 1#39
8;u,ley 1#=9 8r. 0han 2)119 8Abushihab et al. 2)119 8*a>i & Ahad 2)129 8aigh
& chitt n.d.9 8Ahed 2)1)9 and has been found in con4unction with alost all of the
errors discussed abo!e.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
17/54
big di@erence in the !ocabulary and graar between the two dialects 8Tho%sonHanos
& Thoas$uiJ 1#39 and soe would go so far as to say that collo?uial Arabic is
absent of graar. 6hat is ore both of these dialects a%%ear to ha!e an i%act of
Arabic students writing %erforance 8Abiara 2))39. ;owe!er it ay be that "A has
a bigger in:uence on the written %roduction of Arabic s%ea(ers 8Al0hresheh 2)1)9.
'eelo()ental s* trans#er
6hether the errors obser!ed in the studies %resented are truly the result of transfer is a
diBcult ?uestion to answer whether they are de!elo%ental is soewhat easier. oe
studies ha!e noted that de!elo%ental errors outnuber those of transfer 8Abiara
2))39 8Fohnson 2))#9 and this suggests that transfer ay only %lay a sall role in
inhibiting studentsC astery of English. ;owe!er the conclusions on transfer far
outweigh those I was able to gather on de!elo%ental errors.
Transfer sees to ha!e soe in:uence on error %roduction. In fact se!eral researchers
ha!e concluded that it is the ain facilitator of errors and is ore e@ecti!e than
de!elo%ental 8Tahaineh 2)1)9 8Ahed 2)1)9. Gn the other hand others ha!e
claied that it results in the %roduction of a large nuber of errors 8'ro%ton 2)119
8Abiara 2))39. In her study *ada was able to calculate that one third of all errors
%roduced by the students were down to interference 8Abiara 2))39.
*egati!e transfer was shown to be hea!ily salient in uch of the research into Arabs
writing %robles in English. Ahed 2)1) clearly states that Arabic negati!ely interfered
with his sub4ectsC writing. "oreo!er it a%%ears a select grou% of interfered with ites can
be selected fro the studies loo(ed at.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
18/54
G!erall it sees that there is an interesting lin( between errors and transfer be it
%ositi!e or negati!e and that this a%%ears in all %ro-ciencies of Arabic learners of English
writing but that lower le!els are %erha%s the ost %rone due to a lac( of (nowledge.
8Fohnson 2))#9 It ay 4ust be that transfer is an ine!itable %art of language learning
8'ro%ton 2)119 8Ellis 19 and that students will ha!e to learn how to a,ii>e the
%ositi!es and neutrali>e the negati!es as uch as %ossible.
Page1!
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
19/54
+ethodology,ualitatie ,uantitatie data analysis
Nualitati!e data analysis is usually conducted by eans of a ?uestionnaire inter!iew or
focus grou%. It is a tool which will be able to hel% a researcher for a theory but is
unli(ely to result in data which can be coded and ha!e statistics a%%lied to it 8$asinger
2)119. ;owe!er it is an e,cellent eans to see %atterns and can be used to de!elo%
theory and sha%e future ?uantitati!e research. Le!ron 82)119 su%%orts this use of
?ualitati!e data analysis and states that it a(es good bac(u% data and that any
acadeics feel that it is best used at the beginning of a conduct of research.
Nualitati!e data analysis has been used in this %a%er to for the theory u%on which it is
based that Arabic s%ea(ers %roduce the sae ty%e of written errors. To get to this as
entioned in the introduction a seistructured inter!iew was used with a grou% of
+ahraini teachers of English. These teachers were diBcult to gain access to and their
tie was !ery !aluable which is why it was decided to hold a discussion session. It wasalso assued that a +ahraini teacher would ha!e a di@erent %ers%ecti!e of student errors
than a nati!e English teacher and so a di@erent as%ect of reality could be brought to light
8Angouri 2)119. Agouri 82)119 also highlights that rich and inde%th data is attainable by
the use of such ethods.
As entioned in the %re!ious %aragra%h a seistructured ?uestionnaire was used in a
discussion setting with four +ahraini teachers of English. It was felt that by ha!ing access
to the teachers during the %rocedure any %robles could be recti-ed on the s%ot.
Although a set of ?uestions had been ty%ed and was used as the scri%t for the eeting
and hel%ed to for the agenda for the discussion. Le!ron 82)119 suggests doing such
inter!iews on occasions with grou%s which %ro!ed to be the only o%tion for the teachersin!ol!ed due to their busy schedule. This ethod also allowed the eeting to be free
:owingC and ore nature hel%ing to encourage a ore o%en discussion on the to%ic
8Le!ron 2)119. The bene-t of ha!ing +ahraini English teachers was that they were both
aware of the terinology of linguistics and teaching and of the issues facing Arabic
s%ea(ers when writing in English. Therefore there was no need to a!oid the use of
linguistic ters in the ?uestions which is usually ad!ised against 8$asinger 2)119.
The results of such an o%en ?uestion seistructured inter!iew sessions with ulti%le
candidates is that the sub4ects ay be a@ected in any ways and gi!e untrue answers.
They ay feel that they needed to gi!e answers which the researcher sees -tting
8Le!ron 2)119 and this is heightened by the fact that in this situation the researcher was
a nati!e s%ea(er and the sub4ects Arabic.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
20/54
ebers and could cause a bootstra%%ingC e@ect 8Le!ron 2)119 where others bind to
their o%inions.
Nualitati!e data analysis is a tool one can use to loo( at %hysical things in a nueric
%ers%ecti!e 8$asinger 2)119. It is !ery e@ecti!e at generali>ing 8Angouri 2)119 and this
is soething which was needed to answer the research ?uestions %resented earlier and
hel% to for a hy%othesis. Essentially it is a tool for analy>ing things in a statistical wayto loo( for %atterns within the data. ;owe!er before this can be done as entioned the
%hysical entities need to be con!erted into nubers and this is done by the %rocess of
o%erationali>ation 8$asinger 2)119 8Le!ron 2)119. ;owe!er not e!erything can go
through this %rocess as we are only able to count things which are indeed countable
8Le!ron 2)119 anything else is ore than li(ely a %roduct of ?ualitati!e data which will
be discussed later. ed as a eans to dis%ro!e the null hy%othesis which is the statistical chance
that the o%%osite of the hy%othesis is true. In this study the statistical tool hel%ed to test
the null hy%othesis de!elo%ed after the ideas obtained during the -rst seistructured
inter!iew.
ata analysis can be conducted !ia a crosssectional ethod or a longitudinal one. The
forer refers to ta(ing the data sa%le once at a s%eci-c tie whereas with the latter
ulti%le sa%les are ta(ing o!er a %eriod of tie 8$asinger 2)119. Alost all of the
studies loo(ed at in the literacy re!iew concerning Arabic writer errors in English
conducted crosssectional data analysis but this %a%er has done a longitudinal study bycollecting the cor%us of writing fro idway through a course and fro the -nal e,it
e,a. +y doing this the writer is able to %ro!ide data which ay ha!e changed o!er
tie and thus show soe de!elo%ental as%ects which is !ital for discussing whether
an error is de!elo%ental or because of transfer.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
21/54
essay it is a%%lied. The use of a rigorous error ta,onoy which can cater for all the
errors obser!ed is essential to aintaining reliability. The faults of other researchers
categories has been considered to hel% for a ore reliable set for the data in this %a%er
and is %resented later in this section. Oalidity can be sought if oneCs tool actually
easures that which it is intended to so in this case the data analysis ust easure
errors %roduced by writers. +y using siilar ethods to other researchers which a%%ear
to ha!e achie!ed !alidity but custoi>ing these to suit the s%eci-c circustances in thesetting soundness can ore easily been aintained. "oreo!er by using a s%lithalf test
suggested by 8$asinger 2)119 it is %ossible to co%are two sets fro the sae sa%le
of writing and see if the error ratio is siilar for both. The s%lithalf ethod has been used
to s%lit the -nal writing %iece and the earlier writings.
-etting
The Arabian Dulf /ni!ersity is a edical uni!ersity in the centre of +ahrain. It caters for a
range of edical related courses and is both 4ointly funded and %o%ulated by se!eral
Arab countries in the Dulf. 6ithin the uni!ersity there are se!en years of study for the
students to %rogress through before they graduate and begin ore s%eciali>ed trainingwithin a hos%ital. This study focuses on the -rst year of the se!en the foundation year.
This course is run o!er a tenonth %eriod during which the students study fro a boo(
called 6orld English and which consists of soe writing tas(s to co%lient the to%ics
co!ered. In order to graduate fro this foundation year the students ust attain at least
a 5.5 in the IELT test which is currently run by the +ritish council in the country. The
result of which is a hea!y focus towards IELT s(ills early on in the course.
+ahrain is an Island o@ the Arabian Heninsula in the "iddle East. The -rst language is
Arabic although with a foreign %o%ulation of 5 it is ?uestionable if Arabic is the ost
s%o(en language within the country. 8'IA 2)129 Although soe of this foreign %o%ulace is
fro Arabic countries the !ast a4ority of foreign wor(ers are fro India and Ha(istanboth of which do not use Arabic as a -rst or second language but English instead.
80arola( 2)1)2)119 Therefore there are two Arabic dialects and English being used in
the country. es%ite this +ahrain is regarded as a highly literate country with .= of
the nati!es being able to read and write after the age of 15. 8'IA 2)129 A -nal %oint
which is of i%ortance for this study is the fact that +ahrain was a %rotectorate of Dreat
+ritain for any years u% until 171 when it gained inde%endence. 8'IA 2)129
'onse?uently soe as%ects of +ritish in:uence reain within the (ingdo.
Partici(ants
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
22/54
!arious countries within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), but all of whom spoke Arabic as
their first language, and had studied English for at least 8 years before they finished high school,
which is the same as what Tahaineh stated in his report also (Tahaineh, !"#")
Procedure
According to Corder, #$%&, these steps are the ones one should take when conducting EA (Ellis,
#$$&), and so this procedure was followed'
#) Collection of a sample of language learners
!) dentification of errors
) *escription of errors
&) E+planation of errors
) E-aluation of errors
(Ellis, #$$&) (Abushihab, et al, !"##)
Select corpus
.or the purpose of this study, a select corpus of writings produced o-er the two/month period has
been collected This corpus was elicited from the students by getting them to answer an E0T1 style
2uestion at the midway point in the course, and finally at the end of the course in their e+it test Ellis
regards this form of corpus building as between massi-e and selecti-e 1electi-e usually means taking
a sample of writings from a group who ha-e written about the same topic, whereas massi-e is when
multiple topics ha-e been written about by all the students, and collected from the group (Ellis, #$$&)
This has helped form a more longitudinal approach to the data collection and is in contrast to most of
the studies in this field, and those presented earlier in this paper, which make use of more selecti-e orincidental data collection
Identi.cation o# errors
In order to (ee% integrity during the research any error is regarded as a de!iation fro
the nors of the TL. 8Ellis 19 ;owe!er because the students were not inter!iew after
the writing tas(s it is unli(ely that one can say for sure that errors were truly an
erroneous act and not si%ly a ista(e which could be recti-ed. This howe!er is not a
uni?ue liitation of this study and is a coon concern in ost EA studies 8Ellis 19.
+y eans of ?uantitati!e easureents described later the chances of errors being
ade by chance can be calculated.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
23/54
In order to identify the errors a ta,onoy is needed which is ade?uate and not o!erly
co%licated by subcategories which allows for a detailed descri%tion of all the errors
8Ellis 19. Therefore ulay +urt and 0raschenCs surface strategy ta,onoy has been
chosen as it best re:ects the ty%e of errors outlined in the literacy re!iew those of
oission addition and substitution which is subdi!ided as isforations and
isordering 8Ellis 19. Gission accounted for when an eleent of language had been
left out of the utterance. Addition was used to note when e,tra entities had been usedwhich should not ha!e been there. "isforation is the category for a isfored graar
rule or s%elling etc.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
24/54
of the si%lest odels to use for EA and hel%s to focus ore on the as%ect of transfer.
uch a odel states that errors can be due to interference de!elo%ent or uni?ue. The
writer ac(nowledges that it is e,treely diBcult and %erha%s currently i%ossible to
distinguish with certainty that an error is the result of transfer or de!elo%ent 8Ellis
19. uch a diBculty is not uni?ue to this study
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
25/54
0esults and discussion
,uantitatie data results
G!erall errors reduced fro the id P%oint to the -nal writing tas( and this e,a%le oferrors declining o!er tie 8"yles 2))29 is to be e,%ected with cogniti!e de!elo%ents
and strategies being a%%lied. The a4ority of errors ade by the sub4ects in this study
were those relating to synta, and or%hology and this was seen in both the id%oint
sa%le of essays and the -nal e,it essay sa%le. The writer feels that this is to be
e,%ected due to the nuber of graatical ites being used in a ty%ical essay and the
fact that %roducing a correct graar feature ay be ore cogniti!ely co%le, than
using or s%elling a word correctly. uch high le!els of syntactical and or%hological errors
are not uni?ue to this study and Abiaara 82))39 and Tahaineh 82)1)9 re%orted siilar
distinction in their results. It is (nown that Arabic students tend to su@er when it coes
to the use of and ac?uisition of graatical functions 8r. 0han 2)119 and so thiss%eci-c -nding is not sur%rising.
Linguistic category
)
2)
)=)
#)
1))
12)
1)
1=)
1#)
2))
s& Q
or%h Q
le, Q
dis Q
Page25
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
26/54
igure 1 0esults #ro) the )id(oint essay EA
Linguistic category
)
2)
)
=)
#)
1))
12)
1)
s& Q
or%h Q
le, Q
dis Q
igure 2 0esults #ro) e/it test essay
Page26
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
27/54
)
1)
2)
3)
)
5)
=)
nu)ber o# errors
nuber of errors
igure 3 +id(oint
)
1)
2)
3)
)
5)
=)7)
#)
u)ber o# errors
*uber of errors
igure 4 inal test
Page2
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
28/54
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
29/54
failies being loo(ed at o!er the course duration. Gne of the reasons for such a !iew is
that in Arabic one word rarely has ulti%le eanings 8r. 0han 2)119 unli(e in English
where such a %ractice is widely obser!ed. It is estiated that se!eral hundred word
failies were loo(ed at in the %eriod between the two sa%les. Gne %ossible reasoning
behind this reduction of errors against what was e,%ected is that there ay ha!e been
soe %assi!e (nowledge of a lot of the word failies co!ered but that the use of the
was being a!oided or restricted due to %roducti!e (nowledge. A siilar le!el of successwas seen in a utch study where the students focused on con!erting their %assi!e
(nowledge of words into a ore acti!e and usable (nowledge so that writing could
becoe ore :uent and cofortable for the sub4ects 8Delderen et al. 2)119. Therefore
it a%%ears that the students ay ha!e (now any words when they were writing for the
-rst sa%le but that they did not (now the ade?uately and as a result ade ore
wrong word and %re%osition choices. In addition to this natural learning %rocess the
students were also being trained in %re%aration for an IELT e,a and so they were
doing lots of wor( on !ocabulary building and the use of (ey graatical structures for
IELT essays. uch wor( would also e,%lain the reduction in discourse related errors as
the students had ac?uired the correct styles needed for essay writing.
)1)
2)
3)
)
5)
=)
7)
#)
ois
add
isfor
isorder
igure 5 )id(oint errors with s(elling and gra))ar other*
Page2$
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
30/54
)
1)
2)
3)
)
5)
=)
ois
add
isfor
isorder
igure 6 inal test with s(elling and gra))ar other*
)
5
1)
15
2)
25
3)
ois
add
isfor
isorder
igure +id(oint s(eci.c 7no s(elling or gra))ar other*
Page3%
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
31/54
)2=#
1)
1211=1#2)
ois
add
isfor
isorder
igure ! inal test 7no s(elling or gra))ar other*
Punctuation
Gnce the s%elling and other graar errors are reo!ed 8see -gure 79 a two stri(ing
%ea(s are notable in the data set fro the -rst writing tas( which re%resents errors of
%unctuation in the for of oission and addition. The fact that both oission and
addition are both relati!ely high %ossibly eans that the students lac( control o!er the
use of %unctuation. This is %erha%s sur%rising as there is only a little aount of research
which states that students who use Arabic as their -rst language will a(e errors in%unctuation li(e ca%itali>ation coas etc 8*a>i & Ahad 2)1298Ibrahi 177 cited in
Al0hresheh 2)1)9. ;owe!er Abiaara 82))39 did note that errors of substance which
included %unctuation were the a4ority of errors in her study.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
32/54
uch uncontrolled sentences were clearly diinished by the tie the students conducted
their -nal writing assignents as errors or both s%eci-c and generic articles sur%assed
the. 2)) in
'ro%ton 2)119. This lac( of controlled which can be seen in the data fro the last
writing res%onse shows that the students do not ha!e control o!er the use of articles aC
and anC and so they a%%ear to ha!e ulti%le hy%othesis about the use of these articles
8'ro%ton 2)119. This is des%ite the fact that they ha!e had s%eci-c focus during class
tie on this %articular error and the graar rules needed to rectify it and so it a%%ears
that soe fossili>ation has occurred but there are instances of errors occurring where a
generic article has been used where is shouldnCt be. In 'ro%tonCs %a%er he notes that
of generic s%eci-c and >ero article usage the students had the wea(ness le!el of control
of generic articles 8'ro%ton 2)119.
Errors relating to s%eci-c articles a%%ear to contrast what would be e,%ected if transfer
theory was indeed true because there are signs in the data %resented that it did not occur
when it should ha!e in both sa%les. As was stated in the literacy re!iew Arabic a(es
use of the de-nite article which is re%resented as alC before alost all nouns 8wan &
ith 2))19 8'ro%ton 2)119. ;owe!er the data clearly shows that there were soe
errors of s%eci-c article oission. Gne would e,%ect all nouns written in English to ha!esoe for of article e!en if it was the incorrect one but to ha!e no article is sur%rising. It
ay be %ossible that the student had de!elo%ed a hy%othesis which tells the that the
use of a de-nite article in English is !astly di@erent to that of their own language and as
a result they are o!erco%ensating for this di@erence by lea!ing out articles. That being
said they ha!e not left their nati!e language rule for s%eci-c articles co%letely behind
in as both sa%les show that the de-nite article has been used where a >ero article
should be and what is ore this ha%%ened ore in the latter test than in the -rst %iece
of writing %roduced. 'ro%ton 2)11 found siilar occurrences where a >ero article in
English was not used correctly and instead re%laced with the de-nite article 8'ro%ton
2)119.
.
rong choice o# (re(osition
Page32
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
33/54
The ne,t ost signi-cantly large grou% of errors in the data is for the wrong choice of
%re%osition which occurred when students wrote went on schoolC instead of went in
schoolC. These errors ha!e been categori>ed in the le,ical and seantics grou% as their
a%%earance in writing is the result of a lac( of (nowledge of their use or collocations. The
astery of %re%osition use in English is diBcult for any foreign %erson and not 4ust Arabic
learners. English consists of 57 %re%ositions whereas Arabic a(es ore use of the 2)
%re%ositions in has in the language. 8;ayden 15= in ;abash 1#29 Hre%ositions ha!edi@erent functions which co%licate the learning %rocess 8wan 2))59. wan 82))59
further states that 4ust the %re%osition atC has 1# di@erent uses in English all of which
could be co%letely di@erent in Arabic. "oreo!er soe English %re%ositions in %hrases
ha!e no e?ui!alent in Arabic while others ha!e ulti%le e?ui!alents. In fact %re%ositions
also hold their own eaning in Arabic 8wan & ith 2))19 unli(e in English where they
need to be acco%anied by another word. Therefore the diBculty e!ident in this %a%er is
e,%ected and has been shown in other studies across the -eld 8il!a 139 8r. 0han
2)119. Gf cott and Tuc(erCs EA in Tho%sonHanos & Thoas$uiJ 1#3 found that
these errors were aong the to% four %robleatic and fre?uent for Arabic students and
this -ts with the results here. Herha%s a ore draatic reference to %re%osition errors is
%resented in Tahaineh 2)1) where 2= 8)359 errors were %re%ositional which is
substantially higher than those in this %a%er. *ot all %a%ers found large ?uantities of
%re%osition errors for e,a%le Abi aara 2))3 found a relati!ely sall %ro%ortion of
the errors in her research %re%ositions.
In addition to errors where %re%ositions were wrongly used this study found that
%re%ositions were fre?uently oitted and added to utterances with the forer being
ore %robleatic than the latter. "oreo!er this a%%eared to occur alost as uch in
both the id%oint writing and the e,it writing sa%les. uch occurrences are li(ely to be
the result of a lac( of (nowledge of the %re%ositional use in the sentence and as such are
li(ely to decrease with de!elo%ent of their language s(ills. This sees %robably asadditions of %re%ositions increased between the two sets of data here and oissions
decreased. This suggests students are gradually trying to a%%ly %re%osition rules but are
a(ing is4udgeents in their atte%ts.
Incorrect word order
It is e!ident that there was a slight decline in the total nuber of errors %roduced in the
choice of word order by the writers but there is still a %roble %resent. It sees that this
is !ery uch due to the di@erences between the way Arabic and English organi>e their
sentences. As has been entioned Arabic aintains !erb sub4ect ob4ect 8OG9 order of
constituents in a sentence 8wan & ith 2))19 but this is used ore coonly for thewritten for whereas a OG order can be a%%lied to Arabic s%eech 8Alshayban 2)129.
;owe!er word order is e,treely :e,ible in Arabic as one can also use OG and GO
with the latter be an e,treely rare way of organi>ing the %arts of a sentence and has a
fre?uency of use in the world of 4ust o!er 1 co%ared with 1.7 for OG 8"eyer
2)1)9. Gne of the reasons for such an array of sentence organi>ation is the two fors of
Page33
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
34/54
Arabic which are in use as discussed %re!iously. These two fors are both acti!ely
%resent in the studentsC (nowledge base and a%%ear to be causing an eleent of
interference 8Al0hresheh 2)1)9. uch rarity and i,ture is not a trait of English in fact
English is one of the ost widely s%o(en languages in the world and its OG is only
second to GO order in world use fre?uency 8"eyer 2)1)9. In their %a%er Lu%yan &
'hristiansen n.d. suggests that the success of English is down to its strict co%liance to
this order and further suggests that such -r loyalty to an order facilitates learning.English is so strict in its use that a alfored sentence of OG would %roduce soething
of co%lete inco%rehensibility li(e for e,a%le 0ic(ed "ohaed Tony. In this
e,a%le it is not clear who has done the action and therefore a(es no sense in
English. ;owe!er there are languages li(e Arabic erbo'roatian and Arabic which allow
this to occur if certain additions are ade to the words or cues used 8Lu%yan &
'hristiansen n.d.9. This di@erence in word order was (nown about before the course was
started and so the students had training in the use of OG order for English writing.
6hen co%ared to the other errors and considering the focused %aid to this %articular
area of di@erence it is interesting to note such a inial i%ro!eent. 6hat is clear
fro these results and the research and results of other linguists who ha!e studied Arabs
is that the dee% le!el thin(ing behind the two languages !ery uch di@ers. Arabic %laces
e%hasis on the action then tie and %lace before stating who did the action and this
sees to result in the use of the di@erent order. English on the other hand centres around
the %erson conducting the action -rst before e,%loring what the action is and -nal where
and when it ha%%ens. This being said English word order should not %ose great diBculty
to ac?uire as unli(e the rules for s%elling the rules of word order are rigid and so it
a%%ears soe fossili>ation is %resent in these students as they ha!e not reacted to the
additional tuition.
0elatie clauses
$elati!e clauses errors reduced substantially between the two sets of data with the initial
writing sa%le %roducing 17 cases of relati!e clause errors and the -nal writing sa%le
only accounts of such faults. The forer consisted of both oissions and additions of a
%ronoun in the second clause in the sentence whereas the latter only had errors where
an addition had been ade. uch a decline in the oission of the %ronoun whichC whoC
and thatC but a slower reduction in addition errors has already be suggested in recent
literature as a %attern which ost students go through when learning relati!e clauses
8Tho%sonHanos & Thoas$uiJ 1#39. They suggested that learning to delete rule for
the sub4ect %recedes that of the ob4ect in relati!e clauses 8Tho%sonHanos & Thoas
$uiJ 1#39. ;owe!er this general rule ay be further in:uenced by the rules go!erning
%ronouns in Arabic.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
35/54
Arab student errors in English. It a%%ears that relati!e clauses are one of the ost
diBcult challenges to construct for Arab students. There is a ultitude of graatical
functions to get right before the o!erall clause is co%lete and students ha!e to ha!e
%ro-ciency in the use of word order co%ula articles and %ronouns before they can e!en
consider getting the subordination correct in the sentence. It has already been shown
that such linguistic functions already %osed substantial diBculty for the students in this
%a%er which cobined with a tendency to construct relati!e clauses in a orecoordinated style in Arabic resulted in an alost enigatic structure for any of the
writers.
Co(ula
Errors relating to co%ula usage but e,cluding fors of the %assi!e and %resent
%rogressi!e saw a reduction fro total errors ainly in oission in the -rst set of
writings to 7 errors in the second set. "oreo!er the errors in the concluding writing tas(
saw a hal!ing in the nuber of oissions and a doubling in the nuber of additions when
co%ared with the -rst set. This suggests that the writers are atte%ting to a%%ly their
hy%othesis about the use of co%ulas to their written wor( but also that they hold a wrongconce%t of the rules or that they are 4ust ine@ecti!e in their a%%lication. This is e,%ected
because as discussed %re!iously Arabic does not e%loy a co%ula in the sae way that
English does 8wan & ith 2))19. In fact Arabic uses !erbs not co%ulas to hel%
describe state in the language. The nearest e?ui!alent of the !erb be in Arabic is the !erb
(enaC but when this is used in the sae was as English uses its !erb be then
ungraatical sentences are created 8Alshayban 2)129. Alshayban 2)12 gi!es us
further (nowledge into the use of the !erb (enaC in Arabic and states that due to its use
and lac( of use in %resent tenses it is li(ely that Arabic students will succub to the
negati!e transfer and a%%ly such a rule in their English writing 8Alshayban 2)129. This
goes soeway to e,%laining the %ersistence of oissions of the co%ula in Arabs writing of
e!en ad!anced le!els of %ro-ciency and the fre?uency of it in all le!els of learners of
English fro Arabic linguistic bac(grounds 8Alshayban 2)129.
'iscourse
The area of discourse showed that soe errors could be !ery %ersistent in this %art of
language. Long sentences were less coon ty%e of error in the -rst sa%le and this is
li(ely to be due to the lac( of co%le, structures in English that the students were able to
%roduce. ;owe!er after wor( on di@erent clauses in English and ore co%le,
graatical structures the students had ore fors in their re%ertoire. Therefore the
-ndings in the last writing tas(s where errors rose fro 2 to = are not a re!elation.
ation of the Nuran and itCs rich long and co%le, structures has created the
culture of elaborate writing in the Arab world. This use of ore e,%ressi!e language in
Page35
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
36/54
rhetoric a%%ears to be ?uite coon in societies which are built around religion 8$ass
2)119 and such cultural nors e,%lain why in Arabic sentences are lengthier than their
English e?ui!alent and are se%arated by lots of coas and con4unctions 8wan &
ith 2))19.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
37/54
,ualitatie data analysis
The seistructured inter!iew was conducted at the $oyal 'ollege of urgeons in Ireland
P +ahrain edical uni!ersity 8$'I9 and was attended by four +ahraini teachers who all
ga!e consent to their contributions being recorded for this %a%er. This %articular
uni!ersity was chosen due to its siilarities with the sub4ects in this study as it was also a
edical uni!ersity and the students were under band 5 in IELT. The inter!iew was ableto re!eal what +ahraini English teachers generally -nd in this uni!ersity when teaching
English co%osition and what strategies they e%loy to counter these %robles.
The results fro this inter!iew irror the (ind of %robles both researched about %rior to
the EA and the results seen in the EA for this %a%er. The teachers e,%ressed that article
errors were aong the ost %robleatic and %ersistent and that these errors are a result
of the students translating fro Arabic into English. They further e,%lained that this
resulted in the o!eruse of the de-nite article in the studentsC writing. This clearly irrors
what has been disco!ered here in this %a%er and what has been suggested by other
researchers but here the inforation is fro teachers in the -eld. The teachers also
e,%ressed concern with their studentsC word orders in English sentences. They stated thatnouns and !erbs are often i,ed u% and that ad!erbs are fre?uently is%laced. 6ith the
e,ce%tion of ad!erbs which were not hea!ily focused on in this study the results bare
the sae -ndings as in the EA here. The $'I sta@ here in +ahrain also articulated their
frustration and bewilderent with the state of s%elling of their students. oe e!en
suggested that the s%elling %ro-ciency was the worst they had e!er seen and that this
did not change no atter how uch %ractice the students had. The results here also
show that Arabic writers of English clearly struggle iensely in this %art of their English
use.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
38/54
"rans#er hy(othesis
In order to establish if errors ha!e been ade as a result of interference fro the other
tongue of a student any researchers in this %articular -eld either used their own
linguistic (nowledge of Arabic or consulted an e,%ert these %articular o%tions were not
a!ailable for this %a%er and so the hy%othesis de!elo%ed here is based u%on -ndings inthe results here and in other %a%ers.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
39/54
other languages. The diBculty though is deterining if it is truly a %articular language
which is causing errors or 4ust a case of natural de!elo%ent but as the students in this
%a%er were studying with the writer for a substantial %eriod there is a high le!el of
con-dence that any of the errors were a direct result of Arabic as%ects. *egati!e
interference has been claied in alost all of the %a%er %resented in the literature
re!iew Ahed 2)1) and Alshayban 2)12 clai it was the ain catalyst for errors in
their data. A lot of e!idence a%%ears to lay in results relating to article usage siilarly tothose %resented in this %a%erCs -nding suggesting that the article syste used in Arabic
interferes with the ability to aster the use of the English article syste 8Abushihab et
al. 2)119 8Al0hresheh 2)1)9. This was also seen in 'ro%tons %a%er where the de-nite
article was transferred ?uite coonly also was seen in the results in the -gures abo!e
into %ositions where either no article should be %laced or a generic article should be
%osition in both these cases the Arabic use of alC the s%eci-c article is clearly being
a%%lied by the students and this is des%ite the fact that reedial wor( was carried out
during the course for the students in ?uestion. Abuaara also saw a large %ercentage of
errors being the result of transfer in her study in 2))3 and she claied that these were
s%lit between interference between standard Arabic and collo?uial Arabic a !iew also
e,%ressed by "ohaed 2))) in Al0hresheh 2)1). It also a%%ears that the errors of
wrong %ro%osition choice and %re%osition errors in general %resented in the results of this
study are ainly due to transfer issues and it is %ossible that %re%ositions are an area of
linguistic ost a@ected by interlingual interference 8Al0hresheh 2)1)9 8'ro%ton
2)119. The students who wrote for this %a%er were high le!el students all %re%aring for
the -rst year of uni!ersity and achie!ing around 5.5 in the IELT e,a so the
interference of %re%ositions and articles is a %ersistent %roble for e!en ad!anced
learners 8'ro%ton 2)119 and ay ha!e fossilised in the. ;owe!er it ay not be a
%eranent situation and in general the students were able to reduce their o!erall
%roduction of errors and this is a ty%ical occurrence for higher le!el students 8Ellis 19.
The students in this %a%er were able to reduce their errors because they had ac?uiredore rules and (nowledge about the language and this hel%ed to reediate the
%robles seen in the -rst set of writings %roduced by the students. ;owe!er the
obser!ation of increases in certain error categories is a sign that the students were not
coing to an end in %roducing interference dri!en faults in their writing and it a%%ears
that with the learning of new structures and words the sco%e for further errors was
widened so one can say that the reasons soe errors were seen in the second sa%le
but not the -rst was because those structures and words were not ready to be
transferred at that %oint in tie 8Ellis 19. uch a theory follows that %resented in
0elleranCs %a%er in 15 where he %oints to the theory of natural ac?uisition an innate
order of learning that all students go through when learning a language.
Another area already said to be %rone to interlingual transfer is discourse and rhetorical
structures 8$ass 2)119 8Ellis 19 and is not liited 4ust to transfer fro Arabic into
English or !ice !ersa. It has already been entioned in this %a%er that Arabic holds a !ery
tight connection to Isla and as such the nati!e s%ea(ers -nd it diBcult to ste% away
Page3$
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
40/54
fro e,%ressing thesel!es in ways which are religiously and culturally doinated. The
assertion and e,aggeration discussed in the earlier %ages of this %a%er were attributed to
such culture and religious bac(grounds 4ust cited and it was deeed that religiously
doinated societies share a coon trait of this ty%e of discourse. Therefore the
rhetorical functions which were used by the students which caused unnaturally long and
ebellished setneces are the result of a strong transfer fro their other tongue. This is
a -nding which co%lients suggestions fro Tho%sonHanos & Thoas$uiJ 1#3.
Transfer sees to a@ect areas other than graar also and s%elling is %erha%s one of
the ost a@ected in this study. It has been claied in the %ast that s%elling is a@ected by
transfer due to the high le!els of %honetic le!el transfer between languages 8Ellis 19.
Therefore the %honetic nature of Arabic has clearly been a%%lied to English in an atte%t
to deal with the co%le, s%elling syste in the language. uch transfers are li(e the
graatical ones entioned in the %re!ious %aragra%h li(ely to gradually disa%%ear
fro the studentsC error %roduction because of the ac?uisition of s%elling rules and
e,ce%tions o!er tie. Therefore a %otential ?uestion is whether such errors truly are
transfer or de!elo%ental and such a ?uestion is diBcult to answer with co%ounding
resol!e but with ore studies li(e the one carried out here o!er a %eriod of tie a orede-niti!e answer ay start to eerge.
Page4%
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
41/54
Case studies and suggestions which hae or are li9ely to wor9
6hat is clear regardless of the cause of errors is that learners need to ha!e strategies
taught to the so that they can co%e with the %rocess of writing ore co%etently
8"yles 2))29. 6riters who a(e use of strategies to counter de!elo%ental or transfer
issues are highly li(ely to be ore %ro-cient than those who do not 80haldieh 2)))9 as
they ha!e the tools necessary to su%%ort the when such instances occur whereas those
who do not use the will ine!itably a(e decisions in uch ore haste and without
a%titude . trategies can be in the for of either direct or indirect a%%roaches. The forer
is regarded as a cogniti!e strategy 80haldieh 2)))9 where students a(e a ental e@ort
to focus on their errors and on ways to counteract the whereas the latter is de-ned as
etacogniti!e in 0haldieh 2))) and relates to the learning %utting thesel!es into
situations where their language can be fostered and %rooted such as a social setting.
;owe!er strategies alone are not enough to a(e a learner error free and attention
ust be %aid to de!elo%ing the %ro-ciency in writing 80haldieh 2)))9 and the areas oflanguage su%%orting it so that the s(ills can substance to wor( with. Then results li(e
those seen in the %a%er by 0haldieh 2))) where writers that were ore %ro-cient were
those who used ore strategies 80haldieh 2)))9 can be seen ore widely. Therefore the
writer assues that ore s%ecialised writing classes 8il!a 139 which consider
de!elo%ental and interlingual issues should be used as o%%osed to generic writing
classes used ore generally in +ahrain and es%ecially in the institute for the students in
this %a%er. These should be able to hel% the learners by sca@olding the ty%e of writing
they are e,%ected to %roduce 8"yles 2))29 and %ro!ide eleents of linguistics nors
which ight di@er to those found in Arabic.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
42/54
The ain ethod of writing used by all the teachers was a %rocess a%%roach with soe
of the teachers allowing %re writing grou% wor( to continue into the writing stage. Gne
teacher described how she allowed students to write an entire essay in grou%s with each
student being assigned one %aragra%h to scul%t and de!elo%. he claied that this
allowed ore focus on the %rogression of ideas organisation of the %aragra%h and
allowed the to focus on the !ocabulary they wanted to use for the s%eci-c section of
the essay. Another teacher e,%lained how she also used a s%ecial techni?ue forcoherence of essays and ga!e an e,a%le of cutting u% an article into a %u>>le and
allowing the studentsC tie to sol!e it. The -nal idea suggested was to ha!e students
learn error sybols which teacher use and to learn how to re!ise their writing once they
see the.
oe of the strategies entioned by the teachers in the seistructured inter!iew are
co%liented by suggestions and research -ndings elsewhere li(e for e,a%le those
regarding writing ore. oe linguists ha!e suggested that ore writing e?uates to a
higher le!el of %ro-ciency 8Lee 2))59 and one can certainly assue that the o%%osite
would result in %oor co%ositions fro students due to the lac( of %ractice. can also
read aloud their wor( each tie 8*a>i & Ahad 2)129and notice that they need to %utin brea(s i.e. %unctuation otherwise they %hysically run out of breath and this should
hel% the learners to iagine the reader ta(ing in the sentence. A further area of
i%ro!eent should be seen in s%elling due to the re%licating words ulti%le ties in the
writing and this will hel% to ignite the students own eorisation s(ills which the writer
feels are ?uite uni?ue to Arabic s%ea(ers due to a culture of Nuran eorisation. uch a
%ractice is also entioned in *a>i & Ahad 2)12 as %art of their suggestions for
i%ro!ing the writing of Arabic s%ea(ers co%osing in English. ;owe!er not e!eryone
agrees that %ractice a(es %erfect es%ecially when it coes to ore writing %ractice
and des%ite a hy%othesis that suggested i%ro!eents should occur the results
regarding free writing in Lee 2))5 showed little e@ect on %ro-ciency le!els. The writerta(es the stance that writing %ractice does hel% to de!elo%ed the s(ills students need for
co%osing co%etently.
tudents %racticing writing is not bene-cial alone without soe for of feedbac( and it
ay be necessary for the to recei!e soe ty%e of negati!e feedbac( to encourage and
%roote i%ro!eents in their wor( 8"yles 2))29. In the %a%er by "yles in 2))2 it is
suggested that teachers should loo( at a writing %rocess odel de!elo%ed by
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
43/54
%re!ent an o!erwheling aount of teacher led correction being gi!en to the students
8"yles 2))29 8*a>i & Ahad 2)129. I%ro!eents using a siilar techni?ue of %eer
correction showed %ositi!e results in the study by 'heng and te@ensen 1=. +y
learning fro their own ista(es and other students who are %rone to the sae ty%es of
de!elo%ental and transfer factors the students are li(ely to becoe better as the self
regulation i%ro!es detailed focus of the di@erent as%ects of writing 8Abiara 2))39
8Alsaadani 2)1)9. "oreo!er reading ore is has generally recei!ed good %ress withregards to i%ro!ing writing 8Lee 2))59 and this is a o%inion e,%ressed by 0rashen
13 in Lee 2))5 so the writer feels this %articular strategy should be e%loyed with the
students of this study.
Another area which would ha!e a %ositi!e e@ect on the students in this %a%er is the
de!elo%ent of le,ical :uency. uch a strategy if used by the teacher will allow the
students to de!elo% their %assi!e (nowledge of !ocabulary and discourse structures into
acti!e and usable entities 8Delderen et al. 2)119. uch an a%%roaches relies on the
assu%tion that better writer %ossess a richer and ore co%le, le,ical (nowledge
8Delderen et al. 2)119 but at the sae tie this (nowledge is usable in writing.
"oreo!er its (nowledge ust be ?uic( and easy for the writer to access so it ust ha!ebeen %rocedurised by training and re%etition. It was hy%othesised in the study by
Delderen et al. 2)11 that such a strategy would reduce the need for re%etition as the
writers would ha!e ore :uent le,is within their (nowledge but he was unable to -nd
o!erall te,t ?uality di@erentiation between those who had e,tra training and those who
did not. ;owe!er the writer feels that this strategy could be used in con4unction with
others laid out here to de!elo% the wea(ness seen in the %a%erCs sub4ects.
To co%lient the wor( on le,ical :uency the students should also wor( to de!elo% their
etadiscourse use as there is soe e!idence to suggest that by doing so the students
can i%ro!e their o!erall writing. In a s%ecial research %ro4ect on such strategies it was
seen that ore etadiscourse usage resulted in higher grades 8'heng & te@ensen
1=9. These less salient features of writing li(e coentary and attitude ar(ers hel%
to build a connection between the reader and the writer. This strategy would be able to
address certain features relating to discourse which ha!e been stated in the literacy
re!iew to lac( ?uality in ArabsC co%ositions. 'heng & te@ensen 1= state that a
ethod to de!elo% this s(ill is to ha!e students read 4ournal articles about etadiscourse
and then to re:ect and write res%onses to the. uch a strategy could be a%%lied to all of
the coon ty%e of errors %resented here and %ro!iding the students ha!e ade?uate
reading s(ills they could re:ect in the sae way.
Although the theory of transfer which has been acce%ted as a in:uential factor in theerrors %roduced by the students here has any unfa!ourable as%ects teachers should
be encouraged to a(e best use of its %otential facilitating as%ects. This can be done by
e,%loiting siilarities between languages to %roote %ositi!e transfer 8Tho%sonHanos
& Thoas$uiJ 1#39 80elleran 159 li(e that which was naturally seen in the
studentsC use of the s%eci-c article des%ite fre?uently oitting the generic article in the
Page43
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
44/54
data results of this %a%er. uch a strategy would wor( best with s%eci-c article usage in
English and with %re-,es and suB,es used with English words. +oth of these linguistic
features share siilarities with Arabic and should be bene-cial (nowledge for the
students.
Page44
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
45/54
Conclusion
The errors %roduced by the students in this %a%er were of a nature to suggest that
transfer was an i%ortant factor in their %roduction. There were signs of de!elo%ental
errors e,isting in the data set but these :uctuated in a di@erent %attern to those which
are deeed the result of interlingual transfer. Gf all the errors loo(ed at articles
%re%ositions and s%elling were the ost %robleatic. /nfortunately for the sub4ects of
this study these are also areas which are li(ely to be diBcult through the learning
%rocess due to their di@erence to the syste used in Arabic. The writer concludes that
the only way to co%e with these is for both the teacher and student to address the and
a(e use of a cobination of strategies as outlined in this %a%er. The writer feels that
strategy use ust be gi!en e?ual bearing in a course for the sub4ects in this study and
that language %ro-ciency ust ha!e e?ual standing.
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
46/54
:ibliogra(hyAbiara *. 2))3. An analysis of errors in Arabic speakers' English writing, +eirutS s.n.
Abushihab I. ElGari A. ;. & Tobat ". 2)11. An Analysis of 6ritten Draatical
Errors of Arab Learners of English as a aytoonah /ni!ersity of
Fordan. European Journal of Social Sciences, 2)89 %%. 53552.
Ahed A. ;. 2)1). tudentsC Hrobles with 'ohesion and 'oherence in E(i1Dw/T;?5G)HgXTi4ea>;sLY5N0#b"A,u0eygOc'6D=+igig
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
47/54
Ellis $. 1. -he study of second language ac/uisition+ G,fordS G,ford /ni!ersity Hress.
Delderen A. !. Gostda $. & chooten E. !. 2)11. oes
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
48/54
A!ailable atS htt%sSdocs.google.co!iewerVaQ!&?QcacheSFX3
1>IcAsFSciteseer,.ist.%su.edu!iewdocdownload3 ". F. 2)12. 0ey Issues in
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
49/54
Tahaineh Y. . 2)1). Arab E)L $ni6ersity Students' Errors in the $se of #repositions,
AanS Hrincess Alia /ni!ersity 'ollegeAl+al?aK A%%lied /ni!ersity.
Tho%sonHanos 0. & Thoas$uiJ ". 1#3. The Least You hould 0now about ArabicS
I%lications for the EL 6riting Instructor. -ES"L 1uarterly, 1789 %%. =)=23.
Page4$
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
50/54
A((endi/
irst set o# data #ro) )id(oint
isticory
Q 1#5
Q 73
=)
15
333
ty%e
Q 3
Q #
r Q 151
rder Q 13
21
-c*uber oferrors ois add isfor isorder
12 12 ) ) )
11 1) 1 ) )
G = ) = ) )
a = 2 1 )" = ) ) = )
D # ) ) # )
G 3 15 ) 2 )
r >ero 1 ) 1 ) )
OA = ) 1 5 )
12 7 5 ) )
t 3= 2 1) 2 )
2 2 ) ) )
3 = ) )
onoun 17 = 11 ) )13 ) ) ) 13
ng 7 ) ) 7 )
35 ) ) ) )
) ) ) )
sentence 2 ) ) ) )
Page5%
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
51/54
ati!e = ) ) ) )
7 ) ) 7 )
Q 311 #5 3 127 13
-econd set o# data #ro) the e/it e/a)
Linguistic category*uber oferrors
s& Q 127
or%h Q 5)
lex = 3#
dis Q 12
227
Error ty%e*uber oferrors
add Q 31
ois Q 5)
isfor Q
isorder Q 13
%eci-c
nuber of
errors ois add
isfor
isord
erarticle generic 22 1# 3 1 )
article s%eci-c 1) 7 3 ) )article s%eci-c for>ero = 1 5 ) )
co%ula 7 3 ) )
gr rule after odal 1 ) ) 1 )
gr rule ing 3 ) ) 3 )
gr rule other 2= 2 2) )
gr rule %assi!e 1 ) ) 1 )gr rule sub !erb
agree # ) ) ) )%re% 11 7 ) )
%unct = 2 ) )
%unct and 7 7 ) ) )
%unct ca% 5 1 ) )
$' %ronoun ) ) )
Page51
-
8/16/2019 Error Analysis of Bahrani Students
52/54
wo 12 ) ) ) 12
s% 5) ) ) 5) )
ww 23 ) ) ) 1
ww %re% 13 ) ) ) )
long sentence = ) ) ) )
re%etati!e ) ) ) )
start sentence withbecause 2 ) ) 2 )
Total Q 227 5) 33 7# 13
E/a)(le data sheet
s& ois AD are (ind ofs& ois AD as actor
s& ois AD ha!e nuber
s& ois AD in bad way
s& ois AD in liited ti
s& ois AD is interesting
s& ois AD It also old one
s& ois AD it is undeniab
s& ois AD 4ust bene-cia
s& ois AD the o%%ortu