erratum: reconstructing project management reprised: a knowledge perspective

1
114 December 2013 Project Management Journal DOI: 10.1002/pmj A n error was made in the article appearing in Project Management Journal, Volume 44, Number 5, pages 6–23. The second sentence of the second paragraph on page 6 is incorrect. The words “nature of the” should not appear in the sentence. Many academic researchers are primarily interested in proj- ects as examples of temporary organizations, rather than in questions about building a discipline for the delivery of Erratum: Reconstructing Project Management Reprised: A Knowledge Perspective Peter Morris Project Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 6, 114 © 2013 by the Project Management Institute Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/pmj.21382 goals. Indeed, they may well be skeptical about our ability to define the kind of normative or prescriptive nature of the knowledge that would be required for such a discipline, or the value of such guidance should it be available. Thus, the second sentence should appear as follows: Indeed, they may well be skeptical about our ability to define the kind of normative or prescriptive knowledge that would be required for such a discipline, or the value of such guid- ance should it be available. ERRATUM

Upload: peter

Post on 29-Mar-2017

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Erratum: Reconstructing Project Management Reprised: A Knowledge Perspective

114 December 2013 ■ Project Management Journal ■ DOI: 10.1002/pmj

An error was made in the article appearing in Project Management Journal, Volume 44, Number 5, pages 6–23.

The second sentence of the second paragraph on page 6 is incorrect. The words “nature of the” should not appear in the sentence.

Many academic researchers are primarily interested in proj-ects as examples of temporary organizations, rather than in questions about building a discipline for the delivery of

Erratum: Reconstructing Project Management Reprised: A Knowledge PerspectivePeter Morris

Project Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 6, 114

© 2013 by the Project Management Institute

Published online in Wiley Online Library

(wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/pmj.21382

goals. Indeed, they may well be skeptical about our ability to define the kind of normative or prescriptive nature of the knowledge that would be required for such a discipline, or the value of such guidance should it be available.

Thus, the second sentence should appear as follows:

Indeed, they may well be skeptical about our ability to define the kind of normative or prescriptive knowledge that would be required for such a discipline, or the value of such guid-ance should it be available.

E

RR

AT

UM