errata: comparative study of potential energy functions for diatomic molecules
TRANSCRIPT
R FVIFWS OF MOD F RN PH YSICS VOLUMF 31, NUMBFR 3 J UL Y, 1959
Errata: Comparative Study of Potential EnergyFunctions for Diatomic Molecules
LRevs. Modern Phys. 29, 664 (1957)7YATENDRA PAL VARSHNI
Department of Physics, Allahabad P'niversity, Allahabad, India
O N page 670, Eq. (40) should read
o,=0.In line 4, read "0"in place of "2."
On page 671, Linnett function, Eq. (55) should read
(m+1) (m —1)—t2+3t 6B '3 (m+1 —t) co,
Equation (II-29) should read
$(1,1)=—LI'p (s+tJ) —bFI j.S —g
2qb
Equation (II-31) should read: dPp/d = —(dI"I/d )= —FoooI+F IeIo.
1150 for "antilog 4.030—5" read "antilog (4.030-5)."1155 Bottom line, left. Actually, Table V-6 shows that the
largest observed F-, for hydrogen is at 4 kev in argongas.
1162 Table VI-6; for "oII" read "o IT."
1164 Center, right, for "from Eqs. (V-1) and (V-2)" read "fromequations in Sec. VA-3, page 1156."
Consequently, F values in Table II are changed as follows:
011.522.252.52.62.72.752.83.0
0.6661.1111.3661.6661.8452.0552.1522.2582.3162.372.66
Errata: Experimental Results on Charge-ChangingCollisions of Hydrogen and Helium Atoms and
Eons at Kinetic Energies above 0.2 kev)Revs. Modern Phys. 30, 1137 (1958)7
SAMUEL K. ALLISONEnrico Fermi Institute for Nuclear Studies, University of Chicago,
Chicago, Illinois
Page1138 In text, above Eq. (II-1), for "do;f/d8 would be a function
of angle" read "do-;y/dO would be a function of angle. "1139 In text, above Eq. (II-5) for "and exists into high vacuum"
read "and exits into high vacuum. "1140 Equation (II-12) should read
F;=F;„+PP(,,i) exp(nq)+N(s, i) exp( —xq) jXexp( —gm ~ a;f).
1141 Equation (II-28) should read
s+gP(1,1)= LFo (s—g) —bFI2qb
On page 672, Lippincott function, Eq. (61) should read
n, =0.In line 24, delete "As (61) shows this appears to be in error. "
On page 677, Table IX, correct F values are
Linnett (8+3t—t')/3(4 —t)Lippincott 0.
On page 679, Linnett function, change the discussion for a, asfollows:
"Too high at low A. Suitable for CO, N2, NO, 02."
Erratum: Dynamics of a Lattice Universe bythe Schwarzschild-Cell Method
LRevs. Modern Phys. 29, 432 (1957)7RICHARD W. LINDQUIST AND JOHN A, WHEELERPalmer Physical Laboratory, Princeton, ¹mJersey
w E are indebted to Professor G. C. McVittie for pointingout to us that the printed version of Eq. (3) omits a
factor, ' lt should read
with
and
dr2ds'= fa(T)/apg +r'(d8'+sin 8d P) —d T'
1—r'/ap'
=a'(T) LduI'+du2'+du3 +du4'j —d T2
uI ——sing sin8 sing,u2 ——sing sin8 cosy,u3= sing cos8,u4= cosx,
(3a)
(3b)
r=ap sing. (6)The subsequent calculations and the conclusions drawn from themabout the dynamics of a lattice universe remain unchanged.
~ R. C. Tolman, Relativity, Cosmology and Thermodynamics (ClarendonPress, Oxford, England, 1934), Eqs. (149.5) and (149.10).
Errata: Spin Waves/Revs. Modern Phys. 30, 1 (1958)7
J. VAN KRANENDONK AND J. H. VAN VLECKHarvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
' "N Eq. (28), 0.11.87 should be replaced by +~ (0.1173).J ls
In the third member of Eq. (32), 15/8 should be replaced by15/32.
On the top of page 8, 0.96 Nk/2S should be replaced by 0.96(2NkS).
In Eq. (97), a term —NzJS should be added to the right-handsIde.
In Eq. (120), 0.1187 should be replaced by 0.1173/(SI—S2)and 2JSIS2 should be replaced by 4JSIS2.
Below Eq. (121), SIS2/S{SI—S2) should appear as twice thisquantity, and (gIS&—g2S&)p should appear multiplied by afactor (q).
839