eriksson chi egy u20

7/28/2019 Eriksson Chi Egy u20

1/4

Unofficial Referee Observers Report rbitro Internacional & The Third Team

(CHI) CHILE 2:1 EGYPT (EGY)

Group E, 23 June 2013, 17:00 CET Antalya (TUR)

Match Officials Name ORI Mark1 Mark2 Difficulty3

Referee Jonas Eriksson SWE 8.2 Normal

Assistant Referee 1 Mathias Klasenius SWE 8.5 Challenging

Assistant Referee 2 Daniel Wrnmark SWE 8.3 Challenging

Fourth Official Wilmar Roldn COL 8.3 Normal

FIFA Referee Assessor Lee Harmon CKI

Blog Referee Observer Chefren ITA

1 Final mark according to evaluation scale.2 Mark if the final mark had not been influenced by a crucial mistake (only in case of a crucial mistake, to be held empty if no crucial mistake occurred).3 Difficulty has to be integrated into the final mark. Levels of difficulty are: normal, challenging and very challenging. 4 Blog-Referee Observer =Inofficial referee observer appointed by the blog administrator.

Evaluation scale(for referee, ARs andfourth official)

Description of the Marks

9.0 10.0 Excellent.

8.5 8.9 Very good. Important decision(s) correctly taken.

8.3 8.4 Good. Expected level.

8.2 Satisfactory with small areas for improvement.

8.0 8.1 Satisfactory with important areas for improvement.

7.9 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above.

7.8 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.0 8.2.

7.5 7.7Below expectation, poor control, significant point(s) forimprovement.

7.0 7.4Disappointing. Below expectation with one and clear importantmistake or a performance with two or more clear and importantmistakes.

6.0 6.9 Unacceptable.

Small description of the match (extra-ordinary incidents etc.):Matchday 1 in group E of FIFA U-20 WC 2013. The match was played in Antalya, between Chileand Egypt. The referee appointed was Jonas Eriksson from Sweden, at his first FIFA tournament,so it was something like a debut. It was played in front of an attendance of 3,148. The conditions ofthe pitch were good. The match in its progress was not really challenging for the referee, until thelast minutes of second half, in which several things happened. A crucial decision had to be taken.


2/4


Referee

Crucial Decisions (refer to penalty kicks, sending-off situations etc.)

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the referees decision

53Penalty appeal by Egypt. Contact in area between Lichnovsky (CHI) and ElhanafiYasser (EGY). Not enough for a penalty, correct decision by referee.

80

Cuevas (CHI) is directly sent off with a straight RC for a foul on Saleh Gomaa(EGY). The referee evaluates the situation as serious foul play. The decisionappears a bit harsh, because also the Egyptian player tried to catch the ball witha dangerous tackle. Probably the referee decided to punish the Chilean playerbecause he came later and he might have avoided to hit the opponent. Thedecision cant anyway be listed as crucial mistake, because it can be explained

strictly according to LotG.

Basic Observations (refer to the general application of the LotG, highlight thereferees tactical approach, personality, match control, management of the teamsand players, teamwork etc.).Please deploy short but precise and detailed sentences!

Positive Points

1. Control of the game having a good communication with players.

2. Very good teamwork: assistant helped the referee in many situations reportingfoul.

3. Usage of the advantage.

4.Management of added time. Especially in second half, 5 minutes were a correctchoice, because much time was wasted due to injuries.

Points for Improvement

1.

The red card given is acceptable, strictly according to rules, but it can be also apoint for improvement. According to the opinion of this observer, the Egyptianplayer made a reckless tackle which forced the Chilean player to commit the

serious foul play. For this reason, he was sent off. The situation might have beenread in a different way. Anyway, as said it will be not count as crucial mistake.

2.He should try to have a more consistent approach, nevertheless there werentrelevant or crucial mistakes, the feeling is that he can improve in his cardmanagement, paying attention also to the background of each situation.


3/4


The referees character

Physical Aspects + Expected -

Fitness / Stamina X

Always close to play without interfering with it X

Flexible diagonal movement X

Positioning at set pieces X

Efficient positioning, having a good angle ofvision to play

X

Close to the penalty area, if needed X

Tactical Approachvery

lenientlenient medium strict

verystrict

Description X

Yes So-so No

Consistency in the tactical approach / style X

The tactical approach suited to the require-

ments of the match / the match benefittedfrom the tactical approach of the referee X

Ability to adapt the tactical approach ifneeded

X

Further observations (peculiarities of the referee revealing his character)

The tactical approach was a mixed bag, very difficult to identify just sayinglenient or strict. We must underline that almost in all the match, the refereewas able to take the situation under control without cards and it was anacceptable choice. Also applying the advantage in several situations, the game

benefitted from this style. But then when the first card of the match was showed,it was a harsh and straight red. So, his approach immediately changed. Afterthat, in the last 10 minutes of the match, other YC were issued. The feeling isthat, starting from the sending off, the referee decided to changed his style.


4/4


Assistant Referee 1

Please assess the first assistant referees performance.

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the ARs behaviour

1 Castillo (CHI) is correctly evaluated onside.

7 Castillo (CHI) is flagged offside. Correct decision.

35 Fuentes (CHI) is flagged offside. Correct decision.

40 Henriquez (CHI) is correctly flagged offside.

48 Kahraba (EGY) is flagged offside. Correct decision.

79 Hassan Ahmed (EGY) is flagged offside. Correct decision.

Assistant Referee 2

Please assess the second assistant referees performance.

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the ARs behaviour

10 Kahraba (EGY) scores starting from a regular position. Correct evaluation.30 Kahraba (EGY) is correctly evaluated onside. Very good NO FLAG.

57Henriquez (CHI) is correctly evaluated onside. Very difficult and superb NOFLAG.

88 Castillo (CHI) is flagged offside. Mistake. The player is onside.

Fourth Official

Please assess the fourth officials performance.

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the fourth officials behaviour

Full timeNothing extra-ordinary to report. Roldn executed well his duties as fourth official.The benches were fair in their behavior.

eriksson chi egy u20

Documents