erdf and local development interventions - berlin study
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
1/47
Prepared for:EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Call for tenders by open procedure n200!CE!"!0!A#!0$% &
Study on t'e contr(but(on of local
de)elop*ent (n del()er(n+ (nter)ent(ons
co,f(nanced by t'e European Re+(onal
-e)elop*ent .und /ER-. (n
t'e per(ods 2000,0" and 2001,!
Re+(onal Case Study: 3erl(n
November 2011
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
2/47
-(rectorate 4eneral Re+(onal Pol(cy
Pol(cy -e)elop*ent
E)aluat(on
Quotation is authorised as long as the source is acknowledged. The text is not binding for the European ommission
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
3/47
Acrony*s
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
4/47
#A35E O. CON#EN#S
.ORE6OR-!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!%
E7ECU#I8E SUMMAR9!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
2 CON#E7# RE5A#E- .EA#URES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
2.1 !"#"E"N"$#%E&E'"($ENT......................................................................)
2.2 #N!T#T*T#"N+'+N%("'#T#+',+-+TE-#!T#!.........................................1
#E USE O. 5-A IN #E RE4ION: #E55IN4 #E S#OR9!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$
% MAIN IN#ER8EN#IONS USIN4 5-A!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!20
/.1 - E#"N+'!T-+TE +N+'3#N"45ET#&E!..............................................20
/.2 $+((#NE-%6 #NTE-&ENT#"N!*!#N'%+.................................................27
$ E..EC#I8ENESS O. #E IN#ER8EN#IONS CO,.INANCE- 39 ER-.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;!2
./0/ :/71 92:17 92:/9 91:902 /92.)) /C.21 801.11
Male (m) /0.0C1 /0./0 /0.10/
Female (m) 81./M 81.1 M 0:81 /2.0) /2.0C9 /1.7CC
Populat(on B"$
/
18
=2001>
1).2
=2008>
1C.1 17.2 1C. ; 18.7 17.9 1)./
Male (%) 12.7 16.3 -
Female (%) 19.7 22.1 -
Educat(on 5e)el
/5e)el $,"
; 1C.7 22. ; 1C.7 21.)
Male (%) - 23.3 25.9 - 19. 21.!
Female (%) 55. 57.9 55.2 - 15. 1.7 - 19 22.1
4-P per Cap(ta /D
PPS
20:900 2:700 2/:)00 22:/00 2):00 29:)00 1C.000 2.700 2/./00
+ctivit< rate 17;7/
=M>
)/./ ).C )8.) )1 )8. )7.7 79.8 )0. )1
Male (%) 77.5 77.2 79.! 7. 1.3 2.3 77"1 77"6 77"7
Female (%) 71.2 7#.5 72 63 69.3 7#. 6#"1 63 6!"5
E*ploy*ent
Rate: ","% /
7/. 70.0 78.7 78. 7).8 )1.1 72:1 7/:8 7/:2
Male (%) 63.2 61.6 67.6 72.7 72. 76 7#"7 71"6 7#"1
6emale =M> 72.1 89.) 7C.C 8).9 72.2 77.1 8:7 8): 89:2
Une*ploy*ent
Rate /$ /
1.7 19.) 1.2 9 10. ).2 C:/ 9: C:)
Male (%) 1/. 20./ 1/.7 ).) 10.8 ).7 9: ):7 C:)
Female (%) 12.9 17.) 11.8 9. 10.2 7.7 10:) C C:)
Net $igration
=000>
10:/7)
=2001>
10:201
=2008>
10:81)
=200C>
1:989
m
1:70/
m
0.98/
m
!ource Eurostat data: and +mt f@r !tatistik 4erlin;4randenburg =2010>: %ie kleine 4erlin !tatistik.
The population of 4erlin has generall< remained stable: with onl< a slight increase in
recent
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
10/47
erman population: corresponding to 22M of the working population. Jhile it is the
largest erman cit
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
11/47
.(+ure 2! , -e)elop*ent of 3erl(n 4-P co*pared to 4er*any / of c'an+e co*pared to
pre)(ous year
!ource !enJiTech6rau.httpDDwww.berlin.deDimperiaDmdDcontentDsen;
wirtschaftDkon?unkturdatenDaL01.pdfstartRtsS1020)C998RfileSaL01.pdf
The 4erlin econom< is mainl< concentrated in services where 9)M of the workforce
were emplo. The compan< service sector contributes 8.8M
to %( and the public and private service sector 2M. The industrial sector: which
suffered from lower subsidies reunification: emplo and investments via important
media and music companies =like Jarner 4rothers> have made the culture and tourism
sector an important economic driver =culture: telecommunication: media: film and T&:
architecture and cultural heritage>. +s earl< as 2002 there were more than 19:000 !$Es
in the cultural sector: producing 11M of %( and emplo
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
12/47
.(+ure 2!2 , Econo*(c Sector d(str(but(on accord(n+ to +ross )alue addedF of 3erl(n and
4er*any /no*(nalF (n F 200
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
!ource +mt f@r !tatistik 4erlin;4randenburg: $arch 2009:httpDDwww.berlin.deDsenDwirtschaftDdatenDberichte.html
,owever: the largest part of ross %omestic (roduct is generated b< !$Es in the
private sector despite a high incidence of opening and closure of smaller enterpriseswhich are often subsidised b< the !tate =in 200C //:C81 newl< registered against :9/9
closeing down>. The self;emplo compared to 200C: bringing the total to 1:79
million people.
Nonetheless: a high unemplo: is the highest rate of the 17 L,nder" significantl< above
thenational average =).)M> and even lies above the structurall< weak Eastern 'Inder.10
#ncidence of unemplo than women =11.8M> and
long;term unemplo: !chlussbericht =einschlieUlich 5ahresbericht f@r den 3eitraum
01.01.2009 bis 0.07.200C> @ber den EinsatP des EuropIischen 6onds f@r regionale Entwicklung =E6-E> und des EuropIischen!oPialfonds =E!6> im 3eitraum 2000 bis 2007 =2009> im -ahmen des Einheitlichen (rogrammplanungsdokuments f@r die #nterven;
tionen der EuropIischen !trukturfonds in 4erlin =3iel 2>
12
http://www.berlin.de/sen/wirtschaft/daten/berichte.htmlhttp://www.berlin.de/sen/wirtschaft/daten/berichte.html -
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
13/47
+fter man<
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
14/47
both problems of integration and unemplo
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
15/47
#able 2!2: Senate aut'or(t(es (n)ol)ed (n *ana+(n+ ER-. funded act()(t(es 2000,200" and
200",20
Plann(n+ Per(od: 2000,200" /ER-. Plann(n+ Per(od: 200",20 /ER-.
!enate +dministration for Econom.
+s detailed in the next chapter : '%+ interventions in 4erlin are programmed and
implemented at neighbourhood level through a s. !en!tadt is responsible for selecting the Neighbourhood areas to
be financiall< supported during the programme period: collects cit< level data through
regular monitoring and provides funding to the Neighbourhood $anagement =N$> and
4oroughs for pro?ect implementation.
+t the !en!tadt level there are 9 coordinators for activities with the Neighbourhood
$anagement =each coordinator is in charge of 1 to N$ depending on their siPe>:
mostl< grouped according the municipalit< where the< are located. !enate coordinators
are in regular contact with their N$;Teams and the responsible 4orough oordinators
though !teering meetings at local level.
+t borough level 3orou+' Coord(nators =Be&r4l&e 8e0&ets4$$rd&nat$ren> are in
charge of cooperating with the N$s: the !en!tadt and are also an important contact
point for Neighbourhood inhabitants. There are several borough coordinators in each
4orough: usuall< responsible for one or two N$s.
17!enatsverwaltung fu@r !tadtentwicklung: Evaluation des 4erliner Quartiersmanagements in der (ilotphase 1CCC;2002.
1)Empirica: Evaluation 1CCCD2000: 4d. 1
18
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
16/47
#n inter,depart*ental @orH(n+ +roups =,mter0er*re&+ende Ar0e&ts*ruppen>: which
have been operating since 2000: borough coordinators report regularl< to other borough
authorities: in order to better integrate activities at borough level.
#n order to guarantee regular exchange: 3orou+' Steer(n+,rounds =Be&r4l&e
Len4un*srunde> are held ever< two month. These involve the N$;teams and otherrelevant borough authorities =such as the public construction authorit
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
17/47
help: private initiative: and collaboration: stimulating and supporting essential local
development resources.
"ver a number of . #t has also drawn on experience in other European countries and on the
results of the European *nion *-4+N initiative. +s such: the core elements can be
sketched as follows1C
The programme is to complement traditional urban development assistance and
dovetail it with other polic< areas relevant to urban development in a new:
integrated approachA
The aim is to concentrate investment and non;investment measures from various
programmes of the E*: the 6ederal and 'Inder governmentsA
The concept calls for ongoing: area;specific: and integrated local development
action in the sense of a holistic improvement strateg
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
18/47
4ased on socio;demographic indicators: the neighbourhood areas are classified as either
prevention areas or areas for medium to large;scale intervention and provided with
technical and financial support at different levels. Neighbourhood area monitoring is
continuousl< updated: with two;
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
19/47
.(+ure ! & -e)elop*ent (nde 200
!ource !enate %epartment for *rban %evelopment =2010>: !ocial *rban %evelopment: $onitoring2010: *pdated for the period 2009 K 200C: *nit # +2
Jhen the programme !ociall< #ntegrative it< was launched: the Buestion roses on how
to take into account the calls for more inclusive civic participation. #n order to achieve it
together with a lasting improvement of the situation in those areas and to contribute to
their stabiliPation: it was decided to implement a Neighbourhood $anagement =N$> in
each area. The main task of N$ is to activate local residents: especiall< groups that
have so far been difficult or impossible to reach. Neighbourhood managers should
therefore be reachable at a local contact address =communit< bureauF> and: forexample: offer advice: promote personal commitment and responsibilit< b< a variet< of
campaigns: and encourage residents to contribute their own ideas and talents to
integrative urban renewal. The direct lineF to residents helps in identif
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
20/47
communit< bureau as t that: since 2008: have become an integral
part of the work in all N$ areas with a strong role in the decision making process of
'%+ interventions. The main goal of the Ns is to give boroughs a voiceF: to provide
a platform for discussion and consultation as well to enable them to participate in the
decision;making process on the allocation of available program funds to respective
areas. Total funding for the program was divided into five different neighbourhood
funds =N6> in earl< 200) N61 K N6828. Ever since: the Neighbourhood ouncils have
been involved in the decision making process on the two most important funds K N6 2
and K on an ongoing basis: and the underl
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
21/47
% Ma(n (nter)ent(ons us(n+ 5-A
%! Re+(onal strate+y: analy(n+ obJect()es
+s detailed in chapter 2: the cit< of 4erlin contains extensive disparities in the status of
local economies: a feature reflected in the different funding frameworks for East and
Jest 4erlin. %uring the 2000;2007 programming period: the cit< benefited from two
different (rogrammes as the two parts of 4erlin had different development levels. East
4erlin was considered to be an "b?ective 1 phasing;out area: while Jest 4erlin was
considered at an "b?ective 2 phasing out area.
Jithin the 200);201 (rogramming (eriod: 4erlin has received ommunit< support
under the G-egional ompetitiveness and Emplo
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
22/47
industrial sector after reunification> and to address the challenges of becoming a capital
cit< once more.
The "b. 1 programme revolved around five priorit< areas and technical assistance
measures.
:r&$r&t; 1< Supp$rt +$r $mpet&t&'eness
#nvestments in the local econom< were focussed on the modernisation of industrial:
service and technolog< structures to guarantee sustainable emplo
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
23/47
#able %,: 2000,200" ObJ! 3erl(n pro+ra**e , 3reaHdo@n of .(nances by pr(or(ty area
(riorit< +rea Total ost E* ontribution(ublic aid =E V
others>
1 (romoting the competitiveness
of economic activities:
particularl< of !$Es
2.2C2.000 200.C79.000 2.2C2.000
2 $easures for promoting
infrastructure/28.C89.000 28C./1.000 /28.C89.000
(rotection and improvement of
the environment)2.079.000 8/.080.000 )2.079.000
/ (romotion of the labour force
and eBual opportunities27.2/).000 19.729.000 272.771.000
8 -ural development and fisher< C.88C.000 ).17C.000 C.88C.000
7 Technical +ssistance 18.)92.000 11.98.000 18.)92.000
Total 1.10C.C07.000 )17.CC1.000 1.10C.20.000
!ource % -egio %atabase
The main aim of the 2000;07 "b?ective 2 programme for Jest 4erlin =as a complement
to the "b?ective 1 programme for the Eastern sector of the cit< 2)> was to tackle specific
economic features of the cit< such as weak investment: comparativel< low productivit
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
24/47
This entailed promotion of private investment and investment in local maintenance: and
strengthening entrepreneurial potential: with special reference to !$Es: through
counselling and financial assistance. (articular attention was given to the promotion of
research and technical development and technological counselling to !$Es. 6urther
training and promotion of ?ob creation in businesses: particularl< for women: wasconsidered to be the means for conducting an active and preventive labour market
polic< with the ob?ective to create and sustain over 18:000 ?obs: to promote eBual
opportunities for women and men and to facilitate their entr< into the #T societ
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
25/47
stabilise the conditions for local enterprisesA
improve the social: cultural and living environment and securit
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
26/47
The "perational (rogramme of 4erlin =E-%6> for 200);201 has been divided into the
following priorities
:r&$r&t; 1< :r$m$t&$n $+ 0us&ness $mpet&t&'eness and start-ups
The aim of this priorit< is to improve the economic situation of the 'and. #t will also
make a further contribution through its connection with innovation: since business
investments and start;ups are linked to new products: processes and solutions to
problems. The E-%6 aid will be concentrated on the following areas support for
business investment: particularl< through repa
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
27/47
(romotion of business
competitiveness and start;ups2C 010 000 2)8 /2C /00 879 /C /00
#nnovation and knowledge;based
econom . ='ibraries in the borough ; 4#!T and ./ =eEducation
$asterplan>0none of which are implemented via a local development approach.
The main '%+ activities within this priorit< are
!upport for the local econom< and emplo
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
30/47
#able $!: 3erl(n ObJect()e Pro+ra**e 2000,0"F absorpt(on prof(le /(n MEURO
AxisTotal allocation
ERDFallocation
ERDFSpend
ERDFabsorption rate (%)
1 (romoting thecompetitiveness of economic
activities: particularl< of
!$Es
296,67
185,15
139,80 75,51
2 $easures for promotinginfrastructures
442,49
268,65
286,89 106,79
LDA Measure:
241*rban and local
infrastructures in
neighbourhoods with
special development
needs
118,05
79,83
89,61 112,253 (rotection and
improvement of the
environment
72,07
54,05
53,48 98,95
4 (romotion of the labourforce and eBual
opportunities
263,25
-
- -
5 -ural development andfisher
+gain"nce more: the phare in line with all other +xeis and measures.
#able $!$: 3erl(n ER-. Pro+ra* 2001,20F absorpt(on prof(le /(n MEURO
A'!otalallo*ato+
ERDFallo*ato+
ERDFott.&
ERDFa/orto+rat.
1 (romotion of businesscompetitiveness and start;
ups
568,44
293,01
70,39 24,02
2 #nnovation andknowledge;based econom first ?obmarket 1000 8)1 19
[of which for women )0
Training places created 800 297 /
[of which for women /
!upported !$E and $icroenterprises /:/00 2:81/ 11/0
!ource (!!
"n the other handside: the other indicators indicate lag: shows a relative slowness not
reaching the target envisaged for 2010.
,owever: when looking to the totalit< of thepro?ectsapproved and ongoing b< 2010:
the picture is Buite different.
#able $!=: 3erl(n Pro+ra**e 2001,F p'ys(cal perfor*ance prof(le for appro)ed
and on+o(n+ proJects /10
P: Inte+rated urban de)elop*ent OP #ar+et #ar+etunt(l
200
Pro+resst(ll 200
"utputs
Number of !upported socio;cultural facilities and socio;economic initiatives 1:780 C/ 2:92C
[of which number of !$E and micro enterprises supported 2012
[of which number of supporting activities for enterprises 1
[of which number of supporting activities in the area of gender eBualit< andintegration 79C
!ervice hours offered 1:200:00 798:)1/ 1:12:)C7
#mprovement or provision of social #nfrastructure in sBm 190:000 102:98) 212:7/
#mprovement: restructuring and revitalisation of areas in sBm 919:000 /7):2/C 1:087:108
-esults
ross created ?obs =6TE> first ?obmarket 1000 8)1 209
[of which for women )
Training places created 800 297 7)
[of which for women 9
!upported !$E and $icroenterprises /:/00 2:81/ 2:012
!ource +nnual #mplementation -eport and (!! data
+ll the outputs are extremel< positive and exceed overnumber not onl< the targetenvisaged for 2010:but also the "( target.
8
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
36/47
The same cannot be said Not the same can be said for results which:with regard to for
all indicators:are belowboth the target fixed for 2010 and the "( target.
The discrepancies between the planned and the achieved numbersof created ?obs and
training places =also noted with regard to the finalised pro?ects onl have to be
explained in terms of the the framework of the particular situation of theneighbourhoods covered b< the $easure .1:3#!. +s identified in the previous chapters:
3#! covers areas where the !ocial cit< monitoring data indicates shows a low social and
economic index. #n these areas a+ disproportionatel< high number of people are
affected b< unemplo
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
37/47
" Analys(s of t'e actors (n)ol)ed
6rom the outset: the 4erlin '%+ environment has encouraged the involvement of
citiPens and local actors.
The entire process is a bottom;up approach: based in the Neighbourhood itself: where
there exists a prevalence of problems and unmet. !ince 1CCC: local residents and local
actors from across the entire communit< have pla
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
38/47
4rap' 2 , Co*pos(t(on of t'e StaHe'olders and Representat()es (n t'e Ne(+'bour'ood
counc(l
!ource httpDDwww.Buartiersmanagement;berlin.deDfileadminDcontent;mediaDQuartiersraeteDOreisdiagrammL+kteure.?pg
-esident and local actors structures =explained in more detail within the chapter on
procedures> according var< across the different Neighbourhood 6unds =N6>. Jithin N6
1 =short term local pro?ects>: N62 =medium siPe local initiatives> and N6 =socio;
cultural activities and medium siPe infrastructural constructions>: the< are involved in
gdentifA
gathering of proposals contributed b< residents andDor local actors and
developing ideas regarding such proposals b< members of the Ns themselves
=collection of ideas>A
assessment of the ideas gathered and ?oint decision;making on the allocation of
pro?ect funds together with governmental administration and Neighbourhood
$anagementA and
selection of suitable partners to implement pro?ects.
Together with local residents: three other main t
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
39/47
priorities for available N$ area instruments and funds: finding a consensus on all
important decisions: and common engagement of all involved actors. !everal
coordination activities and structureshave been created and are active in both phases:
but are especiall< so in the programming.
4oroughs: like Ns: increased their role at the end of the 2000;2007 programmingperiod and at the beginning of the 200);201 programming period with the !en!tadt
now delegating all administrative management of Neighbourhood activities.
Nevertheless: 4oroughs are currentl< the weakest actor in the decision;making process:
not being directl< involved in either decisions for N61 to N6 =where residents and
local actors have the last wordF in allocating funds and in selecting pro?ects> or in N6/
and N68 =where the !en!tadt has the central role>.
%uring the implementation phase: the role of local actors and institutional
representatives =schools: housing associations: etc.> is more relevant than in the
programming phase as: in man< cases: the< are directl< in charge of specific
pro?ectsDactivities.
The role of N$ teams =in coordination with the 4oroughs and the !en!tadt> is still
important: as is that of Ns and local residents: even if the latter tend to be less involved
after the identification of the bodies in charge of pro?ects.
!ee hapter ) for further details on coordination structures.
C
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
40/47
1 Process des(+n features of t'e *a(n 5-A (nter)ent(ons
#n 1CCC: when the first 18 N$ teams were created: management procedures were alsodrafted in order to define actor roles in '%+ processes and procedures.
The first step was that of setting up of local Neighbourhood offices =ph and N$
teams with specific knowledge of the situation at neighbourhood level: charging them to
build;up '%+ organisation structures in cooperation with the 4orough: the !en!tadt:
local residents and local actors.
The N$;Teams are selected =through tenders>: contracted b< the !en!tadt and the
4oroughs and are usuall< assigned to regional non;governmental institutions such as
*rban %evelopment +ssociations: institutions that had previousl< collaborated with
other urban renewal programmes and had experiences at local level: such as alliances
for citiPens. The interdisciplinar< staff of the N$ is: as much as possible: an inter;ethnic
group with experiences in urban and local development.
6or the composition of the Neighbourhood team: the following skills: expertise: and
focal points are reBuired
management: moderation: and networkingA
small;scale trades and crafts adviceA
?ob training: further education: and labour market programmesA
fundraising: new funding programmes: and filing of applicationsA and
social competence: especiall< concerning
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
41/47
6igure ).1 K "rganisation structure of the Neighbourhood management: 2011
!ource #-! elaboration
/1
5"*- 6#\E
!teering groupmeeting
!en!tadt: all Q$s:
$a
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
42/47
+s the figure shows: the N$ Team meets and exchanges information regularl< with
their 4orough oordinator: both at individual level as well as during !teering meetings.
The Neighbourhood office also organises and coordinates the two local working groups:
which have responsibilit< for selecting pro?ects to be funded.
The Ne(+'bour'ood Counc(l /NCis the X5ur
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
43/47
aim of including these partners is to involve them closel< in activities.8 The
neighbourhood managers also promote local networks and stimulate cooperation
between these institutions: local businesses and housing companies.
4esides the regular working groups and meetings at neighbourhood level: different
coordination meetings of the $anaging authorit
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
44/47
#able 1! , 3oardsF Act()(t(es and Part(c(pants
3oard Act()(t(es Actors .reuency
of *eet(n+s
Publ(c local foru*s (ro?ect development andselection: $ediation; andplanning: seminars:information exchange: workon specific issues: discussionon problems: activities:
networking: conflictmediation: formal andinformal meetings: mediationactivities: !eminars:ongresses: public events
Q$ representative =chair>Neighbourhood residents
'ocal stakeholders
Jorking groups
+ction fund ?ur supports the implementation of larger pro?ects
with a longer pro?ect periods and a budget ranging from Euro 10:000 up to H
80.000 that contribute to the Neighbourhood focus area of action with pro?ect
selection made in the Neighbourhood council. This fund is for socio;cultural
activities and infrastructuredevelopment. #n this case: the implementing partneris the implementer and the grantee at the same time. #t is responsible for the
funding proposal: the reBuest for pa provides funding for construction pro?ects with a
budget exceeding H 80:000. The main procedure is slightl< different here.
Neighbourhood $anagement teams submit proposals identified within the
Neighbourhood councils to 4oroughs which compile a list of priorities from all
the proposals submitted b< N$s across the borough. The list is then submitted
to the !en!tadt which decides the pro?ects to be undertaken.
Neighbourhood 6und 8 =N68> is dedicated to supporting innovative model
pro?ects with a cross;sectoral approach. #t is implemented in different
Neighbourhood areas of 4erlin: and coordinated b< both the !enate and the
borough.
/7
-
8/10/2019 ERDF and Local Development Interventions - Berlin Study
47/47
< 6'at @orHs and doesn?t @orH
Though neighbourhood management had man< positive results =empowerment and
involvement were strengthened: increased cooperation between pla: still challenges remain it
cannot resolve unemplo