epri new build cm initiatives bob renuart russell adams epri technical consultants

EPRI New Build CM Initiatives

Bob Renuart

Russell Adams

EPRI Technical Consultants

2© 2010 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

EPRI ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY

Bob Renuart (for Ken Barry)


EPRI ANT Projects Supporting CM

• Development of an Acceptance Methodology for Commercial Two- and Three-Dimensional Plant Modeling Software

• Benchmarking other industries on the Cost and Benefit of transitioning to a Data-Centric Configuration Management Information System

• Development of a Standardized Plant Information Model (the Primary focus for Today’s Discussion)


Current 2013 ANT Membership Breakdown


DEVELOPMENT OF AN ACCEPTANCE METHODOLOGY FOR COMMERCIAL TWO- AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL PLANT MODELING SOFTWARE


Objective

• Identify a Commercial Grade Dedication methodology for an Owner-Operator to use in accepting commercial 2D & 3D design and modeling software tools and databases and maintaining them for the plant lifetime.


Status

• EPRI Contracted with MPR Associates to get input from End Users (Utilities) and Solution Providers.

• MPR Proposed a Commercial Grade Dedication Methodology based on another EPRI program on CGD of Software used in Nuclear Power Applications.

• Next Step is to Trial the Proposed CGD methodology with a Solution Provider, e.g., Intergraph, Bentley, AVEVA, to evaluate the cost to implement.


UNDERSTAND THE COSTS OF MOVING TO A DATA CENTRIC CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM


Project Description

• EPRI Board has requested better understanding of the conversion cost vs. the benefits of a data-centric CMIS experienced by other high risk, high consequence industries.

• Hypothesis: A “data-centric” CM system will support a variety of plant activities with reliable, controlled data to make critical plant decisions– the “single source of truth”.

• Need to define the cost of installing and maintaining a data-centric system.

• Need to define the savings that a data-centric system will provide in knowledge management and process improvement


Status

• Benchmarked Solution Providers– Intergraph– Bentley– Siemens

• Plan to Benchmark Operating Plants (As-Is Data)– Callaway - Done– McGuire– VC Summer Unit 1

• Plan to Benchmark other Industries that have Transitioned– Oil and Gas Offshore Platforms– Defense– Aerospace– High Speed Railway

• Project Scheduled Completion first half 2014


EPRI STANDARDIZED PLANT INFORMATION MODEL

Bob Renuart and Russell Adams


EPRI PIM Model History

• 1987: EPRI Technical Report - Guidelines for Specifying Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering Applications for Electric Power Plants

– Findings Demonstrated Need for a Plant Data Model

• 2010: Developed Plant Information Network (PIN) Study Model

• 2011: Updated PIN Study Model to Modern Plant Information Model (PIM)

• 2012: Incorporated Handover and Configuration Management Frameworks


EPRI PIM Model Today Thinking Forward

• Evolving Open Source Standard for Handover

– IncorporatingoStandard Handover Framework oCM Taxonomy and Relationship Framework

• Leverages other Industry Initiatives

• Adheres to International Information Standards

• Eighty (80) Percent usable by US NNPP Projects and adoptable by Non-US NNPP Projects

• Supports Implementation for World Class Configuration Management and Information Handover Solutions


Achieving Excellence in Configuration Management and Information Handover

– Leverage Automation for CMIS

– Data Centric CM Environment

– CM Taxonomy Model with Standard Relationships

– Requirements Management Tractability

– Standard Handover/Turnover Representation of Documents and Data






– Requirements Management Traceability



Plant

Docs

Plant

DocsPhysical

Plant

Physical

Plant

Work Processes must assure that:Elements conform all the time

All changes are authorized

Conformance can be verified

Design

Basis

Nuclear Configuration Management

Design Requirements

“What needs to be there”

Facility Configuration Information

“What we say is there”

Physical

Configuration

“What is actually there”

Confo

rmConform

Conform

Configuration Management


PlantDocumentation

Confo

rmConform

Conform PDPDASAS

Knowledge Workers

Automation Systems

EDB

Challe

nge Challenge

Challenge

Paper-based

Quality Assurance

Process

Lots of Tribal Knowledge , Semi-Connected and Disconnected Systems, Manual Processes and yes……Paper

Why Better Leverage of Automation

Nuclear Configuration Management








– Identify, Control and Manage Margins


CMIS Is a Data Hub Along with EAM and Records Management

19


What Does it Mean to be Data Centric?

• Level 1 – Key Design Basis Data (MEL) is Managed in the Work Control System and Updated through a Change Control Process.

• Level 2 – In addition to Design Basis Data, Data to Manage Engineering and Regulatory Programs, Equipment Reliability, and Data Embedded in Engineering, Maintenance, and Operating Procedures are Integrated in a “Single Source of Truth” with Primary Plant Processes and Authoring Tools affecting Plant Configuration and Updated through a Change Control Process.

• Level 3 – Level 2 plus Data is Exposed thorough Embedded Decision Making Tables in the Change Control and Design Control Processes, e.g., Operability Determinations, Equivalency Evaluations, Commercial Grade Dedications.


Relationship Data Structure

21

Pump Properties

•Safety Class

•Des Disch Press

•Des Flowrate

•NPSH

Room Properties

•Normal Temp, Humid

•Accident Temp, Humid

•Rad Levels

Location:

VS-2

Bldg 12

Room 12561

P&ID Drawing:

VS2-CCS-M6-001

CCS Pump

VS2-CCS-MP-01A

IST Program

•Test Freq

•Test Method

•Test Parameters

•Test Results

Maint Rule Properties

•MR Questions

•MR Type

ER Program Properties

•ER Class

•Failure Mode

•Duty Cycle

EQ Properties

•EQ Flag

•Qualification Method

EQ Program

MR Program

IST Program

ER Program


Some Comparisons between Level 1 and 2

• Component Properties– Level 1 manages 25-200 Component Properties– Level 2 manages >1500 Component Properties

• Relationships– Level 1 typically manages Data in Tables– Level 2 manages data as Objects with Properties that can

be related to other Objects. The Advantage is the ability to leverage these relationships for:• Design Impact Reviews• Margin Management • Determining Impact of “Hold Points” on downstream

dependencies• Knowledge


Level 3 Leverages the Data to make Decisions in the Plant Processes

• Operability Determinations


Margin Management Model

High Risk of Failure

Design Margin

Full Qualification

Analytical Margin

Ongoing IST Trend

Actual

Capability

24




• Equivalency Evaluations


Equivalency Evaluation

26

Attribute or Characteristic

Required Value

OriginalEquipment or Configuration

Values

ReplacementEquipment or Configuration

Values

Evaluation Results

Set-Point Range

25–35 psi 10–100 psi 10–100 psi Meets requirements

Pressure Rating/ Proof Pressure

1800 psi/NA 3000/250 psi 3000/250 psi Meets requirements

Instrument Accuracy

0.3% repeatability7 psi maximum deadband

0.25% repeatability5.1 psi deadband

0.25% repeatability5.2 psi deadband

Meetsrequirements, but need to update set-pointcalculation toreflect new deadband and model.


Equivalency Evaluation

27

Attribute or Characteristic

Required Value

OriginalEquipment or Configuration

Values

ReplacementEquipment or Configuration

Values

Evaluation Results

Material Compatibility with Primary Fluid

Material must not degrade orcorrode in contact with primary fluid.

Primary diaphragm is kapton polyimide with an ethylene propylene rubber O-ring seal.

Primary diaphragm is 316L Stainless Steel with awelded seal.

Meetsrequirements; 316L Stainless Steel isacceptable.

SeismicQualification Test Report

IEEE 344-1971 3 g horizontal 2 g vertical 5% damping Site response curve

CTE Test Report 1 777-82N-CRev. 1

CTE Test Report 1 777-82N-CRev. 1

Meets requirements; qualification maintained based on AOB document8200-800.

Environmental Qualification Test Report

IEEE 323-1974 120oF maximum 95% humidity105 rad TAD

CTE Test Report 1777-82N-DRev. 3

CTE Test Report 1777-82N-DRev. 3

Meetsrequirements; qualification maintained based on AOB document8200-800.




• Equivalency Evaluations

• Commercial Grade Determinations

• Margin Management

• Equipment Reliability

• Inservice Testing

• Flow Accelerated Corrosion

• The list goes on and on….


30

Relationships connecting

Requirementsto the

Detailed Design Information

to the

Installed Information that Describes and Validates the

Installed Asset

CM Taxonomy with Standard Relationships


PDF files

Excel Spread Sheets

DrawingsCalculations

SpecificationsData Sheets

Tagtagdesc

docnumberdpressdtempDcode

Supplier System

O/O System


Specificationstag_numtag_descdoc_numdoc_rev

des_pressdes_tempdes_code

PDF files

Excel Spread Sheets

Handover/Turnover

Current State Handover Processes


PDF files

Excel Spread Sheets


SpecificationsData Sheets

Tagtagdesc

docnumberdpressdtempDcode

Supplier System

O/O System




PDF files

Excel Spread Sheets

Documents ClassificationDesign Design Drawings

Mechanical P&IDs Flow Diagrams

ProcurementVendor Drawings Electrical Internal Wiring Diagrams Schematics

Data Objects and AttributesTag DescriptionData Sheet NumberDesign PressureDesign TemperatureDesign Code

PDF files

Excel Spread Sheets

PDF files

Excel Spread Sheets

WIP - PIM Handover Framework


PDFsDrawings

CalculationsSpecificationsData Sheets

DataTag

tagdescdocnumber

dpressdtempDcode

Supplier System

O/O System




Documents ClassificationDesign Design Drawings




PDF files

Excel Spread Sheets

PDF files

Excel Spread Sheets

Future State Normalizing to PIM Handover


Design Design Drawings

Mechanical P&IDs

Flow Diagrams Procurement

Vendor Drawings Electrical

Internal Wiring Diagrams

SchematicsTag Description

Data Sheet NumberDesign Pressure

Design TemperatureDesign Code

O/O SystemDocuments Classification

Design Design Drawings




PDF files

XML Schemas

PDF files

XML Schemas

PDFsDrawings

CalculationsSpecificationsData Sheets

DataTag

tagdescdocnumber

dpressdtempDcode

Supplier System

Future State Normalized to PIM Handover


EPRI Desired End Results

• One source of controlled data that is consumed by multiple applications and changed from the one application that is the source of truth

• Data quality that can be confidently used by all• Data and Document Relationships as a design basis taxonomy to support configuration control of changes and operability determinations of the plant.

• Ability to manage as-designed, as-specified, as-built, and as-tested configurations of the plant.

• Access to data and documents via the 2D and 3D Models

• Electronic Delivery of Compliant, “as-built” Information for Smarter Operation and Maintenance


EPRI PIM Model

Russell Adams Bob Renuart

EPRI Technical Consultant EPRI Technical Consultant

RHAdams Consulting Renuart Consulting

[email protected] [email protected]

Thank you

37

epri new build cm initiatives bob renuart russell adams epri technical consultants

Documents

electric power plantsfindings

datacentric system

nuclear power applications

plant data mode

datacentric cmis

plant lifetime

controlled data

epri program