epistemology
DESCRIPTION
Epistemology. Rationalism vs Empiricism. Skepticism. Do we really know anything? How do we know that we know this? Consider the following statements: The sky is blue The confederation of Canada took place in 1867. Three types of skepticism. Common sense Philosophical Absolute. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EpistemologyRationalism vs Empiricism
![Page 2: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Skepticism• Do we really know anything? How do we know
that we know this?
• Consider the following statements:• The sky is blue• The confederation of Canada took place in 1867
![Page 3: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Three types of skepticism
• Common sense• Philosophical• Absolute
![Page 4: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Name that skepticism• Steve tells his girlfriend he was out late studying with his
ex-girlfriend. She does not know if he is telling the truth• After the death of a loved one, you begin to doubt the
existence of God• Doug feels that traditional morality doesn’t matter and
proceeds to defy all authority figures• You read a pamphlet by the government seeking re-
election and you wonder if it is all true• While filling out a philosophy worksheet, you begin to
doubt whether the information is accurate or meaningful at all
• Am I sitting in my chair right now? Do I exist? Does anyone?
![Page 5: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Pyrrho• Greek philosopher 260-270 BCE• Started a group of philosophers called ‘The
Skeptics”• He taught that nothing can be known.• Use theory of opposites to support claim• He doubted all knowledge that is derived from the
senses and maintained that reason is no help in discovering knowledge because it is based on unreliable knowledge derived from the senses.
![Page 6: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Aenesidemus’ modes of doubt
• People’s feelings and perceptions differ• Physical and mental differences among people
make things appear different• Different senses give people different impressions
of things• People’s perceptions depend on their physical
and intellectual condition when something is perceived
![Page 7: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Aenesidemus’ modes of doubt
• Things appear different at different distances and positions
• People do not perceive things directly. Everything is perceived through a medium (i.e. air)
• Variations in the quantity, colour, motion, and temperature of things make them appear different
![Page 8: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Aenesidemus’ modes of doubt
• People perceive familiar and unfamiliar things in different ways
• What people call knowledge is based only on the relation of things to other things or to themselves. Knowledge does not tell people what a thing is in itself.
• People’s opinions and customs are different in different countries
![Page 9: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Is Ignorance Bliss?• Doubting that you can know anything for
certain carries with it certain concerns:o 'can you trust anyone?‘o 'does he/she really love you?‘o 'do you exist?'
• Pyrrho & Sextus didn't wallow in their scepticism; instead, they argued that the resolution to not knowing anything for certain was Ataraxia - an ancient variation on the idea 'don't worry, be happy'.
![Page 10: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• After all, what if the reality really was you as a brain in a jar?
• Would you want to know that or would you rather continue as a virtual entity within an ultimately satisfying existence?
Think About it:
![Page 11: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Rationalism• True knowledge acquired through reason alone• Senses can deceive• Major contributors: Plato, Descartes, Chomsky
![Page 12: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Plato• Two worlds: -Material world – visible, imperfect world-Forms – perfect, invisible, innate ideas
• World of the senses changes constantly (i.e. colour of sky, temperature of lake)
• Form exists separately, in the human mind in a perfect invisible universe
![Page 13: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Plato• People embark on an intellectual journey that
moves in stages from:-Dreaming and imagining-to believing-to thinking-Knowing
![Page 15: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Problems with classical rationalism
• Assumptions are made by all cultural groups, faiths, disciplines and political parties.
• Commonly held assumptions have been challenged historically
-Women and right to vote, slavery, Newtonian universe, marriage
![Page 16: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Rene Descartes• 17th century philosopher• Used skepticism as a tool to discover difference
between believing and knowing• Started by doubting everything• Used deductive reasoning to come up with two
conclusions-In the process of trying to understand knowledge he was doubting-Therefore he must be a doubter
![Page 17: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Cogito ergo sum
(I think, therefore I am)Rene Descartes
![Page 18: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Plato vs Descartes
• Both questioned information provided by unreliable sensory information
• Plato believed in existence of external world
• Descartes denied the existence of external world
• Plato concerned with content of thought whereas Descartes focused on process of thinking
• If a tree falls in the forest with no one around does anybody hear it?
![Page 19: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Noam Chompsky• Expert in the field of linguistics• Knowledge of language and structures hard-wired
in humans• 4 year old children can comprehend a variety of
sentence structures even though they are not able to produce that structure (e.g. “me go night-night vs. It’s time to go to bed)
• Deep structure vs. Simple structure (e.g. spelling, phonics, style, grammar)
![Page 21: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Empiricism• Challenged the emphasis on reason, innate ideas
and unreliability of sensory experience as a source of knowledge
• Not only a Western idea. Wang Chong and Dharamakirti also wrote of knowledge as a result of experience.
![Page 23: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Aristotle• Plato’s student• Immaterial essence is inseparable from matter• Essence of things are in themselves• Used inductive reasoning to come to develop
generalizations of particular observations• Abstract world of Plato’s forms based on world of
objects that are perceived by the senses.• Sense perception and inductive reasoning are the
foundations of Aristotle’s theory of knowledge.
![Page 24: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Thomas Aquinas• 13th century Dominican monk• Rejected Plato’s theory of forms• Shared many of Aristotle’s ideas but operated
within Christian framework• Supported scientific inquiry which, in some ways,
challenged fixed ideas of the Church
![Page 25: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
John Locke• Mind is blank slate or tabula rasa at birth• An Essay concerning Human Understanding• Sensations are what we directly experience which
lead to impressions• Our minds contemplate these impressions leading
to reflections that give birth to ideas.• Ideas are simple or complex combinations of
reflections of simple sensations.• E.g.. “hot” = simple impression “hot”, “liquid”, “bitter”, “black” = coffee
![Page 26: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
John Locke• Objects have primary and secondary qualities• Primary qualities are objective and they convey
factse.g.. Height, weight
• Secondary qualities are rely on subjective personal judgments
e.g., colour, taste sound
![Page 27: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
David Hume• Refined Locke’s theory of impressions and ideas• Impressions are stronger than ideas• Disputed idea of causality – people embrace
causality because it helps them make sense of their reality
• Highly skeptical of anything that cannot be perceived by the senses
• Also challenged scientific knowledge based on observations that can be replicated.
![Page 28: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Kant we all just get along?
Experience without theory is blind, but theory without experience is mere intellectual play.
Immanuel Kant
![Page 29: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Immanuel Kant• 18th century German philosopher• Schooled in Descartes’ theories of reason but
developed own theory of knowledge after being influenced by Hume’s skepticism
• Both reason and senses can be sources of knowledge
• Divided knowledge into 2 categories:o A posteriorio A priori – concepts that are organizes and unifies a posteriori
knowledge into certain innate concepts
![Page 30: Epistemology](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ac550346895dd4bfaf/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Immanuel Kant• Mind is programmed to see relations between
objects and other phenomena experienced through the senses
• “Unity of consciousness” – Humans ideas are unique to the individual (sensory knowledge and reason are unified within a person’s mind)
• Allowed philosophers to move beyond the dichotomous arguments of rationalism and empiricism to propose new theories of knowledge