environmental quality board harrisburg, pa october 16, 2007 thomas k. fidler, deputy secretary...
TRANSCRIPT
Environmental Quality BoardHarrisburg, PA
October 16, 2007
Thomas K. Fidler, Deputy SecretaryOffice of Waste, Air and Radiation
Management
Feasibility of Modifying the Pennsylvania Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program
Background on I/M Programs The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 require
states to adopt and implement motor vehicle inspection/maintenance (I/M) programs in certain carbon monoxide and ozone nonattainment areas and the Ozone Transport Region.
PA’s federally enforceable I/M Program was approved by EPA and codified in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) at 40 CFR Part 52.2020.
Background (continued) The I/M Program is mandatory in 25 counties in
Pennsylvania; testing and inspection procedures vary by region (Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Southcentral, and Northern Regions).
ERIE
CRAWFORD
WARREN
FOREST
McKEAN POTTER
CAMERONELKVENANGO
MERCER
BEDFORD
BLAIR
SOMERSET
CAMBRIA
INDIANA
ARMSTRONG
BUTLER
LAWRENCE
BEAVER
ALLEGHENY
WASHINGTON
GREENEFAYETTE
WESTMORELAND
JEFFERSONCLINTON
LYCOMING
SULLIVAN
TIOGA BRADFORDWAYNE
WYOMING
PIKE
LUZERNE
MONROE
SCHUYLKILL
CARBON
LEHIGH
COLUMBIA
BUCKSBERKS
CHESTER
LANCASTER
MONTGOMERY
YORK
LEBANONPERRY
CUMBERLAND
DAUPHIN
JUNIATAM
IFFLIN
UNION
SNYDER
CENTRE
ADAMSFRANKLINFULTON
HUNTINGDON
CLEARFIELD
CLARION
LACKA-WANNA
MON-TOUR
NORTH-UMBERLAND
NORTHAMPTON
DELAWARE
SUSQUEHANNA
PHILADELPHIA
Section 126.451(3) of the PA Clean
Vehicles Program requires:
The Department, in conjunction with PennDOT, to study and evaluate the feasibility of modifying the Pennsylvania Vehicle Emission Inspection Program…considering the additional reductions in NOx, VOCs, and other pollutants to be achieved through implementation of the Pennsylvania Clean Vehicles Program. (25 Pa. Code § 126.451(3) )
Evaluation of the I/M Program Legal
Requirements for program. Requirements of program in broader context of
attaining/maintaining health-based national ambient air quality standards.
Technical Emissions estimation in future years: 2010 and
2018. Benefits and latitude for modification within I/M
requirements.
Constraints for modification of Pennsylvania’s I/M Program
I/M programs are mandatory in ozone transport regions established under the Clean Air Act.
Timely attainment/maintenance of the ozone and fine particulate standards.
Compliance with federal “anti-backsliding” requirements in nonattainment or maintenance areas, which require compensating emission reductions.
Compliance with the applicable I/M federal performance standard.
Compliance with the federally prescribed elements of I/M programs.
Findings The benefits of the I/M program include VOC and NOx emission
reductions needed to achieve and maintain ozone and fine particulate standards.
Striped area indicates additional emissions if I/M program were not in place.
I/M Counties Highway VOC Emissions
0
50
100
150
200
250
2010 2018
tons
per
day
I/M Counties Highway NOx Emissions
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2010 2018
tons
per
day
Technical Evaluation Evaluated PA I/M program by area with all other
strategies in place against EPA’s I/M performance standard program with all PA strategies in place.
Both sides of comparison must use PA-specific data with only the I/M program varying.
“Anti-backsliding” and attainment needs are not part of this analysis.
Findings The programs with on-board diagnostics are
projected to continue to meet or slightly exceed the applicable EPA performance standard in 2010 and 2018.
Cost-effective emission reduction benefits to replace any lost through I/M modifications would be difficult to find.
Programs without on-board diagnostics may not produce enough benefits in future years to meet the applicable EPA performance standard as 1996+ vehicles become a larger percentage of fleet.
Conclusion
The emission reductions achieved under PA’s Clean Vehicles Program can not supplant reductions required under the federally mandated enhanced I/M program.
The Clean Vehicles Program, if approved by EPA as a SIP, would be considered a SIP strengthening air quality control measure.
Therefore, the Clean Vehicles Program could not be used to modify the stringency of the I/M program.
Modifications to PA’s I/M Program are not advisable at this time.
Thank YouThomas K. Fidler
Deputy Secretary, Office of Waste, Air and Radiation Management
Joyce E. Epps
Bureau of Air Quality
Kristen Campfield
Office of Chief Counsel
Arleen Shulman
Bureau of Air Quality