ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: IMPLICATIONS FOR

THE BALTIMORE RED LINE TRANSIT PROJECT

Presented by: Tracee Strum-Gilliam, AICP

National Environmental Justice Conference

March 27, 2014

Washington, DC

Trace Strum-Gilliam, AICPNational Environmental Justice Practice Lead

Parsons Brinckerhoff

18 Years Experience

LA Congestion Pricing Plan

Corridor Cities Transitway

Baltimore Red Line Transit Study

I-270 / US 15 Multi-Modal Corridor Study

NEPA Practitioner

Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach Specialist

Member TRB Committee on Environmental Justice

Member TRB Sub-Committee on Community Impact Assessment

Environmental Justice Service Offerings

EJ methodology development

EJ population identification and impact analysis

Benefits and Burden Analysis

Strategic Outreach Services and Public Involvement Program Development

Title VI compliance review and documentation

Grassroots Outreach and Facilitation

Peer Reviews and QA/QC

Training

Policy Review

What is Environmental Justice?

Environmental Justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. Fair treatment means that no group of people, including racial, ethnic, or socio-economic groups, should bear a disproportionate share of the negative environmental consequences resulting from industrial, municipal, and commercial operations or the execution of federal, state, local, and tribal programs and policies. (USEPA)

Source: Final Guidance for Incorporating Environmental Justice Concerns in EPAs NEPA Compliance Analyses (EPA, 1998a)

Executive Order 12898

Issued by President Clinton on February 11, 1994 Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority and Low-Income Populations (EO 12898) directs federal agencies to:

Promote nondiscrimination in Federal programs substantially affecting human health and the environment, and provide minority and low-income communities access to public information on, and an opportunity for public participation in, matters relating to human health or the environment.

Agencies use existing law to ensure that when they act:

They do not discriminate on the basis of race, color, or national origin

They identify and address disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their actions on minority and low-income communities

They provide opportunities for community input in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process (potential effects and mitigation)

EJ and Projects/Policies

The fundamental principles of environmental justice in

the context of infrastructure projects are defined as:

Avoiding, minimizing, or mitigating disproportionately high and

adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and

economic effects, on minority populations and low-income populations;

Ensuring full and fair participation by all potentially affected

communities in the decision-making process; and

Preventing the denial of, reduction in or significant delay in the

receipt of benefits by minority and low-income populations.

EJ Populations Definitions

Low-Income a person whose household income is at or below the Department of Health and Human Services poverty guidelines.

Minority a person who is Black, Hispanic, Asian American, American Indian, or Alaskan Native

Low-Income Population any readily identifiable group of low-income persons who live in geographic proximity

Minority Population any readily identifiable group of minority persons who live in geographic proximity

Renewed Focus

MOU on Environmental Justice signed by all lead

Federal agencies on August 4, 2011

Department of Transportation Updated Environmental

Justice Order 5610.2(a) May 2012 Actions to Address

Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-

Income Populations

FTA Title VI Circular 4702.1B and EJ Circular 4703.1

EPAs Plan EJ 2014 and its supplement Advancing

Environmental Justice Through Title VI of the Civil Rights

Act

As Applied to Transit Projects

Develop EJ methodology and review available EJ plans for agency

EJ population identification (Census 2010 data and ACS estimates) by County and by Tract, Block Group or Block for areas as appropriate

Dont forget transit dependent populations, elderly, children, service zones, minority transit routes and Limited English Proficient (LEP) populations

Prepare Socio-Economic Descriptions of the corridor service areas and general service areas-information should be readily available

Complete a high level EJ impact analysis and disproportionate impact determination for potential affects-routes, pricing in addition to par for the course areas

Analyze Outreach and Public Involvement Program Integration to date for the project and major agency programs

Synthesize data and results into a written report

Title VI Nuances

Under Title VI, each Federal agency is required to ensure that no

person, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, is excluded

from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to

discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal

financial assistance.

Title VI Reporting (monthly, quarterly etc.)

Title VI Claims (Investigation of complaints)

Allocation of funds for projects and agencies as a whole

Project Prioritization

Fare Increases/Service Changes (equity analysis)

Title VI Nuances

Public Participation Plan (entire agency not just a project)

LEP Plan

Does not apply to UDOT

Public Outreach and Engagement

People are to be informed of federal actions and the potential environmental impacts, and are to be given the opportunity to influence federal agency decisions. Environmental justice places an additional requirement in the NEPA to go above and beyond the typical public processes to encourage the involvement of low income and minority communities, including Indian tribes, in these processes.

Tools review database list

Contact groups and inquire as to participation and awareness

Geo-code location of meetings and events to the location of EJ populations

Analyze outreach strategies used

Recipe For Successful Outreach

Provides Opportunity for Two-Way Communication

Embraced by the Community

Visually Engaging

Credible and Fair

Financially Feasible

On Schedule

Stakeholder Identification Ensures The Inclusion

Of All Affected Parties

Agency and Elected Officials Local/State Agencies Federal Agencies Commissioner, State Representatives, Mayors

Businesses Ethnic Chambers of Commerce Institutions of Higher Learning, Medical Facilities

Neighborhood Groups HOAs Community & Civic Organizations and Advocacy Groups LEP Populations Pro-transit and sustainability organizations

Focused Outreach Facilitates Consensus

Agency/Elected Officials Bus Tours/Walking Tours

Briefings/Briefing Packages

Working Groups (if needed)

Businesses Small Group Meetings

Surveys

Local Residents Small Group Meetings

Surveys/Interviews

Information Stations

School Age Education Programs

Outreach to Religious Centers/Social Service Organizations

Outreach to Senior Centers and Care Providers

Baltimore Red Line A Grassroots Outreach

Approach

Grassroots Outreach Strategies

Walking Tours

Door-to-Door Outreach

Transit Center Outreach

Transit Card Stations and Offices

Programs for Seniors and LEP

Populations

Press Kits/Newsletters

Material Development

Pens, Shirts, Sticker, Bags

Branding

The Red Line Corridor Transit Study Engaged Minority

& Low-Income Neighborhoods

Impacted Several Minority and Low-income Neighborhoods

Opposition was at a boiling point

Strategic Recommendations included: Walk Through Visualization Simulations Small Group Meeting (Perceived Impacts vs.

Actual Concerns)

Locally Preferred Alternative was Selected in August 2009

Preferred Alternative Assessed in 2012 FEIS

Community Compact

Community Liaisons and Advisory Committees

Competing for Federal Funding with FullSupport from Community and Elected Officials

The Red Line Corridor Transit Study Engaged Minority

& Low-Income Neighborhoods

Methodology Developed centered around mile buffer area, use of Census 2010 data, baseline CEQ methodology note: FTA circular does not adopt CEQ methodology

Analysis of impacts by subject area

Field review and documentation

Strategic Public Involvement Plan (submitted for FTA)

Legal analysis

FTA review process

Lessons Learned

Sources

Executive Order 12898 (Clinton, 1994a)

PBS NEPA Desk Guide (EPA, 1999) Interim Guidance for Investigating Title VI Administrative Complaints

Final Guidance for Incorporating Environmental Justice Concerns in EPAs NEPA Compliance Analyses (EPA, 1998a)

The Model Plan for Public Participation (National Environmental Justice Advisory Council, 2000)

Environmental Justice, Guidance Under the National Environmental Policy Act (Council on Environmental Quality, 1997)

FTA website www.fta.dot.gov

EPA website www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/