environmental conditions in dawakin kudu

7/29/2019 Environmental Conditions in Dawakin Kudu

1/27

ENVIRONMENTAL

CONDITION OFHOUSES IN DAWAKIN

KUDU


2/27

OUTLINE.

INTRODUCTION.

HOUSING;

General condition.

Average number of people per room as an

index of over crowding.

WATER:

Its source.

Distance from home.


3/27

SEWAGE;

Safety,privacy, and

cleanliness.

SULLAGE;Drainage systems.

FOOD HYGIENE;

Storage facilities.

Site and neatness of cooking

areas.


4/27

REFUSE DISPOSAL;

Possession of dustbin.

Conveyance to dumping site.CONCLUSION


5/27

INTRODUCTION.

Environment can be defined as the external

factors, living and non-living, material andnon-material which surround man. It can be

grouped into 3 components:

Physical environment: these are the non living

part of the environment i.e. water, air, housing,

rainfall, humidity, temperature e.t.c

Biological environment: these include living

component of the environment i.e. plants and

animals.


6/27

Social environment;these include the customs,

culture, habits, income and occupation.


7/27

RESULTS OBTAINED FROM

STUDY

1. General cleanliness: 50.3%- tidy

49.7%- untidy

2. Percentage of the population that rear

animals is 57.9% and most of them co-

habit with these animals.


8/27

SEX OF THE RESPONDENTS.

42.5%

57.5%

males

females


9/27

NUMBER OF PEOPLE PER

ROOM

40.9%

29.2% 26.8%

3.1%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

5-6 persons 1-2 persons 3-4 persons >6 persons


10/27

SOURCES OF WATER

AVAILABLE TO HOUSEHOLDS

IN DAWAKIN KUDU59.1%

39.5%

0.7% 0.7%

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%


11/27

PROPORTION OF SHALLOW TO

DEEP WELLS

23.8%

76.2%

Shallow well

Deep well


12/27

PROPORTION OF IDEAL TO

NON IDEAL WELLS

Ideal well

3%

Non ideal well97%


13/27

6.

Only 3.4% of the wells weresanitary.

7. Distance from water source:

Up to 90.1% of the people have

their water source within 100m

METHODS OF COLLECTION


14/27

METHODS OF COLLECTION

AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID

WASTE

STATUS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

CONTAINER WITHCOVER 173 43.3%

CONTAINER

WITHOUT COVER

198 49.5%

CARELESSLY KEPT 29 7.3%


15/27

METHODS OF FINAL DISPOSAL

OF REFUSE.

68.6%

19.0%

8.3% 4.1%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


16/27

SEWAGE:

Up to 90.4% of the population have a toilet.


17/27

Proportion of houses with toilet

90.4%

9.6%

With toilet

Without toilet


18/27

TYPES OF TOILET FACILITIES

UTILIZED

91.5%

5.7%

2.8%

Pit latrine

Water closet

Practice open

defeacation


19/27

PROPORTION OF PIT LATRINES

WITH COVER.

82.0%

18.0%

Pit latrines with cover

Pit latrines without cover


20/27

PROPORTION OF PIT

LATRINES THAT ARE

CLEAN.

83.2%

16.8%

Dirty latrines

clean Latrines


21/27

DRAINAGE:

Most of the population had drainage facility

Types of drainage facilities:

Gutters (86.2%), however, most of them do not

adequately drain

Ditch behind the house- 11.5%

Others like drainage pipes pouring over sand(percolation)- 2.4%

COMMUNITY CARE OF LIQUID


22/27

COMMUNITY CARE OF LIQUID

WASTE OR SULLAGE.

39.8%36.3%

10.0% 13.8%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

Local drainage Carelessly drained Proper drainage Others*

*Others include: Drain into nearby pond, drain into nearby stream.


23/27

Proportion of households with food

store.

69.7%

30.3%

With store

Without store

PROPORTION OF HOUSEHOLDS


24/27

PROPORTION OF HOUSEHOLDS

WITH PESTS AROUND THEIR

KITCHEN.

38.6%

30.7% 30.7%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

Flies Cockroaches Rodents


25/27

CONCLUSIONS

Although most house-holds have access

to good supply of water, otherenvironmental conditions such as refuse

and sewage disposal systems are not

satisfactory.

This shows that people of Dawakin Kudu

need to improve on their environmentalsanitation.


26/27

ZAUREN SULHU

CROSS SECTION OF WOMEN


27/27

CROSS SECTION OF WOMENAND CHILDREN IN

DAWAKIN KUDU

environmental conditions in dawakin kudu

Documents