enterprise technology plan – customer care & billing (cc&b ...€¦ · 14/05/2019 ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Powering our way of life.May 14, 2019
Enterprise Technology Plan – Customer Care & Billing (CC&B) Upgrade
Enterprise Technology Plan
CC&B UpgradeGrant PUD’s Customer Care and Billing (CC&B) system requires an upgrade by October 2020 and staff has analyzed the options:
Options OutcomeDo Nothing CC&B (version 2.4) would be
unsupported post 10/2020Replace CC&B with a new Customer Information System (CIS)
Significant costs, significant internal resources, significant organizational change management
Continue CC&B (on premise) and upgrade to next version
Short-run option as CC&B will eventually be replaced with Oracle’s current utilities platform
Upgrade to Oracle’s Customer Cloud Services (CCS), a cloud based platform, software as a service (SaaS)
Combines the power of utility meter-to cash solutions with the scale, agility, and simplicity of the Oracle Cloud. Built on the foundation of the market-leading CC&B and Oracle’s Meter Data Management (MDM)
Why Software as a Service (SaaS)• No hardware responsibility
• 24 x 7 system monitoring
• Software upgrades are scheduled and consistent
• Automated database optimization
• Scalability when needed
• Higher level of cyber security than can be maintained
• Pre-configured system using Oracle learned best practices
• Difficulty maintaining current technology skills
• Dedicated Service Levels
• Full suite of products available
Benefits of a MDM• The AMI/MDM systems helps to quickly and more efficiently identify orphan meters that are not tied to a
customer account
• Remote disconnects will be fully automated using our Customer Information System (CIS)
• The AMI/MDM systems will enable Grant PUD to obtain automated outage notification from the meters, receive specific location information and verify when power has been restored. MDM can monitor outage events and forward to other systems whether it is a outage management system or a outbound customer notification
• The MDM/CCS has the ability to calculate complex billing all within one system
• It has the ability to validate, edits and estimate (VEE) meters that might not be able to be reached and possibly resolve the exception
• The technological advances of AMI/MDM networks and meters will allow Grant PUD to collect richer data than ever before, the MDM will provide analytics
• The MDM can aid in the early detection of meter tampering and energy theft by the analytics and functionality of:
• Detect usage on inactive service points• Identify meters with excessively high number of tamper alarms• Detect meters with sudden increase/decrease in consumption
Cost to Upgrade versus CCS Implementation
CC&B ImplementationNov 2013 – Feb 201516 month project
Cost CCS ImplementationJul 2019 – Jun 2020 (tentative)
12 month project
Cost
CC&B Software $563,100 CCS Licensing $442,100Hardware $128,300 Hardware $32,700Contractors (SI only) $3,016,300 Contractors (SI and PM) $3,763,339Internal Labor $1,843,400 Internal Labor (~50%) $943,200
Total $5,551,100 Total $5,181,339
Project Team• TMG Consulting is providing Assessment and Project
Management• CCS implementation services are being completed by
Oracle Services• A Steering Committee will oversee the success of the
project• The Stakeholders will be the departments that use the CIS
system• The Project Team will be from IT and Customer Solutions
areas
Contracts
Contractor Contract CostOracle• Cloud Services• System Implementation
130-9537 7-year total $6.4M• $3.1M• $3.3M
TMG Professional Services Assessment and Project Management
430-9096 Up to $500,000
Cost/Benefit Analysis
SummaryResults
10 YrModel
Total Cost - Solution $10.6MTotal Cost - Alternative $21.8MNet Benefit (escalated) $12.1MNet Present Value $8.5MInternal Rate of Return (IRR) 74.6%Payback Begins in Year 1
Future Projects
• Customer Self-Service Portal & Mobility Solutions• Outage notification• Usage Data• Pre-Pay
• Service Order Management• Mobile Workforce
Powering our way of life.
Q1 2019 BUDGET TO ACTUALS
May 14, 2019
5/9/2019 1
Grant PUD | BUDGET TO ACTUALS Q1 2019
5/9/2019 2
• At the end of Q1 2019, O&M and Labor have both spent less than 25% of their annual budget target. Year End Projections for both O&M and Labor are currently expected to be near their budgeted targets.
• As a comparison, at the end of 2018 Q1 the O&M spent was 13% of budget and Labor was 22% of budget.
• Capital is at 11% of total 2019 budget target as of 2019 Q1. Year End Projections for Capital spending are currently expected to be 10% under the budget target.
• As a comparison, at the end of 2018 Q1, Capital spent was at 10% of its budget target.
• Year End Projection net direct charges (O&M, Labor, Capital) are forecast less than the 2019 budget by $12M, which is due primarily to lower than planned Capital spending.
2019 DIRECTS YEAR-END PROJECTION OVERVIEW2019 Budget 2019 YTD
% of Annual Budget
2019 Year-End Projection
YEP Variance $YEP
Variance %
Under Budget /
Over Budget
Direct O&M 53,571,106$ 9,520,467$ 18% 53,824,561$ 253,455$ 0% Over Budget
Direct Labor 70,696,771$ 15,557,343$ 22% 70,497,168$ (199,602)$ 0% Under Budget
Direct Capital 121,283,874$ 13,389,828$ 11% 109,036,583$ (12,247,291)$ -10% Under Budget
2019 Directs Total 245,551,751$ 38,467,638$ 16% 233,358,313$ (12,193,438)$ -5% Under Budget
Grant PUD | BUDGET TO ACTUALS Q1 2019
5/9/2019 3
2019 DIRECT O&M BY FUNCTIONAL AREA
• At end of Q1 2019, Direct O&M has spent 18% of its annual budget target. Year End Projection for 2019 Direct O&M spending is currently expected to be slightly over budget.
• As a comparison, at the end of Q1 2018, Direct O&M spending was at 13% of the budget target.
• The Chief Customer Officer group: HR up $400K, Rates up $200k.
• The Chief Financial Officer group: CFO Office down $525K, Internal Services down $280k, FP&A up $180k.
Direct O&M by Group
Department Functional Area 2019 Budget 2019 YTDYTD % of Annual Budget
2019 Year End Projection
YEP Variance $
YEP Variance
%
Under Budget /
Over BudgetAA0000 Board of Commission 60,000$ 5,779$ 10% 160,000$ 100,000$ 167% Over BudgetBA0000 General Manager 743,172$ 384,410$ 52% 743,172$ (0)$ 0% Under BudgetCA0000 Attorney 536,790$ 193,301$ 36% 536,790$ -$ 0% Under BudgetDA0000 Chief Customer Officer 4,654,895$ 660,842$ 14% 5,415,247$ 760,352$ 16% Over BudgetEA0000 Chief Operating Officer 30,335,936$ 5,686,508$ 19% 30,243,174$ (92,762)$ 0% Under BudgetFA0000 Chief Financial Officer 17,144,750$ 2,582,649$ 15% 16,630,616$ (514,134)$ -3% Under BudgetGA0000 Merchant Wholesale Telecom 95,563$ 6,977$ 7% 95,563$ -$ 0% Under Budget
53,571,106$ 9,520,467$ 18% 53,824,561$ 253,455$ 0% Over Budget
2019 Direct O&M
Grant PUD | BUDGET TO ACTUALS Q1 2019
5/9/2019 4
2019 YEAR-END PROJECTION LABOR BY FUNCTIONAL AREA
• At the end of Q1 2019, the Year End Projection for FTR and FTE head counts is above the budget target. Current FTR head count is 606.
• For comparison, FTR head count was 590 at the end of Q1 2018 and 592 at the close of 2018.
• FTE is a cumulative figure that reflects part-time and seasonal employees. • For comparison, the FTE utilization at close of 2018 was 19% over the 2018 budget.
• The Overtime Year End Projection is forecast to be 6% (~$330k) over budget. Overtime is both event-dependent and used to partially cover insufficient FTR.
• For comparison, at Year End 2018 Overtime was 31% or $1.35M over budget.
Grant PUD | BUDGET TO ACTUALS Q1 2019
5/9/2019 5
2019 DIRECT LABOR BY FUNCTIONAL AREA
• At end of Q1 2019, Direct Labor has spent 22% of its annual budget target. Year End Projection for 2019 Direct Labor spending is currently expected to be slightly over budget.
• For comparison, at the end of Q1 2018, Direct Labor spending was at 22% of the budget target.
• The Chief Customer Officer group and Chief Operations Officer groups are projecting to be slightly over their Labor budget targets for 2019. The Chief Finance Officer group is projecting to be slightly lower than their Labor budget target for 2019.
Grant PUD | BUDGET TO ACTUALS Q1 2019
5/9/2019 6
2019 YEAR-END DIRECT CAPITAL BY PROJECT
• The table shows projects with a $2M or larger budget. As of end of Q1 2019, Direct Capital spending is at 11% of targeted budget. Direct Capital 2019 Year End Projection spending is forecast to be 10% under budget.
• At the end of Q1 2018, Capital spending was at 10% of budget.
Project Title 2019 Budget 2019 YTD
YTD % of Annual Budget
2019 YEP YEP
Variance Under Budget / Over Budget
PR Turbine Upgrade 18,011,594$ 1,458,926$ 8% 19,509,506$ 1,497,913$ Over BudgetFiber Expansion 15,300,000$ 1,456,844$ 10% 15,300,000$ -$ Under BudgetPR Generator Rewind 11,052,111$ 1,861,802$ 17% 10,289,582$ (762,529)$ Under BudgetPR Embankment Improvements 8,792,000$ 170,969$ 2% 4,335,495$ (4,456,505)$ Under BudgetPR Spillway Stability Improvements 5,850,000$ 61,867$ 1% 2,106,867$ (3,743,133)$ Under BudgetWAN Generator Upgrade 5,771,290$ 198,703$ 3% 7,289,203$ 1,517,913$ Over BudgetWAN Spillgate Rehab 4,115,940$ 710,516$ 17% 3,790,516$ (325,424)$ Under BudgetRandolph Road Substation Expansion - Substation 3,896,222$ 155,241$ 4% 3,805,241$ (90,981)$ Under BudgetBroadband Customer Connectivity 3,100,000$ 1,153,921$ 37% 4,603,921$ 1,503,921$ Over BudgetFleet Replacement Program 2,810,000$ 271,330$ 10% 4,002,665$ 1,192,665$ Over BudgetClass 4000 breakout - Distribution Feeder Lines 2,750,000$ 460,670$ 17% 2,703,670$ (46,330)$ Under Budget10.13 Firewall Replacements 2,653,132$ 7,932$ 930,932$ (1,722,200)$ Under Budget9.1 Access Control and Video Management System 2,267,056$ 24,835$ 1% 1,074,835$ (1,192,221)$ Under BudgetMountain View Lineups 10 & 20 2,193,566$ 1,296,238$ 59% 2,196,238$ 2,672$ Over Budget11.1 ESRI ArcGIS Implementation for Power Delivery 2,009,004$ -$ 0% 2,009,004$ -$ Under Budget
121,283,874$ 13,389,828$ 11% 109,036,583$ (12,247,291)$ Under Budget
Grant PUD | BUDGET TO ACTUALS Q1 2019
O&M Capital Labor Benefits*Capitalized
G&AInventory Loaded YEP†
O&M Elec 18,672,918$ -$ 25,464,001$ 10,517,306$ (3,519,335)$ (695,211)$ 50,439,679$ O&M PRP 35,151,643$ -$ 30,944,834$ 12,781,035$ (2,933,460)$ (1,061,606)$ 74,882,446$
O&M 53,824,561$ -$ 56,408,835$ 23,298,341$ (6,452,794)$ (1,756,818)$ 125,322,125$
Cap Elec -$ 43,315,943$ 7,377,373$ 3,047,050$ 3,519,335$ -$ 57,259,701$ Cap PRP -$ 65,720,640$ 6,710,960$ 2,771,804$ 2,933,460$ -$ 78,136,864$
Capital -$ 109,036,583$ 14,088,334$ 5,818,855$ 6,452,794$ -$ 135,396,566$
Total Expenditures 53,824,561$ 109,036,583$ 70,497,168$ 29,117,196$ -$ (1,756,818)$ 260,718,691$
Loaded Budget Loaded YEP†Loaded
VarianceUnder Budget / Over Budget
O&M 123,312,247$ 125,322,125$ 2,009,878$ Over BudgetCapital 149,245,983$ 135,396,566$ (13,849,417)$ Under Budget
Total Expenditures 272,558,230$ 260,718,691$ (11,839,539)$ Under Budget
Year End Projection Components
†other factors will influence the O&M loaded YEPs in Financial Forecast such as other revenues & expenses
5/9/2019 7
2019 YEAR-END PROJECTION LOADED O&M & CAPITAL
• Direct O&M YEP and Loaded YEP are over budget
• Capital and Total Expenditure YEP is under budget due to lower Direct Capital spending
Grant PUD | BUDGET TO ACTUALS Q1 2019
5/9/2019 8
Questions?
2019 Semi-AnnualAudit Report
Commission
5/14/2019GCPUD Internal Audit Department 1
Meeting Objectives
1. Current State of Audit Department2. Moving Forward3. Review 2019 Audit Plan
Status of open audits Proposed changes to audit plan Three Year Audit Plan
2
Current State of Audit Department
1. Assessment of Internal Audit Practices Audit strategy and methodology Reporting structure and focus
2. Focus on Internal Controls Assessment of internal controls Testing of internal controls
3. Focus on emerging risks and trends LPPC, SAO, OIG and power industry
3
Moving Forward
1. Finalize open audits
2. Continual Risk Assessment Commission Executive Management Enterprise Risk Management
3. Continuing Education and Training
4. Senior Auditor Position
4
Status of Open Audits1. 2017 Voucher Audit
Post-field work (drafting report) June 2019
2. Small and Attractive Asset Audit Draft report May 2019
3. Ghost Employee Audit Final report May 2019
4. Design Build Contract Audit Draft report May 2019
5. Net Metered Loss Audit Field work TBD
5
2019 Audit Plan
6
2019 – Audit PlanKey Focus Areas for Audit Activities
Planned Assurance Audits1. Net System Losses Audit
2. Overtime & Upgrade Audit
3. 2018 Voucher Audit Emphasis on PO’s and procurement process
4. 2018 P-Card Audit
5. Rates and Customer Class Audit
6. Follow-up: Monitor Audit Recommendations
7
2019 2020 20212018 P-Card Audit 2019 P-Card Audit 2020 P-Card Audit
2019 Voucher Audit 2020 Voucher Audit
Vendor Trend & Employee Cross Check Payroll Roster Audit
Payroll - Overtime & Upgrade Audit
Power Distribution and Reliability Audit
Customer Deposit and Billing Audit
Rates and Customer Class AuditWholesale Marketing
Supply Audit Power Production Audit
Net Metered Loss AuditGeneration to BA Load
Customer Request /Metering/ Billing of Kwh Usage
Emerging Risks, Trends, and Focus
Emerging Risks, Trends, and Focus
Emerging Risks, Trends, and Focus
Follow-Up: Monitor Audit Recommendations
Follow-Up: Monitor Audit Recommendations
Follow-Up: Monitor Audit Recommendations
Continuous Monitoring
Audits
Risk Based Assurance
Audits
2018 Voucher AuditEmphasis on PO's and Procurement Process
Three Year Audit PlanApproved by Commission on 11/13/2018
8
2019 Budget To Actual – May 1, 2019
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
Total Labor O&M Travel and Training
9
Questions?
Comments?
Concerns?
10
2019 Federal and State Legislative Update
May 14, 2019 Commission Presentation
Federal Priority Issues116th Congress
2019 Federal Priority Issues:
Pro-Hydro / Sustainability
U.S. hydropower capacity can grow from 100 to 150 GW by 2050 (U.S. Dept. of Energy). There are 80,000 U.S. dams, but only 3% are hydropower. Water Infrastructure Act signed into law on 10/23/18 –
Sec. 3001 – Extends preliminary permits and start of construction deadlines for hydropower approvals. Sec. 3002 – Increases the capacity for exempt small conduit hydro up to 40 MW. Sec. 3004 – Establishes a 2 year permitting deadline for non-powered dams and closed loop pumped storage.Sec. 3005 – Consideration of Early Actions in Relicensing Term up to 50 years (previously 40 years).
President’s Memo to expedite FCRPS EIS to 2020 before his term expires.
Modernize the Columbia River Treaty
The U.S. Dept. of State is leading the effort to negotiate a modernized Treaty with Canada, which began in 1964. Our key objectives: Rebalance the power benefits. Funding for flood control should not be paid by electric rate payers, but by federal dollars. An ecosystem function added if a modern Treaty includes a net improvement to rebalancing the power benefits. Timely conclusion of Treaty negotiations (1-2 years).
Finance&
Telecom
Support S. 5003 (restore Advanced Refunding Bonds) – Opposed by Chairman Brady (R- TX). Support S. 1068 (Clean Renewable Energy Bonds) – Introduced by Senate Finance Committee Democrats. S. 2155 passed – Allows municipal bonds to qualify as high-quality liquid assets for federal bank liquidity standards. FCC – Support H.R. 530, which overturns FCC Order (Sept. 26, 2018) to regulate public power pole attachments. Monitor H.R. 6442 (by Rep. Kilmer, D-WA) – Tax credit to reimburse consumers for broadband infrastructure costs
in rural areas.
State Priority Issues2019 Legislative Session Wrap-Up
Top 5 State Priority Bills
Clean Energy Standard
PASSED – SB 5116: Governor’s 100% Clean Energy Standard Bill 2025: All coal eliminated from rates - Unspecified purchases are exempt from this requirement 2030: 100% carbon neutral standard for service to retail electric load
80% delivered carbon-free power (includes hydro & non-carbon emitting generation) 20% alternative compliance through either: (1) $60/MWh fee (for CCNG unit); (2) investment in energy
transformation activities; and/or (3) Renewable Energy Credits (RECs). Cost Cap: Incremental cost of compliance, including I-937 costs, is ≥ 2%, over a 4-year compliance period, of a
utility’s retail electric revenue requirement. Utility specific short-term reliability exemption
2045: 100% clean – Annual compliance, but no penalty.
Rural Broadband
PASSED – SB 5511: Governor’s Rural Broadband Bill (Grant PUD Bill) $21.5M competitive Grant/Loan program over 2 years ($7.1M Grant / $14.4M Loan). For unserved areas < 25 x 3mbps; Program administered by Public Works Board. ≤ $2M per project; except in econ. distressed co. (e.g. Grant Co.), then ≤ $5M & 90% of the project cost. Supported by Tribes, WA Farm Bureau, and WPUDA.
SafetyBid LimitsWildfires
PASSED – HR 1380: Utility Worker Safety – Increases sentences for assault of a utility worker. PASSED – SB 5418: Increases PUD Bid Limits – Procurement thresholds double in most cases since 2008.
Sunset clause was eliminated. PASSED – SB 5305: Creates Wildfire Task Force – Utilities and WA Dept. of Natural Resources (DNR) Task
Force to develop model agreement to mitigate wildfire liability.
Other Bills of Interest2019 Legislative Session Wrap-Up
2019 Other Bills of Interest:
Energy Bills that Passed
HB 1428: Simplifies the fuel mix calculation within Commerce. -Support HB 1512: Authorizes PUDs and cities to invest in EV infrastructure when cost effective. -Support SB 5588: Authorizes the production, distribution and sale of renewable hydrogen. -Support HB 1126: Includes distributed energy resource (DER) planning in power resource planning. -Neutral SB 5223: Modifies net metering by increasing system limits from 100 to 199 kW & 0.5 to 4% of peak capacity and allows
for meter aggregation in limited circumstances. -Neutral HB 1257: Energy efficiency for large commercial buildings. -Neutral HB 1444: Appliance efficiency standards -Neutral
Other Bills that Passed
HB 1594: Applies National Electric Safety Code (NESC) to wiring in power supply space and safety space for advance telecom installations. -Support
HB 1295: Lowers cost threshold for use of design-build contracts from $10M to $2M. -Support SB 5106: Work group to promote government resiliency and disaster mitigation. -Support HB 1102: Capital Budget -$5.575M for rehabilitation of the Beverly Bridge for vehicular use. -Support
Interim Work:
SB 6012 – Hydro Tax Parity SB 5418 – Bid limits study for consistency among public entities by Capital Projects Advisory Review Board. SB 5981 – Cap and Trade legislation. HB 1110 – Low Carbon Fuel Standards / tax incentives SB 5116 (Clean Energy Standard) Rulemaking and Low income energy assistance outreach.
Powering our way of life.