enterprise architecture for single window planning and ... · swif is a systematic architecture...
TRANSCRIPT
Enterprise Architecture for
Single Window Planning and Implementation
Dr. Somnuk Keretho UNNExT Advisory Committee
Director, Institute for IT Innovation Kasetsart University
Page 2 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Objectives of this presentation
To propose a holistic and systematic approach based on enterprise architecture concept, called SWIF, for guiding the analysis, planning and implementation of SW projects, i.e.
Architecture principles – vision articulation, alignment, decomposition, viewpoints and blueprints
Decomposition of SW challenges into smaller and easier manageable components
Collaborative Project Management
For large-scale e-government projects of many countries, EA frameworks are recommended in many literatures and in practices,
e.g. TOGAF, Korea e-Government EA, and US Federal EA.
Referring also to “UNNExT SW Planning and Implementation Guide,” UNESCAP, UNECE 2012.
Page 3 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
What is SWIF? SWIF is a systematic architecture-based framework*
for guiding the Single Window Planning and Implementation into reality.
SWIF adapts the concept of enterprise architecture and development methodology** to describe an approach on how to – systematically derive the SW strategic architecture, – formulate its implementation plan, and – guide the implementation of SW projects.
** Adapted from An Enterprise Architecture Framework, called TOGAF-9.
* Authored by Eveline van Stijn, Thayanan Phuaphanthong, Somnuk Keretho, Markus Pikart, Wout Hofman, and Yao-Hua Tan, “Single Window Implementation Framework (SWIF),“
Free University Amsterdam, Kasetsart University Bangkok, UNECE and published as an EU-supported ITAIDE D5.0:4b deliverable.
Page 4 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Why a systematic approach is needed?
* Referring to World Bank’s Trading Across Border Indicators (www.doingbusiness.org)
Vision
Realization Complicated
Trade Procedures
Because there are so many complicated challenges to be managed such that the SW Vision could be transformed into reality.
Laws and Regulations Many Document Requirements
Inadequacy in Technology Infrastructure
Many Stakeholders Conflict of Interest
Compliance Governance Many different ICT systems
People and Business In-Readiness
Difficulty in trade data exchange
Barriers in interoperability
Regional Connectivity
Connectivity within the country
System Development
Change Management
achieving trade transaction
cost and time reduction, and compliance
goals
e.g.
25% better, faster,
cheaper trading across border* within 5 years
(2013-2018)**
Standards
Lack of Understanding
Political Will
**Within an economy or a regional economic cooperation, measurable goals should be mandated by its Leaders.
Security Data Privacy
Page 5 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Vision
Realization
Complicated Trade Procedures
Laws and Regulations
Many Document Requirements
Inadequacy in Technology Infrastructure
Many Stakeholders Conflict of Interest Compliance
Governance Many different ICT systems
People and Business In-Readiness
Difficulty in trade data exchange
Barriers in Interoperability
Regional Connectivity
Connectivity within the country
System Development
Change Management
achieving trade transaction
cost and time reduction, and
compliance goals
1. Stakeholders’ needs and requirements
From the “As-Is” conditions (architectures)
of all these components
Migrating to the target “To-Be” architectures
of all these 10 components
timeline
Applying Enterprise Architecture Concept* for strategic planning, detailed design, implementation & operations
10 critical components must be considered for
SW planning and implementation
e.g.
25% better, faster,
cheaper trading across border* within 5 years
(2013-2018)**
Complexity of Single Window can be handled by decomposing its challenges into smaller and more manageable sub-components.
Page 6 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Key Concepts and Guidelines within SWIF
1. Visions & Goals Alignment – formulating SW visions and goals, where possible with quantitative indicators, but by aligning also with national and/or regional policy directions.
2. Decomposition - systematically decomposing and structuring SW implementation challenges into smaller and easier manageable components (10 components are proposed).
3. Iterative Development Cycle – “as-is” or current conditions of those 10 components should be analyzed, and then “to-be” or future architectures (again of those 10 components) need to be developed and agreed (normally many iterations needed before we can really agree).
4. Viewpoints – showing the same thing but with a different level of details based on the interest of target audiences (normally with diagrams).
5. Collaborative Project Management for analysis, planning and overseeing the SW projects (by walking through those 10 components iteratively).
SW Visions & Goals must be aligned with national and/or
regional economic policy directions, and measurable goals should be defined.
National SW vision, goals and planning should be integrated as a part of related national/regional development agenda,
e.g. aligning with national trade facilitation and logistics initiatives. Vision: Enhancing national trade competitiveness by improving import/export procedures and documentation handlings
Quantitative Goals: 25% better, faster, and cheaper in trading across borders* within 5 years**
Page 7
** An example from APEC Vision & Goals for 2015-2020. Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Page 8 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
National Logistics Development Master Plan of Thailand (2007 -2011)
National Single Window Plan
Towards A World-class National Logistics Environment to become a Trade Hub for Indochina Vision
Objectives 1.Reducing logistics cost, increase business
Responsiveness, Reliability and Security 2.Create Value-Added business
Strategic Agenda
Improve Logistics efficiency in industry
Improve
efficiency in
transport and
logistics
Build
Logistics Service
Providers Business
Build
Human Resource
s in Logistics
5 3 2 1
A Thai Case Example
Trade Facilitation Implement
ation
4
Page 9 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Thailand Vision/Goals 2011: from multiple windows to Single Window (Regulatory SW)
(since Paperless Customs has already been developed.)
36 Government Agencies
~350 data items and no travel needed
Single entry process
To reduce time used on document
procedures
~ 24 days *(World Bank 2006)
Less than 10 Days
Impa
ct to
ec
onom
y
One day delay costs 1% reduction in export value (World Bank, 2006)
Direct and indirect costs incurred in documentary process account for 1-15 % of finished goods (OECD, 2003)
A Thai Case Example
1 Billion US$ transaction cost reduction
2006
2011
Goals: better import/export transaction time (60%) and cost (25%)
Decomposition
Page 10
Systematically decomposing and structuring
SW implementation challenges into smaller and easier manageable components
(10 components are proposed here).
Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Page 11 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Vision
Realization
Complicated Trade Procedures
Laws and Regulations
Many Document Requirements
Inadequacy in Technology Infrastructure
Many Stakeholders Conflict of Interest Compliance
Governance Many different ICT systems
People and Business In-Readiness
Difficulty in trade data exchange
Barriers in Interoperability
Regional Connectivity
Connectivity within the country
System Development
Change Management
achieving trade transaction
cost and time reduction, and
compliance goals
1. Stakeholders’ needs and requirements
From the “As-Is” conditions (architectures)
of all these components
Migrating to the target “To-Be” architectures
of all these 10 components
timeline
Applying Enterprise Architecture Concept* for strategic planning, detailed design, implementation & operations
10 critical components must be considered for
SW planning and implementation
e.g.
25% better, faster,
cheaper trading across border* within 5 years
(2013-2018)**
For large-scale e-government projects, EA frameworks are recommended in many literatures and in practices, e.g. TOGAF, and US FEA. Refer to UNNExT SW Planning and Implementation Guide, 2012.
Complexity of Single Window can be handled by decomposing its challenges into smaller and more manageable sub-components.
Page 12 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Ten Critical Success Components Each component must be analyzed to understand the “as-is” and its bottlenecks,
define and agree on the “to-be” conditions.
1. SW Vision Articulation and Political Will Creation
2. Stakeholder Collaborative Platform Establishment
3. Governance & Finance Model
4. Business process analysis and improvement
5. Data Harmonization and document simplification
6. Application architecture design
7. Technology architecture design including standards & technical interoperability
8. Legal Infrastructure
9. IT infrastructure & solutions design
10. Change adoption, operations, and sustainability
Management & Technical Level
Strategic Level
IT Systems Implementation
Operations
Iterative Development Cycle
Collaborative Project Management step-by-step phases for analysis, planning,
implementing and overseeing the SW projects.
Page 13 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Managing the project in five phases – while in each phase, the as-is conditions of those ten
components shall be analyzed, and the new to-be conditions be defined.
Page 14 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Collaborative Project Management - 5 Phases
1. Inception/Preliminary Phase – Developing a concept paper for preliminary and initial discussion
2. Elaboration Phase – Conducting a detailed feasibility study and architecture design
3. Planning Phase – Formulating a high-level SW master plan & and detailed implementation plans
4. Execution/Implementation Phase – Securing the funding, executing and overseeing the SW project implementation
5. Change Adoption/Lessons-learned Phase – Change adoption, impact assessment, collecting lessons learned and suggesting opportunities for further SW improvement in the next cycle.
Page 15 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Collaborative Project Management - 5 Phases
Agreed Conceptual
Design Detailed
Implementation Plans and Governance
Secured Resources
and Implementation
Adoption, Measurement &
Further Improvement suggestion
Detailed Architecture
Design
Political Will Creation
Institutionalized
Collaboration In each phase, all 10 critical
components shall be revisited and refined (as-is to-be).
Page 16 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Each project management phase needs to walk through these 10 critical components (in an iterative sytle)
The 10 components (in a Development Cycle as shown on the left) should be revisited during the inception phase, elaboration phase,
the planning phase, and the implementation phase, but of course, with different levels of depths and perspectives.
These same ten critical components can be illustrated in a strategic/management/operational pyramid.
For example, the purpose of the Inception Phase is to conduct the initial feasibility study, therefore the “As-Is” conditions of all those 10 components need to be understood such that the new “To-Be” architectures can be proposed and analyzed for feasibility and decision to pursue further. But then at the elaboration phase, all those 10 components need to be analyzed and designed again but with a lot more depth and coverage for budgeting and developing detailed implementation plan.
10 components are analyzed iteratively.
Page 17 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
“As-Is” Architecture of Thailand NSW Environment
Bus
ines
s St
akeh
olde
rs
*GHA: Ground Handling Agent **TMO: Terminal Operator
G2G information exchange of permits and certificates
vas
Value-Added Service (VAS) – for paperless Customs
Declaration and E-Manifest Submission
Shipping Line
Airline
GHA/ TMO*
Importer
Exporter
Freight Forwarder
Customs Broker
vas
vas
vas
G2G
NSW
Cargo Regulatory
SW*
Maritime Regulatory
SW**
Air Regulatory
SW**
B2G information exchange G
atew
ay P
rovi
ders
(T
rade
siam
, N
etba
y,
CAT
EDI)
Shipping Line
Airline
Importers and
Exporters
35 websites (windows)
for submitting e-application
Forms.
For Customs duty online payment Bank
Bank Bank National ITMX
36 government and regulatory agencies
** Only partially regulatory SW services provided. 1. Business Stakeholders
2.VAS 3.Gateways 4.NSW Operator 5.Government Agencies
A Case Example Viewpoints
Page 18 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Proposed “To-Be” Architecture to integrate
“trade/transport/regulation/payment” coordinated services within the same SW governance.
A NSW Operator & Governance
Bu
sin
ess
Stak
ehol
ders
*GHA: Ground Handling Agent **TMO: Terminal Operator
Airline/ Vessels
Freight Forwarders
Banks
Customs Brokers
Haulers
Importers Exporters
GHA/TMO*
36 government and regulatory agencies
Bank
Bank Bank National ITMX
B2B & B2G coordination,
cargo visibility,
single window data entry and reuse
G2G coordination
and information exchange
Air Regulatory
SW ***
Train Regulatory
SW
Maritime Regulatory
SW
Trade & Cargo
Regulatory SW
Sea PCS
Air PCS
Land
Transport Regulatory
SW
A proposal for Thailand next generation NSW
A Case Example
The next 5-years development plan can be more clearly developed, validated and mandated with the clear to-be architectures, e.g. to-be” business processes, electronic services, business models and governance structure.
Viewpoints
Page 19 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Summary & Recommendations An Enterprise Architecture concept is recommended as
a holistic and systematic framework for guiding the analysis, planning and implementation of SW projects, e.g.
Decomposition of SW challenges into different but inter-related views, e.g. strategic architecture, business architecture, information system architecture, legal issues, and functions, etc.
Step-wise SW project management in 5 phases include inception phase, detailed feasibility phase, planning phase, implementation oversight phase, and feedback phase. In each phase, the 10 key components and associated
activities/deliverables in the recommended SW development cycles should be revisited and refined iteratively until the “to-be” architectures of those key components are commonly agreed and committed.
Thank You.
Dr. Somnuk Keretho UNNExT Advisory Committee
Director, Institute for IT Innovation Kasetsart University
Page 21 Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Speaker - Somnuk Keretho, PhD
Somnuk Keretho is an assistant professor of Computer Engineering Department, and the founding Director of Institute for IT Innovation (INOVA), a research and development institute of Kasetsart University, Thailand, specializing in ICT-enabled innovation, trade facilitation and e-logistics initiatives including National Single Window strategic planning and implementation, enterprise architecture for e-government and e-business, business process analysis and improvement, data harmonization and modeling, ICT-related standards and interoperability, e-transaction related laws, and process-oriented quality software engineering.
He has led several ICT strategic projects at organizational, national and regional levels. For the past nine years, he has assisted Ministry of Information and Communication Technology, National Economic and Social Development Board, Ministry of Transport, Port Authority of Thailand, and Ministry of Agriculture in architecting “Thailand Single-Window e-Logistics” related projects including its National Single Window strategy, implementation plans, interoperability and standards, harmonization and simplification of trade and transport-related documents and procedures, automatic electronic-gate systems development for the Bangkok Port and the Leamchabang Sea Port, and related software development projects. Several of those projects are being aligned with some regional and international collaborations, in which Dr. Somnuk has actively engaged with those related to trade facilitation, single window and paperless trading initiatives through UNESCAP, UNECE, APEC, ASEAN and GMS. He has played several roles in catalyzing the creation of and actively contributing to the United Nations Network of Experts for Paperless Trade in Asia and the Pacific (http://unnext.unescap.org), and providing several technical supports to the APEC Paperless Trading and ASEAN Single Window Initiatives. He is the main author of the UNNExT Business Process Analysis Guide, the UNNExT Data Harmonization Guide and the UNNExT Guide for Single Window Planning and Implementation as jointly published by UNECE and UNESCAP.