enter o viruses
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
1/29
ENTEROVIRUSES
dr. Sahrun
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
2/29
ENTEROVIRUSES
Enteroviruses are a genus of the picornavirus family which replicatemainly in the gut.
Single stranded naked RNA virus with icosahedral symmetry
Unlike rhinoviruses, they are stable in acid pH Capsid has 60 copies each of 4 proteins, VP1, VP2, VP3 and VP4
arranged with icosahedral symmetry around a positive sense genome.
At least 71 serotypes are known: divided into 5 groups
Polioviruses
Coxsackie A viruses
Coxsackie B viruses
Echoviruses
Enteroviruses (more recently, new enteroviruses subtype have beenallocated sequential numbers (68-71))
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
3/29
FAMILY: PICORNAVIRIDAE
ENTEROVIRUSES
Over 72+
RHINOVIRUS
Type 1-100+
POLIO virus type 1,2,3
COXSACKIE A virus type 1-22,24COXSACKIE B virus type 1-6
E.C.H.O virus type 1-7,11-27,29-34
Numbered ENTEROVIRUSES type 68-71,73
Since 1967-all new ones are numbered
Cardiovirus
Aphthousviru
etc
E.C.H.O = enteric cytopathic human orphan
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
4/29
Traditional Taxonomy Current Taxonomy
Polioviruses
PV13
Coxsackie A viruses
CAV122, 24
Coxsackie B viruses
CBV16
Echoviruses
E17, 9, 1121, 2427, 2933
Numbered enteroviruses
EV6871
Human enterovirus A (HEV-A)
CAV28, 10, 12, 14, 16; EV71, 76, 8991
Human enterovirus B (HEV-B)
CAV9; CBV16; E17, 9, 1121, 2427,
2933; EV69, 7375, 7778, 7988, 100
101
Human enterovirus C (HEV-C)
CAV1, 11, 13, 17, 1922, 24; PV13
Human enterovirus D (HEV-D)
EV68, 70
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
5/29
ENTEROVIRUS PARTICLES
Courtesy of Linda M. Stannard, University of Cape Town, S.A.h
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
6/29
CHARACTERISTICS Rhinovirus labile to
acidic p H
Genome of
Enteroviruses is m
RNA
Naked genome is
sufficient for infection
Replication in
cytoplasm
Cytolytic viruses
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
7/29
PROPERTIES OF ENTEROVIRUSES
CPE in cell cultures
Monkey Human cell Pathology in
Group Virus types kidney culture newborn mice Major disease associations
Poliovirus 3 types + + - Paralytic poliomyelitis, aseptic
(1 - 3) meningitis, febrile illness.
Coxsackie 23 types - or E - or E + Aseptic meningitis, herpangina,
group A (A1-22, A24) febrile illness, conjunctivitis
(A24), hand, foot and mouth disease.
Coxsackie 6 types + + + Aseptic meningitis, severe neonatal
group B (B1-6) disease, myopericarditis, Bornholm
disease, encephalitis, febrile
illness.
Echovirus 31 types + E - Aseptic meningitis, rash, febrile
(1-9, 11-27 illness, conjunctivitis, severe29-33) generalized neonatal disease.
Enterovirus 5 types + + - Polio-like illness, aseptic
(68-72) meningitis, hand, foot and mouth
(E71), epidemic conjunctivitis (E70)
hepatitis A (E72)
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
8/29
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Transmission from person to person:
Fecal-Oral
Respiratory Peak incidence : Summer & Fall
Male =Female
Age: Young children Incubation period: 3-6 Days
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
9/29
PATHOGENESIS
URI Infection
Regional lymph nodes involvement
Low-Grade viremia (Heart,Skin,Pericardium ,Lung..)Clinical illness & Major viremia
Antibody appearance on 7th day
GI Replication
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
10/29
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
11/29
1. POLIOVIRUS
3 serotypes of poliovirus (1, 2, and3) but no common antigen.
Humans are the only susceptible hosts.
Polioviruses are distributed globally. Before the availability ofimmunization, almost 100% of the population in developing countries
before the age of 5.
The availability of immunization and the poliovirus eradication
campaign has eradicated poliovirus in most regions of the world except
in the Indian Subcontinent and Africa. Poliovirus is on course of being eradicated worldwide by the end of
2000 or 2001.
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
12/29
POLIOMYELITIS
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
13/29
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF POLIOMIELITIES
There are 3 possible outcomes of infection:
Subclinical infection (90 - 95%) - inapparent subclinical infection account
for the vast majority of poliovirus infections. Abortive infection (4 - 8%) - a minor influenza-like illness occurs,
recovery occurs within a few days and the diagnosis can only be made by
the laboratory. The minor illness may be accompanied by aseptic
meningitis
Major illness (1 - 2%) - the major illness may present 2 - 3 days followingthe minor illness or without any preceding minor illness. Signs of aseptic
meningitis are common. Involvement of the anterior horn cells lead to
flaccid paralysis. Involvement of the medulla may lead to respiratory
paralysis and death.
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
14/29
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS
Virus Isolation
Mainstay of diagnosis of poliovirus infection
poliovirus can be readily isolated from throat swabs, faeces, andrectal swabs. It is rarely isolated from the CSF
Can be readily grown and identified in cell culture
Requires molecular techniques to differentiate between the wild
type and the vaccine type.
Serology Very rarely used for diagnosis since cell culture is efficient.
Occasionally used for immune status screening for
immunocompromised individuals.
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
15/29
DIAGNOSIS Clinical
Presentation
LaboratoryDiagnosis
Faecal, Throat (2
or more samples),
CSF(Culture and
RT-PCR)
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
16/29
TREATMENT/PREVENTION Supportive
Prevention is by Vaccination.
Global Eradiation Programme
Part of Routine immunisation schedule andtravellers to endemic areas should be vaccinated
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
17/29
GLOBAL ERADICATION PROGRAMME
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
18/29
PREVENTION (1)
No specific antiviral therapy is available. However the disease may be
prevented through vaccination. There are two vaccines available.
Intramuscular Poliovirus Vaccine (IPV)
consists of formalin inactivated virus of all 3 poliovirus serotypes.
Produces serum antibodies only: does not induce local immunity and thus will
not prevent local infection of the gut.
However, it will prevent paralytic poliomyelitis since viraemia is essential for
the pathogenesis of the disease.
Oral Poliovirus Vaccine (OPV)
Consists of live attenuated virus of all 3 serotypes.
Produces local immunity through the induction of an IgA response as well as
systemic immunity.
Rarely causes paralytic poliomyelitis, around 1 in 3 million doses.
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
19/29
PREVENTION (2)
Most countries use OPV because of its ability to induce local immunity and
also it is much cheaper to produce than IPV.
The normal response rate to OPV is close to 100%.
OPV is used for the WHO poliovirus eradication campaign.
Poliovirus was targeted for eradication by the WHO by the end of year 2000
(now 2005). To this end, an extensive monitoring network had been set up.
Poliovirus has been eradicated from most regions of the world except the
Indian subcontinent and sub-Saharan Africa. It is possible that the WHO target
may be achieved.
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
20/29
CURRENT STATUS OF WILD POLIOVIRUS
TRANSMISSION
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
21/29
2. COXSACKIEVIRUSES
They are divided into 2 groups on the basis of the lesions
observed in suckling mice.
Group A viruses produce a diffuse myositis with acute
inflammation and necrosis of fibers of voluntary
muscles.
Group B viruses produce focal areas of degeneration in
the brain, necrosis in the skeletal muscles, and
inflammatory changes in the dorsal fat pads, the
pancreas and occasionally the myocardium.
Each of the 23 group A and 6 group B coxsackieviruses
have a type specific antigen.
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
22/29
HAND/FOOT/MOUTH
CoxsackieA16
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
23/29
H/F/M
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
24/29
3. ECHOVIRUSES
The first echoviruses were accidentally discovered in human faeces.
The viruses were named echoviruses (enteric, cytopathic, human,
orphan viruses).
These viruses were produced CPE in cell cultures, but did not induce
detectable pathological lesions in suckling mice.
Altogether, There are 32 echoviruses (types 1-34; echovirus 10 and 28
were found to be other viruses and thus the numbers are unused)
There is no group echovirus Ag but heterotypic cross-reactions occurbetween a few pairs.
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
25/29
4. NEW ENTEROVIRUSES
4 new enteroviruses have been identified (68 - 72). Enterovirus 70 is the
causative agent epidemics of acute haemorrhagic conjunctivitis that
swept through Africa, Asia, India and Europe from 1969 to 1974. The
virus is occasionally neurovirulent. Enterovirus 71 appears to be highly pathogenic and has been associated
with epidemics of a variety of acute diseases, including aseptic
meningitis, encephalitis, paralytic poliomyelitis-like disease and hand-
foot-mouth disease.
Enterovirus 72 was originally assigned to hepatitis A virus, but it hadnow been assigned to a new family called heptoviruses.
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
26/29
DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH ENTEROVIRUSES
Syndrome Polio Cox A Cox B Echo
Paralytic disease + + + +
Meningitis-encephalitis + + + +
Carditis + + + +
Neonatal disease - - + +
Pleurodynia - - + -
Herpangina - + - -
Rash disease - + + +
Haemorr. conjunctivitis - + - -Respiratory infections + + + +
Undifferentiated fever + + + +
Diabetes/pancreatitis - - + -
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
27/29
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS
Virus Isolation Mainstay of diagnosis of enterovirus infection
Coxsackie B and Echoviruses can be readily grown in cell culture from
throat swabs, faeces, and rectal swabs. They can also be isolated from theCSF
Coxsackie A viruses cannot be easily isolated in cell culture. They can beisolated readily in suckling mice but this is not offered by most diagnosticlaboratories because of practical considerations. Molecular techniquesmay provide a better alternative.
Serology Very rarely used for diagnosis since cell culture is efficient.
Neutralization tests or EIAs are used but are very cumbersome and thusnot offered by most diagnostic laboratories
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
28/29
CYTOPATHIC EFFECT
(Virology Laboratory, New-Yale Haven Hospital)
-
7/29/2019 Enter o Viruses
29/29
MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION
There is no specific antiviral therapy available against enteroviruses
other than polio.
Some authorities use IVIG in the treatment of neonatal infections or
severe infections in immunocompromised individuals. However, the
efficacy is uncertain.
HNIG have been to prevent outbreaks of neonatal infection with good
results.
There is no vaccine available mainly because of the multiplicity ofserotypes.