enhancing venture capital investment evaluation_ a survey of vent

Upload: jignasa-ghaghda

Post on 06-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    1/36

    Journal of Economic and Social Policy

    Volume 10Issue 1Enterprising Finance

    Article 2

    7-1-2005

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation:A Survey of Venture Capitalists', Investees' and

    Entrepreneurs' PerspectivesAbdul RakhmanSouthern Cross University

    Michael EvansSouthern Cross University

    ePublications@SCU is an electronic repository administered by Southern Cross University Librar y. Its goal is to capture and preser ve the intellectual

    output of Southern Cross University authors and researchers, and to increase visibility and impact through open access to researchers around the

    world. For further information please contact [email protected].

    Recommended CitationRakhman, Abdul and Evans, Michael (2005) "Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists',Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives,"Journal of Economic and Social Policy: Vol. 10: Iss. 1, Article 2.

    Available at: hp://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesphttp://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    2/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of VentureCapitalists', Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives

    Tis article is available in Journal of Economic and Social Policy: hp://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    3/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital InvestmentEvaluation: A Survey of VentureCapitalists', Investees' and Entrepreneurs'Perspectives

    Abdul RakhmanDoctor of Business AdministrationGraduate College of ManagementSouthern Cross UniversityandAssociate Professor Michael EvansDirectorGraduate College of ManagementSouthern Cross University

    Abstract

    This research investigates the use of investment criteria to evaluate

    potential partners who seek venture capital. The survey was undertaken in

    the South Sulawesi Province of Indonesia. There were 257 respondents who

    completed questionnaires. Three groups participated in this survey: venture

    capitalists (VCs), firms that provide venture capital funds to entrepreneurs

    to develop their businesses; entrepreneurs, who might seek venture capital

    in the future; and investees, businesses currently in receipt of venture

    capital. The three groups were asked to judge how important a range of

    investment criteria was, using a four-point scale. Each group used adifferent questionnaire and several variables were designed to cover

    investment criteria that were only relevant to VCs, entrepreneurs or

    investees. Data analysis indicated that, for several criteria, VCs shared

    interests with entrepreneurs and investees. However, the three groups did

    not always share investment preferences.

    Introduction

    This study investigated the attitudes of venture capitalists (VCs), or finance

    providers; entrepreneurs, or those seeking finance; and investees, or those inreceipt of finance, to the personality and experience, product/service, market,

    financial and monitoring system, and overall relations of the venture capital

    1

    Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent

    Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    4/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 2

    process. The study also aimed to determine differences in responses from the

    three groups to a range of investment criteria. It was hoped that the variables

    could be reduced, using factor analysis, to identify the most important

    investment factors to the group as a whole.

    Literature Review

    VCs provide finance to entrepreneurs and share the risks of a venture with

    them. Venture capital is risky and deals with small business enterprises, in

    particular, new ventures. The evaluation procedure used by VCs has become

    an important issue in venture capital. Many investment criteria may be

    considered in assessing entrepreneurs in order to accept their proposed

    businesses and provide finance (Boocock & Woods 1997; Hall & Hofer 1993;

    MacMillan et al. 1985, 1987; Tyebjee & Bruno 1984).

    The empirical research on VC decision making has produced a range of

    criteria that VCs report being used when evaluating new venture proposals

    (Fried & Hisrich 1994; Mason & Harrison 1994; Tyebjee & Bruno 1984;

    Wright & Robbie 1996). However, potential partners, the entrepreneurs, also

    want to be well informed of the criteria VCs use for evaluation. This could

    help them influence the VC decision-making process (Zacharakis 2001).

    Previous research (Zacharakis and Meyer 1998) found that a lack of insight by

    applicants for capital affected the nature of VC decision making.

    Investment Evaluation Stages

    Previous research has illustrated the investment activities as a sequentialprocess involving several steps. The process can be summarised into five

    steps: deal origination, screening, evaluation, deal structuring and post-

    investment activities (Boocock & Woods 1997; Fried & Hisrich 1994;

    Tyebjee & Bruno 1984).

    Tyebjee and Bruno (1984) defined deal origination as the process in which

    VCs face a very poorly defined environment within which to find prospective

    deals. They believed that the typical investment prospect was too small and

    various intermediaries played an important role in matching VCs with fledging

    ventures with cash needs. Boocock and Woods (1997) explained that this stage

    involved using prospective investments from a variety of sources, includingintermediaries or other financial institutions.

    2

    Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    5/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 3

    Tyebee and Bruno (1984) emphasized that VCs' screening criteria reflect a

    tendency to limit investment to areas the VC was familiar with, in terms of

    technology, product and market scope of the venture. In the evaluation stage,

    Tyebjee and Bruno (1984) found that VCs had to rely on a subjective

    assessment procedure based on the business plan presented by venture's

    management. Boocock and Woods (1997) emphasized the business plan in a

    search for key features of VC decision making.

    In the deal-structuring step, Boocock and Woods (1997) explained that the

    deal would be consummated only if VCs and entrepreneurs were able to

    structure a mutually acceptable agreement. From the perspective of the VCs,

    they would take into consideration the equity share the entrepreneur would

    give up in exchange for the venture capital. VCs would also consider

    covenants that limited capital expenditure and management salaries (Tyebjee

    & Bruno 1984).

    After the deal is finalised, the role of the VC expands from investor to

    collaborator. This could be through formal representation on the board ofdirectors or informal influence in the market, supplier and creditor networks.

    These roles are performed as post-investment activities. However, Tyebjee

    and Bruno (1984) found that this did not mean that VCs were likely to exert

    control over the day-to-day operation of the venture.

    Investment Criteria

    A number of studies have been undertaken in many countries regarding VCs'

    investment criteria. These indicate that VCs in different cultures use varying

    criteria for evaluating proposals.

    Hall and Hofer (1993) developed six main investment criteria: venture capital

    firm requirements; characteristics of the proposal; characteristics of the

    entrepreneur/team; nature of proposed business; economic environment of the

    proposed business; and strategy for the proposed business. Boocock and

    Woods (1997) applied a similar methodology in the UK.

    McMillan et al. (1985) studied investment criteria in terms of five broad

    classifications: entrepreneur's personality; entrepreneur's experience;

    characteristics of the product or service; characteristics of the market; and

    financial considerations. They found that it was the quality of entrepreneurthat ultimately determines the funding decision. Interestingly, Knight (1994)

    found that the responses from Canadian VCs were slightly different from their

    3

    Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent

    Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    6/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 4

    counterparts in the USA. In Canada, VCs rated the entrepreneur's personality

    and experience much higher than product, market characteristics and financial

    considerations. US investors were far more concerned with financial returns

    and the liquidity of their investment.

    Rah et al. (1994) undertook a study in Korea of investment criteria in six

    broad categories: managerial capabilities; financing ability; superiority ofproduct and technology; availability of raw materials; production capability;

    and market attractiveness. They found interesting results, in that, VCs used

    market attractiveness as the most critical factor in deciding whether or not to

    fund a proposal. This was similar to Japan, where VCs were relatively much

    more focused on the development of new markets in evaluating prospective

    investments and relied heavily on market criteria (Ray & Turpin 1993).

    Venture Capital in Indonesia

    Venture capital is the funds provided without collateral to entrepreneurs to

    help them develop their businesses and which they repay partly in terms of ashare in the profit earned, based on the deal contract. Entrepreneurs who

    operate in profitable businesses are clearly eligible for venture capital.

    However, as the venture capital industry in Indonesia is regarded as being in

    its infancy, compared with those of America and Europe, the selection process

    is highly competitive.

    Even though there is a growing belief that venture capital is a bridge to

    develop business, the selection process must be implemented properly to

    protect VCs from bad debts. The Indonesian government has a revolving

    venture capital system, which is a program to put state-owned funds through

    VCs. Profits from VCs may be used to set up new VCs in other cities and

    provinces.

    VCs in Indonesia must seek profitable business partners. However, venture

    capital is often seen by Indonesian entrepreneurs as a gift to promote

    economic development. Many entrepreneurs believe that they do not have to

    repay the funds because it is the government's duty to provide funds to small

    businesses.

    The agreements between VCs and investee companies can take a range of

    forms. Under Indonesian Corporation Law 1994:

    4

    Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    7/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 5

    VCs can invest in investee companies by buying some of the investees'shares and becoming shareholders. Therefore, VCs must obey the code

    of conduct in Indonesian Corporation Law article 1.

    VCs can invest in investees by limited participation, by which VCsinvest funds without being actively involved in operational matters. VCs

    receive a share of the profits based on the terms of the agreement.

    VCs can only engage with small- and medium-sized enterprises whichhold an Indonesian business number or approval from the Department of

    Industry and Trading.

    VCs must ensure that all small and medium businesses have theopportunity to seek funds through the venture capital system.

    VCs can invest in convertible bonds, whereby investees get funds fromVCs as liabilities but must ensure that, over a certain period, these funds

    are converted to shares.

    Definition of Small Enterprises: Indonesian Perspective

    The Indonesian Constitution Number 9, 1995, was set up to govern how the

    Indonesian government should deal with small enterprises. The Constitution

    defines a small enterprise as any small-scale economic activity that meets the

    criteria of net worth, annual sales or ownership status as it is ruled in the

    Constitution. Article 5 of the Constitution states that the criteria for a small

    enterprise are that it:

    possesses a net worth of a maximum of Rp.200 million excluding landand building used in the operation, or possesses annual sales of a

    maximum of Rp.1 billion;

    is owned and operated by an Indonesian citizen and is autonomous andin the form of an individual business or a business body that is not

    legally incorporated or a business body that is legally incorporated and a

    cooperative;

    is independent and not a subsidiary of, or affiliated with, any companythat is owned or controlled directly or indirectly by medium or large

    companies;

    has a structure of sole proprietorship, business enterprise without anylegal entity or business enterprise with legal entity, including

    cooperative.

    5

    Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent

    Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    8/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 6

    South Sulawesi Venture Capital Company

    The South Sulawesi Venture Capital Company (SSV) is the only venture

    capital firm in the South Sulawesi Province of Indonesia. SSV was established

    on 24 December 1994 under the Department of Finance of Indonesia and

    included prominent business people. The company started operations in 1995.

    The number of staff was only seven from 1995 to 1996, but increased to 30 in2001. Outstanding funds increased dramatically in 1997 because the company

    received Foreign Direct Investment from the South Korean government

    through Jexim Funds. The company has provided Rp.30.5 billion to 126

    investees up to the year 2001. It started to make a significant profit from 1997

    to 2000, after new directors were appointed and more flexible investment

    criteria applied to grow its investment base (SSV Annual Report1995-2001).

    Methodology

    A questionnaire was sent to a total of 450 potential respondents in South

    Sulawesi in June, July and August 2002. Of these, 45 were VCs, 120 investees

    and 285 entrepreneurs. There were five data collectors who conducted the

    survey, in addition to a mail survey. There were 257 respondents who

    completed the questionnaires giving a response rate of 57%. There were 100

    respondents who returned the questionnaire by mail and 157 who completed it

    directly with the data collectors. There were 30 VCs, 126 entrepreneurs and

    101 investees who returned the questionnaires. All the VCs were located in

    Makassar City, the capital of South Sulawesi Province. There were 60

    investees and 29 entrepreneurs who also lived in the capital city making a total

    of 119 respondents (46.13%) from the capital. The other 138 respondentscame from 16 small cities in the province. All the VCs were working at SSV

    and all the investees had received funds from SSV. The entrepreneurs were

    business people who operated in South Sulawesi Province, but had not

    received funding from SSV.

    The respondents were asked to evaluate the importance of the investment

    criteria using a four-point scale, where 1 = irrelevant; 2 = desirable, 3 =

    important and 4 = essential. This scale was chosen to enable comparison with

    previous research. The data was analysed with parametric tests, Kruskal

    Wallis, Pearson's Chi-Square, Fisher Exact Test, factor analysis and

    multidimensional scaling.

    6

    Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    9/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 7

    Results

    The results of this research are presented in the following sections. The first

    section gives the responses from the three groups to the six main investment

    criteria: personality and experience; product/service; market; financial; other

    criteria; monitoring and relations. Section two will report on the factor

    analysis in relation to the criteria. Section three will analyse the responsesusing multidimensional scaling.

    Responses to Investment Criteria

    This section will present the responses from VCs, entrepreneurs and investees

    to the six main criteria. The responses are based on the questions put to each

    group and some of the items are only applicable to certain groups. The

    investment criteria, which are unique to VCs, might be not applicable to

    entrepreneurs and investees or vice versa.

    Venture Capitalists

    Table 1 presents the responses of the VC group to the range of investment

    criteria. Overall, VCs considered projected cash flow to be essential and, as

    expected, rated items that used conventional methods of evaluation and items

    for financial control as very important. They also rated other main criteria,

    such as personality, product/service, market and monitoring and relations, as

    important.

    Table 1: VCs' Responses to Investment Criteria

    Scale used 1 = Irrelevant 2 = Desirable 3 = Important 4 = Essential

    Rank MainCriteria

    Items Mean SD

    1 Honesty, openness and approachability 3.47 0.681

    2 Willingness to cooperate in monitoring system 3.43 0.858

    3 Functional areas ability 3.37 0.718

    4 Integrity 3.30 0.837

    5 Entrepreneur's experience 3.30 0.877

    6 Familiarity with entrepreneur's background 3.23 0.728

    7 Familiarity with VC's rules 3.20 0.847

    8 Hardworking 3.17 0.913

    9 Risk management 3.13 0.776

    10 Venture capital only for profitable businesses 3.03 1.003

    11 Tight control of spending 3.03 0.865

    12 Self-confidence 2.90 0.99513 Leadership 2.90 0.712

    14 Referred by trustworthy source 2.87 0.972

    15

    Personalityand

    Experience

    Providing collateral 2.80 0.931

    7

    Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent

    Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    10/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 8

    RankMain

    CriteriaItems Mean SD

    16 Familiarity with market targeted 2.70 0.988

    17 Willingness to hire staff to cover weaknesses inmanagement

    2.67 0.994

    18 Formal qualifications 2.37 0.999

    19 Entrepreneur is known to other entrepreneurs 2.23 0.898

    20 Personality compatible with VC 2.03 0.928

    21 Recommended by local government or leading

    business people

    1.63 0.964

    22 Entrepreneur must be a friend, relative or family

    member of VC

    1.27 0.583

    1 Raw materials available 3.47 0.571

    2 Well accepted 3.13 0.730

    3 Demonstrated market acceptance 3.10 0.607

    4 In the market for many years 2.87 0.860

    5 Functioning prototype 2.80 0.610

    6 Is proprietary or can be otherwise be protected 2.53 1.042

    7

    Product/

    service

    May be described as high-tech 2.10 0.803

    1 Market Marketing skills 3.40 0.675

    2 Reasonable marketing plan 3.27 0.740

    3 Strong marketing team 3.17 0.648

    4 Significant growth rate 3.10 0.662

    5 Entrepreneur knows distribution system 3.03 0.765

    6 Stimulates an existing market 3.00 0.910

    7 Market not saturated 2.97 0.890

    8 Contract agreement 2.83 0.950

    9 Familiarity with industry 2.73 0.785

    10 Targeting national market 2.43 0.774

    11 Little threat of competition in first three years 2.37 0.928

    12 Targeting new market 2.37 0.850

    13 Targeting foreign market 2.13 0.819

    1 Financial Use projected cash flow 3.50 0.572

    2 Use IRR method in evaluation 3.47 0.571

    3 Use return on investment (ROI) 3.27 0.691

    4 Use cost/benefit ratio 3.23 0.817

    5 Use net present value method in evaluation 3.23 0.679

    6 Require audited financial report 3.03 0.669

    7 Require monthly financial report 3.00 0.871

    8 Require employment of accounting staff 2.67 0.606

    9 Require entrepreneur to invest 50% of funds 2.33 0.868

    10 Require 5% higher return than national interest rate 2.20 0.997

    11 Require hiring of management consultant 2.20 0.761

    12 Require pilot test project with smaller investment 1.87 0.819

    13 Require entrepreneur not to invest in land, building

    or truck

    1.77 0.898

    14 Will not make subsequent investment 1.67 0.802

    1 VC must prevent unfair trading with investee orothers

    3.40 0.855

    2

    Othercriteria

    Will consider number of years of investment 3.40 0.770

    8

    Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    11/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 9

    RankMain

    CriteriaItems Mean SD

    3 Will consider general economic conditions 3.37 0.669

    4 Will consider multiplier effect 3.00 0.743

    5 Must be involved in feasibility studies 2.97 0.809

    6 Will consider regional economic plan 2.57 0.858

    1 Monitoring

    andrelations

    Can take legal action if investee does not pay

    principal on time

    3.47 0.860

    2 Will monitor investee's financial performance

    monthly

    3.40 0.621

    3 Can transfer their equipment to other investees if

    current investee breaks agreement

    2.77 1.135

    4 Will provide management service 2.60 0.814

    5 Will look at opportunities to expand investee's

    businesses

    2.57 0.898

    6 Require weekly report 2.47 0.860

    7 Will be involved in development of actual

    product/service

    2.43 0.898

    8 Will be involved in business plan 2.40 1.003

    9 Will be involved in the search for a management

    team

    2.30 0.915

    10 Will appoint board of directors of investee company 2.27 0.828

    11 Will help investee in seeking finance from other

    financial institutions

    2.17 0.791

    Source: Developed from this research.

    VCs rated 11 out of 22 items under personality and experience as important,

    including entrepreneurs' background, integrity, experience and risk

    management.Availability of raw materials, marketing skills,preventing unfair

    trading and taking legal action if investees did not pay principal on time were

    also rated very highly.

    Table 1 shows that VCs rated six items under personality and experience asfairly important: confidence; leadership; referred by trustworthy source;

    providingcollateral; familiarity withmarket targeted; and willingness to hire

    staff to cover weaknesses in management.Recommendation andfriend, family

    member or relative, were believed to be irrelevant. This might be due to the

    common assumption that friendship and recommendations do not guarantee

    entrepreneurs' business success.

    For the product/service criteria, has been in the market for many years and

    functioning prototype were believed to be fairly important, whereas

    proprietary and high-tech were desirable.

    For the market criteria, market not saturated, contract agreement and

    familiarity with industry as less important, and national market, little threat of

    9

    Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent

    Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    12/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 10

    competition, venture will create new market and foreign marketwere rated

    desirable.

    For the financial criteria, VCs rated accounting staff as fairly important and

    entrepreneur to invest 50% of funds, 5% higher return than national interest

    rate and hiring management consultant as desirable. VCs rated pilot test

    project with smaller investment, not investing in land, building or truckand nosubsequent investment very low, and these items were believed to be

    irrelevant.

    For other criteria, VCs rated feasibility studies and regional economic plan as

    fairly important. For the monitoring and relations criteria, transfer of

    equipment, service in management and opportunity to expand investee's

    business were believed to be fairly important. VCs gave low scores to six

    items in monitoring and relations. These items weekly report from investee,

    development of actual product/service, business plan, candidate management

    team, board of directors and helping investees seek finance from other

    institutions were believed to be desirable.

    Entrepreneurs

    Table 2 presents the entrepreneurs' responses to the investment criteria.

    Table 2: Entrepreneurs' Responses to Investment Criteria

    Scale used 1 = Irrelevant 2 = Desirable 3 = Important 4 = Essential

    RankMain

    Criteria

    Items Mean SD

    1 Risk management 3.52 0.666

    2 Hardworking 3.29 0.705

    3 Honesty, openness and approachability 3.26 0.841

    4 Tightly controlled budget 3.18 0.774

    5 Experience 3.17 0.749

    6 Integrity 3.17 0.728

    7 Self-confidence 3.13 0.759

    8 Recommendation from trustworthy source 3.00 0.849

    9 Leadership 2.91 0.867

    10 Functional areas ability 2.88 0.952

    11 Formal qualifications 2.84 0.862

    12 Being known by other entrepreneurs 2.84 0.871

    13 Familiarity with market targeted 2.81 0.73414 Familiarity with venture team's reputation 2.78 0.911

    15 Profitability rate 2.64 1.084

    16

    Personality

    and

    Experience

    Willingness to cooperate in monitoring system 2.57 1.062

    10

    Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    13/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 11

    RankMain

    CriteriaItems Mean SD

    17 Recommendation from local government 2.48 0.919

    18 Providing collateral 2.41 0.982

    19 Being well known to VC 2.40 0.973

    20 Willingness to hire staff to cover weaknesses inmanagement

    2.27 0.916

    21 Personality compatible with VC 2.24 0.925

    22 Entrepreneur must be a friend, relative or family

    member of VC

    1.90 0.942

    1 Well accepted 3.44 0.663

    2 Raw materials available 3.14 0.986

    3 Availability of technology 2.94 0.813

    4 Developed for many years 2.91 0.727

    5 In the market for many years 2.80 0.770

    6 Popular 2.71 0.937

    7

    Product/

    service

    May be described as high-tech 2.11 0.982

    1 Market Ability to attract customers 3.29 0.757

    2 Reasonable marketing plan 3.22 0.725

    3 Knowing distribution system 3.21 0.744

    4 Market not saturated 3.08 0.700

    5 Familiarity with marketing strategy 3.06 0.773

    6 Strong marketing team 2.98 0.824

    7 Knowing other competitors 2.91 0.830

    8 Having a sales contract 2.80 0.904

    9 Significant growth rate 2.78 0.789

    10 Targeting new market 2.69 0.784

    11 Targeting national market 2.35 0.924

    12 Targeting foreign market 2.29 1.151

    13 Little threat of competition in first three years 2.14 1.049

    1 Agree to submit to audited financial report 3.18 0.784

    2 Agree to be evaluated using IRR 3.18 0.720

    3 Agree to provide monthly financial report 3.02 0.769

    4 Agree to employ an accountant 2.98 0.748

    5 Agree to provide monthly report 2.93 0.831

    6 Agree to submit land certificate 2.71 0.920

    7 Agree to submit projected cash flow 2.67 0.778

    8 Agree to open joint account with VC 2.44 1.024

    9

    Financial

    Agree to pay 5% more than national interest rate 2.14 1.018

    1 Agree to pay back principal even if business fails 3.12 0.796

    2 Will consider economic conditions 2.97 0.779

    3 Agree to invest 50% of funds 2.80 0.800

    4 Agree to cooperate with other companies proposed by

    VC

    2.63 0.864

    5 Agree to a short investment period 2.45 0.909

    6

    Other criteria

    Agree to obey environmental protection laws 2.44 1.149

    1 Entrepreneur must maintain a good relationship with

    VC

    3.24 0.814

    2

    Monitoring

    and relations

    Entrepreneur must actively develop trust with VC 3.10 0.834

    11

    Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent

    Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    14/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 12

    RankMain

    CriteriaItems Mean SD

    3 VC to monitor entrepreneur's financial performance

    monthly

    2.93 0.878

    4 VC can take legal action if entrepreneur does not pay

    principal on time

    2.70 1.112

    5 VC to be involved in providing a business plan 2.56 0.806

    6 VC can transfer their equipment to other investees if

    current investee breaks agreement

    2.56 1.054

    7 VC to be involved in developing product/service 2.53 0.855

    8 Agree to provide weekly report 2.20 0.955

    9 Agree to accept board of directors appointed by VC 2.10 0.893

    10 VC to be involved in the search for a management

    team

    2.08 0.943

    Source: Developed from this research.

    For the personality and experience criteria, entrepreneurs rated risk

    management as essential. They rated seven items under personality and

    experience as important: working hard; honesty; openness andapproachability; tightly controlled budget; experience; integrity; self-

    confidence; and recommendation from trustworthy source.

    Entrepreneurs rated eight items under personality and experience as less

    important: leadership; functional areas ability; formal qualifications; being

    known by other entrepreneurs; familiarity with target market;familiarity with

    venture team's reputation;profitability rate; and willingness to cooperate with

    monitoring.

    They also rated five items under personality and experience as desirable:

    recommendation from local government; providing collateral; being well

    known by VCs; hiring staff to cover weaknesses in management; and

    personality compatible with VCs. Entrepreneur must be a friend, familymember or relative of VCwas believed to be only fairly desirable.

    For the product/service criteria, entrepreneurs rated well accepted as very

    important and raw materials available as important. Technology has been

    developed for many years, has been in the market for many years and

    product/service popularwere rated fairly important. High-tech was rated as

    desirable only.

    For the market criteria, five items were rated as important: capability in

    attracting customers; marketing plan; distribution system; market is not

    saturated; and marketing strategy. Entrepreneurs were not keen to applyfinancial methods and none of the items in the financial criteria were rated as

    very important. However, they rated audited financial report,internal method

    12

    Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    15/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 13

    and monthly financial report as important. Strong marketing team, knowing

    other competitors, sales contract, significant growth rate, and targeting new

    market were rated fairly important, while targeting national market and

    targetingforeign marketwere rated desirable.

    For the other criteria, entrepreneurs rated paying back principal even if

    business failed as important. Considering economic conditions, investing anequal amount of funds and cooperating with other companies were considered

    less important. Short investment periodand obeying environmental protection

    laws were rated desirable.

    Finally, under monitoring and relations, maintaining a good relationship with

    VCand actively developing trust with VCwere believed to be important and

    monthly financial performance, legal action, business plan, transfer of

    equipment and developing product/service were considered fairly important.

    Weekly report, board of directors and search for candidate management team

    were classified as desirable only.

    Investees

    Table 3 presents the investees' responses to the investment criteria.

    Table 3: Investees' Responses to Investment Criteria

    Scale used 1 = Irrelevant 2 = Desirable 3 = Important 4 = Essential

    RankMain

    CriteriaItems Mean SD

    1 Honesty, openness and approachability 3.58 0.667

    2 Leadership 3.48 0.715

    3 Good business plan 3.27 0.581

    4 Self-confidence 3.27 0.7065 Ability to adjust to difficult situations 3.26 0.577

    6 Ability to identify market 3.22 0.522

    7 Functional areas ability 3.20 0.791

    8 Business strategy 3.18 0.590

    9 Experience 3.07 0.711

    10 Track record 3.03 0.801

    11 Being known by other entrepreneurs 2.84 0.845

    12 Formal qualifications 2.66 0.637

    13 Background 2.65 0.899

    14 Strong management team 2.63 0.997

    15 Really interested in VC 2.50 0.996

    16 Willingness to hire staff to cover weaknesses in

    management

    2.32 0.824

    17 Recommended by local government or leading

    business people

    2.18 0.953

    18

    Personality

    and

    experience

    Relying on venture capital only 2.16 0.987

    13

    Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent

    Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    16/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 14

    RankMain

    CriteriaItems Mean SD

    19 Recommended by banks and other financial

    institutions

    2.09 0.950

    20 Presenting land ownership for collateral 1.95 0.994

    21 Friend, family member or relative of VC 1.93 0.908

    22 Business chamber membership 1.84 0.896

    1 Well accepted 3.37 0.703

    2 Raw materials available 3.30 0.701

    3 In the market for many years 3.10 0.625

    4 Popular 2.93 0.778

    5 Availability of technology 2.93 0.803

    6 Developed for many years 2.69 0.797

    7

    Product/service

    May be described as high-tech 2.28 0.991

    1 Market Ability to attract customers 3.40 0.665

    2 Having a sales contract 3.38 0.719

    3 Reasonable marketing plan 3.38 0.581

    4 Knowing distribution system 3.35 0.655

    5 Targeting international market 3.18 1.004

    6 Strong marketing team 3.17 0.649

    7 Marketing strategy 3.13 0.643

    8 Targeting new market 3.03 0.608

    9 Market not saturated 3.02 0.510

    10 Knowing other competitors 2.94 0.870

    11 Significant growth rate 2.70 0.625

    12 Targeting national market 2.58 0.803

    13 Enjoying a significant growth rate 2.78 0.789

    14 Little threat of competition in first three years 1.96 0.927

    1 Agree to be evaluated using internal rate of return

    method

    3.06 0.705

    2 Agree to employ accountant 3.05 0.536

    3 Agree to discuss monthly cash flow 2.97 0.754

    4 Agree to submit audited financial report 2.95 0.638

    5 Agree to make monthly report 2.94 0.798

    6 Agree to submit projected cash flow 2.69 0.797

    7 Agree to submit land certificate 2.43 0.942

    8 Agree to open joint account with VC 2.23 0.893

    9 Agree to pay 5% more than national interest rate 2.03 0.900

    Financial

    1 Agree to pay back principal even if business fails 2.98 0.616

    2 Will consider economic conditions 2.81 0.744

    3 Agree to obey environmental protection laws 2.79 1.160

    4 Agree to a short investment period 2.76 0.981

    5 Agree to invest 50% of funds 2.75 0.727

    6

    Othercriteria

    Agree to cooperate with other companies proposed

    by VC

    2.59 0.777

    14

    Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    17/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 15

    RankMain

    CriteriaItems Mean SD

    1 VC must actively develop trust with investee 3.48 0.687

    2 VC must maintain a good relationship with investee 3.45 0.685

    3 VC must monitor investee's performance monthly 3.04 0.647

    4 VC must be involved in providing a business plan toinvestee

    2.86 0.693

    5 VC must be involved in developing actualproduct/service

    2.76 0.789

    6 VC can transfer their equipment to other investees if

    current investee breaks agreement

    2.61 0.916

    7 VC can take legal action if investee does not pay

    principal on time

    2.54 1.100

    8 Agree to accept board of directors appointed by VC 2.36 0.832

    9 VC to be involved in the search for a management

    team

    2.20 0.917

    10

    Monitoring

    and

    relations

    Agree to provide weekly report 1.91 0.960

    Source: Developed from this research.

    For personality and experience, investees rated honesty, openness and

    approachability as essential, the highest score in the table. Leadership was

    classified as very important. The remaining eight criteria were believed to be

    important.

    For the product/service criteria, the group rated well accepted and raw

    materials available as very important and has been in the market for many

    years as important.

    For the market criteria, the group rated ability to attract customers, having a

    sales contract, reasonable marketing plan and knowing distribution system asvery important. Targeted international market, strong marketing team,

    marketing strategy, targeted a new marketand market is not saturated were

    rated as important.

    For financial criteria, using IRR and employing an accountant were rated as

    important. This indicates that investees did not consider many evaluation

    methods to be important.

    Finally, under monitoring system and relations, VC must actively develop trust

    with investee and VC must maintain a good relationship with investee were

    rated very important. The group also rated the item VCmust monitor investee'sperformance on a monthly basis as important.

    15

    Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent

    Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    18/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 16

    Most of the items in table 3 indicated that investees were concerned about the

    relationship of the entrepreneur, popularity of product, knowing other

    competitors, using monthly cash flow, commitment to paying back principal

    and involvement in business plan. These items were rated as fairly important.

    Similarities and Differences

    Table 4 shows three items have similar responses. Showing self-confidence

    was believed to important by entrepreneurs and investees, and VCs rated it as

    fairly important. All groups rated experience as important and willingness to

    hire staff to cover weaknesses in managementas desirable.

    All groups rated honesty, openness and approachability and capability of

    managing risks before being accepted by venture capitalists very high. VCs

    and entrepreneurs rated leadership as less important, but investees rated it very

    high. VCs rated entrepreneur's backgroundvery high, investees rated it fairly

    important and entrepreneurs rated it as desirable. Entrepreneurs and investees

    rated friend, family member or relative as fairly desirable, but VCs rated it asirrelevant. Entrepreneurs and investees rated known by other entrepreneurs as

    fairly important, whereas VCs rated it as desirable. VCs and investees rated

    functional areas ability as very important while entrepreneurs rated it as less

    important. Entrepreneurs and investees rated formal qualifications as fairly

    important but VCs rated it as desirable only.

    16

    Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2

    http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
  • 8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent

    19/36

    Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 17

    Table 4: Significance Test of Personality and Experience Criteria

    No Criteria

    Venture

    Capitalists'

    Mean (SD)

    Entrepreneurs'

    Mean (SD)

    Investees'

    Mean

    (SD)

    Pearso

    Squ

    p-va

    1 Honesty, openness and approachability 3.47 (0.681) 3.26 (0.841) 3.58 (0.667) 0.070

    2 Leadership 2.90 (0.712) 2.91 (0.867) 3.48 (0.715) 0.000*

    3 Self-confidence 2.90 (0.995) 3.13 (0.759) 3.27 (0.706) 0.047

    4 Familiarity with entrepreneur's background 3.23 (0.728) 2.40 (0.973) 2.65 (0.899) 0.001*

    5 Willingness to hire staff to cover weaknesses in

    management

    2.67 (0.994) 2.27 (0.916) 2.32 (0.824) 0.043

    6 Entrepreneur must be a friend, relative or family

    member of VC

    1.27 (0.583) 1.90 (0.942) 1.93 (0.908) 0.004*

    7 Recommendation by local government or leading

    business people

    1.63 (0.964) 2.48 (0.919) 2.18 (0.952) 0.000*

    8 Entrepreneur known to other entrepreneurs 2.23 (0.898) 2.84 (0.871) 2.84 (0.845) 0.021

    9 Functional areas ability 3.37(0.718) 2.88 (0.952) 3.20 (0.791) 0.026

    10 Entrepreneur's experience 3.30 (0.877) 3.17 (0.749) 3.07 (0.711) 0.101

    11 Formal qualifications 2.37 (0.999) 2.84 (0.862) 2.66 (0.637) 0.000*

    12