enhancing venture capital investment evaluation_ a survey of vent
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
1/36
Journal of Economic and Social Policy
Volume 10Issue 1Enterprising Finance
Article 2
7-1-2005
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation:A Survey of Venture Capitalists', Investees' and
Entrepreneurs' PerspectivesAbdul RakhmanSouthern Cross University
Michael EvansSouthern Cross University
ePublications@SCU is an electronic repository administered by Southern Cross University Librar y. Its goal is to capture and preser ve the intellectual
output of Southern Cross University authors and researchers, and to increase visibility and impact through open access to researchers around the
world. For further information please contact [email protected].
Recommended CitationRakhman, Abdul and Evans, Michael (2005) "Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists',Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives,"Journal of Economic and Social Policy: Vol. 10: Iss. 1, Article 2.
Available at: hp://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesphttp://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
2/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of VentureCapitalists', Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives
Tis article is available in Journal of Economic and Social Policy: hp://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
3/36
Enhancing Venture Capital InvestmentEvaluation: A Survey of VentureCapitalists', Investees' and Entrepreneurs'Perspectives
Abdul RakhmanDoctor of Business AdministrationGraduate College of ManagementSouthern Cross UniversityandAssociate Professor Michael EvansDirectorGraduate College of ManagementSouthern Cross University
Abstract
This research investigates the use of investment criteria to evaluate
potential partners who seek venture capital. The survey was undertaken in
the South Sulawesi Province of Indonesia. There were 257 respondents who
completed questionnaires. Three groups participated in this survey: venture
capitalists (VCs), firms that provide venture capital funds to entrepreneurs
to develop their businesses; entrepreneurs, who might seek venture capital
in the future; and investees, businesses currently in receipt of venture
capital. The three groups were asked to judge how important a range of
investment criteria was, using a four-point scale. Each group used adifferent questionnaire and several variables were designed to cover
investment criteria that were only relevant to VCs, entrepreneurs or
investees. Data analysis indicated that, for several criteria, VCs shared
interests with entrepreneurs and investees. However, the three groups did
not always share investment preferences.
Introduction
This study investigated the attitudes of venture capitalists (VCs), or finance
providers; entrepreneurs, or those seeking finance; and investees, or those inreceipt of finance, to the personality and experience, product/service, market,
financial and monitoring system, and overall relations of the venture capital
1
Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent
Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
4/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 2
process. The study also aimed to determine differences in responses from the
three groups to a range of investment criteria. It was hoped that the variables
could be reduced, using factor analysis, to identify the most important
investment factors to the group as a whole.
Literature Review
VCs provide finance to entrepreneurs and share the risks of a venture with
them. Venture capital is risky and deals with small business enterprises, in
particular, new ventures. The evaluation procedure used by VCs has become
an important issue in venture capital. Many investment criteria may be
considered in assessing entrepreneurs in order to accept their proposed
businesses and provide finance (Boocock & Woods 1997; Hall & Hofer 1993;
MacMillan et al. 1985, 1987; Tyebjee & Bruno 1984).
The empirical research on VC decision making has produced a range of
criteria that VCs report being used when evaluating new venture proposals
(Fried & Hisrich 1994; Mason & Harrison 1994; Tyebjee & Bruno 1984;
Wright & Robbie 1996). However, potential partners, the entrepreneurs, also
want to be well informed of the criteria VCs use for evaluation. This could
help them influence the VC decision-making process (Zacharakis 2001).
Previous research (Zacharakis and Meyer 1998) found that a lack of insight by
applicants for capital affected the nature of VC decision making.
Investment Evaluation Stages
Previous research has illustrated the investment activities as a sequentialprocess involving several steps. The process can be summarised into five
steps: deal origination, screening, evaluation, deal structuring and post-
investment activities (Boocock & Woods 1997; Fried & Hisrich 1994;
Tyebjee & Bruno 1984).
Tyebjee and Bruno (1984) defined deal origination as the process in which
VCs face a very poorly defined environment within which to find prospective
deals. They believed that the typical investment prospect was too small and
various intermediaries played an important role in matching VCs with fledging
ventures with cash needs. Boocock and Woods (1997) explained that this stage
involved using prospective investments from a variety of sources, includingintermediaries or other financial institutions.
2
Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
5/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 3
Tyebee and Bruno (1984) emphasized that VCs' screening criteria reflect a
tendency to limit investment to areas the VC was familiar with, in terms of
technology, product and market scope of the venture. In the evaluation stage,
Tyebjee and Bruno (1984) found that VCs had to rely on a subjective
assessment procedure based on the business plan presented by venture's
management. Boocock and Woods (1997) emphasized the business plan in a
search for key features of VC decision making.
In the deal-structuring step, Boocock and Woods (1997) explained that the
deal would be consummated only if VCs and entrepreneurs were able to
structure a mutually acceptable agreement. From the perspective of the VCs,
they would take into consideration the equity share the entrepreneur would
give up in exchange for the venture capital. VCs would also consider
covenants that limited capital expenditure and management salaries (Tyebjee
& Bruno 1984).
After the deal is finalised, the role of the VC expands from investor to
collaborator. This could be through formal representation on the board ofdirectors or informal influence in the market, supplier and creditor networks.
These roles are performed as post-investment activities. However, Tyebjee
and Bruno (1984) found that this did not mean that VCs were likely to exert
control over the day-to-day operation of the venture.
Investment Criteria
A number of studies have been undertaken in many countries regarding VCs'
investment criteria. These indicate that VCs in different cultures use varying
criteria for evaluating proposals.
Hall and Hofer (1993) developed six main investment criteria: venture capital
firm requirements; characteristics of the proposal; characteristics of the
entrepreneur/team; nature of proposed business; economic environment of the
proposed business; and strategy for the proposed business. Boocock and
Woods (1997) applied a similar methodology in the UK.
McMillan et al. (1985) studied investment criteria in terms of five broad
classifications: entrepreneur's personality; entrepreneur's experience;
characteristics of the product or service; characteristics of the market; and
financial considerations. They found that it was the quality of entrepreneurthat ultimately determines the funding decision. Interestingly, Knight (1994)
found that the responses from Canadian VCs were slightly different from their
3
Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent
Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
6/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 4
counterparts in the USA. In Canada, VCs rated the entrepreneur's personality
and experience much higher than product, market characteristics and financial
considerations. US investors were far more concerned with financial returns
and the liquidity of their investment.
Rah et al. (1994) undertook a study in Korea of investment criteria in six
broad categories: managerial capabilities; financing ability; superiority ofproduct and technology; availability of raw materials; production capability;
and market attractiveness. They found interesting results, in that, VCs used
market attractiveness as the most critical factor in deciding whether or not to
fund a proposal. This was similar to Japan, where VCs were relatively much
more focused on the development of new markets in evaluating prospective
investments and relied heavily on market criteria (Ray & Turpin 1993).
Venture Capital in Indonesia
Venture capital is the funds provided without collateral to entrepreneurs to
help them develop their businesses and which they repay partly in terms of ashare in the profit earned, based on the deal contract. Entrepreneurs who
operate in profitable businesses are clearly eligible for venture capital.
However, as the venture capital industry in Indonesia is regarded as being in
its infancy, compared with those of America and Europe, the selection process
is highly competitive.
Even though there is a growing belief that venture capital is a bridge to
develop business, the selection process must be implemented properly to
protect VCs from bad debts. The Indonesian government has a revolving
venture capital system, which is a program to put state-owned funds through
VCs. Profits from VCs may be used to set up new VCs in other cities and
provinces.
VCs in Indonesia must seek profitable business partners. However, venture
capital is often seen by Indonesian entrepreneurs as a gift to promote
economic development. Many entrepreneurs believe that they do not have to
repay the funds because it is the government's duty to provide funds to small
businesses.
The agreements between VCs and investee companies can take a range of
forms. Under Indonesian Corporation Law 1994:
4
Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
7/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 5
VCs can invest in investee companies by buying some of the investees'shares and becoming shareholders. Therefore, VCs must obey the code
of conduct in Indonesian Corporation Law article 1.
VCs can invest in investees by limited participation, by which VCsinvest funds without being actively involved in operational matters. VCs
receive a share of the profits based on the terms of the agreement.
VCs can only engage with small- and medium-sized enterprises whichhold an Indonesian business number or approval from the Department of
Industry and Trading.
VCs must ensure that all small and medium businesses have theopportunity to seek funds through the venture capital system.
VCs can invest in convertible bonds, whereby investees get funds fromVCs as liabilities but must ensure that, over a certain period, these funds
are converted to shares.
Definition of Small Enterprises: Indonesian Perspective
The Indonesian Constitution Number 9, 1995, was set up to govern how the
Indonesian government should deal with small enterprises. The Constitution
defines a small enterprise as any small-scale economic activity that meets the
criteria of net worth, annual sales or ownership status as it is ruled in the
Constitution. Article 5 of the Constitution states that the criteria for a small
enterprise are that it:
possesses a net worth of a maximum of Rp.200 million excluding landand building used in the operation, or possesses annual sales of a
maximum of Rp.1 billion;
is owned and operated by an Indonesian citizen and is autonomous andin the form of an individual business or a business body that is not
legally incorporated or a business body that is legally incorporated and a
cooperative;
is independent and not a subsidiary of, or affiliated with, any companythat is owned or controlled directly or indirectly by medium or large
companies;
has a structure of sole proprietorship, business enterprise without anylegal entity or business enterprise with legal entity, including
cooperative.
5
Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent
Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
8/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 6
South Sulawesi Venture Capital Company
The South Sulawesi Venture Capital Company (SSV) is the only venture
capital firm in the South Sulawesi Province of Indonesia. SSV was established
on 24 December 1994 under the Department of Finance of Indonesia and
included prominent business people. The company started operations in 1995.
The number of staff was only seven from 1995 to 1996, but increased to 30 in2001. Outstanding funds increased dramatically in 1997 because the company
received Foreign Direct Investment from the South Korean government
through Jexim Funds. The company has provided Rp.30.5 billion to 126
investees up to the year 2001. It started to make a significant profit from 1997
to 2000, after new directors were appointed and more flexible investment
criteria applied to grow its investment base (SSV Annual Report1995-2001).
Methodology
A questionnaire was sent to a total of 450 potential respondents in South
Sulawesi in June, July and August 2002. Of these, 45 were VCs, 120 investees
and 285 entrepreneurs. There were five data collectors who conducted the
survey, in addition to a mail survey. There were 257 respondents who
completed the questionnaires giving a response rate of 57%. There were 100
respondents who returned the questionnaire by mail and 157 who completed it
directly with the data collectors. There were 30 VCs, 126 entrepreneurs and
101 investees who returned the questionnaires. All the VCs were located in
Makassar City, the capital of South Sulawesi Province. There were 60
investees and 29 entrepreneurs who also lived in the capital city making a total
of 119 respondents (46.13%) from the capital. The other 138 respondentscame from 16 small cities in the province. All the VCs were working at SSV
and all the investees had received funds from SSV. The entrepreneurs were
business people who operated in South Sulawesi Province, but had not
received funding from SSV.
The respondents were asked to evaluate the importance of the investment
criteria using a four-point scale, where 1 = irrelevant; 2 = desirable, 3 =
important and 4 = essential. This scale was chosen to enable comparison with
previous research. The data was analysed with parametric tests, Kruskal
Wallis, Pearson's Chi-Square, Fisher Exact Test, factor analysis and
multidimensional scaling.
6
Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
9/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 7
Results
The results of this research are presented in the following sections. The first
section gives the responses from the three groups to the six main investment
criteria: personality and experience; product/service; market; financial; other
criteria; monitoring and relations. Section two will report on the factor
analysis in relation to the criteria. Section three will analyse the responsesusing multidimensional scaling.
Responses to Investment Criteria
This section will present the responses from VCs, entrepreneurs and investees
to the six main criteria. The responses are based on the questions put to each
group and some of the items are only applicable to certain groups. The
investment criteria, which are unique to VCs, might be not applicable to
entrepreneurs and investees or vice versa.
Venture Capitalists
Table 1 presents the responses of the VC group to the range of investment
criteria. Overall, VCs considered projected cash flow to be essential and, as
expected, rated items that used conventional methods of evaluation and items
for financial control as very important. They also rated other main criteria,
such as personality, product/service, market and monitoring and relations, as
important.
Table 1: VCs' Responses to Investment Criteria
Scale used 1 = Irrelevant 2 = Desirable 3 = Important 4 = Essential
Rank MainCriteria
Items Mean SD
1 Honesty, openness and approachability 3.47 0.681
2 Willingness to cooperate in monitoring system 3.43 0.858
3 Functional areas ability 3.37 0.718
4 Integrity 3.30 0.837
5 Entrepreneur's experience 3.30 0.877
6 Familiarity with entrepreneur's background 3.23 0.728
7 Familiarity with VC's rules 3.20 0.847
8 Hardworking 3.17 0.913
9 Risk management 3.13 0.776
10 Venture capital only for profitable businesses 3.03 1.003
11 Tight control of spending 3.03 0.865
12 Self-confidence 2.90 0.99513 Leadership 2.90 0.712
14 Referred by trustworthy source 2.87 0.972
15
Personalityand
Experience
Providing collateral 2.80 0.931
7
Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent
Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
10/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 8
RankMain
CriteriaItems Mean SD
16 Familiarity with market targeted 2.70 0.988
17 Willingness to hire staff to cover weaknesses inmanagement
2.67 0.994
18 Formal qualifications 2.37 0.999
19 Entrepreneur is known to other entrepreneurs 2.23 0.898
20 Personality compatible with VC 2.03 0.928
21 Recommended by local government or leading
business people
1.63 0.964
22 Entrepreneur must be a friend, relative or family
member of VC
1.27 0.583
1 Raw materials available 3.47 0.571
2 Well accepted 3.13 0.730
3 Demonstrated market acceptance 3.10 0.607
4 In the market for many years 2.87 0.860
5 Functioning prototype 2.80 0.610
6 Is proprietary or can be otherwise be protected 2.53 1.042
7
Product/
service
May be described as high-tech 2.10 0.803
1 Market Marketing skills 3.40 0.675
2 Reasonable marketing plan 3.27 0.740
3 Strong marketing team 3.17 0.648
4 Significant growth rate 3.10 0.662
5 Entrepreneur knows distribution system 3.03 0.765
6 Stimulates an existing market 3.00 0.910
7 Market not saturated 2.97 0.890
8 Contract agreement 2.83 0.950
9 Familiarity with industry 2.73 0.785
10 Targeting national market 2.43 0.774
11 Little threat of competition in first three years 2.37 0.928
12 Targeting new market 2.37 0.850
13 Targeting foreign market 2.13 0.819
1 Financial Use projected cash flow 3.50 0.572
2 Use IRR method in evaluation 3.47 0.571
3 Use return on investment (ROI) 3.27 0.691
4 Use cost/benefit ratio 3.23 0.817
5 Use net present value method in evaluation 3.23 0.679
6 Require audited financial report 3.03 0.669
7 Require monthly financial report 3.00 0.871
8 Require employment of accounting staff 2.67 0.606
9 Require entrepreneur to invest 50% of funds 2.33 0.868
10 Require 5% higher return than national interest rate 2.20 0.997
11 Require hiring of management consultant 2.20 0.761
12 Require pilot test project with smaller investment 1.87 0.819
13 Require entrepreneur not to invest in land, building
or truck
1.77 0.898
14 Will not make subsequent investment 1.67 0.802
1 VC must prevent unfair trading with investee orothers
3.40 0.855
2
Othercriteria
Will consider number of years of investment 3.40 0.770
8
Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
11/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 9
RankMain
CriteriaItems Mean SD
3 Will consider general economic conditions 3.37 0.669
4 Will consider multiplier effect 3.00 0.743
5 Must be involved in feasibility studies 2.97 0.809
6 Will consider regional economic plan 2.57 0.858
1 Monitoring
andrelations
Can take legal action if investee does not pay
principal on time
3.47 0.860
2 Will monitor investee's financial performance
monthly
3.40 0.621
3 Can transfer their equipment to other investees if
current investee breaks agreement
2.77 1.135
4 Will provide management service 2.60 0.814
5 Will look at opportunities to expand investee's
businesses
2.57 0.898
6 Require weekly report 2.47 0.860
7 Will be involved in development of actual
product/service
2.43 0.898
8 Will be involved in business plan 2.40 1.003
9 Will be involved in the search for a management
team
2.30 0.915
10 Will appoint board of directors of investee company 2.27 0.828
11 Will help investee in seeking finance from other
financial institutions
2.17 0.791
Source: Developed from this research.
VCs rated 11 out of 22 items under personality and experience as important,
including entrepreneurs' background, integrity, experience and risk
management.Availability of raw materials, marketing skills,preventing unfair
trading and taking legal action if investees did not pay principal on time were
also rated very highly.
Table 1 shows that VCs rated six items under personality and experience asfairly important: confidence; leadership; referred by trustworthy source;
providingcollateral; familiarity withmarket targeted; and willingness to hire
staff to cover weaknesses in management.Recommendation andfriend, family
member or relative, were believed to be irrelevant. This might be due to the
common assumption that friendship and recommendations do not guarantee
entrepreneurs' business success.
For the product/service criteria, has been in the market for many years and
functioning prototype were believed to be fairly important, whereas
proprietary and high-tech were desirable.
For the market criteria, market not saturated, contract agreement and
familiarity with industry as less important, and national market, little threat of
9
Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent
Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
12/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 10
competition, venture will create new market and foreign marketwere rated
desirable.
For the financial criteria, VCs rated accounting staff as fairly important and
entrepreneur to invest 50% of funds, 5% higher return than national interest
rate and hiring management consultant as desirable. VCs rated pilot test
project with smaller investment, not investing in land, building or truckand nosubsequent investment very low, and these items were believed to be
irrelevant.
For other criteria, VCs rated feasibility studies and regional economic plan as
fairly important. For the monitoring and relations criteria, transfer of
equipment, service in management and opportunity to expand investee's
business were believed to be fairly important. VCs gave low scores to six
items in monitoring and relations. These items weekly report from investee,
development of actual product/service, business plan, candidate management
team, board of directors and helping investees seek finance from other
institutions were believed to be desirable.
Entrepreneurs
Table 2 presents the entrepreneurs' responses to the investment criteria.
Table 2: Entrepreneurs' Responses to Investment Criteria
Scale used 1 = Irrelevant 2 = Desirable 3 = Important 4 = Essential
RankMain
Criteria
Items Mean SD
1 Risk management 3.52 0.666
2 Hardworking 3.29 0.705
3 Honesty, openness and approachability 3.26 0.841
4 Tightly controlled budget 3.18 0.774
5 Experience 3.17 0.749
6 Integrity 3.17 0.728
7 Self-confidence 3.13 0.759
8 Recommendation from trustworthy source 3.00 0.849
9 Leadership 2.91 0.867
10 Functional areas ability 2.88 0.952
11 Formal qualifications 2.84 0.862
12 Being known by other entrepreneurs 2.84 0.871
13 Familiarity with market targeted 2.81 0.73414 Familiarity with venture team's reputation 2.78 0.911
15 Profitability rate 2.64 1.084
16
Personality
and
Experience
Willingness to cooperate in monitoring system 2.57 1.062
10
Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
13/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 11
RankMain
CriteriaItems Mean SD
17 Recommendation from local government 2.48 0.919
18 Providing collateral 2.41 0.982
19 Being well known to VC 2.40 0.973
20 Willingness to hire staff to cover weaknesses inmanagement
2.27 0.916
21 Personality compatible with VC 2.24 0.925
22 Entrepreneur must be a friend, relative or family
member of VC
1.90 0.942
1 Well accepted 3.44 0.663
2 Raw materials available 3.14 0.986
3 Availability of technology 2.94 0.813
4 Developed for many years 2.91 0.727
5 In the market for many years 2.80 0.770
6 Popular 2.71 0.937
7
Product/
service
May be described as high-tech 2.11 0.982
1 Market Ability to attract customers 3.29 0.757
2 Reasonable marketing plan 3.22 0.725
3 Knowing distribution system 3.21 0.744
4 Market not saturated 3.08 0.700
5 Familiarity with marketing strategy 3.06 0.773
6 Strong marketing team 2.98 0.824
7 Knowing other competitors 2.91 0.830
8 Having a sales contract 2.80 0.904
9 Significant growth rate 2.78 0.789
10 Targeting new market 2.69 0.784
11 Targeting national market 2.35 0.924
12 Targeting foreign market 2.29 1.151
13 Little threat of competition in first three years 2.14 1.049
1 Agree to submit to audited financial report 3.18 0.784
2 Agree to be evaluated using IRR 3.18 0.720
3 Agree to provide monthly financial report 3.02 0.769
4 Agree to employ an accountant 2.98 0.748
5 Agree to provide monthly report 2.93 0.831
6 Agree to submit land certificate 2.71 0.920
7 Agree to submit projected cash flow 2.67 0.778
8 Agree to open joint account with VC 2.44 1.024
9
Financial
Agree to pay 5% more than national interest rate 2.14 1.018
1 Agree to pay back principal even if business fails 3.12 0.796
2 Will consider economic conditions 2.97 0.779
3 Agree to invest 50% of funds 2.80 0.800
4 Agree to cooperate with other companies proposed by
VC
2.63 0.864
5 Agree to a short investment period 2.45 0.909
6
Other criteria
Agree to obey environmental protection laws 2.44 1.149
1 Entrepreneur must maintain a good relationship with
VC
3.24 0.814
2
Monitoring
and relations
Entrepreneur must actively develop trust with VC 3.10 0.834
11
Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent
Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
14/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 12
RankMain
CriteriaItems Mean SD
3 VC to monitor entrepreneur's financial performance
monthly
2.93 0.878
4 VC can take legal action if entrepreneur does not pay
principal on time
2.70 1.112
5 VC to be involved in providing a business plan 2.56 0.806
6 VC can transfer their equipment to other investees if
current investee breaks agreement
2.56 1.054
7 VC to be involved in developing product/service 2.53 0.855
8 Agree to provide weekly report 2.20 0.955
9 Agree to accept board of directors appointed by VC 2.10 0.893
10 VC to be involved in the search for a management
team
2.08 0.943
Source: Developed from this research.
For the personality and experience criteria, entrepreneurs rated risk
management as essential. They rated seven items under personality and
experience as important: working hard; honesty; openness andapproachability; tightly controlled budget; experience; integrity; self-
confidence; and recommendation from trustworthy source.
Entrepreneurs rated eight items under personality and experience as less
important: leadership; functional areas ability; formal qualifications; being
known by other entrepreneurs; familiarity with target market;familiarity with
venture team's reputation;profitability rate; and willingness to cooperate with
monitoring.
They also rated five items under personality and experience as desirable:
recommendation from local government; providing collateral; being well
known by VCs; hiring staff to cover weaknesses in management; and
personality compatible with VCs. Entrepreneur must be a friend, familymember or relative of VCwas believed to be only fairly desirable.
For the product/service criteria, entrepreneurs rated well accepted as very
important and raw materials available as important. Technology has been
developed for many years, has been in the market for many years and
product/service popularwere rated fairly important. High-tech was rated as
desirable only.
For the market criteria, five items were rated as important: capability in
attracting customers; marketing plan; distribution system; market is not
saturated; and marketing strategy. Entrepreneurs were not keen to applyfinancial methods and none of the items in the financial criteria were rated as
very important. However, they rated audited financial report,internal method
12
Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
15/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 13
and monthly financial report as important. Strong marketing team, knowing
other competitors, sales contract, significant growth rate, and targeting new
market were rated fairly important, while targeting national market and
targetingforeign marketwere rated desirable.
For the other criteria, entrepreneurs rated paying back principal even if
business failed as important. Considering economic conditions, investing anequal amount of funds and cooperating with other companies were considered
less important. Short investment periodand obeying environmental protection
laws were rated desirable.
Finally, under monitoring and relations, maintaining a good relationship with
VCand actively developing trust with VCwere believed to be important and
monthly financial performance, legal action, business plan, transfer of
equipment and developing product/service were considered fairly important.
Weekly report, board of directors and search for candidate management team
were classified as desirable only.
Investees
Table 3 presents the investees' responses to the investment criteria.
Table 3: Investees' Responses to Investment Criteria
Scale used 1 = Irrelevant 2 = Desirable 3 = Important 4 = Essential
RankMain
CriteriaItems Mean SD
1 Honesty, openness and approachability 3.58 0.667
2 Leadership 3.48 0.715
3 Good business plan 3.27 0.581
4 Self-confidence 3.27 0.7065 Ability to adjust to difficult situations 3.26 0.577
6 Ability to identify market 3.22 0.522
7 Functional areas ability 3.20 0.791
8 Business strategy 3.18 0.590
9 Experience 3.07 0.711
10 Track record 3.03 0.801
11 Being known by other entrepreneurs 2.84 0.845
12 Formal qualifications 2.66 0.637
13 Background 2.65 0.899
14 Strong management team 2.63 0.997
15 Really interested in VC 2.50 0.996
16 Willingness to hire staff to cover weaknesses in
management
2.32 0.824
17 Recommended by local government or leading
business people
2.18 0.953
18
Personality
and
experience
Relying on venture capital only 2.16 0.987
13
Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent
Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
16/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 14
RankMain
CriteriaItems Mean SD
19 Recommended by banks and other financial
institutions
2.09 0.950
20 Presenting land ownership for collateral 1.95 0.994
21 Friend, family member or relative of VC 1.93 0.908
22 Business chamber membership 1.84 0.896
1 Well accepted 3.37 0.703
2 Raw materials available 3.30 0.701
3 In the market for many years 3.10 0.625
4 Popular 2.93 0.778
5 Availability of technology 2.93 0.803
6 Developed for many years 2.69 0.797
7
Product/service
May be described as high-tech 2.28 0.991
1 Market Ability to attract customers 3.40 0.665
2 Having a sales contract 3.38 0.719
3 Reasonable marketing plan 3.38 0.581
4 Knowing distribution system 3.35 0.655
5 Targeting international market 3.18 1.004
6 Strong marketing team 3.17 0.649
7 Marketing strategy 3.13 0.643
8 Targeting new market 3.03 0.608
9 Market not saturated 3.02 0.510
10 Knowing other competitors 2.94 0.870
11 Significant growth rate 2.70 0.625
12 Targeting national market 2.58 0.803
13 Enjoying a significant growth rate 2.78 0.789
14 Little threat of competition in first three years 1.96 0.927
1 Agree to be evaluated using internal rate of return
method
3.06 0.705
2 Agree to employ accountant 3.05 0.536
3 Agree to discuss monthly cash flow 2.97 0.754
4 Agree to submit audited financial report 2.95 0.638
5 Agree to make monthly report 2.94 0.798
6 Agree to submit projected cash flow 2.69 0.797
7 Agree to submit land certificate 2.43 0.942
8 Agree to open joint account with VC 2.23 0.893
9 Agree to pay 5% more than national interest rate 2.03 0.900
Financial
1 Agree to pay back principal even if business fails 2.98 0.616
2 Will consider economic conditions 2.81 0.744
3 Agree to obey environmental protection laws 2.79 1.160
4 Agree to a short investment period 2.76 0.981
5 Agree to invest 50% of funds 2.75 0.727
6
Othercriteria
Agree to cooperate with other companies proposed
by VC
2.59 0.777
14
Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
17/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 15
RankMain
CriteriaItems Mean SD
1 VC must actively develop trust with investee 3.48 0.687
2 VC must maintain a good relationship with investee 3.45 0.685
3 VC must monitor investee's performance monthly 3.04 0.647
4 VC must be involved in providing a business plan toinvestee
2.86 0.693
5 VC must be involved in developing actualproduct/service
2.76 0.789
6 VC can transfer their equipment to other investees if
current investee breaks agreement
2.61 0.916
7 VC can take legal action if investee does not pay
principal on time
2.54 1.100
8 Agree to accept board of directors appointed by VC 2.36 0.832
9 VC to be involved in the search for a management
team
2.20 0.917
10
Monitoring
and
relations
Agree to provide weekly report 1.91 0.960
Source: Developed from this research.
For personality and experience, investees rated honesty, openness and
approachability as essential, the highest score in the table. Leadership was
classified as very important. The remaining eight criteria were believed to be
important.
For the product/service criteria, the group rated well accepted and raw
materials available as very important and has been in the market for many
years as important.
For the market criteria, the group rated ability to attract customers, having a
sales contract, reasonable marketing plan and knowing distribution system asvery important. Targeted international market, strong marketing team,
marketing strategy, targeted a new marketand market is not saturated were
rated as important.
For financial criteria, using IRR and employing an accountant were rated as
important. This indicates that investees did not consider many evaluation
methods to be important.
Finally, under monitoring system and relations, VC must actively develop trust
with investee and VC must maintain a good relationship with investee were
rated very important. The group also rated the item VCmust monitor investee'sperformance on a monthly basis as important.
15
Rakhman and Evans: Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Vent
Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
18/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 16
Most of the items in table 3 indicated that investees were concerned about the
relationship of the entrepreneur, popularity of product, knowing other
competitors, using monthly cash flow, commitment to paying back principal
and involvement in business plan. These items were rated as fairly important.
Similarities and Differences
Table 4 shows three items have similar responses. Showing self-confidence
was believed to important by entrepreneurs and investees, and VCs rated it as
fairly important. All groups rated experience as important and willingness to
hire staff to cover weaknesses in managementas desirable.
All groups rated honesty, openness and approachability and capability of
managing risks before being accepted by venture capitalists very high. VCs
and entrepreneurs rated leadership as less important, but investees rated it very
high. VCs rated entrepreneur's backgroundvery high, investees rated it fairly
important and entrepreneurs rated it as desirable. Entrepreneurs and investees
rated friend, family member or relative as fairly desirable, but VCs rated it asirrelevant. Entrepreneurs and investees rated known by other entrepreneurs as
fairly important, whereas VCs rated it as desirable. VCs and investees rated
functional areas ability as very important while entrepreneurs rated it as less
important. Entrepreneurs and investees rated formal qualifications as fairly
important but VCs rated it as desirable only.
16
Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2
http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2http://epubs.scu.edu.au/jesp/vol10/iss1/2 -
8/2/2019 Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation_ a Survey of Vent
19/36
Enhancing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation: A Survey of Venture Capitalists'Investees' and Entrepreneurs' Perspectives 17
Table 4: Significance Test of Personality and Experience Criteria
No Criteria
Venture
Capitalists'
Mean (SD)
Entrepreneurs'
Mean (SD)
Investees'
Mean
(SD)
Pearso
Squ
p-va
1 Honesty, openness and approachability 3.47 (0.681) 3.26 (0.841) 3.58 (0.667) 0.070
2 Leadership 2.90 (0.712) 2.91 (0.867) 3.48 (0.715) 0.000*
3 Self-confidence 2.90 (0.995) 3.13 (0.759) 3.27 (0.706) 0.047
4 Familiarity with entrepreneur's background 3.23 (0.728) 2.40 (0.973) 2.65 (0.899) 0.001*
5 Willingness to hire staff to cover weaknesses in
management
2.67 (0.994) 2.27 (0.916) 2.32 (0.824) 0.043
6 Entrepreneur must be a friend, relative or family
member of VC
1.27 (0.583) 1.90 (0.942) 1.93 (0.908) 0.004*
7 Recommendation by local government or leading
business people
1.63 (0.964) 2.48 (0.919) 2.18 (0.952) 0.000*
8 Entrepreneur known to other entrepreneurs 2.23 (0.898) 2.84 (0.871) 2.84 (0.845) 0.021
9 Functional areas ability 3.37(0.718) 2.88 (0.952) 3.20 (0.791) 0.026
10 Entrepreneur's experience 3.30 (0.877) 3.17 (0.749) 3.07 (0.711) 0.101
11 Formal qualifications 2.37 (0.999) 2.84 (0.862) 2.66 (0.637) 0.000*
12