enhancing knowledge transfer and exchange: …...2016/03/18 · enhancing knowledge transfer and...
TRANSCRIPT
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 1 of 13
Enhancingknowledgetransferandexchange:ReflectionsfromtheSeattleworkshoponevidence-informedpolicymakingAuthor:RyanLi,NICEInternational
AbstractThispaperidentifieskeyinsightsfromtheinternationalDecisionSupportInitiative(iDSI)workshoponSupportingEvidence-InformedPolicymaking,heldinSeattle(October2015),drawnfromthefullreportoftheworkshop(Lavis,2016),withadditionalreflectionsonhowiDSIaimstoimplementthesebestpractices.ThefivekeyareasforiDSItoaddressare:knowingthepolicycontext,enhancingknowledgebrokers,enhancingevidenceproducers,bettercommunication,andaligningtheoriesofchange.iDSIisalreadyconductinganumberofactivitiesintheseareasandwillcontinuetodosothroughout2016-2018,tosupportevidence-informedpriority-settinginlowandmiddle-incomecountries,andtostrengtheninstitutionalcapacitiesforsustainableknowledgetransferandexchange.
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 2 of 13
March2016
ThisworkshopandreportwereproducedaspartoftheInternationalDecisionSupportInitiative(www.idsihealth.org),aglobalinitiativetosupportdecisionmakersinpriority-settingforuniversalhealthcoverage.
ThisworkreceivedfundingsupportfromBill&MelindaGatesFoundation,theUKDepartmentforInternationalDevelopment,andtheRockefellerFoundation.
WiththankstoJohnLavisandJessicaShearer
Photography:RyanLi
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 3 of 13
IntroductionOn5-7October2015,NICEInternationalhostedtheinternationalDecisionSupportInitiative(iDSI)WorkshoponSupportingEvidence-InformedPolicymaking,attheBill&MelindaGatesFoundation(BMGF),Seattle.TheworkshopwasledbyProfJohnLavis(McMasterHealthForum)andDrJessicaShearer(PATH),andaimedtosharelearningandspurreflectionabouthowdevelopmentinitiatives,fundersandgovernmentscantogethersupportevidence-informedpriority-settinginhealth.
TheworkshopbroughttogetherpolicymakerandtechnicalrepresentativesfromThailand,Indonesia,India,Tanzania,Ethiopia,aswellasvariousinitiativesandorganisationsworkinginthepriority-settingspacegloballyandinthesecountries,includingiDSIanditspartners,BMGF,PATH,DiseaseControlPrioritiesNetwork,InstituteforHealthMetricsEvaluation,JointLearningNetworkforUHC,Priorities2020.
Presentationsfromtheworkshopcanbedownloadedhere,andthefullreportfromtheworkshop,whichsynthesisesthepublishedliteratureandinsightsfromthepresentationsandensuingdiscussions,here(Lavis,2016).ThefinalagendaandlistofparticipantscanbefoundintheAppendices.
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 4 of 13
Bestpracticeprincipleshighlightedintheworkshop,andreflectionsforiDSIThefollowingtablelistsbestpracticeprinciplesforsupportingevidence-informedpolicymaking(excerpteddirectlyfromthefullreport),andreflectionsonhowiDSIcouldimplementtheminsupportingcountries’prioritysettinginhealth(aswellasidentifyingexampleswhereiDSIisalreadydoingworkinlinewithbestpractice)
Bestpracticeprinciples ReflectionsforiDSIKnowingandarticulatingthepolicycontextKnowingyourcontextisimportantbecausedifferenttypesofpolicydecisionsanddifferentwaysofmakingandinfluencingpolicydecisionslikelywarrantdifferentapproachestosupportingevidence-informedprioritysetting.Thismeansasking:
• whattypesofpolicydecisionsareyoutryingtoinformwithresearchevidence?
• whereandhowaresuchpolicydecisionsmade?
• whoandwhatinfluencesthesepolicydecisions?
• howwouldyoudefineevidence-informedpolicymakinginthiscontext?
Establishingwhatsuccesslookslikemeanscomingtoanagreementofwhatconstitutesevidence-informedpolicymakingandthenfindingappropriatemeasuredbasedonthisdefinition.
Routinelyconsiderthesecontextualquestionsinplanninganddeliveringallcountry-leveliDSIactivities(bothpracticalsupportandknowledgeproducts)aimedatinfluencingpolicy,particularlyrecognising:
• differencesinpolicycontextbetweencandidateiDSIpartnercountries
• thedifferentgoalsandrequiredapproachesfornationalandsub-nationalgovernmentsiniDSIfocuscountriessuchasSouthAfricaandIndia
• importanttargetaudiencesforcapacitybuildingotherthanthoseiDSIhastraditionallyengagedwith;suchasthemedia,patientsandthepublic,andthejudiciary
• existingorpotentialknowledgebrokersincountries(includingevidencegenerators,e.g.researchunits,whoalsoserveorcouldserveabrokeragefunction),whosecapacitiesandconnectionscouldbeleveragedanddevelopedtomaximiseiDSI’spolicyimpact.
Thequestionsaround“typesofpolicydecisions”,andhow“end-to-end”iDSI’sofferingandtheoryofchangeshouldbe(e.g.shoulditincludeimplementationscience)wasalsoraisedattherecentiDSISteeringGroupmeeting(Beijing,Oct2015).IndeediDSIisalreadyoperatingorplanningworkinanumberoftheseareas,forinstance:
• researchonconstraintsanddeliveryplatforms(Imperial)• impactevaluationofHTAandthevalueofimplementation
(GlasgowUniversity)• implementationofclinicalqualitystandardsinVietnamandIndia
(NICEInternational).Nonethelesswerecognisetheneedtomakeourofferingexplicit,andNI(RyanLi)isdevelopingathinkpiecetooutlinethedifferentlevelsofpriority-setting(broadlyrangingindividualinterventionstothehealthsystemlevel),withexamplesofwhereandhowiDSIhaveengagedateachlevel.ThiscanbediscussedthroughfutureiDSIgovernancearrangements(e.g.Boardmeetings)andinformiDSIactivities.iDSI(IoanaVlad,LondonSchoolofHygieneandTropicalMedicine)ispresentlydevelopingastakeholderscopingtool,andwewillaimtousethisroutinelyinourcountrypracticalsupportwork.Thistoolwillbeinformedbypoliticalscienceandsocialnetworkanalysis,includeachecklistofdifferentkindsofstakeholders(includingrecognisingknowledgebrokers),andvisualmappingoftheiri)influenceover,ii)supporttowardsevidence-informedpriority-setting.TheiDSICapacityBuildingreport(inpreparation)includesfurtherdetailsaroundtheplannedcapacitybuildingactivitiesfordifferenttargetaudiences.
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 5 of 13
Enhancingknowledgebrokers’reach,conveningpower,andsustainability‘Knowledgebrokers’canpushforimprovementsonboththeevidence-supplyside(e.g.,communicatingresearchevidenceeffectively,bothbypackagingitbetterandbydisseminatingitinamoreplannedway)andontheevidence-demandside(e.g.,advocatingforthecreationofinstitutionalmechanismsthatprivilegetheuseofresearchevidenceandbuildingcapacitytofindanduseresearchevidenceefficiently).Socialnetworkanalysiscanhelptoidentifyexistingorpotentialknowledgebrokersaswellastheircontactsamongthoseworkingonboththeevidence-supplysideandevidence-demandside.
Atthegloballevel,ensurethatnetworkthinkingisintegraltotheiDSIMonitoring,Evaluation&Learning(MEL)framework.JessicaShearerhasbeenworkingwithiDSItodevelopandpilotmethodsandtoolsformeasuringthe‘network’levelofiDSI,i.e.the‘effectivepartnerships’intheiDSITheoryofChange,andwillbepresentingpilotnetworkassessmentfindingsin2016.AsiDSIitselfplaystheroleofknowledgebrokeringlobalandnationalcontexts,networkthinkingwillhelpusunderstandandmanagetradeoffsbetweenparallelobjectives(suchasefficiency,effectiveness,andcountryownership),andidentifyandfostermorediverseconnectionsforinnovation.Atthecountrylevel,weshallincludesocialnetworkanalysisasindicatedaboveasaroutinepartofscopingforcountrypracticalsupportprojects.ThiswillfocusonidentifyingandinfluencingthekeyplayersatthecountrylevelwhoarestrategicallybestplacedtosupportiDSIastoenable“betterdecisionsforbetterhealth”.iDSIwillcontinuetosupportthestrengtheningofinstitutionalmechanismsforevidence-informedpolicymaking.Inparticularweshallfocusonbuildingthetechnicalandinstitutionalcapacityofknowledgebrokersincountries,includingthecapacitytoconveneandhand-holdotherevidenceproducerstogetherwithevidenceconsumers(decisionmakers).Insummary,networkthinkingcanbothhelpiDSIbecomeabetterknowledgebroker(globallyandatcountrylevel),andalsohelpusidentifyotherknowledgebrokers(atcountrylevel).
Enhancingevidenceproducers’policy-relevanceSupporttheevidencesupply-sideinvariousways,includingto:
• citesignalsthatyou’rehearingfromatleastsomepartsofgovernmentthatresearchevidenceisvaluedasakeyinputtothepolicyprocessand‘audit’keydecisionsbygovernmentagainsttheresearchevidenceavailableatthetimeofthedecision;
• organizeandactonresearchpriority-settingprocessesandconductresearchinpartnershipwithpolicymakersandstakeholderstoensurethatresearchisrelevanttopolicymaking(Lomasetal.,2003)
• communicateresearchevidenceeffectively,bothbypackagingitbetteranddisseminatingitinamoreplannedway
• developingorusingone-stopshopsforlocalevidenceandusingone-stopshopsforpre-appraisedglobalevidence
Theevidencesupply-sideforiDSIincludesiDSIdeliverypartnersattheinternationallevel(e.g.academicpartnerssubcontractedtodeliverknowledgeproducts),aswellasLMICtechnicalandacademicpartnersatthecountrylevel.SomeofthebestpracticeslistedherearetheveryessenceofiDSIpracticalsupport,whereiDSIdeliverypartnersworkhand-in-handwithLMICdecisionmakersaswellasresearcherstogenerate,synthesiseandadaptglobalandlocalevidenceinacontext-andpolicy-relevantway(forexample,HITAPworkingwithIndonesianpartnerstodevelopandarticulatethepolicyrelevanceofHTAanalyses;NIworkingwithChinesecounterpartstoadaptinternationalclinicalguidelinesintoruralclinicalpathwaysandpaymentsystems).Withrespecttoknowledgeproducts,toensurethatiDSIeconomicevaluationresearchcontinuestobedemand-driven,HITAPhasin2015surveyedLMICresearchersonhigh-prioritymethodologicalandtechnicalissues(Luzetal,inpreparation).Basedontheseidentifiedissues,HITAPisnowdevelopingtheGEAR(GEAR(GuidetoEconomicAnalysisandResearch)database,aninnovativeandinteractivewikiplatformthatallowsaimedatLMICresearchersandtechnicaladvisers,andwhichcanbothservemultiplefunctionsas:
• aone-stopshopforhealtheconomicmethodologyevidence,presentedinanaccessibleformat(e.g.tabularpresentationofdifferentglobalandnationalreferencecasesforeconomicevaluation);
• arapidresponseservice,witha7-dayresponsetimetoretrieveevidenceforquestionsthatarenotyetinthewikibuthavebeenansweredelsewhere;
• a“developmentmarketplace”or“matchmaker”whereby
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 6 of 13
• convenestakeholderdialogues,citizenpanelsandotherdeliberativeprocessesthatareinformedbyresearchevidencebutalsoconsiderthetacitknowledgeandreal-worldviewsandexperiencesofstakeholders
potentialresearchersandfunderscanidentifyandtakeupunaddressedresearchquestions.
Ifsuccessful,thiscouldbeamodelforiDSItoexpandfurtherforaspectsofpriority-settingevidencetosupportpolicydecisions,outsideofeconomicevaluation,suchasthosearoundpoliticaleconomyandethics.Ingeneral,toenhancetheusefulnessandtimelinessofiDSIproductsfordecision-makers,weshould:
• Ensurethatallresearchpapershaveassociatedlayversionsfortargetedaudiences,e.g.policybriefsaimedatpolicymakers
• EncourageiDSItechnicaldeliverypartnerstoparticipateinrapidresponseandotherdemand-drivencapacity-buildingactivities,e.g.deliveringtailoredtrainingworkshopsaspartoflargerpracticalsupportprojectsinLMICs.
• IncludeLMICrepresentativesaswellasbroaderstakeholdersinthedialoguesandconsultationthroughoutdevelopmentofiDSIproducts,e.g.aswithCGDHealthBenefitsPlansroundtable,andHITAPandtheirvariouspracticalsupportoutputs(HTAanalysesinVietnamandIndonesia,andrecentlyengagingWHOglobalandregionalrepresentativesintheconsultationforthemethodsresearchprioritiesdatabase)
• IncludeplanstoapplyknowledgeproductsinthecontextofLMICpracticalsupportprojects(preferablyattheoutsetaspartofresearchproposals),e.g.applyingevidence-informedcost-effectivenessthresholdsinIndonesiaaspartofHTAdevelopment
TohelpiDSIresearchpartnersarticulatethepolicy-relevanceoftheirproposedresearch,targetaudiencesanddisseminationplans,iDSIispilotingabriefresearchproposaltemplate(seeAppendix2)fordeliverypartnerstocompletepriortoembarkingoniDSI-fundedresearch,withaviewtorollingthisoutforallnewknowledgeproductsfrom2016.Infuture,considerincludingtheseassubgrantingconditionsorincentivesforiDSIdeliverypartners.TheiDSIEquityandEthicsWorkingGroupwithitsproposedactivitiesforaWellcomeTrustCollaborativeGrantbid(dueMar2016)isanexemplarofhowweenvisionalliDSIresearchersgoingaboutknowledgetranslation.Forexample,elicitingethicsandequityobjectivesfromstakeholdersinChinaandIndonesia;anddedicatedactivitiestowardsoptimalapproachesforstakeholderengagementthatconsiderresearchevidencealongsidetacitknowledge.
BettercommunicationforbetterhealthCommunicateresearchevidenceeffectively,bothbypackagingitbetteranddisseminatingitinamoreplannedway.Casestudiescanbeverypowerful.
InadditiontotheconsultationanddisseminationactivitiesalreadyundertakenbyiDSI(e.g.thestakeholderworkshopsheldbyHITAP),thenextphaseofiDSIwillincludededicatedcommunicationscapacityin-housewithintheiDSISecretariat(NICEInternational).Thispersonnelwillplayanimportantrolein:
• developingtheiDSIcommunicationsstrategyaswellassupportingiDSIpartnersinday-to-dayknowledgetranslationactivities(suchaseditingpolicybriefs,publishingblogpostsandnewslettersaroundiDSIproducts)
• coordinatingandleveragingthecapacitiesandreachofcommsteamsamongiDSIcorepartners(CGD,HITAP,PRICELESS)aswell
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 7 of 13
asourcorefunders(BMGF,DFID,Rockefeller)• capacitybuildingforiDSIdeliverypartners,e.g.workshopsfor
ouracademicpartnersinwritingforpolicymakersTheiDSIwebsite(‘iDSIinAction’section)isalreadyupdatedwithcasestudiesofourpracticalsupportinourflagshipcountriesincludingChina,Vietnam,IndonesiaandIndia,followingthenarrativeoftheiDSITheoryofChange.Considerproducinganannual“BetterDecisions,BetterHealth”book(alongthelinesofCGD’sMillionsSavedseries)toshowcaseexamplesofbetterpriority-settingandlessonslearnt,withcallsforsubmissionfromwiderLMICpartners.Considerdedicatedevaluationofcommunicationanddisseminationactivities,inordertoidentifywhatismostcost-effectiveanduseful.ThiscouldbetiedinmorecloselywiththewideriDSIMELframework,whichalreadywillincluderoutinemonitoringofknowledgeproductdownloadsfromtheiDSIwebsite.
AligningtheoriesofchangetosustaininstitutionalcapacitybuildingSharetheoriesofchangeandmonitoringandevaluationplansandpushforalignmentswherepossible,andthatcanprovidethetypesoflong-termfinancialsupportrequiredtocreateandsustaintheinstitutionalandtechnicalcapacityneededforevidence-informedpriority-setting.
MaketheiDSIMELframework(TheoryofChange,MELstrategy,indicators,assessmenttools)andevaluations(annualself-assessments,anddeep-diveevaluations)availableasglobalpublicgoodsontheiDSIwebsite,whilstbeingmindfulofissuesaroundsensitiveand/orconfidentialinformationinrelationtostakeholdersatthecountry-level.ContinuedialoguewithiDSI’smainfunders,BMGFandDFID,aswellasengagementwithotherglobaldevelopmentagenciessuchasWHO,theWorldBank,theGlobalFund,Gavi,toinfluencetheirstrategiesforsupportinghealthsystemsstrengtheningforpriority-setting.Inparticular,maintaincloselinkswithfunderssothattheongoingdevelopmentandrefinementofourMELframeworkcanalsoinformfunders’M&Eactivities,e.g.todevelopaunifiedscorecardonuseofevidenceandcapacitybuildingindifferentcountriesacrossdifferentinitiatives.Wehavealreadymadeprogressinthisareain2015throughourinteractionwithSEARO,whohasadoptedtheiDSITheoryofChangeintheircountry-levelHTAsupportasaresultofiDSIengagement.Continuetoengagewithotherpriority-settinginitiativessuchasJLN,DCP-3,IHMEandPriorities-2020,ataminimumkeepingeachotherinformedregardingplannedactivitiesinoverlappingcountries,andconsideringjointactivitieswhereappropriate(e.g.iDSIcontributiontoJLN-convenedworkshops;iDSIadoptingoradaptingDCP-3orIHMEproducedevidenceindeliveringitspracticalsupportwithcountrypartners)
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 8 of 13
ConclusionIniDSI’smissiontosupportevidence-informedpriority-settingforbetterhealthinLMICs,itshouldseektoenhanceknowledgetransferandexchangebyfocusingonfivekeyareas:knowingthepolicycontext,enhancingknowledgebrokers,enhancingevidencegenerators,bettercommunication,andaligningtheoriesofchange.Thepaperhasoutlinedrecommendations(drawnfromtheresearchliteratureaswellasthosearisingfromtheparticipantdiscussionsattheSeattleworkshop;Lavis2016),andreflectionsonproposedactivitiesthatwouldallowiDSItoimplementsuchrecommendations.EventhoughthenextphaseofiDSIwillnotincludeadedicatedbudgetlinefor‘knowledgetransferandexchange’,inpracticeiDSIisalreadyconductinganumberofsaidactivitiesandwillcontinuetodosothroughout2016-2018.Rathersimilarto‘capacitybuilding’,knowledgetransferandexchangeisbestnotconsideredasasingleactivity,ratheritisacomplex,iterativeprocessencompassingamultitudeofplayersandprocesses.KnowledgetransferandexchangeshouldbeembracedasaprincipleacrossallofwhatiDSIproducesandprovides,whetherpracticalsupporttocountriesorknowledgeproductsbasedonrobustacademicresearch.
Atthenationallevel,theendgoalforiDSIwillbetostrengthencountries’institutionalcapacitiesforsustainableknowledgetransferandexchange.Atthegloballevel,giventhatiDSIisuniquelyplacedasaglobalknowledgebrokerinitsownrightattheinterfacebetweenfunders,LMICdecision-makers,technicaldeliverypartners,andotherglobaldevelopmentinitiatives,ittoohasaroleincultivatingnewpartnershipsandinnovationsinareassuchasmonitoringandevaluation;anddisseminatinglearningtoaswellaslearningfromfundersandotherdevelopmentinitiatives.Indoingso,wehopetoenhancetheoverallalignmentandeffectivenessoftheglobalnetworkofinitiativesinthepriority-settingspace,andtofurtherourmissionofhelpingLMICsmakebetterdecisionsforbetterhealth.
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 9 of 13
Appendix1.ListofworkshopparticipantsFirstName LastName Company E-MailWorkshopfacillitatiorsJohn Lavis McMasterUniversity [email protected]
Jessica Shearer PATH [email protected]
iDSIteam(supplyside)Ryan Li NICEInternational [email protected]
Vicharn Panich HITAPFoundation [email protected]
Sripen Tantivess HITAP [email protected] Tritasavit HITAP [email protected]
Benjarin Santatiwongchai HITAP [email protected]
Sam McPherson Itad [email protected]
Martin Belcher Itad [email protected]
Amanda Glassman CGD [email protected]
Andrew Mirelman UniversityofYork [email protected]
Abha Mehndiratta NICEInternational [email protected]
Peter Littlejohns KingsCollegeLondon [email protected]
Nicola Barsdorf Stellenbosch,SouthAfrica [email protected]
Carleigh Krubiner R4D [email protected](supplyside)Rachel Nugent UniversityofWashington
Sujata Mishra UniversityofToronto [email protected]
Carol Levin UniversityofWashingtonDepartmentofGlobalHealth
IHMEteam(supplyside)Nancy Fullman InstituteforHealthMetrics
andEvaluation(IHME)[email protected]
Bill Heisel InstituteforHealthMetricsandEvaluation(IHME)
Roy Burstein InstituteforHealthMetricsandEvaluation(IHME)
Lauren Hashiguchi InstituteforHealthMetricsandEvaluation(IHME)
JLNteam(supplyside)Amanda Folsom R4D [email protected]
PATHteam(supplyside)Ritu Kumar PATH [email protected]
Ashwin Budden PATH [email protected]
Breese Arenth PATH [email protected]
Anja Thompson PATH [email protected]
Kammerle Schneider PATH [email protected]
Kristy Kade PATH [email protected]
Priorities2020team(supplyside) OleFrithjof Norheim Priorities2020 [email protected]
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 10 of 13
BMGF(intermediary/funder)Damian Walker BMGF [email protected]
Karolyne Carloss BMGF [email protected]
Melissa Mugambi BMGF [email protected]
Kate Harris BMGF [email protected]
Skye Gilbert BMGF [email protected]
John Grove BMGF [email protected]
Margaret Cornelius BMGF [email protected]
Thailandteam(demandside)Somsak Chunharas MinistryofPublicHealth,
Ethiopiateam(demandside)Elias Asfaw EthiopianPublicHealth
Abduljelil*joiningremotely
Reshad EthiopianHealthInsuranceAgency,FederalMinistryofHealth
Indonesiateam(demandside)Sudigdo Sastroasmoro ChairofHTACommittee [email protected]
Akmal Taher MinistryofHealth,Indonesia [email protected]
Tanzaniateam(demandside)MariamAlly Juma DirectorateofPolicy&
Planning,[email protected]
OtherTara Schuller INAHTA N/ASean Sullivan UniversityofWashington [email protected]
Lou Garrison UniversityofWashington [email protected]
Alejandro Cravioto InternationalVaccineInstitute [email protected]
Ed Mills McMasterUniversity [email protected]
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 11 of 13
Appendix2.iDSItemplateforresearchproposalsInternationalDecisionSupportInitiative
Briefoutlineofresearchworkstreams
Forallresponses,pleasenotesuggestedmaximumwordcounts
1. Proposedresearchtopic
Researchquestion Leadinginstitution(s) PrincipalInvestigator(s)
2. Whatisthescopeofthiswork?
Pleasebrieflydescribewhatactivitiesthisworkwillinvolveovereachyearofthegrant(2016-2018)andwhatoutputsyouexpectthisworktoleadto(200words)
3. Whatisthepolicyrelevance/expectedpolicyimpactofthiswork?
Pleaseoutlinehowyouexpectthisworktoinfluencepolicyorresourceallocationdecisions(inaspecificcountryorinternationally)withadescriptionofwhomyouaimtoinfluenceandhow(200words)
4. Whoisthetargetaudienceforthiswork?(100words)
5. Howdoyouproposetoengageandgetbuy-infromLMICdecisionmakers(includingpolicymakersand/orclinicians)inthedevelopmentofthiswork?
Pleaseprovidedetailsofwhomyouaimtoengageandhowyouwilldosoateachstageoftheresearchprojectasapplicable,including:scoping,projectdesign,datacollection,dataanalysis,drafting,dissemination,andimplementation(200words)
Suchactivitiesmayinclude(butarenotlimitedto):
a) Informaldiscussions,formalinterviews/meetingsorsurveyswithdecisionmakerstounderstandtheirneeds
b) Topicselectionandscopingworkshopsinvolvingdecisionmakers
c) Submissionofresearchorfundingproposalsviaformalchannels(e.g.LMICethicsboards,otherofficialresearchregulatorybodies);andinvolvingdecisionmakersandinstitutionsasnamedcollaboratorsinresearchproposals
d) Stakeholderroundtablesorpaneldiscussionstoinvitedecisionmakerinputintothedevelopmentprocess
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 12 of 13
e) Invitingdecisionmakerstobeco-authors
f) Stakeholderconsultationworkshops,andothermeansofconsultingdecisionmakerfeedbackondraftproducts
6. Howdoyouplantoengageandgetbuy-infromacademicsandresearchersfromLMICsinthedevelopmentofthiswork?(200words)
Pleaseprovidedetailsofwhomyouaimtoengageandhowateachstageoftheresearchprojectasapplicable,including:scoping,projectdesign,datacollection,dataanalysis,drafting,dissemination,andimplementation.Pleaseindicatetheircurrentplaceofwork(200words)
Suchactivitiesmayinclude(butarenotlimitedto):
g) Informaldiscussions,formalinterviews/meetingsorsurveyswithLMICresearcherstounderstandtheirneeds
h) TopicselectionandscopingworkshopsinvolvingLMICresearchers
i) InvolvingnamedLMICacademiccollaboratorsinresearchproposals
j) InvitingLMICresearcherstobeco-authors
k) Stakeholderconsultationworkshops,andothermeansofconsultingLMICresearcherfeedbackondraftproducts
7. Whatotherstakeholderengagementandcapacitybuildingactivities(ifany)areplannedforthiswork?
Pleaseprovidedetailsofactivities,withadescriptionofwhomyouaimtoinvolveandhow(200words)
8. Howmighttheoutcomeofyourstakeholderengagementactivitybemonitoredoverthecourseofthiswork?Whatroledoyouenvisageyou(orotheriDSIpartners)wouldtakeinthisprocess?
Pleaseprovidedetailsofanyexistingorplannedmechanismstomonitorandevaluateengagementwithkeystakeholders(200words)
9. Howwillthisworkbedisseminatedamongstvariouskeystakeholders?
Pleaseprovidedetailsofproposeddisseminationorknowledgetranslationactivitiesandoutputswithadescriptionofwhoyouaimtoinfluenceandhow(250words)
Disseminationorknowledgetranslationactivitiesandoutputsmayinclude(butarenotlimitedto):
a)Publicationsfortechnicalaudience(e.g.technicalreports,peer-reviewedjournals)
b)Eventsfortechnicalaudience(e.g.academicconferences,disseminationworkshops)
iDSI: Knowledge transfer and exchange 13 of 13
c)Accessibleandappliedversionsfornon-technicalaudience(e.g.laysummaries,policybriefs,targetedimplementationplans)
d)Otheraccessibleversionsfornon-technicalaudience(e.g.blog,socialmedia)
e)Stakeholderdialoguesfornon-technical(e.g.policymakerroundtables,1-to-1withministers,citizenpanels)
10. Whomightbesuitablereviewersofthiswork?
Pleaselistthenamesandcontactemails(whereknown)ofatleasttwopeople(includingatleastonepersonfromanLMICwherepossible)youthinkwouldbesuitabletoreviewthetechnicalcontentandthepolicy-relevanceofthiswork(50words)
11. HowwillyouproposetolinkthisresearchtoexistingorplannediDSIpracticalsupportprojectsinLMICs?
Pleaseindicatethecountry/countriesorregion(s)whereyourresearchcouldpotentiallybeapplied,thekindsofcapacitydevelopment(suchastraining)orimplementationactivitiesenvisioned,implementingpartners(ifknown)andanyroleyouenvisageforotheriDSIpartners(150words)
12. Pleaseprovidedetailsofcollaborationwithotherpartners(whererelevant)
Pleaselistanycollaboratinginstitutions,iDSIpartnersorresearcherscontributingtothisworkandanoutlineofthecontributiontheywillhave(150words)
Partner
(e.g.:HITAP/MahidolUniversity)
Contributiontoresearch
(e.g.:supportdraftingprojectplan/localdatacollection)