enhancement of the natural earth satellite population ...enhancement of the natural earth satellite...

21
Enhancement of the natural Earth satellite population through meteoroid aerocapture Althea Moorhead, Bill Cooke NASA Meteoroid Environment Office April 28, 2014 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140010988 2020-03-24T05:44:54+00:00Z

Upload: others

Post on 18-Mar-2020

9 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Enhancement of the natural Earth satellitepopulation through meteoroid aerocaptureAlthea Moorhead, Bill CookeNASA Meteoroid Environment OfficeApril 28, 2014

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140010988 2020-03-24T05:44:54+00:00Z

1972 Great Daylight FireballImage credit: ANSMET, James M. Baker

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Earth-grazing meteoroids

Questions:How many re-exit?How many areaerocaptured?

Ratcliff et al. (1993)Hills & Goda (1997)Hunten (1997)

Can they become naturalEarth satellites?

Granvik et al. (2012)

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 3/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

source population in-atmosphere post-atmosphere

Outline

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 4/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Number and Size

10−7 10−4 10−1 102 105 108 1011 1014 1017 102010−10

10−6

10−2

102

106

N = 3.7 KE−0.9

KE (kt TNT equivalent)

N/y

ear

Small fireball (Halliday, 1996)Lunar impacts (Suggs et al., 2014)Lunar impacts (Madiedo et al., 2014)Infrasound/acoustic (ReVelle, 1998)Satellite (Brown, 2002)Spacewatch (Rabinowitz et al., 2000)LINEAR (Harris, 2002)LINEAR (Stewart)NEAT (Rabinowitz et al., 2000)Lunar cratering (Werner et al., 2002)

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 5/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Velocity

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

10−5

10−4

10−3

10−2

10−1

v (km/s)

fract

ion

(km

/s)−

1

Radar (CMOR)All-sky (NASA & SOMN)

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 6/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Directionality

N

� ×

S

Data from NASA All-Sky Fireball Networkand Southern Ontario Meteor Network

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 7/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Directionality

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5 Anisotropy is (mostly) preserved

deflection angle (◦)

fract

ion

perh

alfd

egre

e

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 8/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

The trajectory in the atmosphere

x

yR⊕

Hbl

θ

FgFD

Compute trajectory underEarth’s gravity andatmospheric drag

~Fg = −GM⊕mr2 r

~FD = −12ρav2CdAv

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 9/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Model Earth

Earth as ellipsoid MSIS-E 90 model

0 500 1,00010−18

10−10

10−2

h (km)ρ

(g/c

c)

“in-atmosphere” = within 100 km of the surface

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 10/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Ablation

Meteoroid ablation is a function of mass and velocity(Ceplecha, 2000):

m = −σCdAρ−2/3d ρm2/3v3

Meteoroids modeled as spheres (Cd = 0.47, A = 1.21)Effective ablation coefficient (σ) includes some fragmentation

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 11/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Catastrophic fragmentation

Occurs when ram pressureexceeds material strength:

S < ρv2

Model fragmentation:20% chance offragmentation every 0.1 s0-50% reduction inprimary mass

48 Z. Ceplecha and D. ReVelle

at approximately the same heights, where also a large numberof tiny particles was released and overwhelminglycontributed to Beneov bolide radiation. This is very differentfrom the Lost City bolide, where radiation of individual largefragments was relatively more important compared to theradiation of small fragment clusters.

The terminal mass of the main body of Beneov was foundto be 2.7 kg. However, large fragments are certainly hidden inthe overwhelming radiation originating from clusters of smallfragments. Information on these larger fragments are availableonly from the study of Borovika et al. (1998), who analyzedvery large fragments from their individually discernible trails

Table 4. FM solution for the Innisfree bolide.hf m dtf dtu 8(km) (%) (sec) (sec) (c.g.s.) (s2 km2)

71.8 2.0 2.1 1.3 0.96 0.00858.1 3.8 1.0 0.5 0.86 0.00855.6 30 2.2 0.8 0.46 0.00846.2 42 2.0 0.85 0.27 0.00841 – – – 0.25 0.00838 – – – 0.65 0.00836 20 1.5 0.8 0.60 0.00834.7 11 1.5 1.1 0.48 0.00826 6 0.8 0.4 0.35 0.00623.72 61 0.32 0.26 0.38 0.00423.2 1.5 0.8 0.25 0.38 0.004

Table 5. FM solution for the Beneov bolide.hf m dtf dtu mF 8(km) (%) (sec) (sec) (c.g.s.) (%) (s2 km2)

90.4 0.016 1.2 0.50 0.023 0 0.00880.2 0.001 1.0 0.35 0.07 0 0.00877.4 0.0007 0.28 0.17 0.16 0 0.00870.1 0.05 1.0 0.20 0.23 0 0.00866.1 0.6 1.0 0.28 0.52 65 0.00766.0 3.6 1.1 0.62 0.52 80 0.00755.7 0.1 0.8 0.4 1.2 0 0.00751.5 0.001 1.0 0.2 1.6 0 0.00645.3 3.0 0.7 0.26 2.2 0 0.00639.8 14 0.46 0.28 2.0 0 0.00536.1 38 0.70 0.3 1.8 0 0.00529.5 19 0.40 0.20 1.1 0 0.00525.9 83 0.21 0.16 0.84 0 0.00524.3 97 0.55 0.10 0.43 0 0.005

Table 6. The Beneov bolide: comparison of fragmentation heights derived from FM and from intersection of trails. For the notation of fragments see Borovika et al. (1998).

FM fragmentationheight(km)

Separationheight(km) Fragment #

45.3 42 839.8, 36.1 37.5 1, 229.5 27 525.9, 24.3 24.2, 23.5 7, 6

Fig. 15. The FM computed velocity of the main body of the Innisfreebolide is compared to the single body solution.

Fig. 16. The FM computed deceleration of the main body of theInnisfree bolide is compared to the single body solution.

Fig. 17. The FM computed mass of the main body of the Innisfreebolide is compared to the single body solution with two different K.

Fragmentation model 51

Fig. 28. The FM computed mass of the main body of the Benešovbolide. The dynamically derived mass (the single body solution) isnot contained in this figure because it is extremely and unrealisticallylow (starts with 75 kg).

Fig. 29. The intrinsic ablation coefficient of the Benešov meteoroidderived from the FM fit to observation.

Fig. 30. The shape density coefficient K of the Innisfree meteoroidderived from the FM fit to observation.

Fig. 31. The intrinsic luminous efficiency of the Innisfree meteoroidcorresponding to the FM fit to observation.

Fig. 32. Comparison of the intrinsic (the FM derived) and theapparent ablation coefficient of the PN 39048 bolide.

Fig. 33. Comparison of the intrinsic (corresponding to the FM fit)and the apparent luminous efficiency of the PN 39048 bolide.

Ceplecha & ReVelle, 2005

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 12/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Meteoroid composition

Fireball meteoroid properties by type:

Type % ρd σ S

Iron 3 7.8 0.07 200

Stony 29 3.7 0.014 30

Carbonaceous 33 2.0 0.042 10

Cometary 30 0.75 0.1 1

g/cc s2/km2 MPa

Ceplecha (2001)Hills & Goda (1993)

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 13/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Surviving population

Out of 107 incident meteoroids:

Grazers Aerocaptures

27,250 10,589

Ablation 18,307 5,040

Frag. 16,754 5,146

Numbers are per year for meteoroidsgreater than 1 cm in diameter

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 14/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Simulations

Image credit: NASA

Simulations include Sun,Earth, and MoonUsed Mercury,Bulirsch-Stoer methodRandom start between J2Kand J2K + 19 years(Metonic cycle; Granvik etal., 2012)

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 15/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

End states

Leaving Earth’s Hill sphere Atmospheric re-entry

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 16/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

End states

Re-entry or escapeafter several orbits

Re-entry or escapeafter many orbits

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 17/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Steady-state population

1 10 1000

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Norbits

CDF

Using time spent in near-Earth space and in orbit:

Number

Outbound 3,000

Orbiting 1,600

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 18/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Period distribution

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

P/P%

N

aerocapturedsteady state

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 19/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Size dependence

100 101 102 103 104 10510−25

10−18

10−11

10−4

103

× gravitational capture(Granvik et al., 2012)

diameter, d (cm)

N>

d

N in Earth orbitN in Hill sphere

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 20/ 21

Source PopulationIn-atmosphere

Post-atmosphere

Conclusions and future work

0.2% of large meteoroids re-exit the atmosphereMeteoroid aerocapture can maintain a population of small(cm-sized) NES’s

∼ 3,000 in near-Earth space∼ 1,500 orbiting in near-Earth space

Gravitational capture (Granvik et al., 2012) dominates formeter-sized bodiesFuture work:

Convolve results with meteoroid directionality

Moorhead Meteoroid aerocapture 21/ 21