enhanced perinatal surveillance, georgia 2005-2010

49
Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Upload: adanne

Post on 24-Feb-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010 . Background. August 1994 the USPHS Task Force recommends use of ZDV to reduce perinatal transmission - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Page 2: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Background• August 1994 the USPHS Task Force recommends

use of ZDV to reduce perinatal transmission• HIV testing recommendations revised 2006 to

include routine opt-out HIV testing all pregnant women, repeat testing in third trimester and rapid testing during delivery

• Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance (EPS) begun in 7 states in 1995, increased to 24 jurisdictions in 1999

• Name-based reporting begins in Georgia in 2004• Georgia funded for EPS 2005-2011• July 2008 USPHS Task Force recommendations

update includes treatment options for HIV-infected pregnant women and for their infants

Page 3: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Overall goals for EPS project• Assist in timely evaluation of perinatal prevention

efforts• Monitor the implementation of the USPHS

recommendations for testing, use of antiretrovirals, and the effect of implementation of recommendations on perinatal HIV transmission

• Establish a surveillance system to collect data to allow states to respond to selected requirements of the Ryan White CARE Act

Page 4: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Methodology for EPS in Georgia• Data collected on HIV-infected pregnant women

who gave birth to a live infant 2005-2010 • HIV-infected pregnancies identified through case

report forms, birth registry match, and active case surveillance

• Eight page data collection form collects information from prenatal, intrapartum and neonatal periods

• EPS in Georgia transitioned from a population-based (2005-2006) to a facility-based surveillance system (2007-2010) to focus efforts on the seven tertiary care centers in Georgia

Page 5: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Facility-based sampling, Georgia EPS, 2007-2010

Facility City Health District

 Emory Crawford Long Hospital  Atlanta  3-2 Grady Memorial Hospital  Atlanta  3-2 Medical Center of Central Georgia  Macon  5-2 Medical College of Georgia  Augusta  6 Memorial Health University  Savanna

h 9-1

 Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital  Albany  8-2 The Medical Center Columbu

s 7

Page 6: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

EPS Georgia 2005-2010• Methodology changed

– 2005-2006 EPS review attempted for every HIV-infected pregnancy proved overwhelming

– 2007-2009 EPS review limited to seven tertiary care facilities in Georgia doing high risk obstetrics

– 2010 close-out year with fewer case investigations• Number of cases investigated decreased

– 154 in 2005, 150 in 2006– 109 (2007), 111 (2008), 118 (2009)– 69 (2010)– Cannot use the number of cases for trend analysis

• EPS data in this analysis represents a population based (2005-2006) and facility-based (2007-2010) sample of 695 HIV-infected pregnancies that resulted in 710 live births in Georgia during the years 2005-2010.

• Comparison of this Georgia sample is made with a national sample of 8,054 HIV-infected pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 7: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

HIV infected pregnant women giving birth to a live infant, by age group, Georgia, 2005-2010

13-19 20-24 25-34 >=350

50100150200250300350400

48

199

347

101

Mother’s age at delivery

Num

ber

of c

ases

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010

Page 8: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnant women, by age group,

Georgia and US

13-19 20-24 25-34 >=35 Unknown0

102030405060

7

29

50

15

06

21

49

19

5

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Mother’s age at delivery

Perc

ent

of to

tal

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 9: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV-infected pregnant women, by race/ethnicity, Georgia

and US

Black Hispanic/Latino

White Other raceUnknown

0102030405060708090 85

6 7 2 1

65

239

2 1

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent o

f tot

al

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 10: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV-infected pregnant women, by

transmission category, Georgia and US

Heterosexual contact

Injection Drug Use

(IDU)

Other Unknown0

10203040506070

37

2 3

58 46

8 8

37

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent

of to

tal

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008Heterosexual contact = heterosexual contact with a person who is HIV infected or in a high risk transmission category (e.g., IDU or MSM)

Page 11: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnant women, by marital status, Georgia and

US

Single Married SeparatedDivorced Widowed Unknown0

1020304050607080

70

21

1 2 1 5

55

15

1 1 0

28

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent o

f tot

al

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 12: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnant women, by mother’s

country of origin, Georgia and US

US Outside US Unknown0

1020304050607080 76

12 12

54

13

33

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent

of to

tal

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 13: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnant women receiving

prenatal care, Georgia and US

Prenatal care No prenatal care Unknown0

102030405060708090

100 90

4 6

90

7 3

GA 2005-2010

Perc

ent o

f tot

al

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008Prenatal care = at least one prenatal care visit prior to delivery

Page 14: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnant women, by timing of HIV

diagnosis, Georgia and US

Before pregnancy

During pregnancy

At delivery After birth Unknown0

1020304050607080

64

32

1 1 2

68

26

3 1 2

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent o

f tot

al

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 15: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnant women receiving prenatal ART*, Georgia and

US

Prenatal ART No prenatal ART Unknown0

102030405060708090 81

5 14

84

124

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent

of to

tal

*ART = antiretroviral therapyGeorgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 16: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnant women receiving intrapartum ART*,

Georgia and US

Intrapartum ART No intrapartum ART

Unknown0

102030405060708090 83

5 12

85

114

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent o

f tot

al

*ART = antiretroviral therapyGeorgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 17: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV exposed infants receiving ART* during

neonatal period, Georgia and US

Neonatal ART No neonatal ART Unknown0

20

40

60

80

100

120

87

1 12

96

2 3

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent

of to

tal

*ART = antiretroviral therapyGeorgia sample of 710 infants from 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 18: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnancies by delivery type,

Georgia and US

Vagin

al

Electi

ve C-se

ction

Non-el

ective

C-secti

on

C-secti

on, u

nkno

wn typ

e

Unkno

wn0

204060

31

59

5 3 3

40 40

152 2

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent

of to

tal

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 19: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected women reporting illicit drug use during pregnancy, Georgia and

US

Illicit drug use No illicit drug use Unknown0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

12

62

26 28

65

7

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent o

f tot

al

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 20: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected women reporting alcohol

and/or tobacco use during pregnancy, Georgia and US

020406080

2 11 2

59

26 1

143

82

0

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent

of to

tal

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 21: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of toxicology screen results among HIV infected

women, Georgia and US

Positive result Negative result

Not done Unknown0

1020304050607080

10

36

2

53

10 9 11

70

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent

of to

tal

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 22: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnant women receiving Group B

Strep (GBS) screen, Georgia and US

Group B Strep screen

No Group B Strep screen

Unknown0

10203040506070 62

3

36

55

8

37

GA 2005-2010

Perc

ent o

f tot

al

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 23: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnant women receiving Hepatitis B screen,

Georgia and US

Hepatitis B screen No hepatitis B screen

Unknown0

102030405060708090 85

0

15

71

2

27

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent

of to

tal

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 24: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnant women receiving Rubella screen, Georgia and US

Rubella screen No Rubella screen Unknown0

102030405060708090 85

0

15

68

3

29

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent o

f tot

al

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 25: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV-infected pregnant women receiving

Syphilis screen, Georgia and US

Syphilis screen No Syphilis screen Unknown0

102030405060708090 82

0

18

71

2

27

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent

of to

tal

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 26: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnant women with an STD*, Georgia and US

STD No STD or Unknown0

102030405060708090

31

69

23

77

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent o

f tot

al

*Includes presumptive or definitive diagnosis during pregnancy of Chlamydia, genital herpes, Gonorrhea, hepatitis B, syphilis and/or Trichomonas

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 27: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected pregnant women receiving prenatal care,

Georgia and US

Prenatal care No prenatal care Unknown0

102030405060708090

100 90

4 6

90

6 4

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent o

f tot

al

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 28: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected Black, non-Hispanic women receiving prenatal care, Georgia and US

90%

4%6%Georgia

Prenatal care

No prenatal care

Unknown90%

7% 3% US

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 29: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected Hispanic/Latino women receiving

prenatal care, Georgia and US

93%

2%5%Georgia

Prenatal care

No prenatal care

Unknown92%

6% 2% US

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 30: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected white, non-Hispanic women receiving prenatal care, Georgia and US

89%

7%4%Georgia

Prenatal care

No prenatal care

Unknown89%

6% 5% US

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 31: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected Black, non-Hispanic pregnant women,

by timing of HIV diagnosis, Georgia and US

Before pregnancy

During pregnancy

At delivery

After birth

Unknown

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8063

34

1

2

68

26

3

1

2

USGeorgia

Percent

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 32: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected Hispanic/Latino pregnant women,

by timing of HIV diagnosis, Georgia and US

Before pregnancy

During pregnancy

At delivery

After birth

Unknown

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8063

33

3

3

67

27

3

2

1

USGeorgia

Percent

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 33: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected white, non-Hispanic pregnant women,

by timing of HIV diagnosis, Georgia and US

Before pregnancy

During pregnancy

At delivery

After birth

Unknown

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8074

17

2

2

71

23

2

1

3

USGeorgia

Percent

4

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 34: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected Black, non-Hispanic women receiving perinatal ART, Georgia and US

80%

5%

15%

Georgia

Prenatal ARTNo prenatal ARTUnknown

84%

12%

4%US

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 35: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected Black, non-Hispanic women receiving

intrapartum ART, Georgia and US

83%

5%

12%Georgia

Intrapartum ARTNo intra-partum ARTUnknown

86%

9%5%

US

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 36: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV exposed Black, non-Hispanic infants given

neonatal ART, Georgia and US

88%

1%

11%Georgia

Neonatal ARTNo neonatal ARTUnknown

96%

2% 2%US

Georgia sample of 710 infants from 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 37: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected Hispanic/Latino women receiving

prenatal ART, Georgia and US

83%

2%

15%

Georgia

Prenatal ARTNo prenatal ARTUnknown

87%

10% 3%

US

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 38: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected Hispanic/Latino women receiving intrapartum ART, Georgia and US

75%

5%

20%

Georgia

Intrapartum ARTNo intra-partum ARTUnknown

86%

11% 3%

US

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 39: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV exposed Hispanic/Latino infants given neonatal ART, Georgia and US

73%

27%

Georgia

Neonatal ARTNo neonatal ARTUnknown

96%

2% 2%

US

Georgia sample of 710 infants from 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 40: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected white, non-Hispanic women receiving prenatal ART, Georgia and US

85%

11%

4%Georgia

Prenatal ARTNo prenatal ARTUnknown

87%

9% 4%US

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 41: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV infected white, non-Hispanic women receiving intrapartum ART,

Georgia and US

89%

7% 4%

Georgia

Intrapartum ARTNo intra-partum ARTUnknown

86%

9%5%

US

Georgia sample of 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 42: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV exposed white, non-Hispanic infants given neonatal ART, Georgia

and US

89%

11%Georgia

Neonatal ARTNo neonatal ARTUnknown

97%

1% 2%US

Georgia sample of 710 infants from 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 43: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of HIV-exposed infants receiving Pneumocystis

prophylaxis during first year of life, Georgia and US

020406080

19 7

74 45

24 31

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent o

f tot

al

Georgia sample of 710 infants from 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 44: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Proportion of infants infected with HIV through mother-to-child

transmission, Georgia and US

Infected Not infected Indeterminate*0

1020304050607080

2 1/2

45 53

2

71

27

GA 2005-2010 15 areas US 2005-2008

Perc

ent

of to

tal

*Indeterminate includes cases missing infant’s HIV statusGeorgia sample of 710 infants from 695 pregnancies during 2005-2010US sample of 8,054 pregnancies from 15 jurisdictions 2005-2008

Page 45: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Highlights• Higher proportions of HIV infected women in

Georgia EPS were Black, non-Hispanic (85%) vs. national sample (65%)

• Majority (58%) of HIV infected pregnant women in Georgia had an unknown transmission category vs. nationally (37%)

• Almost all (90%) had at least one prenatal care visit in both the Georgia and national sample

• The proportion receiving prenatal care in Georgia was comparable across races with at least one prenatal visit documented for 90% Black, 93% Hispanic/Latino and 89% white women

Page 46: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Highlights (continued)• Almost all (97%) HIV infected pregnant women in

Georgia were diagnosed with HIV before (63%) or during (34%) pregnancy, comparable to the national rates

• Most HIV infected Georgia women received prenatal ART (79%) and/or intrapartum ART (82%)

• Comparisons with national data are limited by missing data (15% and 12% for prenatal and intrapartum ART use in Georgia)

• Most (85%) HIV exposed infants in Georgia received neonatal ART, with 12% missing data

• Most (58%) HIV infected pregnant women in Georgia delivered by elective C-section compared to 40% nationally

Page 47: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Highlights (continued)• Based on this sample of 710 HIV infected

pregnancies in Georgia, 2.5% (18/710) resulted in mother-to-child (MTC) HIV transmission, comparable to the national sample rate of 2%

Page 48: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

Limitations• Facility-based sample may not accurately reflect HIV

perinatal care for all Georgia• Large proportion of unknown values for some

variables limits comparisons within category and to the national sample

• Large proportion of indeterminate HIV status for HIV exposed infants limits calculation of MTC transmission in Georgia

• Definition of heterosexual contact as sexual contact with a man known to be HIV infected or in a high risk transmission category (MSM or IDU) contributes to the high proportion of unknown transmission category

Page 49: Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance, Georgia 2005-2010

For more information on Perinatal Surveillance visithttp://dph.georgia.gov/enhanced-perinatal-hivaids-surveillance-eps

For information on HIV prevention visithttp://dph.georgia.gov/hiv-prevention-program

For more information on HIV surveillance in Georgia, visithttp://dph.georgia.gov/georgias-hivaids-epidemiology-surveillance-section