engineered solutions international rethinking the ‘waste hierarchy’ euring ian m. arbon msc,...
TRANSCRIPT
Engineered Solutions International
Rethinkingthe
‘Waste Hierarchy’
EurIng Ian M. Arbon MSc, MBA, CEng
FIMechE, FASME, FEI, FInstR
“Materials for a Greener Environment”01 November 2005IMechE HQ, London
Engineered Solutions International
EurIng Ian M. Arbon MSc, MBA, CEng, PE
FIMechE, FASME, FEI, FInstR
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
30+ years experience in delivering Energy from Waste Chairman – Energy, Environment & Sustainability Group – IMechE Chairman – Engineering Forum for Energy – ICE, IMechE, IEE, IChemE, CIBSE, EI Chairman – Renewable Power Committee, Power Industries Division – IMechE Distinguished Lecturer on “Renewable Energy & Sustainability” - ASME
Engineered Solutions International
Some Definitions
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
“’When I use a word’, Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.’”
- Through the Looking Glass (1872)
In this presentation we shall also look at the meaning of some words: ‘waste’, ‘recycle’, ‘incineration’, etc.
Engineered Solutions International
Dictionary Definitions of Waste
‘Refuse from places of human or animal habitation’
‘Anything rejected as useless, worthless, or in excess of what is
required’
‘Anything unused or not used to full advantage’
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Other Definitions of Waste
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
“Any subject or object in the categories set out in Annex 1 of the Waste Framework Directive (91/156/EEC), which the holder discards or intends or is required to discard”
- European Union
“a resource that is not safely recycled back into the environment or the marketplace.”
- ZeroWasteAmerica
Engineered Solutions International
Historical Analysis of Household Waste in UK
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Million tonnes / year 1905 1955 2005
Coal Ash 4.8 4.6 0.4
Food Waste 0.3 0.5 2.6
Glass 0.1 0.3 2.7
Paper/Card/Rags 0.1 0.7 8.5
Plastics 0.0 0.0 2.8
Metals 0.1 0.4 2.6
Garden Waste 0.0 1.0 8.5
Other 2.4 3.3 7.3
Total 7.8 10.8 35.4
Waste per capita per year
181kg 211kg 592kg
Population 43.0m 51.9m 59.8m
Engineered Solutions International
Definition of the ‘Waste Hierarchy’
1 – Reduce–
2 – Re-use–
3 – Recycle–
4 – Recover–
5 – Reject
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Definition of the ‘Waste Hierarchy’
1 – Reduce (do not generate waste items)
–2 – Re-use (find another use for the
same item)–
3 – Recycle (turn into a different item)–
4 – Recover (usually heat and power)–
5 – Reject (usually dispose to landfill)Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Analysis of the ‘Waste Hierarchy’
1 – Reduce• It would seem to be axiomatic that the best way of dealing with ‘waste’ is not to generate it in the first place!• Despite the ‘hierarchy’ having been with us for many years now, waste arisings in the UK continue to grow at around 3% per annum, so it is clearly not achieving its primary objective of reducing wastage.
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Analysis of the ‘Waste Hierarchy’2 – Re-use
• The second priority, i.e. re-using items rather than throwing them away, is also highly commendable.
• Differs from “recycle” in that it finds another use for the same item, rather than changing it into a different item.
• “Re-use” is far easier to achieve in less developed economies than it is in a sophisticated, consumer-orientated society. We live in a “throw away, disposable” society and it may take several generations to change our thinking in this area.
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Analysis of the ‘Waste Hierarchy’
3 – Recycle• The third priority, “recycling” waste products, is not as straightforward as it might appear.• Recycling involves the transformation (usually requiring energy input) of the waste product into another, different, product, e.g. the transformation of waste plastic cups into pens and pencils.
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Analysis of the ‘Waste Hierarchy’3 – Recycle (cont.)
• In some cases, the energy required in the recycling process (especially when separation, collection and transport are taken into consideration) is greater than the energy required to make the product from raw materials. This appears to be particularly true in the case of recycling paper:“It was disclosed last year that more than a third of Britain’s waste paper and plastic went to China for recycling.” – Daily Telegraph 18.07.05Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Analysis of the ‘Waste Hierarchy’
4 – Recover• “recover” is regarded by many environmentalists as a ‘bad thing’ and the option of disposing to landfill will shortly no longer be available to us!
• On the other hand, many waste products can be excellent fuels for EfW plants where some of the energy that was expended in manufacturing the product in the first place is converted to electric power.
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Analysis of the ‘Waste Hierarchy’
5 – Reject (disposal to landfill)
Landfill sites consist of depositing waste in holes in the ground which is compacted and covered with earth. Different waste fractions decompose over different time periods and in the process produce carbon dioxide, methane and numerous other trace gases. If these gases are not collected and removed, they will either leak into the atmosphere or, in some circumstances, create explosive conditions in the landfill site. Dangerous liquids may also be discharged into the surrounding water table.Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Analysis of the ‘Waste Hierarchy’
5 – Reject (disposal to landfill)
The UK is reluctantly phasing-out landfill sites, partly because it is running out of suitable landfill sites and partly because of the European Landfill Directive (2002) which will require the organic fraction of landfilled waste to be reduced by 25% by 2010, 50% by 2013 and 65% (all below 1995 levels) by 2020.
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Is the ‘Waste Hierarchy’ working?
As we have seen, the ‘Waste Hierarchy’ has some basic flaws:
The first priority (Reduce) has to be contrasted with an annual growth in waste arisings of c.3% per annum.
The second priority (Re-use) has had only limited success in a ‘throw-away’ society.
The third priority (Recycle) has been given an artificial importance by recent legislation:Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
CO2 Impact for Glass
CO2 Saving
kg/t
Reduce c.843
Re-use 550
Re-cycle (closed-loop) – UK 314Re-cycle (closed-loop) – Export 290Re-cycle (open-loop) – Bricks 66Re-cycle (open-loop) – Gl. Fibre 275Re-cycle (open-loop) – Shot Blast 19Re-cycle (open-loop) – Filtration -43Re-cycle (open-loop) – Aggregates -2
Landfill Disposal 0
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
‘Waste’
Priority
Source: Oakdene Hollins and Enviros
Engineered Solutions International
Is the ‘Waste Hierarchy’ working?
It is evident that blindly following current recycling legislation can lead to a situation which is absurd.
Every example of ‘recycling’ needs to be analysed to ensure that the process is genuinely solving the problem (e.g. reducing CO2 emissions) and not exacerbating it.
In any case, why should we continue to regard ‘waste’ as a problem; why not a ‘resource’?Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
CO2 Impact for Glass
CO2 Saving
kg/t
Reduce c.843
Re-use 550
Re-cycle (closed-loop) – UK 314Re-cycle (closed-loop) – Export 290Re-cycle (open-loop) – Bricks 66Re-cycle (open-loop) – Gl. Fibre 275Re-cycle (open-loop) – Shot Blast 19Re-cycle (open-loop) – Filtration -43Re-cycle (open-loop) – Aggregates -2
Landfill Disposal 0
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
‘Waste’
Priority
Source: Oakdene Hollins and Enviros
‘Resource’Priority
Engineered Solutions International
‘Waste’ or ‘Resource’?
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
“The past 12 months have continued to show the denial and disconnected thinking with which the Government, businesses and the public approach the subject of waste. In this country, waste is seen as an end – a dead end – rather than a means. That view has to change.”
“State of the Nation” Report - ICE (October 2005)
Engineered Solutions International
‘Waste’ or ‘Resource’?
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
“Waste is a combination of materials – our resources for tomorrow. If we extract reusable materials, what’s left is residual waste – solid material containing energy that can be released to light rooms, heat buildings and drive businesses.”
“State of the Nation” Report - ICE (October 2005)
Engineered Solutions International
‘Waste’ or ‘Resource’?
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
“A report published by ICE and the Renewable Power Association measuring the potential energy from residual waste estimated that, by 2020, 17% of all electricity could, theoretically, come from waste. A more realistic but still very significant contribution would be 10%.”
“State of the Nation” Report - ICE (October 2005)
Engineered Solutions International
In some cases, the energy required in the recycling process (especially when separation, collection and transport are taken into consideration) is greater than the energy required to make the product from raw materials. This appears to be particularly true in the case of recycling paper, for example. On the other hand, many waste products can be excellent fuels for EfW plants where some of the energy that was expended in manufacturing the product in the first place is converted to electric power. In each waste case, an energy balance should be made to calculate the net benefits of recycling or recovery.
Isn’t it always better to ‘recycle’ than ‘burn’?
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Definition of ‘Incineration’
Having looked at the abuse in the UK of the English words ‘waste’ and
‘recycle’, let’s now look at the most misused word of all in this field:
‘Incineration’
All ‘Energy-from-Waste’ plants in the UK now, by law, regardless of the
actual technology, must comply with the absurdly named ‘Waste
Incineration Directive’!Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Most people in the UK do not know the difference between ‘incineration’ and ‘combustion’. The term ‘incineration’ stems from the outdated method of
burning municipal solid waste (MSW) in order to destroy it. This thinking, in turn, derives from seeing waste as a
‘problem’ rather than as a ‘resource’; there is a particular issue here, in that
the UK Government is itself very unclear on this subject! DEFRA constantly refers
to EfW plants as ‘incinerators’ and despite public ‘consultation’ on this issue appears to have ignored the
feedback!
Is EfW a euphemism for Incineration? - 1
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
• Incineration is the process of ”burning up completely” or “reducing to ashes” - i.e. the emphasis is on destruction of the material, or at least the organic fraction;
• Combustion is “the process of burning” or “any process in which a substance reacts to produce a significant rise in temperature and the emission of light” or “a process in which a compound reacts slowly with oxygen” – i.e. the emphasis is on the (chemical) reaction taking place in the process.
Collins Concise Dictionary, Fourth Edition, Harper Collins,1999
Is EfW a euphemism for Incineration? - 2
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
• Incineration is “a volumetric waste reduction process that relies on combustion under suitable controlled conditions to reduce the volume and/or mass of [waste] material for disposal” – i.e. the emphasis is on the disposal.
• Combustion is “a chemical reaction in which fuel combines with oxygen with the evolution of heat” – i.e. the emphasis is on the chemical reaction.
Prof Andrew Porteous, Dictionary of Environmental Science and Technology, Third Edition, John Wiley &
Sons, 2000
Is EfW a euphemism for Incineration? - 3
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Examples of modern Energy-
from-Waste (EfW) Plants.
Stoke on TrentStoke on Trent
BillinghamBillingham
If these areIncinerators…
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
…then please describe this
as a Coal Incinerator!
Drax Coal-FiredPower Station,
North Yorkshire –3,400 MW from
largely importedfossil fuels.
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Peterborough Gas-Fired CCGT Station –Peterborough Gas-Fired CCGT Station –380 MW from increasingly imported fossil 380 MW from increasingly imported fossil
fuels.fuels.
… … and this as a Gas Incinerator!and this as a Gas Incinerator!
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
1) Direct Combustion
Most developed countries recognise the important contribution which can be made to EfW by the simplest, cheapest and, often, most efficient method of energy conversion, i.e. Direct Combustion.
Modern combustion plants have overcome most of the problems associated with older ‘incinerators’ and it is strange indeed that it is not included among the Advanced Conversion Technologies (ACT)! From a technical standpoint, this makes no sense whatsoever and this situation should be urgently reviewed.
State-of-the-art in energy conversion - 1
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Heat
Feed Steam turbine
Boiler
Direct combustion Solid organic fuel Components: boiler, steam turbine Proven technology Highly reliable
State-of-the-art in energy conversion - 2
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
San Ouen, ParisSan Ouen, Paris
Rotterdam
Some European examples of Direct Combustion:
State-of-the-art in energy conversion - 3
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
2) Pyrolysis
Pyrolysis is the thermal degradation of organic waste in the absence of oxygen to produce a carbonaceous char, oils and combustible gases. Although pyrolysis is an age-old technology its application to biomass and waste materials is relatively recent. An alternative term for pyrolysis is thermolysis, which is technically more accurate for waste energy processes because these systems are usually starved-air rather than the total absence of oxygen. Although the future for pyrolysis is extremely promising, there is as yet little direct operating experience with this method.
State-of-the-art in energy conversion - 4
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Pyrolysis
Feed
Liquid Solid Gas
Bio-oil (medium temp/short time)
75 12 13
Charcoal (Low temp/long time)
30 35 35
Fuel gas (high temp./medium time)
5 10 85
• solid organic fuel• absence of oxygen• thermal degradation
State-of-the-art in energy conversion - 5
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
State-of-the-art in energy conversion - 6
Compact
Power
Pyrolysis/
Gasification
System
3 High TemperatureOxidation
1 Pyrolysis
4 Energy Recovery
2 Gasification
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
3) Gasification
Gasification differs from pyrolysis in that oxygen in the form of air, steam or pure oxygen is reacted at high temperature with carbon in waste to produce a gas, ash or slag and a tar product. Although gasification is very recent in its application to waste, coal gasification of coal, is well proven. Major benefit of gasification is that product gas is used directly to fuel a gas turbine generator which forms part of a CHP or CCGT system, improving overall thermal efficiency. Main disadvantage is high capital investment and lengthy pay-back periods.
State-of-the-art in energy conversion - 7
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Gasification
Gas turbine
Gas engine
Syngas
Feed
• Solid organic fuel / gas from pyrolysis
• Partial oxidation
• Fuel gas: CO / CO2 / CH4 / H20
• Reduced NOx / dioxin formation
Gasifier
State-of-the-art in energy conversion - 8
Heat
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
State-of-the-art in energy conversion - 9
GlobalOlivineHigh
Temperature
Combustion/
GasificationSystem
CombustorUHTC
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
3) (Anaerobic) Digestion (AD)
AD is commonly used with liquid and semi-liquid slurries such as animal waste; it is also used for obtaining gas from human sewage but is now being applied to certain biomass wastes. Digestion utilises the same biological processes as a landfill but under controlled conditions in a digester system, which is a warmed, sealed, airless container where bacteria ferment organic material in oxygen-free conditions to produce biogas. Amount of biogas is limited by the size of the digester tank so is used as fuel in a gas boiler or in an engine to generate electricity.
State-of-the-art in energy conversion - 10
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Digestion
Digester
Gas turbineBiogas
Feed
• Liquid organic fuel
• Anaerobic
• CH4/CO2 fuel gas
Gas engine
State-of-the-art in energy conversion - 11
Heat
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Typical DigesterSystems
Large-scale Digester Gas Storage Tank
Small-scaleFlexible Liner Digester
State-of-the-art in energy conversion - 12
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
The growing problem of The growing problem of Waste which cannot be Waste which cannot be
landfilled.landfilled.PREP can handle all of these!PREP can handle all of these!
Proposed Peterborough Renewable Energy Plant
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Proposed Peterborough Renewable Energy Plant
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Proposed Peterborough Renewable Energy Plant
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Typical Fuel Input for PREP (1 million t/y):
Industrial/Commercial Waste410,000 t/yMunicipal Solid Waste (MSW)300,000 t/ySewage Sludge 90,000 t/yVehicle Tyres 30,000 t/yOil/Thinners (after recycling) 20,000 t/yLocally-grown Biomass150,000 t/y
Proposed Peterborough Renewable Energy Plant
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Normal Annual Outputs: 126 MW Electric Power NETT! (>1.0 TWh) Up to 58,000 m3 Concrete 145,000 t Aggregates – block products 2,500 t Non-ferrous metal ingots 30,000 t Iron & Steel 50,000 t Glass Products (tiles, filtration,
enamel etc) 12,000 t Hydrochloric Acid Up to 4000 tonnes Pure Sulphur Up to 2 tonnes Pure Mercury 725,000 MWh Renewable Obligation
Credits 1,300,000 tonnes Carbon Credits ZERO output to landfill!
Proposed Peterborough Renewable Energy Plant
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy
Engineered Solutions International
Will PREP ever be built?
After 5 years of immensely hard work, we seem to have made hardly
any progress.Often we feel like giving up but we are encouraged by the thoughts of
Mahatma Gandhi:
“First they ignore you,Then they laugh at you,
Then they fight you,Then you win!”
Rethinking the Waste Hierarchy