energy needs assessment and energy policy formulation for pro-poor community
DESCRIPTION
Energy Needs Assessment and Energy Policy Formulation for Pro-Poor Community . Technical Working Group (TWG) V Meeting Works Progress Semarang, July 10 2011. Design of Activities in TWG V. Methodology of Study. Design of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Pusat Studi Pengelolaan Energi RegionalCentre for Regional Energy ManagementPUSPER
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Energy Needs Assessment and Energy Policy Formulation for Pro-Poor Community
Technical Working Group (TWG) V Meeting Works Progress
Semarang, July 10 2011
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Activities (TWG V) Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July
Selected suitable communities-Pre study &PRA material & methodology Co
mpleted
Merapi
Volcano Haza
rd (Eru
ption) in
Yogyakart
a Region
Conduct needs assessment-FGD-PRA surveys
Identify options of needs-Evaluation
Review of available pro-poor energy policy- FGD and communication with stakeholders
Policy Energy Formulation and Program-Energy formulation program -Economic Analysis-Workshop,FGD,Data Analysis and Compilation
FGD1
FGD2
Report writing up and completionDraft
1Draft
2Final
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Design of Activities in TWG V
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Methodology of Study
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Design of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)• The information will be collected during the FGD and PRA survey (semi-
structured interview) based on the following issues for set of guideline questions.– Average daily or monthly income of rural communities, and
daily/monthly energy and other needs expanses– Form of energy which is currently used for domestic activities,
community services and local entrepreneur,– Renewable energy potentials, accessibility and constraints,– Socio-economy conditions,– The lifestyle, community social characteristics and cultural
background,– Willingness and ability to pay by community in terms of energy
installation in their household.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
• HOUSEHOLD– To assess the daily/monthly income and expenses.– To get a better insight in current energy related problems. – To calculate the energy need and its consumption (cost) for energy
and other needs.– To evaluate the energy priorities for households.– To evaluate socio-economy condition: potentials and limitations.– To formulate the available energy potentials surrounding their
village(s) that can be used as alternative energy for household.– To assess the willingness and ability to pay of community for RE
installation in household.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
• LOCAL ENTREPRENEURS– To get a better insight in current energy related problems. – To calculate the energy need and its consumption (cost) for energy.– To formulate the energy potentials surrounding their village(s).– To evaluate the priority of energy use in ranking according to the
urgency of a problem for local entrepreneurs. – To identify possible economic activities (development) that can be
operated if the new energy have been supplied to the sites. – To evaluate the willingness and ability to pay for RE installation in their
industries/production.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
• LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS (LOCAL AND REGIONAL GOVERNMENT)
– To evaluate the energy problems and energy potential source– To list the available energy policy and program– To evaluate the stakeholder rules in energy/economic program– To evaluate possible financial (credit) scheme for energy installation (if
any).
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
FGD (focus group discussion)• The main issues were discussed in this activity was:
– energy needs : summary from PRA– energy priorities in community and business opportunities
in the village(s) – willingness to pay for energy installation
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
PRA Survey• PRA Survey
– Conducted in two different locations of dusun/desa.
– Involved on field-survey: in depth interview and stakeholder analysis, sampling to households, local entrepreneurs and stakeholders.
• Stakeholders and community representative meeting
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Sampling of Respondents in PRA• Group 1 : Low income, household, work: farmer/
services• Group 2 : Medium income, household, work:
farmer/ services with additional income• Group 3 : Medium income, household, work: officer
(government)• Group 4 : Medium income, local entrepreneur in
various sectors
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Location of TWG 4 and 5
Location 1:Dusun Srumbung Segoroyoso Village Pleret DistrictBantul RegencyYogyakarta Region
Location 2:Dusun WirokertenBotokenceng Village Banguntapan DistrictBantul RegencyYogyakarta Region
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Cow-skin crackers industry
Cow-skin crackers are still cooked using fire-wood stove. Proposed RE project will be implemented to reduce the use of fire-wood stove.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Conventional drying process? Can RE energy give the solution?
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Potential renewable energy sources: animal dung from chicken, horse and cow husbandries.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Energy Use in Community
Activity
Type of Energy Supply/Source
REElec. Fuels Wood LPG Elect. Fuels Wood LPG
Cooking - - BuyBuy &
Collected
Buy -
Lighting - - PLN Buy - - -
Ironing - - - PLN - - - -
Transportation - - - Buy - - -Entertainment - - - PLN - - - -Washing - - - PLN - - - -Sewing - - - PLN - - - -Production (Local Entrepreneurs)
PLN BuyBuy &
Collected
Buy -
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Kerosene used for cooking
Cluster and class Average monthly income/production
Percentage of kerosene use from all energy
expenses
Household 1 IDR 750,000 46 %
Household 2 IDR 1,500,000 20 - 40 %
Household 3 IDR 2,000,000 0 % (only uses LPG)
Entrepreneur group 1 IDR 30 – 100,000,000 45 %
Entrepreneur group 2 IDR 5 – 15,000,000 10-12 % (some cases may up to 80 %)
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Comparison of energy use in each cluster of household and entrepreneur
Cluster and class Average monthly income/production
Percentage from monthly income or production
Household group 1 IDR 2,000,000 10 – 15 % (avg. 12 %)
Household group 2 IDR 750,000 43 %
Household group 3 IDR 1,500,000 16 %
Household group 4 IDR 1,500,000 52 %
Entrepreneur group 1 IDR 30 – 100,000,000 4 – 10 % (average 8 %)
Entrepreneur group 2 IDR 5 – 10,000,000 25 %
Entrepreneur group 3 IDR 7 – 15,000,000 52 %
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Energy Usage Priority: HouseholdPriority in Activity Energy Type
Priority 1Energy Type
Priority 2Energy Type
Priority 3
1. Cooking LPG (liquefied petroleum gas)
Firewood ---
2. Lighting Electricity Kerosene (blackout) ---
3. Transportation Petrol Solar ---
4. Ironing Electricity --- ---
5. Entertainment Electricity --- ---
6. Washing Electricity --- ---
7. Sewing Electricity --- ---
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Energy Usage Priority: Local Entrepreneurs
Priority in Activity Energy TypePriority 1
Energy TypePriority 2
Energy TypePriority 3
1. Production (cattle breeder)
Firewood Electricity ---
2. Production (cracker industry)
Firewood LPG (liquefied petroleum gas)
Direct sun (for cracker producer)
3. Lighting Electricity Kerosene (blackout)
4. Transportation Petrol Solar (mass transport)
---
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Willingness to Pay
Cluster and class Possible Investment Monthly payment (credit scheme)
Monthly Gross Income / Production
Percentage energy
expanses from monthly
income or production
Household group 1 IDR 1 – 5 millions IDR 10 – 20 thousands IDR 2,000,000 10 – 15 % (average 12 %)
Household group 2 < IDR 1 millions IDR 20 thousands IDR 750,000 43 %Household group 3 IDR 1 - 2 millions IDR 25 thousands IDR 1,500,000 16 %Household group 4 IDR 1 - 4 millions IDR 40 thousands IDR 1,500,000 52 %Entrepreneur group 1 IDR 10 millions IDR 60 – 80 thousands IDR 30 – 100,000,000 4 – 10 %
(average 8 %)
Entrepreneur group 2 IDR 5 millions IDR 20 – 50 thousands IDR 5 – 10,000,000 25 %
Entrepreneur group 3 IDR 15 millions IDR 60 – 100 thousands IDR 7 – 15,000,000 52 %
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
FGD Result: Energy problems• Increasing fossil fuel price, i.e., petrol, solar and kerosene, has
directly burdened to the community. • The energy price increase, the goods also increase. • Household must decrease the spending for energy sector,
e.g., reducing transportation activities, changing the kerosene to other type of energy for cooking, i.e., firewood and LPG; and energy saving for example limited lighting in household at night.
• For local entrepreneurs, increasing energy price causes production cost increases. As a result, they must change to other type of energy to reduce the incremental cost.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
FGD Result: Energy problems• Community in study area is still fearful to use LPG due to
increasing explosion cases in use of 3kg gas cylinder. It causes the LPG conversion program this village is not totally successful. In addition, the use of LPG for cooking activities is more expensive compared to the energy mix of LPG and firewood.
• The electricity connected from PLN grid often blackout. It may cause the disturbances in their activities at night and business. As a result, they use the kerosene for lighting when the electricity is blacking out.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Concept of Energy Program (Policy) Formulation
Needs of energy
Energy Potential
Proposed Programs/
Policies
Economic Analysis & Technology
Local Wisdom
Non & Government& Programs
LocalStakeholders
Energy Infrastructure
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Formulation Scheme on Energy Policy
Most energy priority or need
WTP
Energy potential/ source
Energy technology
ATP
Financial scheme & cash flow analysis
Energy Need
Energy program
Energy policy
Roadmap Action Plan Community Participation
Local wisdom/culture/ condition
Stakeholders analysis
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Alternative Renewable Energy Program
• Biogas for households and local entrepreneurs– Saving in cooking and production costs– (side effect) benefit from residual biogas material
of fertilizers • Jathropa Stove for households and local
entrepreneurs• SHS for house lighting
– Saving in electricity
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Schema of first proposed RE Project-Needs-Potential
Cow-skin cracker industry
Household – foods cooking
Animal manures
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Scheme of third proposed RE Project-Needs-Potential
Available Unproductive Lands
for Jatropha Cultivation
Cow-skin cracker industry
Household – foods cooking
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Schema of second proposed RE Project-Needs-Potential
Household – lighting
Adequate solar radiation
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Price of Proposed Biogas
4m3 6m3 8m3 10m3 12m3
Cow 3 4-5 6 7-8 9Estimated biogas production (m3)
1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Construction cost(million IDR)
4.720 5.290 5.920 6.890 7.400
Source: BIRU Program
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Solar Home System (200W)• 1 unit solar panel 50 wp • Cable 7 m and jack, • 1 unit electric box system (ebs) 200 w, • 1 set of electrical installation (35 m wire, fuse, etc.), • 4 set led 12 v - 2,5 w• 1 unit florescent lamp 220 v - 10 w• Price: IDR 5,000,000.00
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Jatropha StoveNo Remark Specification1 Dimension 28 x 28 x 27 cm2 Tank capacity 1.8 - 2 liter3 Fire flame Blue and red4 Fuel
consumption138 ml/hour
5 Water boiling 14 minutes/2 literPrice: IDR 175,000 – 200,000
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Investment cost of Jatropha stove
No Remark Volume Price Unit Estimated Cost
1 Roller/Presser Equipment for Jatropha Oil
1 unit Rp. 2,000,000 Rp. 2,000,000
2 Jatropha cultivation- Land 0.2 ha - -- Seed 0.4 kg Rp. 50,000 Rp. 20,000
3 Wick Stove 1 unit Rp. 200,000 Rp. 200,000Investment Total/Cost Rp. 2,220,000
Note : Land used in the proposed program is the marginal land that does not cultivated by agricultural plants for food or commercial purposes.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Workshop and Focus Group Discussion on Proposed Energy Programs
• Workshop:– Solar panel (SHS)– Biogas
• Focus Group Discussion:– Stakeholders– Community (representatives)– Local entrepreneurs
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Response from Community (Household) on Option of Proposed Energy Programs
B. Jatropha Stove for cooking (household)
C. Solar Home System (SHS) for lighting
A. BIOGAS for household and local entrepreneurs.
87%
10%3%
ABC
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Reason for choosing the biogas• Household has the energy potential for biogas, i.e., cow (1-4
cow) and chicken (10-30 chicken).• Biogas installation also produces the additional economic
values, i.e., organic fertilizer from the biogas.• The energy potential is provided in household and
surrounding area.• Biogas installation can be managed (constructed and
maintained) easily compared to others RE installation.• Investment cost is not quite expensive.• Operation cost is not high and the maintenance is
effortlessness.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Some notes from FGD (Community and Local Entrepreneur Response) for RE installations
• Biogas– community gives the impressive response for biogas
installation, but they need to look at the real example on the success story of biogas directly.
– for this installation, the subsidy scheme is preferred.
• SHS– The technology is quite complex, they concern in the
maintenance.
• Jatropha– The supply of Jatropha seed is not adequate in the market.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Willingness to Pay• WTP is the maximum amount of money that
individual/household states that they are willing to pay for a good/services.
• The three methods:1) observation in the price that people pay for goods or services in
various market/cases.2) observation in individual expenditures of money, labor, etc. to obtain
the particular goods or services3) asking the people directly what they are willing to pay.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Willingness to Pay (WTP)Cluster and class Possible Investment Monthly payment
(credit scheme)Monthly Gross Income /
Production
Household group 1 IDR 1 – 5 millions IDR 10 – 20 thousands IDR 2,000,000
Household group 2 < IDR 1 millions IDR 20 thousands IDR 750,000
Household group 3 IDR 1 - 2 millions IDR 25 thousands IDR 1,500,000
Household group 4 IDR 1 - 4 millions IDR 40 thousands IDR 1,500,000
Entrepreneur group 1 IDR 10 millions IDR 60 – 80 thousands IDR 30 – 100,000,000
Entrepreneur group 2 IDR 5 millions IDR 20 – 50 thousands IDR 5 – 10,000,000
Entrepreneur group 3 IDR 15 millions IDR 60 – 100 thousands IDR 7 – 15,000,000
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Ability to Pay (ATP) for Biogas• Some measure of "ability to pay" is typically used for
determining the level of community capability to provide their own money to contribute in the program and for estimating the subsidy, grants or loans to be made available to projects.
• The "ability to pay" analysis is a definition based on the amount that households pay for energy cost in cooking relative to "residual income". Residual income is defined as the amount remaining from household income after payment of housing costs.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Equation• ability to pay factor = average energy cost paid
for cooking ÷ residual income in IDR• residual income = household income - home
payment – non-cooking utilities – tax (etc.)
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
No Analysis Cost Annual Cost
1 Income 1,050,000 12,600,000
2 Expenses
a. Housing costs 775,000 b. Taxes 25,000 c. Energy costs 170,000 d. Others 0
Total: 970,000 1,1640,0003 Residual income 80,000 960,0004 Energy for cooking 52,000 624,0005 ATP factor 0.65
6 90 % Percentile of Annual ATP - cost of energy (cooking) per residual income (1) 0.677
7 Annual ATP 649,920
8 ATP to biogas (monthly)1 54,160
9 Design formulation: Annual ATP - cost of energy (cooking) per residual income (2) 0.423
10 Annual ATP 406,08011 ATP to biogas (monthly)2 33,840
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
(1) Percentile Analysis:Sample data from survey of annual residual income and annual
cost of energy cost for cooking
No. Household Monthly Income Annual Income Annual Cost for
CookingAnnual residual
income
Annual “energy cost for cooking"
per IDR 100 residual income
1 1500000 18000000 432000 924000 46.75324675322 970000 11640000 888000 1212000 73.26732673273 1050000 12600000 624000 960000 65.00000000004 1220000 14640000 432000 2088000 20.68965517245 2850000 34200000 864000 5376000 16.0714285714… … … … … …… … … … … …
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Percentile computation for annual "cost for cooking" per IDR 100 residual income
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Annual cost for cooking per IDR 100 residual income
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
(2) Equation
Design of ATP factor = average ATP – 1.28
Computation Example:• Average ATP factor = 61.84• Deviation = 15.30• Design of ATP factor = 0.42
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Calculation of ATP
No. Group Annual Income ATP factor
Ability to Pay (IDR)
Percentile Formulation1 < IDR 1,000,000.00 0.623 60,591.50 37,858.502 IDR 1-2,000,000 0.878 50,726.64 31,694.793 > IDR 2,000,000 0.161 303,296.00 189,504.004 All income class 0.755 77,956.55 48,708.45
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Stakeholder Analysis• Participation and rule of
stakeholder involved in the program.
• SWOT Analysis: Planning to Implementation
• Evaluation on Project Sustainability
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Energy program
Tujuan: Meningkatkan akses energi di masyarakat dengan memanfaatkan potensi energi
yang ada disekitarnya.Target: Masyarakat dapat memanfaatkan energi
(EBT) dalam aktivitas kehidupan sehari-hari sehingga bisa dapat mengurangi pengeluaran.
Community
Energy Policy
Bentuk (finansial) program:1Program pemerintah
2Swadaya masyarakat3Subsidi-Grant & swadaya masyarakat
Government
Local stakeholder
Community leader
Community org.
LSM
University
Donor
Bank/Financial Inst.
Stakeholders
Diagram 1: Keterikatan stakeholder dalam kebijakan/program
TOPIK DISKUSI 1: Apakah setuju dengan unsur stakeholder yang terlibat untuk kebijakan/program uang diusulkan?
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Policy Program Implementation
Strength Weakness (Constraint)
Opportunity Treat
SWOT ANALYSIS
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Strengths (internal) Weaknesses (internal)1. Availability of Renewable energy potential (EBT) in
village2. Mutual cooperation (social-gathering) in community 3. Possible community participation (limited) in providing the
funding and material
1. Lack of knowledge in renewable energy technology.2. No example of successful pilot project.3. Very limited funding for investment (household).4. Lack of knowledge in renewable energy potential in
surrounding area and its utilization.5. No example for energy program contributes directly
to community economic improvement.6. No institutional coordination for renewable energy
development in region.7. Uncertainty in credit scheme for renewable energy
installation by financial unit /bank.8. Limited own-funding by community.9. Lack of awareness in energy saving and renewable
energy (community).10. Distance of house and stall location (biogas)11. Lack of practical knowledge in biogas.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Opportunities (external) Threats (external)1. Federal and regional government have expressed
interest in renewable energy development to be priority in recent years.
2. Universities are looking for internship opportunities for their students for community development.
3. Restructuring in Federal government (initiating the directorate general in renewable energy sector).
4. BIRU program for biogas development in village (household scale).
5. National and regional renewable energy target in energy mix for 2025.
6. Renewable energy technology is more accessible and not expensive.
7. Energy self-sufficient village is potential program can be initiated.
8. RE technologies and installation have been developed in line with the community development in economic.
9. Community development for residual product of biogas for fertilizer
1. Less market on biogas fertilizer 2. The demand for biogas exceeds the supply of
potential skilled labors and capability of subsidy (funding)
3. There is less federal and regional subsidy money available for biogas installation in villages.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Stakeholder participationStakeholder Participation
Regional government Socialization and campaign in energy saving and renewable energy.
Provide the RE pilot project for model and example successful installation.
Provide subsidy in RE investment and give the solution on credit rule for RE installation.
Provide the community assistance in RE development.
Supervising the implementation of the proposed energy project.
Local stakeholder Socialization and campaign in energy saving and renewable energy.
Provide the community assistance and development in RE development.
Provide effective communication and supervision in the implementation of the proposed energy project.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Stakeholder participationStakeholder Participation
University Provide training and education facilities for capacity building in development of energy alternative.
Mentoring and assisting in operational of energy alternative.
Improving an applied research, technology (practice) and development of energy alternative.
Provide the community assistance, empowerment and development in RE development
NGO Socialization and campaign in energy saving and renewable energy.
Provide the community assistance, empowerment and development in RE development.
Finding the alternative funding and subsidy for RE development.
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Proposed Financial Scheme
A: Subsidy/Grant from government and donor institution.B: Limited investment from community own-funding.C: Credit/soft loan with soft-interest rate.D: Total community own-funding.
Scheme PercentageResponse
from community
Percentage
A : B : C 30 % : 30 % : 40 % Agreed 26 %A : B 30 % : 70 % Agreed 8 %A : C 30 % : 70 % Agreed 66 %D 100 % Rejected ---
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Soft-loan financial calculationLoan (IDR)
3,7000,000
Interest Rate 5.00%
Period 8 years
Month Payment Monthly Loan Interest Main Loan Residual Loan1 46841.70404 31425.03738 15416.66667 31425.03738 3668574.9632 46841.70404 31555.97503 15285.72901 62981.01241 3637018.988
3 46841.70404 31687.45826 15154.24578 94668.47068 3605331.529… … … … … …94 46841.70404 46261.02841 580.6756302 3606898.877 93101.1228395 46841.70404 46453.7827 387.9213451 3653352.66 46647.3401396 46841.70404 46647.34013 194.3639172 3700000 0
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Comparison with conventional loan
Conventional Loan
Rate of interest: 12.5 %
Loan: IDR 3.7 million
Period: 6 Year
Monthly Payment:IDR 89,930.56
Soft-Loan
Rate of interest: 5 %
Loan: IDR 3.7 million
Period: 8 Year
Monthly Payment:IDR 46,842.00
PRA & FGD
ATP: IDR 48,708.451
WTP: IDR 40,0002
1 ATP calculation for all household income2PRA survey (the maximum value ranging from IDR 10 – 40,000)
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Comparison with “Without Biru Program Scenario”
Without Biru Subsidy-1
Rate of interest: 5 %
Loan: IDR 5.7 million
Period: 8 Year
Monthly Payment:IDR 72,151.54
Soft-Loan with Biru
Rate of interest: 5 %
Loan: IDR 3.7 million
Period: 8 Year
Monthly Payment:IDR 46,842.00
Without Biru Subsidy-2
Rate of interest: 5 %
Loan: IDR 5.7 million
Period: 13.5 Year
Monthly Payment:IDR 48,456.62
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
“Arisan” scheme
Month Collected money per month Collected money received by
1 IDR 3,000,000 HH 12 IDR 3,000,000 HH 2
3 IDR 3,000,000 HH 3
… … …60 IDR 3,000,000 HH 60
• Involved household 60 households (HH)• Payment per month per household IDR 50,000.00• Target per collected money IDR 3,000,000.00• Period (at one round, each household only has opportunity to
receive one “collected money”) 60 months
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Recommendation: Roadmap Instruments on Energy Policy for Community
Community Response
Financial Scheme
Roadmap of Energy
Policy
Economic Analysis
Local Wisdom
SWOT
StakeholderParticipation
Analysis
Ener
gy
Infra
stru
ctur
e
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
Next activities• Completing the final report: correction, revision and
finalization (July – 8 August 2011)• Submit the final report (August/September 2011)
PUSAT STUDI PENGELOLAAN ENERGI REGIONAL
THANK YOUENERGY FOR PROVERTY ALLEVIATION