UNCLASSIFIED

2

The Context: Strategic EnvironmentThe Context: Strategic Environment

Homeland Defense

Cyber Threats

Rising Powers

Humanitarian Assistance

WMD Proliferation

Current Conflicts

3Sources: BP Statistical Review Year-End 2004 and Energy Information Administration; Environmental Action; BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2011 Reserves-to-production ratios

Dynamic energy markets have geopolitical, fiscal, and strategic implications

The Context: Global Energy Supply and The Context: Global Energy Supply and DemandDemand

The Context: DoD Fiscal ChallengesThe Context: DoD Fiscal Challenges

4

$400B

Defense Energy ChallengesDefense Energy Challenges

5

New capabilities with growing energy needs

Implications for sustainment

Legacy equipment

Energy Choke Points High and Volatile Prices Threats to fuel projection

affect power projection AirSea Battle

Complicated distribution networks

Tactical fuel logistics in contested battlespace

Inefficient equipment in theater adds to burden

Defense Energy OpportunitiesDefense Energy Opportunities

6

Improved routing and flight profiles

Optimized cargo loading and center of gravity

Engine wash / less drag

Hybrid electric drives in LHDs, LHAs, and DDGs

Better hull and propeller coatings and stern flaps

UUVs

Centralized power generation

Energy-efficient shelters, lighting, and heating/air conditioning

Fielding of advanced power distribution

Tactical Solar

GOAL: to assure that U.S. armed forces will have the energy they require for 21st century military missions

The DoD Operational Energy StrategyThe DoD Operational Energy Strategy

Reduce Demand for Energy in Military Operations

Expand and Secure the Supply of Energy to Military Operations

Build Energy Security into the Future Force

More Fight, Less Fuel

More Options, Less Risk

More Capability, Less Cost

Operational Energy is Operational CapabilityOperational Energy is Operational Capability

8

Gen James Mattis12 July 2011

Gen John R. Allen11 December

2011

Leadership stands behind capability improvements through operational energy

Measure Operational Energy Consumption Improve Energy Performance and Efficiency Promote Operational Energy Innovation Improve Operational Energy Security at Fixed

Installations Promote the Development of Alternative Fuels Incorporate Energy Security Considerations into

Requirements and Acquisition Adapt Policy, Doctrine, PME, and CCMD Activities

Implementation Plan Implementation Plan

9

Near, Mid, and Long-Term GoalsEnergy Security for the Warfighter

Operational Energy Capability Improvement Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund PE 0604055D8Z Fund PE 0604055D8Z

Mission: Fund innovation to improve operational effectiveness via science & technology investments to improve energy performance of our forces. Incentivize long term change in line with OE Strategy.

Technical Goal – Develop or demonstrate and rapidly transition new operational energy technologies and practices that will improve military capabilities and reduce costs.

Institutional Goal – Establish within the Services a sustainable DoD capacity that will continue those innovations. This PE provides “seed funds” to establish/consolidate programs that will be sustained by the Services.

The Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund Complements OEPP’s oversight role

The Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund Complements OEPP’s oversight role

Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund Basic Concept for FY 12Basic Concept for FY 12

Programs to develop or demonstrate technologies or practices that will reduce the energy load of expeditionary outposts• Load is the final use of energy that drives the entire demand• FOBs, Combat Outposts and patrol bases for combat, stability and

humanitarian operations

Key and unusual features• Looking for Programs, not just a series of projects• Strongly encourage leveraging and involving non-traditional innovators

Programs to be executed through RDT&E organizations, not OSD

OEPP will fund this set of programs for 3 fiscal years

Program Proposals Received Program Proposals Received

32 Program Proposals Received Via:• 22 - Service Energy Offices (16 Army, 4 Navy, 2 Air Force)• 9 - COCOMs (5- SOUTHCOM, 2 CENTCOM or

CENTCOM/EUCOM,1 PACOM, 1 AFRICOM)• 1 - DOD-DOE MOU Executive Committee

Considerable overlap and complementarities• Combined 6 Army and AF proposals into one shelters program• Combined PACOM testbed proposal with comprehensive

expeditionary outpost proposal from DOE/Oak Ridge

Resulting in 5 Programs

Five OECIF ProgramsFive OECIF Programs

Two focused on improving heating and air conditioning equipment for expeditionary outposts

• Innovative Cooling Equipment (ICE) Development/Demonstration Program; led by Army Communications Electronics Research, Development, and Engineering Center

• Navy Expeditionary Technology Transition Program; led by Naval Facilities Engineering Command Expeditionary Program Office

Two focused on energy efficient shelters• Advanced, Energy Efficient Shelter Systems for Contingency Basing and

Other Applications; led by Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center

• Super Energy Efficient Containerized Living Unit (SuperCLU) Design and Development; led by Naval Facilities Engineering Command

One to identify and assess technology to reduce energy load of expeditionary outposts in tropical environments

• Transformative Reductions in Operational Energy Consumption (TROPEC); led by PACOM

Two Complementary EffortsTwo Complementary Efforts

Project to establish a quantitative baseline for energy use in Afghanistan and test an array of energy related technology• Led by Army Research Development and Engineering Command

– Field Assistance in Science and Technology Center – Bagram Air Base

Program to develop efficient, deployable waste to energy systems• Teamed with SERDP to fund four projects towards this goal.

On July 22nd, 2010, Deputy Secretary Poneman and Deputy Secretary Lynn signed an Energy Security MOU to better leverage the resources, expertise, and capabilities of both agencies to achieve our respective missions.

This partnership can help propel research, development, and deployment of new energy technologies that will assure DOD access to reliable supplies of energy to meet both operational and installation energy needs. It can also help DOE propel new technologies into the marketplace at a faster pace.

Joint activities under the MOU now cover a wide range of areas, including energy storage, microgrids, vehicle technologies, tactical renewable energy technologies, and systems to reduce overall fuel demand at our forward operating bases.

DOE-DOD Energy Security MOUDOE-DOD Energy Security MOU

15

“Quick Wins”• Operational Energy policy memo to commanders from

USPACOM senior leadership• Operational energy considerations in TERMINAL FURY 2012• Energy-efficient equipment in CRIMSON VIPER

USPACOM Action Plan to Implement Operational Energy Strategy and Improve Energy Security for Warfighters• Governance Structure• Analysis• Planning• Security Cooperation• Exercises and Training

USPACOM Operational Energy SummitUSPACOM Operational Energy SummitMarch 6-7 2012 OutcomesMarch 6-7 2012 Outcomes

16

http://energy.defense.gov

facebook.com/sharon.e.burke

asd_sharonburke

17

BACKUPBACKUP

18

Improved Heating And Air Conditioning Improved Heating And Air Conditioning Equipment For Expeditionary OutpostsEquipment For Expeditionary Outposts

Innovative Cooling Equipment (ICE) Development/Demonstration Program; led by Army Communications Electronics Research, Development, and Engineering Center

Navy Expeditionary Technology Transition Program; led by Naval Facilities Engineering Command Expeditionary Program Office

Advanced, Energy Efficient Shelter Systems for Contingency Basing and Other Applications; led by Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center

Super Energy Efficient Containerized Living Unit (SuperCLU) Design and Development; led by Naval Facilities Engineering Command

Energy Efficient SheltersEnergy Efficient Shelters

20Current

InsulationHigh Performance

Insulation

Solar Fly with Flexible Photovoltaics

Advanced Shelter Lighting Advanced Solar Barriers

Transformative Reductions in Operational Energy Consumption (TROPEC); led by PACOM

Reducing Demand for Tropical Expeditionary OutpostsReducing Demand for Tropical Expeditionary Outposts

21

Examples of LeveragingExamples of Leveraging

ICE led by Army CERDEC, teamed with Navy ONR

Navy Expeditionary Technology Transition led by Navy NAVFAC, teamed with ARPA-E

Advanced Energy Efficient Shelters led by Army Natick, teamed with AFRL and Army Construction Engineering Research Lab

TROPEC led by PACOM, teamed with USMC Pacific Experimentation Center and DOE Oak Ridge and Lawrence Berkeley

Two Complementary EffortsTwo Complementary Efforts

Project to establish a quantitative baseline for energy use in Afghanistan and test an array of energy related technology• Led by Army Research Development and Engineering Command

– Field Assistance in Science and Technology Center – Bagram Air Base

Program to develop efficient, deployable waste to energy systems• Teamed with SERDP to fund four projects towards this goal.

OECIF POC: john.jennings@osd.milOECIF POC: john.jennings@osd.mil

Energy for a Globally Active ForceEnergy for a Globally Active Force

24

Afghanistan76.2M Gallons

$231.4MVessels Afloat168.6M Gallons

$510M

Germany54.4M Gallons

$164.4M

Greenland4.6M Gallons

$14.1M

Guam18.4M Gallons

$55.6M

Italy14.6M Gallons

$44.4MJapan

55.9M Gallons$169.2M

Kyrgyzstan41.6M Gallons

$126.1M

Spain40.6M Gallons

$123.1M Iraq94.5M Gallons

$285.7MQatar

93.1M Gallons$282.2M

UAE65.0M Gallons

$199.0M

Defense Fuel Supply Sales By Country(January-April 2011)

1,538,127,144 Gallons of Fuel in 4 months