endgame for the eurozone? - unctad | homeunctad.org/meetings/en/presentation/tdb59_item...

20
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Trade and Development Board Fifty-ninth session Geneva, 17–28 September 2012 Item 4: Interdependence: Coorinating stimulus for global growth Endgame for the Eurozone? Tuesday, 18 September 2012 Professor Costas Lapavitsas, School of Oriental and African Studies, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UNCTAD.

Upload: doquynh

Post on 17-May-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT

Trade and Development Board Fifty-ninth session

Geneva, 17–28 September 2012

Item 4: Interdependence: Coorinating stimulus for global growth

Endgame for the Eurozone?

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

Professor Costas Lapavitsas,School of Oriental and African Studies,

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UNCTAD.

Endgame for the Eurozone?

Costas LapavitsasSOAS/RMFSeptember 2012

Unusual nature of EMU

Not merely a system of fixed exchange rates

A formal alliance to create an international reserve currency – the main competitor to the US dollar.

A formal alliance to create a domestic monetary standard – the national money of 17 sovereign states.

Inherent weakness

International and domestic roles of the euro clash with each other.

The changes needed to make them compatible are highly unlikely given the social, political and institutional conditions in Europe.

Domestic Euro - International Euro

The domestic euro is managed by the ECB via interest rates and controls on credit provision

The international euro is not directly managed. It is supposed to be non-existent within the EMU. No reserves required.

In effect, international money has reappeared within the EMU

For the euro to work

The factors affecting its international functioning must be eliminated within the EMU – diverging inflation, imbalances in current accounts and capital flows.

The factors affecting its domestic functioning must be handled by the ECB according to each country’s specificities.

‘International’ functioning within EMU

Systematic divergence in competitiveness/inflation

Systematic imbalances in current accounts

Sudden and violent shifts in capital flows

Unit labour costs/Inflation, core-periphery

Current account deficits, core-periphery

German ‘other’ capital flows by region

Outcome: Core vs periphery split

Periphery has accumulated euro-denominated debt for ‘international’ and ‘domestic’ reasons. The debt is held publicly and privately.

Peripheral debt appears entirely ‘domestic’, since it is denominated in euro, but much of it is in reality ‘international’.

EU policy toward the periphery

Fix ‘international’ malfunctioning through austerity, privatisation, liberalisation.

Replace private flows from abroad with official flows the ECB and EFSF as well as by ELA.

Target 2 flows

Results:

‘International’ functioning dominates ‘domestic’ functioning - crisis.Collapse in demand, huge social costs, debt position has worsened. Shortage of domestic private credit as banks hoard liquidity with ECB.Tightening of links between national banks and nation states.

Bank fixed-term deposits, Eurosystem

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

450000

2000

W01

2000

W19

2000

W37

2001

W03

2001

W21

2001

W39

2002

W05

2002

W23

2002

W41

2003

W07

2003

W25

2003

W43

2004

W09

2004

W27

2004

W45

2005

W10

2005

W28

2005

W46

2006

W12

2006

W30

2006

W48

2007

W14

2007

W32

2007

W50

2008

W16

2008

W34

2008

W52

2009

W18

2009

W36

2010

W01

2010

W19

2010

W37

2011

W03

2011

W21

2011

W39

Euro Million

Deposit Facility, Euro area (changing composition), Euro Fixed‐term deposits, Euro area (changing composition), Euro

Peripheral bank holdings of public bonds

Could it be done otherwise?

Marshall plan for the periphery to raise productivityRebalancing the German economyDebt forgivenessRestructuring financeIncome and wealth redistribution

Little chance of this happening, hence a break-up is likely

Greece – a depression

Huge reduction in labour costs

Disappearance of liquidity

Vast contraction of public spending

Persistent debt – public and private

Contraction of all sources of demand

Current outlook in Greece is unsustainable

Output contraction, 2008-11: 14%, 2012: 7-9%, 2013: perhaps 5-7%

Unemployment: Adult >24%, Youth > 55%

Public debt: 2012 perhaps 160%, 2013 perhaps 170%

A humanitarian crisis in urban centres

Outcomes?

Greek default and exit from EMU in 2012-3 taking command over ‘domestic’ money and treating euro as ‘international’ money

Economic, social and political instability for a long time

First step in unravelling of EMU.