end of regions final version
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The End of Regions?
What new role for cities?:
the case of England
Kevin Richardson
www.slideshare.net/30088
![Page 2: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
EU Context• EU Parliament / Committee of Regions; increased co-decision following
TFEU – but what real power compared to EU Council?
• Only limited examples of significant / constitutional regional government (AU, DE, BE?); exceptions often based on identity (Scotland, Cataluña etc)
• Few (if any) examples of genuine functioning regional economies.Regional geography (often) defined by statistical (i.e. artificial) NUTS 1 boundaries (e.g. England, RO, PL, HU?)
• Sufficient institutional capacity within DG REGIO to ‘manage’ growing number and widening characteristics of regions (including continued accession). New ‘regions’. Experiments with ‘macro’ and cross border ‘regions’ (Interreg / EGTC)
• Regulations allow delegation of EU funds to cities…but rarely / not used
• Trend away from grants and towards greater use of risk based investment finance (JESSICA, JEREMIE etc)
![Page 3: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Bonfire of the Regions
May 2010 (Con / Liberal)
• Regional Development Agencies
• Regional Spatial Strategies (inc. housing &
transport)
• Regional offices of Central Government
• Regional Business Link (enterprise agencies)
• Regional Funding Allocations
• Regional Tourism Boards
• Nationalisation of Employment Programmes and
Inward Investment
• Nationalisation of all funding for technology and
regeneration, including European Social Fund
![Page 5: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
History: Regional Government in England
• ‘14 – administrative / ‘military’ regions
• ’79 – (CON) neo-liberalism, end of spatial strategies
• ’94 – (CON) Government Offices for the Regions (GOs)
• ’97 onwards – (LAB), formal regional government for Scotland, Wales & N Ireland; and indirectly (unelected) Regional Assemblies & many new regional strategies & institutions (including RDAs) in England
• ’04 North East referendum farce (78% ‘No’; all 25 districts reject proposal for formal regional government, including Newcastle as a the Core City)
![Page 6: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
OECD Review of Newcastle
in the North East (2006)
• central government is the ‘dominant actor’ in regional development
• no national spatial strategy for either regions or cities
• only a small number of central departments engaged in regional development; most remain focussed on design, funding and delivery of standard services to people and firms regardless of their location
• funds for regional economic development tiny when compared to other mainstream budgets
• sub national agencies with only very limited authority & autonomy
• existing artificial boundaries of institutions increasingly not reflective of functioning economic areas (at all levels of geography)
• a ‘democratic deficit’ and a lack of public legitimacy in some of these agencies preventing those bodies from making difficult choices
• public identities rooted much more in parochialism than regionalism
![Page 9: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Sub National Review (Phase 2) ‘09- ‘10 (Labour)
• The beginnings of renationalisation; e.g. Technology Strategy Board, Strategic Investment Fund, Business Support Simplification Project, UK Finance for Growth (UKFG), Capital for Enterprise, UK InnovationInvestment Fund and (national) Regional Growth Funds
• Abolition of regional Learning & Skills Councils, Cultural Consortia, Arts Councils
• Creation of new national agencies e.g. Homes & Communities Agency, Technology Innovation Centres etc
• top-slicing’ of RDA budgets e.g. to pay for housing investments in the South East and ‘Accelerated Development Zones’
• Meanwhile, major investments in Thames Gateway, Crossrail, 2012 Olympics, Heathrow airport, & High Speed Rail 2 (London – Birmingham)
![Page 12: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The New ‘Localism’
• ‘Rebalancing’: North/South, rich/poor, public/private, service / manufacturing
• Localism Bill (directly elected Mayors, neighbourhood planning, community assets)
• Local Councils or Local Places / People? 27% cut in budgets for local councils over 4 years, impact of community right to challenge?
• New forms of ‘local finance’ e.g. New Homes Bonus, Business Rates Bonus, Big Society Bank, Green Investment Fund, Tax Increment Financing, (national) ‘Regional’ Growth Fund and Enterprise Zones (tax breaks)
• (Part time junior) Minister for (all) ‘Cities’
• Local Enterprise Partnerships
![Page 13: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
LEPs and Cities• No status, powers, functions, democratic accountability or
money
• Functioning economic areas or administrative simplicity for weakened central departments?
• Doing or thinking? Making difficult choices?
• Growth, Enterprise & Jobs or sustainable development?
• What future for cross boundary working?
• Cities as one equal partner amongst many!
![Page 15: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: End of regions final version](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051608/5457afd7af795994188b51cb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
What Role for Cities?• Does it matter? NEG tells us that growth and the market is increasingly
(inter) dependent on cities (see Krugman et al)
• Understanding ‘trade offs’ between supporting agglomeration and high speed rail (between cities) and, (for now) local cost air travel
• Planning to building the ‘urban core’; why facilitate travel to work by car?
• Any real hope within informal partnerships? But what genuine political interest or benefit in hard administrative / boundary reform? (at all levels)
• A false dichotomy between national and local levels (towards shared design, management & delivery)?
• Or towards a contractual relationship based on evidence / results / rewards (see Barca (2009)?
• Risk based investment capital favours cities; e.g. the ‘C’ in JESSICA
• SMART strategies for growth also dependent on cities (and their universities) (see McCann (2011)