enclosure uap-hf-09215 docket no. 52-021 · enclosed are the responses to questions 14.03.03-1...

62
Ak MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. 16-5, KONAN 2-CHOME, MINATO-KU TOKYO, JAPAN April 27, 2009 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Attention: Mr. Jeffrey A. Ciocco, Docket No. 52-021 MHI Ref: UAP-HF-09215 Subject: MHI's Responses to US-APWR DCD RAI No. 242-2153 Revision 0 Reference: 1) "Request for Additional Information No. 242-2153 Revision 0, SRP Section: 14.03.03 - Piping Systems and Components - Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria" dated March 2, 2009. With this letter, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MHI") transmits to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC") a document entitled "Responses to Request for Additional Information No. 242-2153 Revision 0." Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. Please contact Dr. C. Keith Paulson, Senior Technical Manager, Mitsubishi Nuclear Energy Systems, Inc. if the NRC has questions concerning any aspect of the submittals. His contact information is below. Sincerely, Yoshiki Ogata, General Manager- APWR Promoting Department Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, LTD. Enclosure: 1. Responses to Request for Additional Information No. 242-2153 Revision 0 CC: J. A. Ciocco C. K. Paulson Contact Information C. Keith Paulson, Senior Technical Manager Mitsubishi Nuclear Energy Systems, Inc. 300 Oxford Drive, Suite 301 Monroeville, PA 15146 E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: (412) 373-6466 KSJ VC

Upload: others

Post on 31-May-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

AkMITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.

16-5, KONAN 2-CHOME, MINATO-KUTOKYO, JAPAN

April 27, 2009

Document Control DeskU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Attention: Mr. Jeffrey A. Ciocco,

Docket No. 52-021MHI Ref: UAP-HF-09215

Subject: MHI's Responses to US-APWR DCD RAI No. 242-2153 Revision 0

Reference: 1) "Request for Additional Information No. 242-2153 Revision 0, SRP Section:14.03.03 - Piping Systems and Components - Inspections, Tests,Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria" dated March 2, 2009.

With this letter, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MHI") transmits to the U.S. NuclearRegulatory Commission ("NRC") a document entitled "Responses to Request for AdditionalInformation No. 242-2153 Revision 0."

Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are containedwithin Reference 1.

Please contact Dr. C. Keith Paulson, Senior Technical Manager, Mitsubishi Nuclear EnergySystems, Inc. if the NRC has questions concerning any aspect of the submittals. His contactinformation is below.

Sincerely,

Yoshiki Ogata,General Manager- APWR Promoting DepartmentMitsubishi Heavy Industries, LTD.

Enclosure:

1. Responses to Request for Additional Information No. 242-2153 Revision 0

CC: J. A. CioccoC. K. Paulson

Contact InformationC. Keith Paulson, Senior Technical ManagerMitsubishi Nuclear Energy Systems, Inc.300 Oxford Drive, Suite 301Monroeville, PA 15146E-mail: [email protected]: (412) 373-6466

KSJ VC

Page 2: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Docket No. 52-021MHI Ref: UAP-HF-09215

Enclosure 1

UAP-HF-09215Docket No. 52-021

Responses to Request for Additional Information No. 242-2153Revision 0

April 2009

Page 3: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-1

In Tier 2, Section 3.12.5.7, the applicant identified that the requirements delineated in RG 1.207,Rev. 1 concerning environmental impact on fatigue of ASME Code Section III Class 1 piping will befollowed. In particular RG 1.207 provides guidance to be used in determining the acceptable fatiguelife with the consideration of the light-water reactor environment. The requirements in the RG aremore stringent than those design criteria in the ASME Code Section III. In Tier 1, Table 2.3-2, theapplicant stated in the ITAAC that Class I piping systems and components will be designed to meetASME Code Section III requirements. In this ITAAC, the additional fatigue design requirements inRG 1.207 were not addressed. The staff requests the applicant to modify the ITAAC such thatrequirements of the ASME Code Section III and RG 1.207 will be met.

ANSWER:

As stated, MHI does delineate in Tier 2, Section 3.12.5.7, that the requirements of RG 1.207, Rev.1 concerning environmental impact on fatigue of ASME Code Section III Class 1 piping will befollowed. Reference to the RG 1.207 was not included in the Tier 1 Table 2.3-2 ITAAC Item 1 to beconsistent with the content guidance provided in the SRP. Other options were considered such asincorporating specific design information pertaining to the fatigue or a general reference to themore stringent criteria in lieu of referencing RG 1.207; however, it was deemed that thesealternatives would be unwieldy or would also be inconsistent with the Tier 1 ITAAC contentrequirements. MHI will appropriately incorporate the Tier 2 information pertaining to the fatiguedesign requirements of RG 1.207 into the design documentation that will be developed andavailable for inspection.

Impact on DCD

There is no impact on the DCD.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

14.02-1

Page 4: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-2

Page 5: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS.AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-2

In Tier 1, Table 2.3.2 Item 3, the applicant stated in the Inspections, Tests, and Analyses (ITA) thatan analysis of representative ASME Code Section III Class 2 or 3 piping systems and componentsthat significantly contribute to risk will be performed. The AC further identified that the result of.theanalysis of those representative piping systems and components concluded that the designrequirements of the ASME Code Section III are met. However, the design completion of thoseremaining Class 2 or 3 risk-significant as well as all Class 2 or 3 non risk-significant piping systemsand components were not discussed. The staff does not consider the design of representative ofClass 2 or 3 piping systems and components constitute the complete design of all Class 2 and 3piping systems and components. The staff requests the applicant to modify the ITAAC reflectingthat all Class 2 and 3 piping systems and components design will meet the requirements of theASME Code Section II1.

ANSWER:

The design analyses will be performed for all ASME Code Section III Class 2 & 3 piping systemsand components in accordance with the plan described in MHI's letter UAP-HF-08123, dated July14, 2008, (ref. ML082030589). In this letter, MHI proposes the design acceptance criteria (DAC)approach with the engineering schedule for the design of Class 2 & 3 piping systems andcomponents (PSC), and the DAC closure plan.

The stress reports for representative Class 2 & 3 risk-significant PSC and design specifications forremaining Class 2 & 3 PSC will be available for NRC review and audit in the DCD review phase.MHI considers that completion of stress reports for representative Class 2 & 3 risk-significant PSC,combined with the completion of design specifications for all Class 2 & 3 PSC provide a sufficientbasis to close the DAC for Class 2 and 3 PSC. This approach is proposed in ITAAC Item 3 in Tier1 Table 2.3-2.

The stress reports of the remaining risk-significant PSC will be available and these will be finallyverified by the ASME fabrication/reconciliation ITAAC in the individual plant system sections.The design of non-risk significant PSC will be completed later in the design phase as described insection 2.3, item 2 of UAP-HF-08123. These piping systems and components are verified inaccordance with the ASME fabrication/reconciliation ITAAC in the individual plant system sections.

In summary, MHI takes a graded approach for the PSC design ITAAC, and MHI is confident thatimplementation of the plan will provide the NRC with sufficient information to conclude that there isreasonable assurance that all safety requirements are met. The information will also be sufficient

14.03.03-3

Page 6: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

to complete and close all DAC for piping systems and components as described in Tier 1 Section2.3. Closure of the DAC will be followed by verification of the as-built ASME III PSC inaccordance with the ITAAC in the Tier 1 sections for the individual plant systems.

Therefore, the current ITAAC is believed to be satisfactory and changes are not necessary for theClass 2 or 3 PSC ITAAC.

Impact on DCD

There is no impact on the DCD.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-4

Page 7: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification, ......

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-3

For piping systems and components designated as ASME Code Section III Class 1, 2 or 3, theAcceptance Criteria (AC) of Items 1 and 3 of Tier I Table 2.3-2 stated that the results of the analysisconclude that the piping systems and components have been designed and are in accordance withASME Code Section III requirements. It is not clear to the staff how the results of the analysis will bedocumented and what type of report will exist. SRP 14.3.3 indicates that an acceptable version ofan ASME Code certified stress report is the design document required by ASME Code Section III,Subarticle NCA-3550. A certified design report provides assurance that the requirements of ASMECode, Section III for design have been met and that the design complies with the designspecifications. The staff requests the applicant to revise the AC to identify the certified DesignReport as discussed in Subarticle NCA-3550 or other appropriate design documents.

ANSWER:

As discussed in DCD Tier 2 Subsection 3.9.3, the analyses to demonstrate that Class 1 SSCs arewithin allowable stresses, and referred to in ITAAC item 1, will be documented in design reports.Tier 1 Table 2.3-2 will be clarified to reference that a design report will be the means in which theanalyses demonstrating acceptable pressure integrity and functional capability will bedocumented.

Refer to MHI's response provided to RAI 14.03.03-2 on the plan for demonstrating acceptancecriteria are met for ASME III Class 2 and 3 SSCs. ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.3-2 will be revised forconsistency to reference that the representative piping and component analysis exists.

Impact on DCD

Piping Systems and Components ITAAC Items 1 and 3 in Tier 1 Table 2.3-2 will be revised asfollows:

14.03.03-5

Page 8: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

1. The ASME Code Section III, 1. An analysis of the ASME Code, 1. The ros'-'lts of the n;,alysisClass 1 piping systems and Section III, Class 1 piping ASME Code Section IIIcomponents are designed to systems and components will design reports exist andretain their pressure integrity be performed. conclude that the designand functional capability under requirements of the ASMEinternal design and operating Code Section III are met.pressures and design basisloads.

3. The ASME Code Section III, 3. An analysis of representative 3. The ASME Code Section IIIClass 2 or 3 piping systems and ASME Code, Section III, Class design reports results-ef-the-components are designed to 2 or 3 piping systems and aRalysis for the representativeretain their pressure integrity components that significantly ASME Code, Section III, Classand functional capability under contribute to risk will be 2 or 3 piping systems andinternal design and operating performed. components exist andpressures and design basis conclude that the designloads. requirements of the ASME

Code Section III are met anddesign specifications areprovided for all ASME CodeSection IIII, Class 2 or 3 pipingsystems and components.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-6

Page 9: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.:

SRP SECTION:

NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-4

In Tier 1, Table 2.2-4, Items 7, 8 and 17 referred to ITAAC in section 2.3. However, it referred toeither a wrong ITAAC or a non-existing ITAAC. The staff requests the applicant to correct the errorin those items in Table 2.2-4.

ANSWER:ITAAC Items 7, 8 and 17 in Tier 1 Table 2.2-4 will be revised to reference the appropriate ITAAC.

Impact on DCD

Structural and System Engineering ITAAC Items 7, 8, and 17 in Tier 1 Table 2.2-4 will be revisedas shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

7. The ASME Code, Section III, 7. Refer to Section 2.3 ITAC #2 7. Refer to Szctinr. 2.3 ITA AC #2Class 1 piping systems and Table 2.3-2 ITAAC #1 Table 2.3-2 ITAAC #1components are designed toretain their pressure integrityand functional capabilityunder internal design andoperating pressures anddesign-basis loads.

8. The ASME Code, Section III, 8. Refer to Soctione. 2.3 2ITAArC #5 8. Refer to Section2 .3 ITAA C #5.Class 2 or 3 piping systems Table 2.3-2 ITAAC #3 Table 2.3-2 ITAAC #3and components are designedto retain their pressureintegrity and functionalcapability under internaldesign and operatingpressures and design-basisloads.

14.03.03-7

Page 10: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

17. Safety-related SSCs are 17. Refer to Section 2.3 ITA AC #6 17. Referto Section 2.3 TTAAC #Sdesigned to withstand the Table 2.3-2 ITAAC #4. Table 2.3-2 ITAAC #4.dynamic effects of pipebreaks.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-8

Page 11: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-5

Components ITAAC

In USAPWR DCD Tier 1, Table 2.4.1-5, Item 5, the applicant stated in the Design Commitment thatASME Code components are designed and fabricated in accordance with the requirements ofASME Code Section III. In the ITA and AC, the "as-built" components were discussed. The twoactivities, Fabrication & Installation and As-built Reconciliation, should have separate ITAAC.

(a) Fabrication and Installation:

For components designated as ASME Code Section III, SRP 14.3.3 identifies that a certified datareport provides assurance that requirements of the ASME Code, Section III for fabrication,installation, and examination have been met. The staff requests the applicant to include an ITAACto reflect that an inspection of the components will be conducted. A certified ASME Code DataReports and inspection reports should document that the components are fabricated, installed, andinspected in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements.

(b) As-built Reconciliation

Also described in SRP 14.3.3, the as-built ITAAC should identify that the components shall bereconciled with the design requirement. The staff requests the applicant to include an ITAAC toreflect that a reconciliation analysis using as-designed and as-built information and ASME Codecertified Design Report will be performed.

These two questions are also applicable to Tier 1, Sections 2.4.2, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.7.1.2,2.7.1.9, 2.7.1.10, 2.7.1.11, 2.7.3.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.7.6.7, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3.

ANSWER:

It is assumed that the referenced ITAAC for this question is Tier 1 Table 2.4.1-2, Item 5. The singleITAAC ITA and AC for the Design Commitment that ASME Code components are designed andfabricated in accordance with the requirements of ASME Code Section III will be separated into twoactivities; fabrication and installation and an as-built reconciliation. ITAAC Item 7 in Table 2.4.1-2addresses hydrostatic testing of the ASME Code Section III reactor system components. The otherITAAC cited in this question, (i.e., Subsections 2.4.2, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.6.4, 2.7.1.2, 2.7.1.9,2.7.1.10, 2.7.1.11,2.7.3.1,2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.7.6.7, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3) associated with thedesign commitments to design and construct ASME Code Section III components in accordance

14.03.03-9

Page 12: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

with the ASME Code Section III requirements will be also revised as needed to address the SRP14.3 guidance.

Impact on DCD

Reactor System ITAAC Item 5 in Tier 1 Table 2.4.1-2 will be revised as shown below: ......

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

5. The ASME Code components 5.a An inspection of the as-built 5.a The ASME Code Section IIIof the reactor system identified ASME Code components of data desigR reports exist andin Table 2.4.1-1 are designed the reactor system will be conclude that the as-builtand fabricated in accordance performed. ASME Code Section IIIwith the requirements of the components of the reactorASME Code. system identified in Table

2.4.1-1 are r "con d "ithdesin documents fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

5.b An analysis will be 5.b The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the reactor

system identified in Table2.4.1-1 are reconciled with thedesign requirements.

The other ITAAC affected by this question, (i.e., Subsections 2.4.2, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.6.4(expanded ITAAC for emergency power source support systems), 2.7.1.2, 2.7.1.9, 2.7.1.10,2.7.1.11, 2.7.3.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.7.6.7, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3) associated with the designcommitments to design and construct ASME Code Section III components in accordance with theASME Code Section III requirements will be revised to follow the SRP 14.3 guidance for ITAACinvolving ASME code components. Mark-ups of these ITAAC tables can be found in Attachment 1.

Example ITAAC Item 2 in DCD Tier 2 Table 14.3-2 will be revised accordingly as shown below.

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2a. The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i Analyseso well be performod. 2.a.i The results of analysescomponents of the __ An inspection of the concludo that the ASME Codesystem identified in Table as-built ASME Code components of the __

are designed and components of the system are comply with th.. efabricated in accordance with system will be requirement.. of SectmAn III ofthe requirements nf-Sentinn performed. the ASMEdc.of the ASME Code.

ASME Code Section III datareports exist and concludethat the as-built ASME CodeSection III components of the

system identified inTable are fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

14.03.03-10

Page 13: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

2-. Tho ASME Coda Section 111 2.a.ii 1npetonswill be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIco.ponentS, •idntifi•ed in conduted of the as built design reports exist fGi andTahlA arc components ar doc.uMnted in conclude that the as-builtdsigned and construce d• in the ASME design repoets. ASME Code Section IIIaccordance with ASME Coda components of theSt~inllre,.uircm.nts. An analysis will be system identified in Table

conducted to reconcile the are reconciled with theas-built component design deGum-entsinformation with the ASME requirements.design reports.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-11

Page 14: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-6

PipinQ ITAAC

In USAPWR DCD Tier 1, Table 2.4.2-5, Item 4b, the applicant stated in the Design Commitmentthat ASME Code piping are designed and fabricated in accordance with the requirements of ASMECode Section III. In the ITA and AC, the "as-built" pipings were discussed. The two activities,Fabrication & Installation and As-built Reconciliation, should have separate ITAAC.

(a) Fabrication and Installation:

For piping designated as ASME Code Section III, SRP 14.3.3 identifies that a certified data reportprovides assurance that requirements of the ASME Code, Section III for fabrication, installation,and examination have been met. The staff requests the applicant to include an ITAAC to reflect thatan inspection of the piping will be conducted. A certified ASME Code Data Reports and inspectionreports should document that the piping system is fabricated, installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME Code Section III requirements.

(b) As-built Reconciliation

Also described in SRP 14.3.3, the as-built ITAAC should identify that the piping shall be reconciledwith the design requirements. The staff requests the applicant to include an ITAAC to reflect that areconciliation analysis using as-designed and as-built information and ASME Code certified Design'Report will be performed.

These two questions are also applicable to Tier 1, Sections 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.7.1.2, 2.7.1.9,2.7.1.10, 2.7.1.11, 2.7.3.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.7.6.7, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3.

ANSWER:

The single ITAAC ITA and AC for the Design Commitment that ASME Code piping are designedand fabricated in accordance with the requirements of ASME Code Section III will be separated intotwo activities; fabrication and installation and an as-built reconciliation. The recommended changeto Tier 1 Table 2.4.2-5 is provided and will be included for similar items in other tables listed.

14.03.03-12

Page 15: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Impact on DCD

Reactor Coolant System ITAAC Item 4.b in Tier 1 Table 2.4.2-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

4.b The ASME Code Section III 4.b.i Inspections will be 4.b.i The ASME Code Section IIIpiping of the RCS, including eenduGted An inspection of data design reports exist andsupports, identified in Table the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-built2.4.2-3, is designed and piping system as- ASME Code Section IIIGGRStF-eted fabricated in docu-mented in the AS.ME piping system of the RCSaccordance with ASME Code desi4g .epe4 of the RCS identified in Table 2.4.2-3 areSection III requirements. will be performed., r,,onilcd with the design

decumeRnts is fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASMECode Section IIIrequirements.

4.b.ii An analysis will be 4.b.ii The ASME Code Sectionconducted to reconcile the III design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. piping system of the RCS

identified in Table 2.4.2-3is reconciled with thedesign requirements.

The ITA and AC noted above for the ITAAC associated with the design commitment to design andconstruct ASME Code Section III piping in accordance with the ASME Code Section IIIrequirements will also be incorporated into the following ITAAC: 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.6.4(expanded ITAAC for emergency power source support systems), 2.7.1.2, 2.7.1.9, 2.7.1.10,2.7.1.11, 2.7.3.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.7.6.7, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3. Mark-ups of these ITAACtables can be found in Attachment 2.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

140303-13

Page 16: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-7

Pipinq Supports as-built reconciliation ITAAC

As described in SRP 14.3.3, one ITAAC item that should be included is that the as-built pipingsupports shall be reconciled with the design requirements. In USAPWR DCD Tier 1 Table 2.4.2-5,an ITAAC for as-built reconciliation is not included. The staff requests the applicant to include anITAAC for piping supports reflecting that a reconciliation analysis using as-designed and as-builtinformation and ASME Code certified Design Report will be performed.

This question is also applicable to Tier 1, Sections 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.7.1.2, 2.7.1.9, 2.7.1.10,2.7.1.11, 2.7.3.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.7.6.7, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3.

ANSWER:

SRP Section 14.3.3 does require that the as-built reconciliation analysis provide an overallverification by inspection that the as-constructed piping systems, including supports, are consistentwith the design commitments. The response to question 14.03.03-6 provided a separate ITAACitem for the reconciliation analysis for the Reactor Coolant System piping which includes pipingsupports, consistent with the SRP. Therefore, a separate ITAAC item for reconciliation analysis forpiping supports is not considered necessary. The explanation provided also applies to the pipingreferenced in the system ITAAC in the Tier 1 Subsections listed above.

Impact on DCD

Refer to the response to question 14.03.03-6.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-14

Page 17: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-8

Pressure boundary welds

For pressure boundary welds of components and piping identified as ASME Code Section III, theapplicant provided ITAAC Items 5a and 5b in Tier 1 Table 2.4.2-5. The AC stated that the ASMECode Section III requirements are met for non-destructive examination of the as-built pressureboundary welds. It is not clear to the staff how the proposed AC can be concluded by the ITA. Thestaff requests the applicant to append the phrase "An ASME Code Report exists and concludes" tothe beginning of the AC.

This question is also applicable to Tier 1, Sections 2.4.1, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.7.1.2, 2.7.1.9, 2.7.1.10,2.7.1.11, 2.7.3.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3.

ANSWER:

Acceptable as-built pressure boundary weld inspections will be documented in an ASME CodeReport to demonstrate that the ASME Code Section III requirements have been met. The proposedwording used is to be consistent with other ITAAC that reference the existence of a code report.The recommended change to Tier 1 Table 2.4.2-5 is provided and will be included for similar itemsin the other tables as listed.

The associated design commitments will be revised to specifically address non-destructiveexamination of welds, for consistency with the acceptance criteria and the SRP acceptance criteriain NUREG-0800 Subsection 14.3.3.11.2.B.

14.03.03-15

Page 18: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Impact on DCD

Reactor Coolant System ITAAC Items 5.a and 5.b in Tier 1 Table 2.4.2-5 will be revised as shownbelow.

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

5.a Pressure boundary welds in 5.a Inspections of the as-built 5.a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tThe ASMETable 2.4.2-2, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

5.b Pressure boundary welds in 5.b Inspections of the as-built 5.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.4.2-3, be performed in accordance conclude that t-The ASMEmeet ASME Code Section III with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for II1. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

In a similar manner, the revision of the ITAAC associated with documenting pressure boundaryweld inspections acceptability will also be incorporated into the following ITAAC: 2.4.1, 2.4.4,2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.6.4 (expanded ITAAC for emergency power source support systems), 2.7.1.2,2.7.1.9, 2.7.1.10, 2.7.1.11, 2.7.3.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.7.6.7, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3. Mark-upsof these ITAAC tables can be found in Attachment 3.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-16

Page 19: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

. Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-09

In Tier 1, Chapter 2, Table 2.4.4-3, Emergency Core Cooling Systems piping that are classified asSeismic Category I were identified. In Table 2.4.4-5, the applicant provided ITAAC Item 5b forseismic category piping. The Design Commitment used the words "seismic category lines" while"seismic category piping" and "as-built piping" were used in the AC and ITA. The AC also stated thateach of the as-built seismic category piping identified in Table 2.4.4-3 meets the seismic categoryrequirements.

a) It is not clear to the staff how the proposed AC can be concluded by the ITA, The staff requeststhe applicant to append the phrase "Report(s) documents that" to the beginning of the AC.

b) Seismic Category I is the only seismic classification identified in the section. To bring consistencyamong all the columns in the ITAAC as well as clarify the seismic category of the piping systems.The staff requests the applicant to change the words "seismic category lines" or "seismic categorypiping" to "Seismic Category I piping".

These questions are also applicable to Tier 1, Sections 2.4.2, 2.4.5, 2.7.1.2, 2.7.1.9, 2.7.1.10,2.7.1.11, 2.7.3.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3.

ANSWER:

The ITAAC for verifying Seismic Category I piping will be revised to include reference to report(s)that exist and conclude the Seismic Category I requirements are met. In addition, the ITAAC willbe amended to provide consistency in the terminology used. The recommended change to Tier 1Table 2.4.4-5 is provided and will be included for similar items in other tables as listed.

14.03.03-17

Page 20: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Impact on DCD

Emergency Core Cooling System ITAAC Item 5.b in Tier 1 Table 2.4.4-5 will be revised as shownbelow.

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

5.b Each of the seismic CGategory I 5.b Inspections will be performed 5.b Report(s) documents thatDipinq Iies identified in Table on the as-built seismic eEach of the as-built seismic2.4.4-3 is designed to withstand Category I piping. Category I piping identified incombined normal and seismic Table 2.4.4-3 meets thedesign basis loads without a seismic Category I pingloss of its functional capability, requirements.

In a similar manner, the revision of the ITAAC associated with verifying Seismic Category I pipingwill also be incorporated into the following ITAAC: 2.4.2, 2.4.5, 2.7.1.2, 2.7.1.9, 2.7.1.10, 2.7.1.11,2.7.3.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3. Mark-ups of these ITAAC tables can be foundin Attachment 4.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-18

Page 21: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/##12009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.:

SRP SECTION:

NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-10

In Tier 1, Tables 2.4.1-2 and 2.4.2-5, there are ITAAC stated that the ASME Code Section IIIcomponents are constructed of material in accordance with ASME Code requirements. In Tier 1,Section 2.4.5.1, subsection Seismic and ASME Code Classification, the applicant stated that thematerial used in the RCPB conform to the applicable ASME code rules. However, an ITAAC similarto that of Table 2.4.1-2 is not included in Table 2.4.5-5. The staff requests the applicant to includean ITAAC in section 2.4.5 to address this deficiency or justification for not including this ITAAC.This question is also applicable to Tier 1, Sections 2.4.4 and 2.4.6.

ANSWER:

The requested ITAAC applies to the ASME Code requirements for reactor coolant pressureboundary piping and components. Therefore, an ITAAC for verifying that the materials ofconstruction for the ASME Code Section III, Class 1 components and piping are in accordance withthe ASME Code requirements will be added to Tier 1 Tables 2.4.4-5, 2.4.5-5 and 2.4.6. TheseITAAC are consistent with MHI's response to RAI 193, question 14.03.04-20 for ITAAC.

Impact on DCD

Residual Heat Removal System ITAAC Items 15.a and 15.b in Tier 1 Table 2.4.5-5 will be addedas shown below.

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

15.a The materials of construction I5.a Inspection of the certified 15.a The materials ofof the ASME Code Section III, material test reports will be construction of the ASMEClass I components, performed. Code Section III, Class Iidentified in Table 2.4.5-2. are components identified inin accordance with ASME Table 2.4.5-2 conform toCode requirements. the requirements of the

ASME Code.15.b The materials of construction 15.b Inspection of the certified 15.b The materials of

of the ASME Code Section III material test reports will be construction of the ASMEClass I piping, identified in performed. Code Section III, Class ITable 2.4.5-3. are in PiDing identified in Tableaccordance with ASME Code 2.4.5-3 conform to therequirements. requirements of the ASME

Code.

14.03.03-19

Page 22: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

In a similar manner, the addition of an ITAAC associated with ensuring that components and pipingare constructed of material in accordance with the ASME Code will also be incorporated into ITAAC2.4.4 and 2.4.6.

Emergency Core Cooling System ITAAC Items 14.a and 14.b in Tier 1 Table 2.4.4-5 will be addedas shown below.

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

14.a The materials of construction 14.a Inspection of the certified 14.a The materials ofof the ASME Code Section IIIH material test reports will be construction of the ASMEClass I components, performed. Code Section III Class Iidentified in Table 2.4.4-2, are components identified inin accordance with ASME Table 2.4.4-2 conform toCode requirements. the requirements of the

ASME Code.

14.b The materials of construction 14.b Inspection of the certified 14.b The materials ofof the ASME Code Section III, material test reports will be construction of the ASMEClass I piping, identified in performed. Code Section Ill, Class ITable 2.4.4-3. are in piping identified in Tableaccordance with ASME Code 2.4.4-3 conform to therequirements, requirements of the ASME

Code.

Chemical and Volume Control System ITAAC Items 14.a and 14.b in Tier 1 Table 2.4.6-5 will beadded as shown below.

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

14.a The materials of construction 14.a Inspection of the certified 14.a The materials ofof the ASME Code Section III material test reports will be construction of the ASMEClass I components, performed. Code Section I1l, Class Iidentified in Table 2.4.6-2. are components identified inin accordance with ASME Table 2.4.6-2 conform toCode requirements. the requirements of the

ASME Code.

14.b The materials of construction 14.b Inspection of the certified 14.b The materials ofof the ASME Code Section III, material test reports will be construction of the ASMEClass I piping, identified in performed. Code Section III, Class ITable 2.4.6-3. are in piping identified in Tableaccordance with ASME Code 2.4.6-3 conform to therequirements. requirements of the ASME

Code.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

140303-20

Page 23: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-11

In Tier 1, Section 2.7.5.1.1, the applicant stated that the Main Control Room HVAC systemcomponents are not designed or constructed to ASME Code Section III requirements and there isno ITAAC in Table 2.7.5.1-3 for components listed as ASME Code Section III. In Tier 2, Table 3.2-2(Sheet 43 of 53), the Main Control Room air handling unit cooling coils were designated as ASMECodes Section III Class 3 because the entry is "3" in the "Code and Standards" column. The staffrequests the applicant to provide appropriate ITAAC for the ASME Code Section III components orjustification for not including any ITAAC for these components

The question is also applicable to some components in Sections 2.7.5.2-2, 2.7.5.2-3,2.7.5.2-4, 2.7.5.2-5, 2.7.5.3.1.2, and 2.7.5.3.1.3

ANSWER:

The Main Control Room air handling unit cooling coils use essential chilled water as the coolingmedium. The details of the design, construction, and testing requirements of the cooling coils arecontained in Section 2.7.3.5, Essential Chilled Water System (ECWS) and Tier 1 Table 2.7.3.5-3,Essential Chilled Water System Piping Characteristics. The ITAAC items applicable to the ASMECode Section III requirements of Main Control Room air handling unit cooling coils are delineatedin Tier 1 Table 2.7.3.5-5, Items 2b for design and construction, 3b for welds, 4b for pressureboundary integrity, and 5b for piping seismic loads. As a result of RAI 14.03.03-6, an additionalITAAC item will be created to perform a reconciliation of the as-designed and as-built cooling coilinformation to the ASME Code requirements.

Similarly, ECWS also provides the cooling medium to the unit cooling coils of the EngineeredSafety Features Ventilation System (ESFVS) described in Section 2.7.5.2. Therefore, thejustification provided for the Main Control Room air handling unit cooling coils is also applicable tothe ESFVS. Based on review of the delineated ECWS ITAAC, it is concluded that the appropriaterequirements are adequately addressed and additional ITAAC are not necessary. Sections 2.7.5.1Main Control Room HVAC System, 2.7.5.2.1.2 Class 1E Electrical Equipment Room Ventilation,2.7.5.2.1.3 Safeguard Component Area HVAC System, 2.7.5.2.1.4 Emergency Feedwater PumpArea HVAC System, and 2.7.5.2.1.5 Safety Related Component Area HVAC System will be revisedto include clarification that the air handling unit cooling coils are designed and constructed to ASMESection III requirements. In addition, a cross reference will be added in the applicable sections toECWS Tier 1 Table 2.7.3.5-3 for the applicable cooling coil ITAAC.

14.03.03-21

Page 24: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

The non-essential chilled water lines to and from CRDM cooling unit and containment fan cooler isthat non-ECWS is closed system inside containment designed and constructed to ASME Ill.Therefore, Section 2.7.5.3.1.2 Containment Fan Cooler System and 2.7.5.3.1.3 Control Rod DriveMechanism (CRDM) Cooling System will be also revised to include clarification that these unitcooling coils are designed and constructed to ASME Section III requirements.

Impact on DCD

The following information will be incorporated into the listed ventilation sections:

2.7.5.1 Main Control Room HVAC System2.7.5.1.1 Design DescriptionSeismic and ASME Code Classifications

The main control room air handling unit cooling coils are the only system componentsare-not designed eo and constructed to ASME Code Section III requirements.

2.7.5.1.2 Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

Table 2.7.5.1-3 specified the inspections, tests analyses, and associated acceptance criteriafor the MCR HVAC system. Table 2.7.3.5-5 specifies the ITAAC for the main control roomair handling unit cooling coils.

2.7.5.2 Engineered Safety Features Ventilation System (ESFVS)2.7.5.2.1.2 Class 1E Electrical Room HVAC SystemSeismic and ASME Code Classifications

The Class I E electric room area air handlinq unit cooling coils are the only systemcomponents are-net designed e• and constructed to ASME Code Section III requirements.

2.7.5.2.1.3 Safeguard Component Area HVAC SystemSeismic and ASME Code Classifications

The safeguard component area air handling unit cooling coils are the only systemcomponents aie-net designed eG and constructed to ASME Code Section III requirements.

2.7.5.2.1.4 Emergency Feedwater Pump Area HVAC SystemSeismic and ASME Code Classifications

The emergency feedwater pump area air handling unit cooling coils are the only systemcomponents are-Pet designed GF and constructed to ASME Code Section III requirements.

2.7.5.2.1.5 Safety Related Component Area HVAC SystemSeismic and ASME Code Classifications

The annulus emergency exhaust filtration unit area, penetration area, charging pumparea, component cooling water pump area, and essential chiller unit area air handlingunit cooling coils are the only system components a-e- net designed 9f and constructed toASME Code Section III requirements.

2.7.5.2.2 Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

Table 2.7.5.2-3 specified the inspections, tests analyses, and associated acceptance criteriafor the ESFVS. Table 2.7.3.5-5 specifies the ITAAC for the ESFVS air handling unitcooling coils.

14.03.03-22

Page 25: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

2.7.5.3 Containment Ventilation System (CWS)2.7.5.3.1.2 Containment Fan Cooler SystemSeismic and ASME Code Classifications

The containment fan cooler unit cooling coils are only the system and component .designed and constructed to ASME Code Section III requirements. system i-" nt seismiccategory and ir, not designed- to ASRAW Code Secionn 111 requierements.

2.7.5.3.1.3 Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) Cooling SystemSeismic and ASME Code Classifications

The CRDM cooling unit cooling coils are only the system and component designed andconstructed to ASME Code Section III reguirements. system is non seis.;mi catego,' andis not designed t,.A•-, ME , od Setien III reqrements.

2.7.5.3.2 Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance CriteriaSeismic and ASME Code Classifications

Table 2.7.5.3-1 specified the inspections tests, analyses, and associated acceptance criteriafor the CWS. Table 2.7.3.5-5 specifies the ITAAC for the containment fan cooler unitand CRDM cooling unit cooling coils.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-23

Page 26: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-12

In Tier 1 Section 2.7.1.11, subsection Key Design Features, the applicant stated that the EFWS iscapable of automatically initiating flow upon receipt of a system actuation signal. However, in Table2.7.1.11-5, there is no ITAAC about verifying that the pump will start after receiving a signal. As anexample, similar ITAAC is provided in Table 2.4.4-5. The staff requests the applicant to provide anITAAC to verify that the pump will start after receiving a signal or justification for not including anITAAC.

ANSWER:

MHI will revise Tier 1 Table 2.7.1.11-2, Emergency Feedwater System Equipment Characteristics,to identify the components that receive a control signal from the protection and safety monitoringsystem (PSMS) that will include the EFW pumps. A new ITAAC will be added to Table 2.7.1.11-5,to verify each EFW pump starts after receiving a signal.

Impact on DCD

A mark-up of DCD Tier 1, Section 2.7 Revision 2, with changes to Table 2.7.1.11-2 and 2.7.1.11-5is shown below. The affected portions of the table are shown including the addition of the "PSMSControl" column to Table 2.7.1.11-2 per MHI's response to RAI 192 question 14.03.04-16.

14.03.03-24

Page 27: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Revise Table 2.7.1.11-2, Emergency Feedwater System Equipment Characteristics as follows:

ASME Class Loss ofCode Seismic Remotely lE/Qual. PSMS Active Motive

System Name Tag No. Section Category Operated For SafetyIII I Valve Harsh control Function Posto

Class Envir.

A-emergencyfeedwater pump Emergency.(turbine driven, for EFS-RPP-001A 3 Yes Yes/No Feedwater Startinside electrical Actuationcomponents)

B-emergency Emergencyfeedwater pump EFS-RPP-001 B 3 Yes Yes/No Feedwater Start(motor driven) Actuation

C-emergency Emeraencvfeedwater pump EFS-RPP-001C 3 Yes Yes/No Feedwater Start(motor driven) Actuation

D-emergencyfeedwater pump Emergency(turbine driven, for EFS-RPP-001 D 3 Yes Yes/No Feedwater Startinside electrical Actuationcomponents)

Add new Item 17 to Table 2.7.and Acceptance Criteria:

1.11-5 Emergency Feedwater System Inspections, Tests, Analyses,

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

17. Each pump identified in Table 17. Tests will be performed 17. Each as-built pump2.7.1.11-2 as having PSMS for each as-built pump identified in Table 2.7.1.11-2control performs its active identified in Table as having PSMS controlsafety function in response to 2.7.1.11-2 as having performs its active safetythe PSMS control signal. PSMS control, using function after receiving a

simulated signals, simulated signal.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-25

Page 28: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION... ...... ..... ...... ........... .......... I.- .1 ............................... ... .......................

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-13

In Tier 1, Section 2.7.1.10, subsection Logic, the applicant stated that the containment isolationvalves will close automatically upon receipt of a containment isolation signal. However, in Table2.7.1.10-3, there is no ITAAC to verify that the SG Blowdown system provides containmentisolation of the piping that penetrating the containment. As an example, similar ITAAC is provided inTable 2.4.4-5 Item 7a. The staff requests the applicant to provide an appropriate ITAAC to addressthe isolation of the system piping that penetrate the containment or justification for not including anITAAC.

ANSWER:

MHI's responses to RAI 184-1912 question 14.03.07-27 and RAI 222 question 14.03.11-22 willincorporate the necessary revisions DCD Tier 1 to address the issue described in the abovequestion. No additional changes are proposed at this time.

Impact on DCD

Refer to MHI's responses to RAI 184-1912 question 14.03.07-27 and RAI 222 question14.03.11-22.

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-26

Page 29: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-14

In Tier 1, Table 2.6.4-1, Item 7 Design Commitment, the applicant stated that the support systemsfor piping that is required to perform safety functions of starting and operating the Class 1 E EPS areclassified as ASME Code Section III. The staff questions whether simply confirming theclassification of the support system is sufficient. For ASME Code Section III piping, there should betwo separate ITAAC entries to encompass the as-built reconciliation and fabrication & installation.The staff requests the applicant to provide appropriate ITAAC in Table 2.6.4-1 for the ASME CodeSection III piping or justification for not including an ITAAC.

ANSWER:

ITAAC in Table 2.6.4-1 will be expanded to address the support system piping and componentsthat are required to support the safety functions of starting and operating the Class 1E EPS.These changes will be consistent with other US-APWR ITAAC for ASME Ill piping andcomponents. The revision to ITAAC Item 7 will include separate hydrostatic testing ITAAC forEPS support systems piping and components. The ITAAC will also be clarified with respect to thesystems' support function, and use terminology consistent with other hydrostatic test ITAAC forASME III systems. The requested ITAAC to encompass fabrication, installation and as-builtreconciliation of EPS support system piping and components are addressed in MHI's response toquestions 14.03.03-5, 14.03.03-6, and 14.03.03-8.

Impact on DCD

MHI will revise ITAAC Item 7 in Table 2.6.4-1 as follows:

14.03.03-27

Page 30: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

7.a The ASME Code Section 7.a Pressure Hydrostatic tests will 7.a The results of theIII components for support be conducted on the as-built hydrostatic tests ofsystems Fipi~g that is-are components code coPm- oentS een urdes-that the as-builtrequired to perfrn supp•ort of the as--buy support systems ASME Code Section-Illthe safety functions of required by the ASME Code components for supportstarting and operating the Section III to be hydrostatically systems fer-piping that is areClass 1 E EPS, retain their tested. pipirq, required to per•fom supportPressure boundary the safety functions of startingintegrity at their design and operating the Class 1 Epressure in accordance EPS ara thewith aroassified ASME conform to the requirementsCode Section III. of ASME Code Section III.

7.b The ASME Code Section 7.b Hydrostatic tests will be 7.b The results of theIll piping for support conducted on the code hydrostatic tests of thesystems that are required components of the as-built as-built ASME Code Sectionto support the safety piping of the support systems Ill piping for supportfunctions of starting and required by the ASME Code systems that are required tooperating the Class I E Section III to be hydrostatically support the safety functionsEPS, retain their pressure tested. of starting and operating theboundary integrity at their Class I E EPS conform todesign pressure in the requirements of ASMEaccordance with ASME Code Section III.Code Section III.

Refer to MHI's response tochanges to Table 2.6.4-1.

questions 14.03.03-5, 14.03.03-6, and 14.03.03-8, for additional

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-28

Page 31: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.:

SRP SECTION:

NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-15

In Tier 1 Table 2.7.4.2-1 Item 3, the applicant stated that the as-built ASME Code components ofthe Gaseous Waste Management System will conform to the requirements in the applicable ASMECode. It is not clear to the staff what the applicable ASME Code is. As an example, in Table2.7.4.1-1, the applicant identifies it being ASME Code B31.3 as described by RG 1.143. The staffrequests the applicant to identify the ASME Code in ITAAC Item 3 of Table 2.7.4.2-1.

ANSWER:

The Gaseous Waste Management System valves and piping are to be constructed in accordancewith the requirements of ASME Code B31.3. Table 2.7.4.2-1 will be revised to add ITAAC Item 4 toaddress the design and construction requirements of the system valves and piping. The ITAACincorporates comments made in RAI 14.03.03-5 pertaining to fabrication and installation andperforming design reconciliation.

Impact on DCD

MHI will add ITAAC Item 4 to Table 2.7.4.2-1 as follows:

4. The Gaseous Waste 4.a Inspections will be 4.a Design documentationManagement System conducted of the exists and concludes that thevalves and piping are fabrication and installation as-built valves and piping ofdesigned and constructed of as-built components. the Gaseous Wastein accordance with ASME Management System areB31.3 requirements. fabricated, installed, and

inspected in accordance withASME B31.3 requirements.

4.b Analysis will be conducted 4.b The analysis concludes thatto reconcile the as-designed the as-built Gaseous Wasteand as-built component Management System valvesinformation with the ASME and piping are reconcileddesign documentation, with the design documents.

14.03.03-29

Page 32: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-30

Page 33: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

04/27/2009

US-APWR Design Certification

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Docket No. 52-021

RAI NO.: NO. 242-2153 REVISION 0

SRP SECTION: 14.03.03 - PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS - Inspections,Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

APPLICATION SECTION: DCD SECTION 3.9

DATE OF RAI ISSUE: 03/02/2009

QUESTION NO.: 14.03.03-16

In Tier 1 Section 2.7.6.8.1, subsection Seismic and ASME Code Classifications, the applicantstated that the seismic category and ASME code Section III requirements are applied to thoseisolation valves installed in the drainage piping from the engineered safety features (ESF)equipment room. The staff recognized that the isolation valves installed to provide isolation for thecontainment are addressed in Tier 1 Section 2.11.2. However, there is no ITAAC associated tothese isolation valves installed in the drainage piping from ESF equipment room.

The applicant is requested to:i) Provide appropriate ITAAC to address the design of this seismic category equipment orjustification for not including an ITAAC.

ii) Provide appropriate ITAAC to address the as-built reconciliation of ASME Code. Section IIIcomponents or justification for not including an ITAAC.

iii) Identify any ASME Code Section III piping in the drainage piping from the ESF equipment room.If there is ASME Code Section III piping, appropriate ITAAC should also be included.

ANSWER:

MHI has reviewed the ITAAC for the Equipment and Floor Drainage System and has revised Table2.7.6.8-1 to incorporate requirements for the drain isolation valves. The following items are inresponse to the requested items above:

i) An ITAAC item will be added associated with the acceptability of the seismic design and aseparate ITAAC has been added to verify isolation capability.

ii) Since the valves are to be designed, fabricated and installed in accordance with theASME Code Section III, an ITAAC item will be added to require a design report and toperform an as-built reconciliation.

iii) There is no ASME Code Section III piping in the Equipment and Floor Drainage Systemsince the piping is not required in preventing backflow into the ESF equipment rooms.

Changes that are proposed are consistent with other sections and incorporate other RAIresponses.

140303-31

Page 34: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Impact on DCD

MHI will revise ITAAC Table 2.7.6.8-1 to incorporate the following items:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

4. The seismic Category I 4.a Inspections will be 4.a -The as-built seismicdrain isolation valves from performed to verify that the Category I as-built drainthe ESF equipment rooms seismic Category I as-built isolation valves are locatedare designed to withstand drain isolation valves are in the drain lines from theseismic design basis loads located in the drain lines ESF equipment roomswithout loss of safety from the ESF equipmentfunction. rooms.

4.b Type tests and/or analyses 4.b The results of the typeof the seismic Category I tests and/or analysesdrain isolation valves will conclude that the seismicbe performed. Category I equipment can

withstand seismic designbasis loads without loss ofsafety function.

4.c Inspections will be 4.c The as-built drain isolationperformed on the as-built valves including anchoragedrain isolation valves are seismically bounded byincluding anchorage, the tested or analyzed

conditions.

5.a Controls exist in the MCR to 5.a Tests will be performed on 5.a Controls in the MCRclose the remotely operated the as-built remotely operate to close the as-builtdrain isolation valves, operated drain isolation remotely operated drainidentified in section valves from the ESF isolation valves, identified2.7.6.8.1. from the ESF equipment rooms using in section 2.7.6.8.1, fromequipment rooms. controls in the MCR. the ESF equipment rooms.

5.b Alarms and displays of the 5.b Inspections will be 5.b Alarms and displays of theremotely operated drain performed for retrievability parameters for the remotelyisolation valves, identified of the alarms and displays operated drain isolationin section 2.7.6.8.1. from the in the MCR. valves, identified in sectionESF equipment room can 2.7.6.8.1. from the ESFbe retrieved from the MCR. equipment room can be

retrieved from the MCR.6. The ASME Code Section III 6.a An inspection of the 6.a The ASME Code Section III

drain isolation valves from as-built ASME Code drain data reports exist andthe ESF equipment rooms are isolation valves from the conclude that the as-builtdesigned and fabricated in ESF equipment rooms will ASME Code Section IIIaccordance with the be performed. drain isolation valves fromrequirements of the ASME the ESF equipment roomsCode. are fabricated, installed,

and inspected inaccordance with ASMECode Section IIIrequirements.

6.b Inspection and/or analysis 6.b The ASME Code Section IIIwill be conducted to design report exists andreconcile the as-built concludes that the as-builtcomponent information with ASME Code Section IIIthe ASME design reports. drain isolation valves from

the ESF equipment roomsare reconciled with thedesign documents.

14.03.03-32

Page 35: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Impact on COLA

There is no impact on the COLA.

Impact on PRA

There is no impact on the PRA.

14.03.03-33

Page 36: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Attachment IITAAC Table Mark-ups for RAI 14.03.03-5

Similar to ITAAC Table 2.4.1-2 for the reactor system, the ITA and AC noted for the ITAACassociated with the design commitment to design and construct ASME Code Section IIIcomponents in accordance with the ASME Code Section .111 requirements will also be incorporatedinto similar ITAAC in the following Tier 1 subsections: 2.4.2, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.6.4, 2.7.1.2,2.7.1.9, 2.7.1.10, 2.7.1.11,2.7.3.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.7.6.7, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3.

Impact on DCD

Reactor Coolant System ITAAC Item 4.a in Table 2.4.2-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

4.a The ASME Code Section III 4.a.1 InSPectionS Wall be 4.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents, of the reactor ,enducted An inspection of data design reports exist andcoolant system, identified in the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtTable 2.4.2-2, are designed components as d-ocuented ASME Code Section IIIand .... •..•ted-fabricated in in the AS MAE design r.port, components of the RCSaccordance with ASME Code of the reactor coolant identified in Table 2.4.2-2 areSection III requirements. system will be performed. ron•cil•ed. with the design

decuments fabricatedinstalled, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

4.a.ii An analysis will be 4.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the RCS

identified in Table 2.4.2-2 arereconciled with the designrequirements.

Emergency Core Cooling System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.4.4-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria'

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i Inspections 411 be 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the ECCS, nnnd-ated An inspection of data design reports exist andidentified in Table 2.4.4-2, are the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtdesigned and eeRstFr+ted components as deoumented ASME Code Section IIIfabricated in accordance with in the ASME design reports components of the ECCSASME Code Section III of the ECCS will be identified in Table 2.4.4-2 arerequirements. performed. reconciled with the design

d mns - fabricatedinstalled, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the ECCS

identified in Table 2.4.4-2 arereconciled with the designrequirements.

14.03.03-34

Page 37: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Residual Heat Removal System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.4.5-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i An inspection of the as-built 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the RHRS, ASME Code components of data design reports exist andidentified in Table 2.4.5-2, are the RHRS will be performed. conclude that the as-builtdesigned and ,en•itrugted ASME Code Section IIIfabricated in accordance with components of the RHRSASME Code Section III identified in Table 2.4.5-2 arerequirements. o with the design-

d e fabricatedinstalled, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code components ofdesign reports. the RHRS identified in Table

2.4.5-2 are reconciled with thedesign requirements.

Chemical and Volume Control System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.4.6-5 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i Inspectio•n#ill bhe 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the CVCS, peFfermed An inspection of data desigR reports exist andidentified in Table 2.4.6-2, are the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtdesigned and Gentrunted components -g do-uented. ASME Code Section IIIfabricated in accordance with in theA.SME d^sign• , opaos components of the CVCSASME Code Section III of the CVCS will be identified in Table 2.4.6-2 arerequirements. performed. ro.nc.. with the design,;

deumeRts fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the CVCS

identified in Table 2.4.6-2 arereconciled with the designrequirements.

14.03.03-35

Page 38: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Emergency Power Sources System ITAAC Item 26.a will be added to Table 2.6.4-1 as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

26.a The ASME Code Section 26.a.i An inspection of the 26.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIIII components of the EPS as-built ASME Code data reports exist andsupport systems are components of the EPS will conclude that the as-builtdesigned and fabricated in be performed. ASME Code section IIIaccordance with ASME components of the EPSCode Section III support systems arerequirements. fabricated, installed, and

inspected in accordancewith ASME Code Section IIIrequirements.

26.a.ii An analysis will be 26.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the EPS

support systems arereconciled with the designrequirements.

Main Steam System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.7.1.2-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i Inspections will bh 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the MSS, pe.f rIed- An inspection data design reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.1.2-2, of the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtare designed and GetruGted components as ASME Code Section IIIfabricated in accordance with in the.. AS.E design reports+ components of the MSSASME Code Section III of the MSS will be identified in Table 2.7.1.2-2 arerequirements. performed. reonc.iled w,,,,ith the design-

den-me fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the MSS

identified in Table 2.7.1.2-2are reconciled with the designrequirements.

14.03.03-36

Page 39: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Condensate and Feedwater System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.7.1.9-5 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i InspeGtions Will Ne 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the CFS, . I e-r An inspection data design reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.1.9-2, of the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtare designed and G-nstrunted components as deoumented ASME Code Section IIIfabricated in accordance with i; the ASME design repo.ts components of the CFSASME Code Section III of the CFS will be identified in Table 2.7.1.9-2 arerequirements. performed. recncl. with the desig,,

deG-meRts fabricatedinstalled, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the CFS

identified in Table 2.7.1.9-2are reconciled with the designrequirements.

Steam Generator Blowdown System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.7.1.10-3 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i An inspection will-be- 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the SGBDS, Aeendsted of the as-built data design reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.1.10-1, ASME Code components as- conclude that the as-builtare designed and stFusted doc.um.ented in ASE de•sig•n ASME Code Section IIIfabricated in accordance with reperts of the SGBDS will components of the SGBDSASME Code Section III be performed. system identified in Tablerequirements. 2.7.1.10-1 are reconciled with

the design documnentsfabricated, installed, andinspected in accordancewith ASME Code Section IIIrequirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the SGBDS

identified in Table 2.7.1.10-1are reconciled with the design

_______________________________________________ requirements.

14.03.03-37

Page 40: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Emergency Feedwater System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.7.1.11-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i Inspections will be 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the EFWS, . I e-i An inspection data design reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.1.11-2, of the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtare designed and Gstru ded components as documontd- ASME Code Section IIIfabricated in accordance with in the ASME dsi.gn ... ot components of the EFWSASME Code Section III of the EFWS will be identified in Table 2.7.1.11-2requirements. performed, are reconciled with the design

de~uments fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the EFWS

identified in Table 2.7.1.11-2are reconciled with the designrequirements.

Essential Service Water System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.7.3.1-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i An inspection will-be- 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the ESWS, ce, -dueted of the as-built data design reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.3.1-2, components as dcumented conclude that the as-builtare designed and nansted in ASME de sei reports of ASME Code Section IIIfabricated in accordance with the ESWS will be components of the ESWSASME Code Section III performed, identified in Table 2.7.3.1-2 arerequirements. owth the design

decuments fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the ESWS

identified in Table 2.7.3.1-2are reconciled with the designreguirements.

14.03.03-38

Page 41: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Component Cooling Water System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.7.3.3-5 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i IRspections will he 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the CCWS, GeRduated An inspection of data desigR reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.3.3-2, the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtare designed and nens4 inted components as do•mr.nted ASME Code Section IIIfabricated in accordance with in the ASME design repo.ts components of the CCWSASME Code Section III of the CCWS will be identified in Table 2.7.3.3-2 arerequirements. performed,. .r.nci. ;l.e ,wth the d.i4g;

doe, meFnp fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the CCWS

identified in Table 2.7.3.3-2are reconciled with the designrequirements.

Essential Chilled Water System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.7.3.5-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i An inspection will-be- 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the ECWS, nPRdused of the as-built of data desigR reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.3.5-2, ASME Code components as- conclude that the as-builtare designed and enstrigted docum..ented inS•.R de•sg• ASME Code Section IIIfabricated in accordance with Feperts of the ECWS will be components of the ECWSASME Code Section III performed. identified in Table 2.7.3.5-2 arerequirements. recnc..iled with the design4;

deigmeMA fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the ECWS

identified in Table 2.7.3.5-2are reconciled with the designrequirements.

14.03.03-39

Page 42: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.7.6.3-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i Inspections Will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the SFPCS, pe~eirmed An inspection of data desigR reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.6.3-1, the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtare designed and nenstruited components as documentAd ASME Code Section IIIfabricated in accordance with in theARME design •.eprts components of the SFPCSASME Code Section III of the SFPCS will be identified in Table 2.7.6.3-1 arerequirements. performed. re.o.ncled with the design

deeumeRtS fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the SFPS

identified in Table 2.7.6.3-1are reconciled with the designrequirements.

Process and Post Accident Sampling System ITAAC Item 2 in Table 2.7.6.7-3 will be revised asshown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.aThe ASME Code Section III 2.a.i An inspection will-be- 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the PSS, Geeduated of the as-built data desigR reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.6.7-1, as ASME Code components as- conclude that fef the as-builtAISA rCnopdeRctien 111 are doc-.u.mented in ASME design ASME Code Section IIIdesigned and npnstrueted reperts of the PSS will be components of the PSSfabricated in accordance with performed, identified in Table 2.7.6.7-1 areASME Code Section III fabricated, installed, andrequirements. inspected in accordance

with ASME Code Section IIIrequirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the PSS

identified in Table 2.7.6.7-1are reconciled with the designrequirements.

14.03.03-40

Page 43: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Containment Isolation System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.11.2-2 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i IRSPectione Will b9 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the CIS, GeRducted An inspection'of data design reports exist andidentified in Table 2.11.2-1, are the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtdesigned and nanstr ited components as d-ocumnted ASME eCode Section IIIfabricated in accordance with in theA.SME dcsign rep.•ts components of the CISASME Code Section III of the CIS will be identified in Table 2.11.2-1 arerequirements. performed. reconciled with the design

depents fabricatedinstalled, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports. components of the CIS

identified in Table 2.11.2-1 arereconciled with the designrequirements.

Containment Spray System ITAAC Item 2.a in Table 2.11.3-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.a The ASME Code Section III 2.a.i lnspcctiens will hb 2.a.i The ASME Code Section IIIcomponents of the CSS, eGRduGted An inspection of data desigR reports exist andidentified in Table 2.11.3-2, are the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtdesigned and Geaetr-uted components as; doume-ntP ASME Code Section IIIfabricated in accordance with in the ASME design reports components of the CSSASME Code Section III of the CSS will be identified in Table 2.11.3-2 arerequirements. performed. recon.c with the d+P-S ign

deeumei4 fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.a.ii An analysis will be 2.a.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built component conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section IIIdesign reports, components of the CSS

identified in Table 2.11.3-2 arereconciled with the designrequirements.

14.03.03-41

Page 44: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Attachment 2ITAAC Table Mark-ups for RAI 14.03.03-6

Similar to ITAAC Table 2.4.2-5 for the Reactor Coolant System, the ITA and AC noted for theITAAC associated with the design commitment to design and construct ASME CodeSection IIIpiping in accordance with the ASME Code Section III requirements will also be incorporated intosimilar ITAAC in the following Tier 1 subsections: 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.6.4, 2.7.1.2, 2.7.1.9,2.7.1.10, 2.7.1.11, 2.7.3.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.7.6.7, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3.

Impact on DCD

Emergency Core Cooling System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.4.4-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b._ IncPccins well be 2.b.i The ASME Code Section IIIpiping of the ECCS, including Gendueted An inspection of data desigR reports exist andsupports, identified in Table the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-built2.4.4-3, is designed and piping system-as- ASME Code Section III pipingGe;n•t-uted fabricated in dcumentod in th' ARSME system of the ECCS identifiedaccordance with ASME Code desig§-repHes of the ECCS in Table 2.4.4-3 a-re renn iled-Section III requirements. will be performed. with the design docum.ents is

fabricated, installed, andinspected in accordancewith ASME Code Section IIIrequirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built pipina system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports. system of the ECCS identified

in Table 2.4.4-3 is reconciledwith the design requirements.

14.03.03-42

Page 45: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Residual Heat Removal System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.4.5-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b.i An inspection of the as-built 2.b.i The ASME Code Section IIIpiping of the RHRS, including ASME Code piping system of data design reports exist andsupports, identified in Table the RHRS will be performed. conclude that the as-built2.4.5-3, is designed and ASME Code Section III pipingGeRstr-uGted fabricated in system of the RHRS identifiedaccordance with ASME Code in Table 2.4.5-2 3 apeSection III requirements. reconil. wIth t'he* d Reign

de umeRts is fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports. system of the RHRS identified

in Table 2.4.5-3 is reconciledwith the design requirements.

Chemical and Volume Control System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.4.6-5 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b.i Inspections will be 2.b.i The ASME Code Section IIIpiping of the CVCS, including G9Rdusted An inspection of data desigR reports exist andsupports, identified in Table the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-built2.4.6-3, is designed and piping system-as- ASME Code Section III piping

str-ntue fabricated in documented in the ASME system of the CVCS identifiedaccordance with ASME Code desigR4epef of the CVCS in Table 2.4.6-3 are e-enaled-Section III requirements. will be performed. with the design document is

fabricated, installed, andinspected in accordancewith ASME Code Section IIIrequirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports. system of the CVCS identified

in Table 2.4.6-3 is reconciledwith the design requirements.

14.03.03-43

Page 46: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Emergency Power Sources System ITAAC Item 26.b will be added to Table 2.6.4-1 as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

26.b The ASME Code Section III 26.b.i An inspection of the 26.b.i The ASME Code Section IIIpiping of the EPS suD~ort as-built ASME Code piping data reports exist andsystems, including system of the EPS will be conclude that the as-builtsupports, are designed performed. ASME Code Section III pipingand fabricated in system of the EPS supportaccordance with ASME systems are fabricated,Code Section III installed, and inspected inrequirements. accordance with ASME Code

Section III requirements.

26.b.ii An analysis will be 26.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports. system of the EPS support

systems are reconciled withthe design requirements.

Main Steam System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.7.1.2-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b._i Inspectoslb 2.b.i The ASME C.ode Section IIIpiping of the MSS, including perfermed-erv An inspection data desigR reports exist andsupports, identified in Table of the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-built2.7.1.2-3, is designed and piping system-as- ASME Code Section III pipingGeretrueted fabricated in documnteptd in th AS.ME system of the MSS identifiedaccordance with ASME Code desigepe• s of the MSS in Table 2.7.1.2-3 are-Section III requirements. will be performed. r ..nilcd. with the dc. ..

deeuments is fabricated.installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports. system of the MSS identified

in Table 2.7.1.2-3 is reconciledwith the design requirements.

14.03.03-44

Page 47: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Condensate and Feedwater System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.7.1.9-5 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b.i lnspections will be 2.b.i The ASME C.ode Section IIIpiping of the CFS, including perfo. - An inspection data desigR reports exist andsupports, identified in Table of the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-built2.7.1.9-3, is designed and piping system-as- ASME Code Section III pipingeeRtFUoted fabricated in dcu'-montod in the ASME system of the CFS identifiedaccordance with ASME Code designrepefs of the CFS in Table 2.7.1.9-3 are-Section III requirements. will be performed. . re.onM with the de. ,.n

deeCmer is fabricated.installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports, system of the CFS identified

in Table 2.7.1.9-3 is reconciledwith the design requirements.

Steam Generator Blowdown System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.7.1.10-3 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b.i An inspection will-be 2.b.i The ASME Code Section IIIpiping of the SGBDS, nnd- dted of the as-built data desigR reports exist andincluding supports, identified ASME Code piping system- conclude that the as-builtin Table 2.7.1.10-2, is as docu-mentod in AS.ME ASME Code Section III pipingdesigned andGGRntrUited design reperts of the SGBDS system of the SGBDSfabricated in accordance with will be performed, identified in Table 2.7.1.10-2 isASME Code Section III r...n..iled w;ith the deignrequirements. deleumens fabricated

installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports. system of the SGBDS

identified in Table 2.7.1.10-2 isreconciled with the designrequirements.

14.03.03-45

Page 48: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Emergency Feedwater System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.7.1.11-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b. Inspections will be 2.b.i The ASME Ccode Section IIIpiping of the EFWS, including e An inspection data design reportsexist andsupports, identified in Table of the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-built2.7.1.11-3, is designed and piping system-as- ASME Code Section III pipingGGRctP-nted fabricated in docume,.nted in the ASME system of the EFWS identifiedaccordance with ASME Code des4qR epepts of the EFWS in Table 2.7.1.11-3 areSection III requirements. will be performed. reoncied with th, design

deerments is fabricated.installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports, system of the EFWS identified

in Table 2.7.1.11-3 isreconciled with the designrequirements.

Essential Service Water System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.7.3.1-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b.i An inspection wil-be- 2.b.i The ASME Craode Section IIIpiping of the ESWS, nnnduted of the as-built data design reports exist andincluding supports, identified ASME Code piping system- conclude that the as-builtin Table 2.7.3.1-3, is designed as docuam.ented in ASA.ME ASME Code Section III pipingand senst-ueted fabricated in desigR Fe of the ESWS system of the ESWS identifiedaccordance with ASME Code will be performed, in Table 2.7.3.1-3 are-Section III requirements. rcnid. w.Aith the design-

deeu4mer is fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports. system of the ESWS identified

in Table 2.7.3.1-3 is reconciledwith the design requirements.

14.03.03-46

Page 49: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Component Cooling Water System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.7.3.3-5 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b.i Inpecti9nSWill be 2.b.i The ASME Ceode Section IIIpiping of the CCWS, eernduGted An inspection of data design reports exist andincluding supports, identified the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtin Table 2.7.3.3-3, is designed piping system-as- ASME Code Section III pipingand Genst•ucted fabricated in documnted in the ASME system of the CCWSaccordance with ASME Code desigR-reperts of the CCWS identified in Table 2.7.3.3-3 areSection III requirements. will be performed. reconciled 'ith the desgn

des'ments is fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports. system of the CCWS

identified in Table 2.7.3.3-3 isreconciled with the designrequirements.

Essential Chilled Water System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.7.3.5-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b.i An inspection will-be- 2.b.i The ASME Code Section IIIpiping of the ECWS, nendudted of the as-built data desigR reports exist andincluding supports, identified ASME Code piping system- conclude that the as-builtin Table 2.7.3.5-3, is designed ac docu'.mented in ASME ASME Code Section III pipingand ganstrunted fabricated in desig-reperts of the ECWS system of the ECWSaccordance with ASME Code will be performed, identified in Table 2.7.3.5-3 areSection III requirements. roc.n.d w4th the de÷sign4i

dOeuments is fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports, system of the ECWS identified

in Table 2.7.3.5-3 is reconciledwith the design requirements.

14.03.03-47

Page 50: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.7.6.3-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b.. InSPectionS Will be 2.b.. The ASME Code Section IIIpiping of the SFPCS, pe.Irmed-d An inspection data desig reports exist andincluding supports, identified of the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtin Table 2.7.6.3-2, is designed piping system-as- ASME Code Section III pipingand Getr'urted fabricated in docuc'ented in the ASME system of the SFPCSaccordance with ASME Code design repeft of the SFPCS identified in Table 2.7.6.3-2 areSection III requirements. will be performed., w-e iled • w.ith the d'. , ,"

deeme is fabricated.installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports. system of the SFPCS

identified in Table 2.7.6.3-2 isreconciled with the designrequirements.

Process and Post-accident Sampling System ITAAC Item 2 in Table 2.7.6.7-3 will be revised byadding sub-step 2.b as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b.i An inspection of the 2.b.i The ASME Code Section IIIpiping of the PSS, including as-built ASME Code piping data reports exist andsupports, is designed and system of the PSS will be concludethat the as-builtfabricated in accordance performed. ASME Code Section III pipingwith ASME Code Section III system of the PSS isrequirements, fabricated, installed, and

inspected in accordancewith ASME Code Section IIIrequirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports. system of the PSS is

reconciled with the designreguirements.

14.03.03-48

Page 51: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Containment Isolation System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.11.2-2 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b.i IRspections wall he 2.b.i The ASME Ceode Section IIIpiping of the CIS, including GGeduGted An inspection of data design reports exist andsupports, is designed and the as-built ASME Code conclude that the as-builtGanstFU+ted fabricated in piping system-as- ASME GCode Section III pipingaccordance with ASME Code dc'umented in the ASME system of the CIS are-Section III requirements. desigR-epe of the CIS will reconciled 'ith the design

be performed. denumeits is fabricated,installed, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built pipinn system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports. system of the CIS is

reconciled with the designrequirements.

Containment Spray System ITAAC Item 2.b in Table 2.11.3-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

2.b The ASME Code Section III 2.b.1 InSPectionS wall be 2.b.i The ASME CGode Section IIIpiping of the CSS, including nendurted An inspection of data design reports exist andsupports, identified in Table theas-built ASME Code conclude that the as-built2.11.3-3, is designed and piping system-as- ASME Code Section III pipingGcRstruGted fabricated in docu-mentod in the ASM, E system of the CSS identifiedaccordance with ASME Code designrepeft of the CSS in Table 2.11.3-3 are-Section III requirements. will be performed. rncn•cn.id with the design

documet is fabricatedinstalled, and inspected inaccordance with ASME CodeSection III requirements.

2.b.ii An analysis will be 2.b.ii The ASME Code Section IIIconducted to reconcile the design reports exist andas-built piping system conclude that the as-builtinformation with the ASME ASME Code Section III pipingdesign reports. system of the CSS identified

in Table 2.11.3-3 is reconciledwith the design requirements.

14.03.03-49

Page 52: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Attachment 3ITAAC Table Mark-ups for RAI 14.03.03-8

Similar to ITAAC Table 2.4.2-5 for the Reactor Coolant System, the revision of the ITAACassociated with documenting pressure boundary weld inspections acceptability will also beincorporated into the following ITAAC: 2.4.1, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.6.4, 2.7.1.2, 2.7.1.9, 2.7.1.10,2.7.1.11, 2.7.3.1, 2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.7.6.7, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3.

Impact on DCD

Reactor System ITAAC Item 6 in Table 2.4.1-2 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

6. Pressure boundary welds in 6. Inspections of the as-built 6. The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tThe ASMETable 2.4.1-1, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

Emergency Core Cooling System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.4.4-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a Inspections of the as-built 3.a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tTlhe ASMETable 2.4.4-2, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.4.4-3, be performed in accordance conclude that tT-he ASMEmeet ASME Code Section III with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for Ill. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

14.03.03-50

Page 53: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Residual Heat Removal System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.4.5-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure bQundary welds in 3.a Inspections of the as-built 3.a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will- - - code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tlhe ASMETable 2.4.5-2, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.4.5-3, be performed in accordance conclude that tThe ASMEmeet ASME Code Section III with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for Ill. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

Chemical and Volume Control System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.4.6-5 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a Inspections of the as-built 3.a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tTlhe ASMETable 2.4.6-2, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds in

ASME Code Section IIIcomponents.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.4.6-3, be performed in accordance conclude that tlhe ASMEmeet ASME Code Section III with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for Ill. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds in

ASME Code Section III piping.

14.03.03-51

Page 54: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Emergency Power Sources System ITAAC Item 27 will be added to Table 2.6.4-1 as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

27.a Pressure boundary welds 27.a Inspections of the as-built 27.a The ASME Code Section IIIin ASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds code reports exist and ------components, meet ASME will be performed in conclude that the ASMECode Section III accordance with the ASME Code Section IIIrequirements for Code Section III. requirements are met fornon-destructive non-destructiveexamination of welds, examination of the as-built

pressure boundary welds inASME Code Section IIIcomponents.

27.b Pressure boundary welds 27.b Inspections of the as-built 27.b The ASME Code Section IIIin ASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds code reports exist andpiping, meet ASME Code will be performed in conclude that the ASMESection III requirements for accordance with the ASME Code Section IIInon-destructive Code Section III. requirements are met forexamination of welds. non-destructive

examination of the as-builtpressure boundary welds inASME Code Section IIIpiping.

Main Steam System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.7.1.2-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a Inspections of the as-built 3.a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tT-he ASMETable 2.7.1.2-2, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.1.2-3, be performed in accordance conclude that tT-he ASMEmeet ASME Code Section III with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for Ill. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

14.03.03-52

Page 55: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Condensate and Feedwater System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.7.1.9-5 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a Inspections of the as-built 31a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that t-The ASMETable 2.7.1.9-2, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.1.9-3, be performed in accordance conclude that tT-he ASMEmeet ASME Code Section III with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for Ill. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

Steam Generator Blowdown System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.7.1.10-3 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a Inspections of the as-built 3.a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tlhe ASMETable 2.7.1.10-1, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.1.10-2, be performed in accordance conclude that tr-he ASM Emeet ASME Code Section III with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for Ill. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

14.03.03-53

Page 56: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Emergency Feedwater System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.7.1.11-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a Inspections of the as-built 3.a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary-welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tThe ASMETable 2.7.1.11-2, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.1.11-3, be performed in accordance conclude that tT-he ASMEmeet ASME Code Section III with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for II1. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

Essential Service Water System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.7.3.1-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a Inspections of the as-built 3.a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tTFhe ASMETable 2.7.3.1-2, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.3.1-3, be performed in accordance conclude that tThe ASMEmeet ASME Code Section III with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for Ill. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

14.03.03-54

Page 57: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Component Cooling Water System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.7.3.3-5 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a Inspections of the as-built 3.a The ASME Code Section III oASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tThe ASMETable 2.7.3.3-2, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.3.3-3, be performed in accordance conclude that tT-he ASMEmeet ASME Code Section Ill with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for Ill. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

Essential Chilled Water System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.7.3.5-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a Inspections'of the as-built 3.a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tThe ASMETable 2.7.3.5-2, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.3.5-3, be performed in accordance conclude that tT-he ASMEmeet ASME Code Section III with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for Ill. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

14.03.03-55

Page 58: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.7.6.3-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a Inspections of the as-built 3.a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist and.components, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tFhe ASMETable 2.7.6.3-1, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.7.6.3-2, meet be performed in accordance conclude that tTFhe ASMEASME Code Section III with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for Ill. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of examination of the as-builtwelds. pressure boundary welds.

Process and Post-accident Sampling System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.7.6.7-3 will be revised asshown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a An-inspieGtie Inspections of 3a. The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III the as-built pressure boundary code reports exist andcomponents, identified in welds will be performed in conclude that tiThe ASMETable 2.7.6.7-1, as ASME accordance with the ASME Code Section III requirementsGode Section 14 meet ASME Code Section II1. are met for non-destructiveCode Section III requirements. examination of the as-builtfor non-destructive pressure boundary welds.examination of welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds code reports exist andpiping meet ASME Code will be performed in conclude that tThe ASMESection III requirements for accordance with the ASME Code Section IIInon-destructive Code Section III. requirements are met forexamination of welds. non-destructive

examination of the as-builtpressure boundary welds.

14.03.03-56

Page 59: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Containment Isolation System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.11.2-2 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a Inspections of the as-built 3.a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tVl-he ASMETable 2.11.2-1, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds, pressure boundary welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andmeet ASME Code Section III be performed in accordance conclude that tT-he ASMErequirements for with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsnon-destructive Ill. are met for non-destructiveexamination of welds. examination of the as-built

pressure boundary welds.

Containment Spray System ITAAC Item 3 in Table 2.11.3-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

3.a Pressure boundary welds in 3.a Inspections of the as-built 3.a The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andcomponents, identified in be performed in accordance conclude that tiThe ASMETable 2.11.3-2, meet ASME with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsCode Section III requirements. Ill. are met for non-destructivefor non-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in 3.b Inspections of the as-built 3.b The ASME Code Section IIIASME Code Section III piping, pressure boundary welds will code reports exist andidentified in Table 2.11.3-3, be performed in accordance conclude that tr-he ASMEmeet ASME Code Section III with the ASME Code Section Code Section III requirementsrequirements for Ill. are met for non-destructivenon-destructive examination of the as-builtexamination of welds. pressure boundary welds.

14.03.03-57

Page 60: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Attachment 4ITAAC Table Mark-ups for RAI 14.03.03-9

Similar to ITAAC Table 2.4.4-5 for the Emergency Core Cooling System, the revision of the ITAACassociated with documenting Seismic Category I piping inspection acceptability will also beincorporated into the following ITAAC: 2.4.2, 2.4.5, 2.7.1.2, 2.7.1.9, 2.7.1.10, 2.7.1.11, 2.7.3.1,2.7.3.3, 2.7.3.5, 2.7.6.3, 2.11.2, and 2.11.3.

Impact on DCD

Reactor Coolant System ITAAC Item 8 in Table 2.4.2-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

8. Each of the seismic CGategoryI 8. Inspections will be performed 8. Report(s) documents thatpiping identified in Table on the as-built seismic eEach of the as-built seismic2.4.2-3 is designed to withstand Category I piping.. Category ! piping identified incombined normal and seismic Table 2.4.2-3 meets thedesign basis loads without a seismic Category! pipingloss of its functional capability, requirements.

Residual Heat Removal System ITAAC Item 5.b in Table 2.4.5-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

5.b Each of the seismic CGategory I 5.b Inspections will be performed 5.b Report(s) documents thatpiping 49e, identified in Table on the as-built lins -meets the eEach of the as-built seismic2.4.5-3, is designed to seismic Category I piping icategory I piping, identified inwithstand combined normal Fequirements. Table 2.4.5-3, meets theand seismic design basis loads seismic cGategory 1 pipingwithout a loss of its functional requirements.capability.

Main Steam System ITAAC Item 5.b in Table 2.7.1.2-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

5.b Each of the seismic Ceategory I 5.b Inspections will be performed 5.b Report(s) documents thatpiping identified in Table on the as-built seismic eEach of the as-built seismic2.7.1.2-3 is designed to Category I piping. Category I piping identified inwithstand combined normal Table 2.7.1.2-3 meets theand seismic design basis loads seismic Category I pipingwithout a loss of its functional requirements.capability.

Condensate and Feedwater System ITAAC Item 5.b in Table 2.7.1.9-5 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

5.b Each of the seismic Ceategory I 5.b Inspections will be performed 5.b Report(s) documents thatpiping identified in Table on the as-built seismic eEach of the as-built seismic2.7.1.9-3 is designed to Category I piping. Category I piping identified inwithstand combined normal Table 2.7.1.9-3 meets theand seismic design basis loads seismic Category . pipingwithout a loss of its functional requirements.capability.

14.03.03-58

Page 61: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Steam Generator Blowdown System ITAAC Item 5.b in Table 2.7.1.10-3 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analys-es Acceptance Criteria~

5.b Each of the seismic Ceategory I 5.b Inspections will be performed 5.b Report(s) documents thatpiping identified in Table on the as-built seismic eEach of the as-built seismic2.7.1.10-2 is designed to Categorv I piping. Category I piping identified inwithstand combined normal Table 2.7.1.10-2 meets theand seismic design basis loads seismic Category Ipipingwithout a loss of its functional requirements.capability.

Emergency Feedwater System ITAAC Item 5.b in Table 2.7.1.11-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

5.b Each of the seismic Ceategory I 5.b Inspections will be performed 5.b Report(s) documents thatpiping identified in Table on the as-built seismic eEach of the as-built seismic2.7.1.11-3 is designed to Category I piping. Category I piping identified inwithstand combined normal Table 2.7.1.11-3 meets theand seismic design basis loads seismic Category! pipingwithout a loss of its functional requirements.capability.

Essential Service Water System ITAAC Item 5.b in Table 2.7.3.1-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

5.b Each of the seismic CGategory I 5.b Inspections will be performed 5.b Report(s) documents thatpiping identified in Table on the as-built seismic eE-ach of the as-built seismic2.7.3.1-3 is designed to Category I piping. Category I piping identified inwithstand combined normal Table 2.7.3.1-3 meets theand seismic design basis loads seismic Category . pipingwithout a loss of its functional requirements.capability.

Component Cooling Water System ITAAC Item 5.b in Table 2.7.3.3-5 will be revised as shownbelow:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

5.b Each of the seismic Ceategory I 5.b Inspections will be performed 5.b Report(s) documents thatpiping identified in Table on the as-built seismic eE-ach of the as-built seismic2.7.3.3-3 is designed to Category I piping. Category I piping identified inwithstand combined normal Table 2.7.3.3-3 meets theand seismic design basis loads seismic Category I Pipingwithout a loss of its functional requirements.capability.

14.03.03-59

Page 62: Enclosure UAP-HF-09215 Docket No. 52-021 · Enclosed are the responses to Questions 14.03.03-1 through 14.03.03-16 that are contained within Reference 1. ... remaining Class 2 & 3

Essential Chilled Water System ITAAC Item 5.b in Table 2.7.3.5-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

5.b Each of the seismic CGategory I 5.b Inspections will be performed 5.b Report(s) documents that...piping identified in Table on the as-built seismic eEach of the as-built seismic2.7.3.5-3 is designed to Category I piping. Category I piping identified inwithstand combined normal Table 2.7.3.5-3 meets theand seismic design basis loads seismic Category pipingwithout a loss of its functional requirements.capability.

Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System ITAAC Item 6 in Table 2.7.6.3-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

6. Each of the seismic CGategoryl 6. Inspections will be performed 6. Report(s) documents thatpiping identified in Table on the as-built seismic eFach of the as-built seismic2.7.6.3-2 is designed to Category I piping. Category I piping identified inwithstand combined normal Table 2.7.6.3-2 meets theand seismic design basis loads seismic Category! pipingwithout a loss of its functional requirements.capability.

Containment Isolation System ITAAC Item 5.b in Table 2.11.2-2 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

5.b Each of the seismic Category I 5.b Inspections will be performed 5.b Report(s) documents thatPiping Iies is designed to on the as-built seismic eEach of the as-built seismicwithstand combined normal Category I piping. Category I piping meets theand seismic design basis loads seismic Category! pipingwithout a loss of its functional requirements.capability.

Containment Spray System ITAAC Item 5.b in Table 2.11.3-5 will be revised as shown below:

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

5.b Each of the seismic Csategory I 5.b Inspections will be performed 5.b Report(s) documents thatpiping 4nes identified in Table on the as-built seismic _eFach of the as-built seismic2.11.3-3 is designed to Category I piping. ,Category I piping identified inwithstand combined normal Table 2.3.11-3 meets theand seismic design basis loads seismic Category Ipipingwithout a loss of its functional requirements.capability.

14.03.03-60