empowerment in the dianova therapeutic … · empowerment in the dianova therapeutic communities...
TRANSCRIPT
EMPOWERMENTINTHE
DIANOVATHERAPEUTICCOMMUNITIES
Relatori:EducatriceDo0.ssaIndiraPastoris,PsicologaDo0.ssaMichelaB.Pozzoli
• Customized residen.al programs, personalized
andflexibles,basedonobjec.ves• Five therapeu.c communi.es accredited in
accordancewithcurrentregionalregula.ons• Admission criteria: legal age, either sex users in
treatmentwithalterna.vemeasurestodeten.onandfrompublicserviceandpeniten.arycircuit
• BioPsychoSocialapproach• Mul.disciplinaryteam
DianovaMissionDevelopmentofac.onsandprogramsthatac.velycontributetopersonalautonomyandsocialprogress
INTRODUCTION
THEHISTORY
1974BorninFranceLe
Patriarce
1984ItalyandLePatriarche
1990DRG309/90
1998Dismissaloffounderand
bornofDianova
2005UnificaQonLePatriarcheand
Dianova
2007ECOSOC
2012UNESCO
2013Minorsandteenagers
2014Thirty
«Drugfree»:integralpartofaglobalproject
Networkworking:increaseindividualskillsandresources,ensureagreater
supplyofresponsestotheneeds
Mul.disciplinaryteam
Thepersonistreatedand
observedinthetotalityofhis
needs
PERSON
FROMTHEHOLISTICVIEWOFTHEBIOPSHYCOSOCIALAPPROACHTOTHEEMPOWERMENTASTHEPURPOSE
OFTHEINTERVENTION
THEBIOPSICHOSOCIALAPPROACH
«Healthisastateofcompletephysical,mentaland social well-being and not merely theabsenceofdiseaseorinfirmity»(OMS,1946)
Itispossiblethroughtheanalysisoftheinterac.onofbiological,psychological
andsocialaspects
THEBIOPSICHOSOCIALAPPROACH
BIOLOGICALANALYSISOFMEDICALCONDITION PSYCHOLOGICAL
DIAGNOSIS,PSYCHOLOGICAL
SUPPORT,PSYCHOTHERAPY
SOCIALSOCIALIZATION,TRAINING,SCHOOLING,LEGALFIELDS
SURVEYAREAS
Areaofself-care
Regulatoryarea
Areaof��socialskills
Areaof��rela.ons
Areaof��responsibility
Cogni.ve-mo.va.onalarea
Emo.onalarea
IndividualEduca.onProject(PEI)constantlymonitored
Ac.veinvolvementof
theuser(responsibility)
THEBIOPSICHOSOCIALAPPROACH
EMPOWERMENT
TOEMPOWER=INCREASEINPOWERConstruc.veandgenera.vepower:«powerof»
From«learnedhelplessness»to«learnedhopefulness»(Rappaport,1987)
Ac.va.onofindividualresources
Influencingtheirownlifedecisions
Growthinthecapacityofuse
theownposi.vequali.es
BIOLOGICALASSUMPTIONOFRESPONSIBILITYFORTHECAREOF
THESELFPSYCHOLOGICALSELF-KNOWLEDGE
FORINCREASINGTHERESPONSIBILITYFORTHEIROWNACTIONS
ANDEVERYDAYDINAMICS
SOCIALINTEGRATIONINTHESOCIETYBYACQUIRINGNEW
SKILLS
EMPOWERMENT
WORKINGACTIVITY
Toimprovethegrowthandempowermentprocess,the
careofoneself,ofothersandoflivingspaces,therela.onshipwiththeother,respectforrules
andcommoncoexistence
LAUNDRY
COOKING
CAREOFGREEN
CAREOFCOMMONAREA
ACTIONSTOBETAKEN
CERTIFIEDTRAINING• SCHOOLING• BAKING• HORTICULTURE
TRAINING• CYCLOFFICINA• RESTORATION• GLASS
LABORATORIES/PROJECTS• MOUNTAINTHERAPY• EXPERENTIALWORKSHOPS
LABORATORIESPROJECTS
technicallearning;cultural
growth;developmentofsocialskills,
communica.onandexpression;developmentof
crea.vity;socializa.onandself-esteem
ACTIONSTOBETAKEN
ACTIVITYSPORTSANDLEISURE
to increasebody awarenessand limits; afen.on to thecare and psycho-physicalwell-being; a befer moodand also the chance tobecome passionate about asport,whichis alsousefulinthemanagementofleisure.
RUNNING
FITNESS
NORDICWALKING
CLIMBING
ACTIONSTOBETAKEN
ARESEARCHONTHEEVALUATIONOFCHANGE
OBJEC
TIVE
S Verifythechangesobtainedbythepersononthemo.va.onforchange
Monitorthequalityofour
service
Definingmodifytotheinterven.on
THEINSTRUMENT
MACTestthatevaluatesthemo.va.onforchange
BASED ON THE TRANSTHEORIC MODEL OF PROCHANSKA E
DICLEMENTE
ARESEARCHONTHEEVALUATIONOFCHANGE
STAG
ES PRECONTEMPLATION
CONTEMPLATION
DETERMINATION
ACTION
PSYC
HOLO
GICA
LFA
CTORS
SELFEFFICACY
AVAILABILITYTOCHANGE
INNERFRACTURE
ARESEARCHONTHEEVALUATIONOFCHANGE
ADMINISTRATION
Time1(T1)Secondadministra.on(Threemonthslater)
Time0(T0)first
administra.on(Entry)
ARESEARCHONTHEEVALUATIONOFCHANGE
THESAMPLEINSPECTED SAMPLE because subjects are rectruited in a
determined period of time
3FEMALES
27MALES
TOTALSAMPLE45SUBJECTS
VALIDSAMPLE30SUBJECTS
AVERAGEAGE40,2YEARSMIN24YEARSMAX57YEARS
ARESEARCHONTHEEVALUATIONOFCHANGE
0 0
19
11
1 1
11
19
PRECONTEMPLATION CONTEMPLATION DETERMINATION ACTION
FREQUENCESOFSTAGESATTIME0ANDTIME1
TIME0 TEMPO1
THENUMBEROFSUBJECTSPRESENTINTHEACTIONAREAINCREASES
ATTIME1
DATEANALISYS
60,73
16,93 18,4
61,23
18,9 16,97
AVAILABILITYTOCHANGE SELFEFFICACY INNERFRACTURE
AVERAGESOFPSYCHOLOGICALVARIABLESATTIME0AND1
TIME0 TIME1
THEAVERAGEINCREASEFORAVAILABILITYTOCHANGEAND
SELFEFFICACYWHILEITDECREASESFOR
INNERFRACTURE
DATEANALISYS
COMPARISONAVERAGESAVAILABILITYTOCHANGE
(R)
NOSIGNIFICATIVEDIFFERENCE
t(29)=-0,267p=0,79
Availability to change remains stable.
Constant level of availability to change.
DATEANALISYS
COMPARISONAVERAGESSELFEFFICACY
(S)
SIGNIFICATIVEDIFFERENCE
t(29)=-2,197p=0,036
Self efficacy increases. Greater confidence in their skills.
DATEANALISYS
COMPARISONAVERAGESINNERFRACTURE
(F)
SIGNIFICATIVEDIFFERENCE
t(29)=2,069p=0,048
Inner fracture decreases, More internal consistency.
Less contradictions between ideal self-image and actual self-image.
DATEANALISYS
CONCLUSIONThereareverifiableandquanSfiablechanges
intermsofmoSvaSontochangethatarerepresentaSveof
thequalityofworkcarriedoutbytheDianovateam.
OBJEC
TIVE
S Verifythechangesobtainedbythepersononthemo.va.onof
change
Monitorthequalityofour
service
Definingmodifytotheinterven.on
CONCLUSION
Directlyfromthedic.onaryAUTONOMY:istheability
andtherighttogovernitselfandstandonitsown
ABOUTAUTONOMY
THEINDIVIDUALISATTHECENTEROFTHEINTERVENTION
MAXIMUMDEGREEFORTHEPOSSIBLE
AUTONOMY
FromFEELINGACTED(externallocusofcontrol)
ToINTENTIONALACTION,AWARENESS,RESPONSIBILITY
(internallocusofcontrol)
CHANGE
COMMUNITY:PLACEWHEREPEOPLECANGAINEXPERIENCEAND
WHERECANDESIREANDHOPEFORABETTERANDPOSSIBILEFUTURE
Perceivingthecontrolof
themselvesandtheirbehavior,
par.cipa.on,responsibility,feeling'partof'
CONCLUSION