employment law update

36
EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE By: A. Craig Carter Davis & Davis, P.C. PO Box 1588 Austin, TX 78767

Upload: redford

Post on 18-Jan-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE. By: A. Craig Carter Davis & Davis, P.C. PO Box 1588 Austin, TX 78767. Taking Adverse Personnel Actions. Employment at will – What does it mean and how much should employers rely on it when taking a personnel action?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

By: A. Craig Carter

Davis & Davis, P.C.

PO Box 1588

Austin, TX 78767

Page 2: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Taking Adverse Personnel Actions

Employment at will – What does it mean and how much should employers rely on it when taking a personnel action?

Employment at will means the employment relationship can be terminated by either party at any time without notice or cause.

There is no such thing as a per se “wrongful termination” claim under Texas law, BUT…….

Page 3: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Taking Adverse Personnel Actions

Because there are many exceptions in the law to the employment at will doctrine, employers should not terminate employees for no reason and instead should have a valid reason for taking a disciplinary action and should be able to articulate that reason. Need to have a “legitimate non-discriminatory/non-retaliatory reason for the action.”

Page 4: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Taking Adverse Personnel Actions

- Race, national origin, gender, religion, disability, age. - Discrimination in employment based on genetic information becomes effective beginning 11/21/09. - Sexual preference/gender identity is a protected class in at least 21 states, and in the currently pending federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2009. - The EEOC may take the position in the near future that obesity is a disability under the ADA in light of the recent ADA amendments. - There are also many types of protected activity under state and federal law

Protected Classes:

Page 5: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Taking Adverse Personnel ActionsPartial List of Protected Activity under the Law: i)                   i) Title VII and TCHRA: participation in

investigation/proceedings and opposition to discrimination, including filing a Charge of Discrimination with the EEOC or TWC, or making a claim of workplace harassment.

ii)                   ii) ADA: including requests for accommodation and participation and opposition.

iii)                iii) FMLA: includes taking FMLA protected leave, and participation and opposition.

iv)                 iv) FLSA: includes making a claim and participating in investigation, as well as merely contacting the Department of Labor regarding FLSA rights.

v)                  v) Workers Comp claim: includes making claim and participation vi)                vi) Military Service: – USERRA, 38 U.S.C. §4301; Tex. Gov’t

Code §431.005, 431.006

Page 6: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Taking Adverse Personnel ActionsPartial List of Protected Activity under the Law:

vii) Hospital Licensing Law anti-retaliation provisions: prohibits discrimination against employee (or non-employee, including doctors) who reports “violation of law, including Hospital Licensing Law and regulations, to their supervisor, an administrator, regulatory or accrediting agency, or law enforcement agency”. 

viii) Nurse Practice Act provisions: safe harbor for nurses; prohibits retaliation for reporting to Texas Board of Nursing.

ix) Medical Practice Act anti-retaliation: prohibits retaliation for reporting to TMB

x) Report of abuse/neglect in Nursing Homexi) Texas Whistleblower Act: applies to state and local government hospitals.xii) First Amendment activity: applies to government employers; includes

free speech, petitioning the government, and assembly; generally must be on a matter of public concern.

Page 7: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Taking Adverse Personnel ActionsPartial List of Protected Activity under the Law:

xiii) Bankruptcy protection: can’t discriminate in employment solely on basis that person has been debtor in Bankruptcy, or was insolvent prior to Bankruptcy.

xiv) ERISA retaliation: cannot discriminate against employee for exercising any right under benefits plan.

xv) False Claims Act retaliation: cannot retaliate against employee for conduct that could reasonably lead to viable FCA action.

xvi) Sarbanes-Oxley: cannot retaliate against employee of publicly traded company who provides information or assists in investigation of violation of securities laws, etc.

xvii) Jury service: Tex. Civil Prac. & Rem. Code §122.001 – 122.003xviii) Compliance with subpoena: Tex. Labor Code §52.051xix) Voting: Tex. Elec. Code §276.004

Page 8: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Taking Adverse Personnel Actions

My Recommendations for How to Take Employee Disciplinary Actions

1. Evaluate whether reason makes sense and is provable. 2. Best to put reasons for disciplinary action in writing and present to employee. 3. Give an employee the opportunity to sign and comment in writing on all disciplinary actions. 4. Always state the true reasons for the disciplinary action and set out a brief summary of the complete reasons. 5. Do not rush disciplinary action unless necessary; consider putting employee on paid leave in emergency or high-risk situation; its not personal, its business

Page 9: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Taking Adverse Personnel ActionsThings to watch out for:

a. Differential treatment of other employees under similar circumstances.b. Disciplinary action against employee with long service and/or spotless record.c. Disciplinary action against employee that has previously complained, spoken

out, reported. Generally should not discourage employees from legitimately speaking out or discipline for speaking out.

d. Disciplinary action against employee who is on or has recently been on FMLA leave, or who requested ADA reasonable accommodations. Timing is often crucial in these situations. Cases have held that a “prima facie” case of unlawful interference with FMLA rights can be established when disciplinary action takes place as long as 2 ½ months after leave was taken.

Page 10: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Taking Adverse Personnel Actions

Things to watch out for:

e. Try to avoid treating an employee like a criminal when they are terminated;

f. Disciplinary action against employee because he or she made an unconfirmed allegation of workplace harassment, or for failing to follow “chain of command” when reporting harassment; in harassment investigation, be careful about making legal conclusion that sexual harassment occurred, just document allegations, findings, and remedial action; don’t just end investigation with “he said /she said”; Consensual relationships - not all advances or touching in a consensual relation is welcome.

Page 11: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

FMLA UPDATE – New Regulations

Link to Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division FMLA page; includes updated FMLA forms: http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/fmla/index.htm

Page 12: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Clarification of “Needed to Care for a Family Member.”

FMLA can be used to care for a spouse, child, or parent with a serious health condition.

Revised regulations clarify that the employee does not have to be only person or family member available to care for the family member with a serious health condition to be entitled to FMLA leave.

DOL also clarifies that caring for family member can include psychological care as well as physical care.

Section 825.124

Page 13: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Amount of Leave

Revised regulation clarifies that, if employee is taking less than a full week of FMLA leave, then holidays during leave are not counted toward FMLA entitlement unless employee was scheduled to work holiday; but if taking full week, holidays are counted toward FLMA leave entitlement

DOL clarifies the application of FMLA leave to overtime hours. If the employee would be required to work the overtime hours were it not for being entitled to FMLA leave, then the hours the employee would have been required to (but did not) work may be counted against the employee's FMLA entitlement.

Section 825.000 and section 825.205

Page 14: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Employee Failure to Make Health Premium Payments

Section 825.212

Revised regulation adds language to make clear that if an employer allows an employee's health insurance to lapse due to the employee's failure to pay his or her share of the premium during FMLA leave as set forth in the regulations, the employer still has a duty to reinstate the employee's health insurance when the employee returns to work and can be liable for harm suffered by the employee if it fails to do so. So, best course of action for employer is to maintain employee’s health insurance by paying employee’s share of the premiums and then recouping that amount from employee.

Page 15: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Protection for Employees Who Request Leave or Otherwise Assert FMLA Rights

Section 825.220

The revised regulation makes it clear that when an employee is performing a light duty assignment, that employee's rights to FMLA leave and to job restoration are not affected by such light duty assignment.

Page 16: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Employee Notice Requirements

Section 825.302 and Section 828.303

When an employee can’t give notice of FMLA leave 30 days in advance, the employee is expected to give notice of foreseeable or unforeseeable leave “as soon as practicable.” The revised regulation deletes the sentence which defines ``as soon as practicable'' as “ordinarily within one or two business days of when the need for leave becomes known to the employee.''

For foreseeable leave, the revised regulations say that it should be practicable for the employee to provide notice of the need either the same day or the next business day

For unforeseeable leave, the revised regulations say it generally should be practicable for the employee to provide notice of leave within the time set out in the employer’s usual and customary notice requirements applicable to such leave.

Page 17: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Employee Notice Requirements

Section 825.303 and Section 828.304

Complying With Employer Policy When Requesting Leave

Revised regulations provide that if an employee fails to follow the employer's normal procedures for requesting leave. Then, absent unusual circumstances justifying failure to give notice, employer may take disciplinary actions that are not discriminatory against employee taking FMLA leave. Language stating that an employer cannot delay or deny leave if an employee fails to follow these procedures has been deleted.

This will allow employers to enforce their no call, no show policies (except under unusual circumstances), even when the absence qualifies for FMLA leave. Need to revise no-call, no show policies accordingly and make employees aware of new policies.

Page 18: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Employee Notice Requirements

Content of Employee Notice of Need for FMLA Leave

Revised regulation clarifies that sufficient information must indicate that (1) the employee is unable to perform the functions of the job (or that a covered family member is unable to participate in regular daily activities), (2) the anticipated duration of the absence, (3) and whether the employee (or family member) intends to visit a health care provider or is receiving continuing treatment.

Revised regulations also clarify that calling in and only saying that the employee or family member is “sick” is not sufficient.

Page 19: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Medical Certifications

Section 825.307

Revised regulations allow employer to contact employee’s physician to authenticate and clarify medical certification.

Revised regulation eliminates requirement that only the employer's health care provider, as opposed to the employer itself, may contact the employee's health care provider, but such contact may only take place after the employee has been afforded the opportunity to cure any deficiencies with the certification and contact can only be made by health care provider, HR Professional, leave administrator or a management official; under no circumstances may employees’ direct supervisor contact the health care provider. HIPPA privacy rules must be complied with anytime individually identifiable health information is shared by provider with employer.

Authentication and clarification of medical certification

Page 20: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

New Regulations Regarding Military Family Leave

• Qualify Exigency Leave

Two Types of Military Family Leave (MFL)

• Military Caregiver Leave

• Unless otherwise noted in regulations, normal FMLA procedures will apply

Page 21: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Twelve weeks of FMLA leave available while employee’s spouse, son, daughter, or parent is on active duty or call to active duty for qualifying exigencies. 29 CFR § 825.126.

General Provisions

Qualifying Exigency Leave

Page 22: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Exigency leave applies only to members of the Reserve and National Guard, and certain retired members of the Regular Armed Forces and Retired Reserve. 29 CFR §825.126(b)(2)(iii).

Excludes active members of the Regular Armed Forces. Id.

Applies only to Federal call to active duty of a National Guard or Reserve member. A State call to active duty of National Guard or state militia is not included within this section unless under order of the President. 29 CFR§ 825.126 (b)(2)(iii).

Defining “Active Duty”

Qualifying Exigency Leave

Page 23: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

29 CFR § 825.126 (a)

• Short-notice Deployment• Military Events and Related Activities• Childcare and School Activities• Financial and Legal Arrangements• Rest and Recuperation• Post-Deployment Activities• Additional Actives

Qualifying Exigency Leave

Page 24: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Military Caregiver Leave

General Provisions

Allows an eligible employee who is spouse, son, daughter, parent or next of kin to a covered service member to take 26 workweeks of leave during a single 12 month period to care for the service member who is on the temporary disability retired list, who has a serious injury or illness incurred in the line of duty on active duty for which he or she is undergoing medical treatment, recuperation, or therapy; or otherwise in outpatient status or on the temporary disability retired list. 29 CFR § 825.127.

Page 25: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Military Caregiver Leave

Covered Service Member

Includes members of the Regular Armed forces, current members of the National Guard or Reserves, and members of the Regular Armed Forces, the National Guard and Reserves who are on temporary disability retired list.

Page 26: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Military Caregiver LeaveNext of Kin

A servicemember’s nearest blood relative other that the covered servicemember’s spouse, parent, son or daughter, in the following order or priority:

• Blood relative who have been granted legal custody of the servicemember by court decree or statutory• Brothers and Sisters• Aunts and Uncles • First Cousins• Exception: if a servicemember has written designation otherwise. 29 CFR § 825.127 (b)(3)

Page 27: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Military Caregiver Leave

Serious Injury or Illness

An injury or illness incurred by a covered by a servicemember in the line of duty on active duty that may render the servicemember medically unfit to perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating.29 CFR § 825.127 (a)(1)

Page 28: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

New ADA Amendments

Congress amended the Americans with Disabilities Act, effective January 1, 2009, with the stated purpose of expanding the scope of who has a disability under the Act. The amendments did not change the basic definition of disability, which is an impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, a record of such a impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment. It did, however, change the way these statutory terms are to be interpreted in several ways, and these changes will have an impact on employers.

Page 29: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Major Changes in the Amendments

Contrary to an earlier Supreme Court decision, mitigating measures, such as medication, will no longer be considered in assessing whether an individual has a disability. In other words, the determination of whether an employee has a disability will now be made by evaluating what limitations the employee has without the use or benefit of medications, hearings aides, prosthetics, etc. The only exception to this is ordinary eyeglasses and contact lenses.

Page 30: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Major Changes in the Amendments

Contrary to an earlier Supreme Court decision, major life activities no longer have to be “of central importance to most people’s daily lives” and an impairments no longer has to “prevent” or “severely restrict” a major life activity to meet the “substantially limits” requirement. Also, the amendments direct the EEOC to revise its current regulation that defines “substantially limits” as “significantly restricted”.

Page 31: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Major Changes in the AmendmentsThe amendments have added two non-exhaustive lists of qualifying “major life activities.” One list included activities that the EEOC has already recognized as major life activities in its regulations and interpretive guidance, as well as the following activities that have not previously been listed by the EEOC:

• Eating, sleeping, bending, reading, and communicating

The second list adds a new statutory category of major life activities, namely “major body functions” which includes the following bodily functions:

• The immune system, normal cell growth, digestive, bowel, bladder, neurological, brain, respiratory, circulatory, endocrine, and reproductive functions.

Page 32: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Major Changes in the Amendments

The amendments clarify that an individual with an impairment that is episodic or in remission is still disabled under the law if the impairment is substantially limiting when it is active.

Page 33: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Major Changes in the Amendments

Under the amendments, in order to qualify as “regarded as” disabled, an individual now only needs to be regarded as having an impairment, as opposed to being regarded as having a “substantially limiting” impairment.

Page 34: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Workplace Privacy Issues

Recent case where Court held that a governmental employer intercepting and monitoring private calls of employees at work without employee consent may violate Federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act and similar Texas Act. See Garza v. Bexar Metropolitan Water Dist., 2009 WL 563222 (W.D. Tex. 2009).

Could also be applicable to searching of computer/emails.

Page 35: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Workplace Privacy Issues

Employers should clearly put employees on notice that they do not have an expectation of privacy in certain areas, or with regard to certain equipment in the workplace and have employees sign acknowledgment. For example, employees could be put on notice and acknowledge in writing that their use of telephone and computers at work will be monitored and any communications on those items are not private.

Page 36: EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

Workplace Privacy Issues

Drug Testing- Big difference between drug testing of private and public employees. Drug testing of governmental employees is considered a search under the Fourth Amendment.